<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Ligand Docking Tools and Software !]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36395/ligand-docking-tools-and-software?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36395/ligand-docking-tools-and-software?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36395/ligand-docking-tools-and-software</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:05:17 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36395/ligand-docking-tools-and-software</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Ligand Docking Tools and Software !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Ligand docking referred to cases where small molecule (&ldquo;ligand&rdquo;) is being docked into much larger macromolecule ("target"). The following is partial list of docking software, focusing on free (at least for academic institutes) and/or popular docking tools.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://autodock.scripps.edu/" target="_blank">AutoDock</a></p><p>Stochastic (GA)</p><p>Flexible ligand and partially flexible target</p><p><a href="http://www.arguslab.com/" target="_blank">ArgusLab</a></p><p>Systematic</p><p>Flexible ligandX-Score based</p><p><a href="http://dock.compbio.ucsf.edu/" target="_blank">DOCK</a></p><p>Systematic (IC)</p><p>Flexible ligandDOCK 3.5 (force field)</p><p><a href="http://www.simbiosys.ca/ehits/index.html" target="_blank">eHITS</a></p><p>Systematic (RBD of fragments followed by reconstruction)Flexible ligand and partially flexible targetHiTS_Score (empirical)</p><p><a href="http://www.biosolveit.de/" target="_blank">FlexX</a></p><p>Systematic (IC)Flexible ligandFlexX SF (empirical)Commercial</p><p><a href="http://flipdock.scripps.edu/" target="_blank">FLIPDock</a></p><p>Stochastic (GA)Flexible ligand and flexible targetAUTODOCK (empirical)</p><p><a href="http://www.eyesopen.com/products/applications/fred.html" target="_blank">FRED</a></p><p>Systematic (RBD)Flexible ligandChemScore, PLP, ScreenScore, ChemGauss (empirical/consensus)</p><p><a href="http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/products/life_sciences/gold/" target="_blank">GOLD</a></p><p>Stochastic (GA)</p><p>Flexible ligand and partially flexible targetGoldScore, ChemScore (empirical), ASP (knowledge based)</p><p><a href="http://www.molsoft.com/docking.html" target="_blank">ICM</a></p><p>Stochastic (MC)</p><p>Flexible ligand and partially flexible targetICM SF (empirical)</p><p><a href="http://www.scfbio-iitd.res.in/dock/pardock.jsp" target="_blank">ParDOCK</a></p><p>Stochastic (MC)</p><p>RigidBAPPL (empirical)</p><p><em><a href="http://www.scfbio-iitd.res.in/dock/pardock.jsp" target="_blank"></a></em><a href="http://www.tcd.uni-konstanz.de/research/plants.php" target="_blank">PLANTS</a></p><p>Stochastic (ACO)Flexible ligand and partially flexible target</p><p>CHEMPLP, PLP (empirical)</p><p><a href="http://www.biopharmics.com/" target="_blank">Surflex</a></p><p>Systematic (IC/MA)Flexible ligandHammerhead based (empirical)</p><p>Point to note:</p><p>Several studies have shown that the performance of most docking tools is highly dependent on the particular characteristics of both the binding site and the ligand to be investigated, and the determination which method would be more suitable in a specific context is difficult. We encouraged you to check several docking methods to determine which one(s) work best for your system.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://autodock.scripps.edu/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>