<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/10243?offset=140</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/10243?offset=140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/34212/webinar-on-unique-molecular-identifier-umi-powered-ultra-sensitive-variant-calling-using-strand-ngs-case-study</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 03:55:52 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/34212/webinar-on-unique-molecular-identifier-umi-powered-ultra-sensitive-variant-calling-using-strand-ngs-case-study</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Webinar on Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI)-powered Ultra-sensitive Variant Calling using Strand NGS - Case Study]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h2><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Webinar on Unique Molecular Identifier-powered Ultra-sensitive Variant Calling using Strand NGS - Case Study</a></h2><p>by&nbsp;Dr. Pandurang Kolekar, Bioinformatics Engineer, Strand Life Sciences</p><h3><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Abstract</a>:</h3><p>Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are short random nucleotide sequences that are increasingly being used in high-throughput sequencing experiments. In this webinar, we will highlight the UMI-friendly features of Strand NGS v3.1 including support for handling well known and customised UMI libraries, QC metrics, consensus alignment, UMI-based family size filters for read list, genome browser enabled with UMI-specific features and filters, UMI-aware variant calling parameters, and exporting UMI-tagged aligned samples. These all features together empower users to harness the potential of UMI-tagged NGS data for deeper insights. A case study demonstrating application of these UMI-based features in Strand NGS for low frequency variant calling in cfDNA sample will be presented.</p><p>UMI-tagged NGS libraries allow, ultra-sensitive detection of low frequency variants from liquid biopsy samples using DNA-Seq and accurate quantification of transcript-level expression using RNA-Seq. The recent release of Strand NGS v3.1, is equipped with the necessary features to efficiently analyse UMI-tagged NGS data helping researchers and labs involved in rare variant calling like in cfDNA based cancer diagnostics, and accurate transcript quantification with RNA-Seq.</p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Webinar Details:</strong></a></p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Session 1:</strong></a> 13 Dec 2017, 2:30 PM IST<br /><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Session 2:</strong></a> 13 Dec 2017, 9:30 PM IST</p><p><br /><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Register here:</strong></a> http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration</p><h3>&nbsp;</h3>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Strand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43308/rna-seq-differential-expression-work-flow-using-deseq2</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:57:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43308/rna-seq-differential-expression-work-flow-using-deseq2</link>
	<title><![CDATA[RNA-Seq differential expression work flow using DESeq2]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>One of the aim of RNAseq data analysis is the detection of differentially expressed genes. The package&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html">DESeq2</a><span>&nbsp;provides methods to test for differential expression analysis.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.sthda.com/english/wiki/rna-seq-differential-expression-work-flow-using-deseq2" rel="nofollow">http://www.sthda.com/english/wiki/rna-seq-differential-expression-work-flow-using-deseq2</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44789/kallisto-vs-salmon-choosing-the-right-tool-for-rna-seq-quantification</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 06:28:46 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44789/kallisto-vs-salmon-choosing-the-right-tool-for-rna-seq-quantification</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Kallisto vs Salmon: Choosing the Right Tool for RNA-Seq Quantification]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>In the world of transcriptomics, quantifying gene and transcript expression accurately and efficiently is crucial. With the explosion of RNA-Seq data, researchers have turned to fast, alignment-free tools that streamline the quantification process without compromising accuracy. Two leading tools in this space are&nbsp;<span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<span>Salmon</span>. Both tools are highly efficient and widely used in the bioinformatics community, but they differ in subtle yet important ways. If you're unsure which one to use for your next RNA-Seq project, this post is for you.</p><h2>What Are Kallisto and Salmon?</h2><p>At their core, both&nbsp;<span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;are tools for&nbsp;<span>quantifying transcript abundance</span>&nbsp;from RNA-Seq reads. They bypass traditional alignment-based methods, replacing them with&nbsp;<span>pseudoalignment</span>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<span>quasi-mapping</span>, which drastically speeds up the process.</p><ul>
<li><span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;was developed by Lior Pachter&rsquo;s lab and introduced the concept of&nbsp;<em>pseudoalignment</em>&nbsp;using a de Bruijn graph.</li>
<li><span>Salmon</span>, developed by Rob Patro&rsquo;s group, builds on this idea with&nbsp;<em>quasi-mapping</em>&nbsp;and offers additional features like advanced bias correction.</li>
</ul><h2>Head-to-Head Comparison</h2><h3>1. Algorithm</h3><ul>
<li><span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;uses&nbsp;<em>pseudoalignment</em>, focusing on matching k-mers from reads to a transcriptome index.</li>
<li><span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;uses&nbsp;<em>quasi-mapping</em>, which adds more flexibility and can also work with aligned reads (BAM files).</li>
</ul><h3>2. Input and Flexibility</h3><ul>
<li><span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;works with raw FASTQ reads and requires a custom transcriptome index.</li>
<li><span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;accepts FASTQ or pre-aligned BAM files, giving you more workflow options.</li>
</ul><h3>3. Bias Correction</h3><p>One of Salmon&rsquo;s major advantages is its sophisticated bias correction system. It corrects for:</p><ul>
<li>Sequence-specific bias</li>
<li>Positional bias</li>
<li>GC-content bias</li>
</ul><p>Kallisto offers basic sequence bias correction but lacks the comprehensive models found in Salmon.</p><h3>4. Speed and Resources</h3><ul>
<li><span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;is blazing fast and slightly more memory-efficient.</li>
<li><span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;is still very fast, but the added features can come at a small computational cost.</li>
</ul><h3>5. Output and Downstream Analysis</h3><ul>
<li>Both tools provide transcript-level quantifications and support bootstrapping for variance estimation.</li>
<li><span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;can also summarize counts at the gene level if provided with a mapping file (<code>--geneMap</code>).</li>
<li>Kallisto integrates seamlessly with&nbsp;<span>Sleuth</span>&nbsp;for differential expression analysis.</li>
<li>Salmon works well with&nbsp;<span>tximport</span>,&nbsp;<span>DESeq2</span>,&nbsp;<span>edgeR</span>, and other Bioconductor tools.</li>
</ul><h2>Choosing the Right Tool</h2><table>
<thead>
<tr><th>Goal</th><th>Recommended Tool</th></tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Maximum speed</td>
<td>Kallisto</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced bias correction</td>
<td>Salmon</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Use BAM files</td>
<td>Salmon</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Transcript-level quantification with Sleuth</td>
<td>Kallisto</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Integration with DESeq2/edgeR</td>
<td>Salmon</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table><h2>Example Command Lines</h2><p><span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;(paired-end):</p><pre><code>kallisto quant -i transcriptome.idx -o output -b 100 sample_R1.fastq sample_R2.fastq
</code></pre><p><span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;(paired-end, bias correction):</p><pre><code>salmon quant -i salmon_index -l A -1 sample_R1.fastq -2 sample_R2.fastq \
  -p 8 --validateMappings --seqBias --gcBias -o output
</code></pre><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>Both Kallisto and Salmon are exceptional tools that have transformed RNA-Seq analysis. Your choice largely depends on your priorities&mdash;whether it's speed, accuracy, flexibility, or compatibility with downstream tools.</p><p>For many users,&nbsp;<span>Salmon</span>&nbsp;offers a more complete and flexible solution, especially when bias correction and gene-level outputs are essential. However,&nbsp;<span>Kallisto</span>&nbsp;remains a favorite for quick, accurate quantification, especially when paired with the&nbsp;<span>Sleuth</span>&nbsp;pipeline.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37291/transrate-understanding-your-transcriptome-assembly</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37291/transrate-understanding-your-transcriptome-assembly</link>
	<title><![CDATA[transrate: Understanding your transcriptome assembly]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Transrate is software for&nbsp;</span><em>de-novo</em><span>&nbsp;transcriptome assembly quality analysis. It examines your assembly in detail and compares it to experimental evidence such as the sequencing reads, reporting quality scores for contigs and assemblies. This allows you to choose between assemblers and parameters, filter out the bad contigs from an assembly, and help decide when to stop trying to improve the assembly.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://hibberdlab.com/transrate/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://hibberdlab.com/transrate/index.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4099/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:05:35 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4099/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Sequencing Solutions to World Health]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>New technology that quickly, easily and economically reveals the genomes of viruses and pathogens transforms public health and medicine."</em></p>
<p><strong>Source</strong>: Life technologies</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.lifetechnologies.com/global/en/home/communities-social/blog/blogs/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health.html?cid=social_blogseries_20130829_11098264" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifetechnologies.com/global/en/home/communities-social/blog/blogs/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health.html?cid=social_blogseries_20130829_11098264</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/2518/genome-browsers</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:04:47 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/2518/genome-browsers</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genome Browsers]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Genome Browser is the platform/database used for searching and retreiving sequences and annotation of genomes belong to various eukaryotes, prokaryotes, etc.</p><p>Following are the weblink for different available browsers:</p><p><a href="http://www.ensembl.org/index.html">http://www.ensembl.org/index.html</a></p><p><a href="http://ensemblgenomes.org/">http://ensemblgenomes.org/</a></p><p><a href="http://genome.ucsc.edu/">http://genome.ucsc.edu/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome</a></p><p><a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/genomes/">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/genomes/</a></p><p><a href="http://flybase.org/">http://flybase.org/</a></p><p><a href="http://cmr.jcvi.org/tigr-scripts/CMR/CmrHomePage.cgi">http://cmr.jcvi.org/tigr-scripts/CMR/CmrHomePage.cgi</a></p><p><a href="http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/">http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/4164/two-major-breakthrough</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:18:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/4164/two-major-breakthrough</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Two major breakthrough!!]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>"Scientists in Uruguay in colloboration with European partners sequenced the genome of the high-value Tannat grape, from which "the most healthy of red wines" are fermented.</p><p>A quick, $1 syphilis&nbsp;test in development by researchers from UNU-BIOLAC."</p><p><strong>Source</strong>:</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130902101846.htm">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130902101846.htm</a></p><p><a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-09/tca-ssg082613.php">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-09/tca-ssg082613.php</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/9400/largest-genome-sequenced</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:57:19 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/9400/largest-genome-sequenced</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Largest Genome Sequenced]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The enormous size of the <strong>loblolly pine genome</strong> having <strong>22 billion base pairs</strong> compared to only 3 billion in the human genome. In other words, it is&nbsp;<strong>seven times</strong> larger than a human&rsquo;s and also the largest and the most complete&nbsp;<strong>conifer<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinophyta" target="_blank"></a></strong>&nbsp;genome ever sequenced.</p>
<p><strong>Related Paper:</strong></p>
<p>http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/3/R59/abstract</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10859" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10859</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/10246/deadly-human-pathogen-cryptococcus-sequenced</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:02:21 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/10246/deadly-human-pathogen-cryptococcus-sequenced</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Deadly Human Pathogen Cryptococcus  Sequenced]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>"Now, researchers have sequenced the entire genome and all the RNA products of the most important pathogenic lineage of Cryptococcus neoformans, a strain called H99. The results, which appear in&nbsp;</span><em>PLOS Genetics</em><span>, also describe a number of genetic changes that can occur after laboratory handling of H99 that make it more susceptible to stress, hamper its ability to sexually reproduce and render it less virulent."</span></p><p><span><strong>Source</strong>:</span></p><p><span>http://www.biosciencetechnology.com/news/2014/04/deadly-human-pathogen-cryptococcus-fully-sequenced</span></p><p><span><strong>Paper</strong>:</span></p><p><span>http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1004292</span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11365/drawback-of-exome-sequencing</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:46:43 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11365/drawback-of-exome-sequencing</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Drawback of Exome Sequencing]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span><span>Dr Eric Londin, Assistant Professor, Thomas Jefferson University, USA, stated that analysis of 44 exome datasets from four different testing kits showed that they missed a high proportion of clinically relevant regions in the 56 ACMG genes. "At least one gene in each exome method was missing more than 40 percent of disease-causing genetic variants, and we found that the worst-performing method missed more than 90 percent of such variants in four of the 56 genes," he says.</span><br /></span></p><p><span><strong>Source</strong>:&nbsp;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-05/esoh-pco052914.php</span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>