<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: The anatomy of successful computational biology software]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5436/the-anatomy-of-successful-computational-biology-software?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5436/the-anatomy-of-successful-computational-biology-software?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5436/the-anatomy-of-successful-computational-biology-software</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:53:08 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5436/the-anatomy-of-successful-computational-biology-software</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The anatomy of successful computational biology software]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Creators of software widely used in computational biology discuss the factors that contributed to their success</p><p><em>Nature Biotechnology</em><span>&nbsp;spoke with Altschul and several other originators of computational biology software programs widely used today (</span><a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n10/full/nbt.2721.html#t1">Table 1</a><span>). The conversations explored what makes certain software tools successful, the unique challenges of developing them for biological research and how the field of computational biology, as a whole, can move research agendas forward. What follows is an edited compilation of interviews.</span></p><p>Detail @&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n10/full/nbt.2721.html">http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n10/full/nbt.2721.html</a></p><p>News Source @ Nature</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>