<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/17176?offset=160</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/17176?offset=160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31089/conpade-genome-assembly-ploidy-estimation-from-next-generation-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:55:41 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31089/conpade-genome-assembly-ploidy-estimation-from-next-generation-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ConPADE: Genome Assembly Ploidy Estimation from Next-Generation Sequencing Data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>ConPADE (Contig Ploidy and Allele Dosage Estimation), a probabilistic method that estimates the ploidy of any given contig/scaffold based on its allele proportions. In the process, they report findings regarding errors in sequencing. The method can be used for whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing data. They also show applicability of the method for variant calling and allele dosage estimation. Results for simulated and real datasets are discussed and provide evidence that ConPADE performs well as long as enough sequencing coverage is available, or the true contig ploidy is low.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>https://github.com/microsoftgenomics</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/microsoftgenomics" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/microsoftgenomics</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31295/mycc-accurate-binning-of-metagenomic-contigs-via-automated-clustering-sequences-using-information-of-genomic-signatures-and-marker-genes</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 08:34:23 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31295/mycc-accurate-binning-of-metagenomic-contigs-via-automated-clustering-sequences-using-information-of-genomic-signatures-and-marker-genes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MyCC: Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>MyCC, an automated binning tool that combines genomic signatures, marker genes and optional contig coverages within one or multiple samples, in order to visualize the metagenomes and to identify the reconstructed genomic fragments.</span></p>
<p><span>More at&nbsp;http://www.nature.com/articles/srep24175</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/sb2nhri/files/MyCC/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/sb2nhri/files/MyCC/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31351/maxbin-software-for-binning-assembled-metagenomic-sequences-based-on-an-expectation-maximization-algorithm</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 04:03:38 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31351/maxbin-software-for-binning-assembled-metagenomic-sequences-based-on-an-expectation-maximization-algorithm</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MaxBin: software for binning assembled metagenomic sequences based on an Expectation-Maximization algorithm.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>MaxBin is software for binning assembled metagenomic sequences based on an Expectation-Maximization algorithm. Users can understand the underlying bins (genomes) of the microbes in their metagenomes by simply providing assembled metagenomic sequences and the reads coverage information or sequencing reads. For users' convenience MaxBin will report genome-related statistics, including estimated completeness, GC content and genome size in the binning summary page.</span><br><br><span>Users can use MEGAN or similar software on MaxBin bins to find the taxonomy of each bin after the binning process is finished.</span></p>
<p>https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/32/4/605/1744462/MaxBin-2-0-an-automated-binning-algorithm-to<br><br><span>The most recent version of MaxBin is 2.2, which supports the analysis of coassemblies of multiple samples. It is available at this JBEI downloads sites as well as&nbsp;</span><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/maxbin/" target="_blank">MaxBin</a><span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/maxbin2/" target="_blank">MaxBin 2.0</a><span>&nbsp;sourceforge sites.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://downloads.jbei.org/data/microbial_communities/MaxBin/MaxBin.html" rel="nofollow">http://downloads.jbei.org/data/microbial_communities/MaxBin/MaxBin.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31377/groopm-metagenomic-binning-toolset</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:59:45 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31377/groopm-metagenomic-binning-toolset</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GroopM: Metagenomic binning toolset]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>GroopM is a metagenomic binning toolset. It leverages spatio-temoral<br>dynamics (differential coverage) to accurately (and almost automatically)<br>extract population genomes from multi-sample metagenomic datasets.</p>
<p>GroopM is largely parameter-free. Use: groopm -h for more info.</p>
<p>For installation and usage instructions see : http://ecogenomics.github.io/GroopM/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/ecogenomics/GroopM" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ecogenomics/GroopM</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32048/json</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 08:02:39 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32048/json</link>
	<title><![CDATA[JSON]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>JSON</strong>&nbsp;(JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the&nbsp;<a href="http://javascript.crockford.com/">JavaScript Programming Language</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ecma-st/ECMA-262.pdf">Standard ECMA-262 3rd Edition - December 1999</a>. JSON is a text format that is completely language independent but uses conventions that are familiar to programmers of the C-family of languages, including C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, Perl, Python, and many others. These properties make JSON an ideal data-interchange language.</p>
<p>JSON is built on two structures:</p>
<ul>
<li>A collection of name/value pairs. In various languages, this is realized as an&nbsp;<em>object</em>, record, struct, dictionary, hash table, keyed list, or associative array.</li>
<li>An ordered list of values. In most languages, this is realized as an&nbsp;<em>array</em>, vector, list, or sequence.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are universal data structures. Virtually all modern programming languages support them in one form or another. It makes sense that a data format that is interchangeable with programming languages also be based on these structures.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://json.org/" rel="nofollow">http://json.org/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 05:07:41 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32465/tetra-nucleotide-analysis</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Tetra-Nucleotide Analysis]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A tetra-nucleotide is a fragment of DNA sequence with 4 bases (e.g. AGTC or TTGG). Pride&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;(2003) showed that the frequency of tetra-nucleotides in bacterial genomes contain useful, albeit weak, phylogenetic signals. Even though tetra-nucleotide analysis (TNA) utilizes the information of whole genome, it is evident that it cannot replace other alignment-based phylogenetic methods such as&nbsp;<a href="https://chunlab.wordpress.com/orthoani/">OrthoANI</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;16S rRNA phylogeny. However, TNA can be useful for&nbsp;phylogenetic characterization when whole genome or 16S rRNA gene information is not available. For example, a partial genomic fragment obtained from a metagenome can be identified by TNA (Teeling&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>, 2004). TNA is also fast enough that it can be&nbsp;used&nbsp;as a search engine against a large genome database.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://chunlab.wordpress.com/tetra-nucleotide-analysis/" rel="nofollow">https://chunlab.wordpress.com/tetra-nucleotide-analysis/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32730/ncbi-prokaryotic-genome-annotation-pipeline</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 08:56:03 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32730/ncbi-prokaryotic-genome-annotation-pipeline</link>
	<title><![CDATA[NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline is designed to annotate bacterial and archaeal genomes (chromosomes and plasmids).</p>
<p>Genome annotation is a multi-level process that includes prediction of protein-coding genes, as well as other functional genome units such as structural RNAs, tRNAs, small RNAs, pseudogenes, control regions, direct and inverted repeats, insertion sequences, transposons and other mobile elements.</p>
<p>NCBI has developed an automatic prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline that combines&nbsp;<em>ab initio</em>&nbsp;gene prediction algorithms with homology based methods. The first version of NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;list_uids=18416670">see Pubmed Article</a>) developed in 2005 has been replaced with an upgraded version that is capable of processing a larger data volume. You can find a more detailed description of the new version of&nbsp;the pipeline in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/">NCBI Handbook chapter</a>. NCBI's annotation pipeline depends on several internal databases and is not currently available for download or use outside of the NCBI environment.</p>
<p>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44751/large-language-models-in-bioinformatics-transforming-data-analysis-and-interpretation</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 11:26:29 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44751/large-language-models-in-bioinformatics-transforming-data-analysis-and-interpretation</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Large Language Models in Bioinformatics: Transforming Data Analysis and Interpretation]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into bioinformatics has ushered in a new era of computational biology. Among the most transformative advancements are large language models (LLMs), such as GPT and BERT, which leverage deep learning to process and interpret vast amounts of text data. These models are reshaping bioinformatics by enhancing data analysis, hypothesis generation, and literature mining.</p><h3>Understanding Large Language Models</h3><p>LLMs are AI systems trained on extensive datasets of natural language. Their ability to model context, identify patterns, and generate coherent language has proven invaluable across domains, including bioinformatics. By fine-tuning these models on biological datasets, researchers can unlock insights into molecular biology, systems biology, and beyond.</p><h3>Key Applications of LLMs in Bioinformatics</h3><h4>1. <strong>Annotating Biological Data</strong></h4><p>Annotating genomic and proteomic data is fundamental yet labor-intensive. LLMs streamline this process by extracting functional annotations from literature and databases, predicting gene and protein functions, and providing automated insights.</p><h4>2. <strong>Mining Scientific Literature</strong></h4><p>The exponential growth of publications presents a challenge for researchers to stay updated. LLMs can process large volumes of text to extract key findings, summarize papers, and identify trends, thereby facilitating efficient literature reviews.</p><h4>3. <strong>Predicting Gene and Protein Functions</strong></h4><p>By leveraging sequence data and annotations, LLMs can predict the functions of uncharacterized genes and proteins. This capability is particularly useful for studying non-model organisms and orphan genes.</p><h4>4. <strong>Drug Discovery and Repurposing</strong></h4><p>LLMs enable pattern recognition across chemical, genomic, and clinical datasets, identifying novel drug candidates and repurposing existing drugs for new therapeutic targets. They can simulate interactions between drugs and biological molecules, accelerating the discovery pipeline.</p><h4>5. <strong>Generating Hypotheses for Research</strong></h4><p>LLMs analyze complex datasets to propose testable hypotheses. For example, they can predict protein-protein interactions, identify regulatory motifs, or model evolutionary processes in genomes.</p><h3>Advantages of LLMs in Bioinformatics</h3><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Scalability:</strong> LLMs process massive datasets rapidly, reducing the time required for data analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Versatility:</strong> These models adapt to diverse bioinformatics tasks, from genomic annotation to network analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Contextual Insights:</strong> By synthesizing information across disparate datasets, LLMs provide integrative insights into biological systems.</p>
</li>
</ul><h3>Challenges in Applying LLMs</h3><p>Despite their promise, LLMs face limitations:</p><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Data Quality and Bias:</strong> Inaccurate or biased datasets can affect model predictions, necessitating rigorous data curation.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Interpretability:</strong> Understanding the decision-making process of LLMs remains a critical challenge, especially in high-stakes fields like genomics and medicine.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Resource Intensity:</strong> Training and deploying LLMs require substantial computational power, which can limit accessibility.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Ethical Concerns:</strong> Handling sensitive genomic data raises privacy and security issues, emphasizing the need for ethical guidelines.</p>
</li>
</ul><h3>Future Prospects</h3><p>The continued development of LLMs tailored for bioinformatics promises exciting advancements. Specialized models trained on omics data, open-access platforms, and interdisciplinary collaborations will expand the utility of LLMs. Moreover, integrating LLMs with other AI technologies, such as graph neural networks and reinforcement learning, can unlock deeper biological insights.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Large language models are revolutionizing bioinformatics by addressing longstanding challenges in data annotation, literature mining, and function prediction. Their ability to analyze complex biological datasets efficiently positions them as indispensable tools for modern research. As bioinformatics embraces AI, the synergy between LLMs and biological sciences holds the potential to unravel the complexities of life with unprecedented precision and scale.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/428/five-unique-traits-of-effective-computational-biologist</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:12:51 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/428/five-unique-traits-of-effective-computational-biologist</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Five unique traits of effective computational biologist]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Bioinformatics research is driven by large set of software, scripts, and tools to analyse gigantic biological data. Being a great biological programmer or bioinformatician involves more than writing code that works. The biological programmers who rise to the top ranks of their profession are not only good programmer but also expert in biological stuff. Moreover, In order to be a good and effective biological programmer, you need to possess a combination of traits that allow your computational as well as biological skill, experience, and knowledge to produce working code. There are some technically skilled biological programmers who will never be effective because they lack the other important traits needed. Here are top five traits that are necessary to become a great biological programmer.</p><p><strong>1. Learn and get updated</strong></p><p>Some of the bad biological programmers only learn new technical or non-technical things when it&rsquo;s absolutely necessary. The good biological programmers learn new technical skills proactively. But great biological programmers not only learn new technical skills on their own but also learn non-technical skills, and have an open mind to sources of knowledge that others may shut out.</p><p>In other concrete term, the bad biological programmer learn Perl's regular expression when they started a project on comparative genomics; the good biological programmer learned it a year before because it looked interesting; and the great biological programmer also read about the BioPerl packages, genomics, DNA string, genomic theories, or some similar course of study so that they could understand the results and explain it biologically.</p><p><strong>2. Not a merely coder!!!</strong></p><p>I often encountered with biological programmer who call themself a hard-core computer programmer and avoid biology. I can almost guarantee that if you are one of them then you are not doing research but merely writing "dry" codes.</p><p>According to my supervisor most of the computational biologist, don't know what they are doing biologically. Even they struggle to explain their own programs output and results. Therefore, It is highly advisable to learn basic of biology which can assist you to explain the result and understand your discovery. Always remember you are a researcher not a coder.</p><p><strong>3. Be Social with biologist</strong></p><p>The computational biologist spends most of the time in from of computers, writing codes. They always think their job is to produce working codes, not technical research perfections. But, they are completely wrong. You should not forget that apart from your computational skills you also need some biologist, other than your supervisor, to explain and make you understand the complex biological mechanism.</p><p>I highly recommend your to interact with biotech researchers and learn how do they explain their one graph (which they generally produce after one year of work) biologically. Remember, the origin of your research project is complex biological phenomenon, which is more complex than that of your limited programming rules.</p><p><strong>4. Do not search, research for answers</strong></p><p>Researching for answers means more than typing several keywords into a search engine or posting a question at Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums. I have entered problems into search engines that generate no results, and every question I posted on Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums never got anything resembling an answer, yet I solved the issues and moved on. I&rsquo;m not a magician &mdash; I just know how to find answers or discover root causes.</p><p>Many problems are situational, and if you depend on search engines and forums, you can waste a lot of time going down a rabbit hole and possibly never getting a solution. Learn to perform root cause analysis, learn enough about the underlying system to look for other clues and solutions, and learn to take a long distance view of an issue before deep diving into it.</p><p><strong>5. Love and defend your research</strong></p><p>You cannot rise to the top in this research profession without loving your work. There are some very good &ldquo;it&rsquo;s just a job&rdquo; biological programmers (I&rsquo;ve been one at times), but if that is your outlook, you won&rsquo;t be willing to do whatever it takes to succeed. This idea gets a lot of folks in a huff, because they feel it is a personal insult. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m a good programmer, but I have other priorities and can&rsquo;t make work my life.&rdquo; I understand completely; I have other priorities too. As much as I hate to say it, when I am passionate about my work, I am willing (though not eager) to abandon my other priorities to finish the job. It is not an insult to say that if you aren&rsquo;t willing to pull out all the stops you can&rsquo;t be the best, it is a fact.</p><p>You must be passionate about more than programming &mdash; you must also be excited about your research, the tools and technology you are using, and so on. I have seen very good and even great biological programmers operating at mediocre levels because something was not a good fit, such as they hated the project or were using a technology they disliked. Therefore, like your research project and get excited about your discoveries. You have not only to discover but also defend your finding with scientific words.</p><p>Thanks to all of you for reading.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/851/the-institute-for-molecular-bioscience-imb-bailey-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:53:08 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[The Institute for Molecular Bioscience (IMB), Bailey Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Pattern recognition and computational biology</p>

<p>MEME Suite software development; gene expression; mathematical modelling; gene regulation and transcription</p>

<p>Specialization:<br />Pattern recognition and modelling in computational biology</p>

<p>Link @ http://www.imb.uq.edu.au/tim-bailey</p>
]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>