<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Tetra-Nucleotide Analysis]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 05:07:41 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Tetra-Nucleotide Analysis]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A tetra-nucleotide is a fragment of DNA sequence with 4 bases (e.g. AGTC or TTGG). Pride&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;(2003) showed that the frequency of tetra-nucleotides in bacterial genomes contain useful, albeit weak, phylogenetic signals. Even though tetra-nucleotide analysis (TNA) utilizes the information of whole genome, it is evident that it cannot replace other alignment-based phylogenetic methods such as&nbsp;<a href="https://chunlab.wordpress.com/orthoani/">OrthoANI</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;16S rRNA phylogeny. However, TNA can be useful for&nbsp;phylogenetic characterization when whole genome or 16S rRNA gene information is not available. For example, a partial genomic fragment obtained from a metagenome can be identified by TNA (Teeling&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>, 2004). TNA is also fast enough that it can be&nbsp;used&nbsp;as a search engine against a large genome database.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://chunlab.wordpress.com/tetra-nucleotide-analysis/" rel="nofollow">https://chunlab.wordpress.com/tetra-nucleotide-analysis/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>