<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: PubMed opens for comment]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5887/pubmed-opens-for-comment?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5887/pubmed-opens-for-comment?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5887/pubmed-opens-for-comment</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:40:17 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/5887/pubmed-opens-for-comment</link>
	<title><![CDATA[PubMed opens for comment]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The informal conversations that researchers have at scientific meetings look set to move online, if a new initiative by the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) has its way. On 22 October, the NCBI of Bethesda, Maryland, launched the pilot phase of a programme called PubMed Commons. This will allow users to comment on published abstracts on the PubMed website, which indexes some 22 million papers.<br /><br />For now, only a select group of researchers and their invited guests can use the system. But the NCBI's director David Lipman, who helped to develop the programme, says that soon any PubMed author will be allowed to comment under his or her real name and anyone will be able to read the comments.</p><p>More @ <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/pubmed-opens-for-comment-1.14023">http://www.nature.com/news/pubmed-opens-for-comment-1.14023</a></p><p>News source Nature.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>