<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Should you get sequenced? Not all bad genes predict disease]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4100/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4100/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4100/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:10:53 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4100/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Should you get sequenced? Not all bad genes predict disease]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>&ldquo;What we really don&rsquo;t know yet is whether the predictive aspects of the genome are going to turn out to be beneficial or potentially harmful&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span><span>&ldquo;As we roll out genomic medicine we are fighting against this society-wide misconception that having the bad gene means you&rsquo;re going to get the disease. That&rsquo;s only true in a very few cases.&rdquo;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><strong>Source</strong>:Today Health</span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.today.com/health/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease-8C11017154" rel="nofollow">http://www.today.com/health/should-you-get-sequenced-not-all-bad-genes-predict-disease-8C11017154</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>