<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: WHich method is best to convert pacBio reads in .sra format to .fastq format?]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/answers/view/39407/which-method-is-best-to-convert-pacbio-reads-in-sra-format-to-fastq-format?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/answers/view/39407/which-method-is-best-to-convert-pacbio-reads-in-sra-format-to-fastq-format?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/answers/view/39407/which-method-is-best-to-convert-pacbio-reads-in-sra-format-to-fastq-format</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 11:16:15 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/answers/view/39407/which-method-is-best-to-convert-pacbio-reads-in-sra-format-to-fastq-format</link>
	<title><![CDATA[WHich method is best to convert pacBio reads in .sra format to .fastq format?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>i am using fastq dump to convert sra files into fastq.</p><p>In case of fastq this tool gives me a message on terminal "Ignoring --- number of reads as the spot length is less than 1"). if my sra file is of 6GBs, i always get fastq file less than the afforementioned size. Ideally it must be a larger fastq file (~10gbs).Why is this so?</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Nadia Baig</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>