<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/1886?offset=1120</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/1886?offset=1120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43725/comparative-genomics-workshops</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:39:58 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43725/comparative-genomics-workshops</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Comparative Genomics Workshops !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This meeting's objective was to obtain a big picture look at the current state of the field of comparative&nbsp;genomics with a focus on commonalities across genomic investigations into humans, model organisms&nbsp;(both traditional and non-traditional), agricultural species, wildlife species and microbes.</span></p>
<p>https://www.genome.gov/event-calendar/perspectives-in-comparative-genomics-and-evolution</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.genome.gov/event-calendar/perspectives-in-comparative-genomics-and-evolution" rel="nofollow">https://www.genome.gov/event-calendar/perspectives-in-comparative-genomics-and-evolution</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/44639/the-sheppard-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 02:48:34 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[The Sheppard Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Ineos Oxford Institute of Antimicrobial Research – Department of Biology – University of Oxford</p>

<p>Our research centres on the use of genetics/genomics and phenotypic studies to address complex questions in the ecology, epidemiology and evolution of microbes. Our most recent interest focuses upon comparative genome analysis to describe the core and flexible genome of pathogenic bacteria (Campylobacter, Acinetobacter, Escherichia coli, Helicobacter, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus suis) and how this is related to population genetic structuring, the maintenance of species, and the evolution of host/niche adaptation and virulence.</p>

<p>More at https://sheppardlab.com/research/</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/14215/the-8000-years-old-tibetian-gene-mutation</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 21:57:44 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/14215/the-8000-years-old-tibetian-gene-mutation</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The 8000 years old Tibetian gene mutation !!!]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A new study has provided insight into how gene mutation around 8,000 years ago helped Tibetans' to survive in the thin air on the Tibetan Plateau, where an average elevation is of 14,800 feet.<br /><br />A study led by University of Utah scientists is the first to find a genetic cause for the adaptation, a single DNA base pair change that dates back 8,000 years and demonstrate how it contributes to the Tibetans' ability to live in low oxygen conditions.</p><p>About 8,000 years ago, the gene EGLN1 changed by a single DNA base pair. Today, a relatively short time later on the scale of human history, 88 percent of Tibetans have the genetic variation, and it was virtually absent from closely related lowland Asians. The findings indicate the genetic variation endows its carriers with an advantage.<br /><br />In those without the adaptation, low oxygen caused their blood to become thick with oxygen-carrying red blood cells, an attempt to feed starved tissues, which could cause long-term complications such as heart failure. The researchers found that the newly identified genetic variation protected Tibetans by decreasing the over-response to low oxygen.</p><p>Reference: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v512/n7513/abs/nature13408.html</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44758/the-ifs-and-buts-of-ngs-quality-control-and-trimming</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:11:07 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44758/the-ifs-and-buts-of-ngs-quality-control-and-trimming</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The &quot;Ifs&quot; and &quot;Buts&quot; of NGS Quality Control and Trimming]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized biological research, providing vast amounts of data for a wide range of applications. However, the reliability of NGS analyses heavily depends on the quality of raw sequencing data. Quality control (QC) and trimming are critical preprocessing steps that can make or break your downstream analyses. In this blog, we explore the "ifs" (why you should perform QC and trimming) and the "buts" (challenges or considerations) of this vital step in NGS workflows.</p><h3><strong>The "Ifs" of NGS QC and Trimming</strong></h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Ensures Data Integrity</strong><br />If you want to minimize errors in downstream analyses, QC and trimming remove low-quality reads and bases, ensuring high-confidence data. This step is essential for reliable variant calling, assembly, and other applications.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Removes Contaminants</strong><br />If adapter sequences or contaminants are present in the raw reads, trimming can eliminate them. This prevents issues like misalignment or incorrect biological interpretations, ensuring cleaner data for analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Improves Mapping and Assembly</strong><br />If your goal is better alignment to a reference genome or improved de novo assembly, trimming low-quality bases and adapters is critical. High-quality reads map more efficiently and generate more accurate assemblies.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reduces Computational Load</strong><br />If you want to save computational resources, trimming reduces the dataset size, which speeds up processing and analysis. Clean datasets mean less computational time spent on processing low-quality data.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Prepares for Standardized Analyses</strong><br />If your project involves multiple datasets, QC and trimming ensure uniformity across them. This standardization makes comparisons valid and reproducible, particularly in large collaborative studies.</p>
</li>
</ol><h3><strong>The "Buts" of NGS QC and Trimming</strong></h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Risk of Over-Trimming</strong><br />But excessive trimming can lead to the loss of informative sequences, reducing read depth and potentially discarding biologically relevant data. This is especially critical in studies with limited sequencing depth.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Bias Introduction</strong><br />But trimming algorithms might introduce biases, especially if they inadvertently remove sequences with specific biological patterns. This can skew results and compromise biological insights.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Loss of Context in Paired-End Reads</strong><br />But trimming one read in a pair more than the other can lead to loss of pairing information. This complicates downstream analyses that rely on paired-end data, such as structural variant detection.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Time and Resource Intensive</strong><br />But running QC and trimming for large datasets can be computationally expensive and time-consuming. As sequencing depth increases, preprocessing becomes a bottleneck in the analysis pipeline.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Variable Standards</strong><br />But the criteria for trimming (e.g., quality threshold, minimum read length) can vary between tools and datasets. This variability may affect reproducibility and comparability of results across studies.</p>
</li>
</ol><h3><strong>Balancing the "Ifs" and "Buts"</strong></h3><p>To maximize the benefits of QC and trimming while mitigating the challenges, consider the following best practices:</p><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Use QC Tools Wisely:</strong> Start with tools like <strong>FastQC</strong> to identify quality issues in your raw data. Visualizing quality metrics helps tailor your trimming parameters.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Choose Reliable Trimming Tools:</strong> Tools like <strong>Trimmomatic</strong>, <strong>Cutadapt</strong>, and <strong>BBduk</strong> offer adaptive and customizable trimming options. Select one that aligns with your dataset and project goals.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Set Reasonable Parameters:</strong> Avoid over-trimming by setting quality thresholds and minimum read lengths that balance data retention and quality improvement.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Test Downstream Effects:</strong> Validate the impact of QC and trimming on downstream analyses, such as alignment efficiency, variant calling accuracy, or assembly quality.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Document Your Workflow:</strong> Maintain detailed records of the parameters and tools used for QC and trimming. This ensures reproducibility and enables better troubleshooting.</p>
</li>
</ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>NGS quality control and trimming are essential steps to ensure reliable and accurate data for analysis. While the "ifs" highlight the clear benefits of these steps, the "buts" remind us of the potential pitfalls. By adopting best practices and carefully balancing these considerations, you can optimize your preprocessing workflow and unlock the full potential of your sequencing data.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4943/molecular-genetics-lecture</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:24:45 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4943/molecular-genetics-lecture</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Molecular Genetics Lecture]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>"Robert Sapolsky makes interdisciplinary connections between behavioral biology and molecular genetic influences. He relates protein synthesis and point mutations to microevolutionary change, and discusses conflicting theories of gradualism and punctuated equilibrium and the influence of epigenetics on development theories."&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>"<span><strong>Robert Sapolsky</strong> is an American neuroendocrinologist, professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University, researcher and author" ----Wikipedia</span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dRXA1_e30o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dRXA1_e30o</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/13025/the-5-reasons-to-mistakes-at-bioinformatics-work</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 02:51:41 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/13025/the-5-reasons-to-mistakes-at-bioinformatics-work</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The 5 reasons to mistakes at bioinformatics work !!!]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>When you're just starting out with biological programming, it's easy to run into complex problems that make you wonder how anyone has ever managed to write a program. There are some problems that trip up nearly every bioinformatician--everything from getting started understanding the biological problems to dealing with program design. Some random mistakes are so prominent that even experienced biological programmers do it. The 8 years in bioinformatics and my few random observations, most of them are snarky. These reasons will always take longer than expected and compel you to postpone your project deadline.</p><p><strong>1.Stupid for biologist:</strong> Biology is so complex that it will make bioinformatician feel stupid. There are no any universal fixed rules; it can surprise you any time. So be nice to biologists who ask questions and resolve your biological puzzles. Sometime you will have no idea what the hell you were doing either.<br /><br /><strong>2.Puzzling why:</strong> Do not hesitate to ask question. Especially. at the beginning of project you will have to ask a lot of questions. Instead of puzzling it out at end check out and clear your doubt even for a single error. It may can leads to wrong conclusion.<br /><br /><strong>3.Running marathon:</strong> The most of the biological software&rsquo;s documentation is always incomplete. In other word they are no more than 95 percent complete. Sometime a single problem can halt your entire project for months. Compilation and running the pipelines in tedious because almost all are interdependent and need proper configuration. I face the same kind of problem with Evolver :( &hellip; <br /><br /><strong>4.Folders missing:</strong> The pipelines generate lots of data, and we keep them in several folders for future use. But sometime we delete them by mistake and move to recovery&hellip;<br /><br /><strong>5.Digging deeper:</strong> Digging deeper is fruitful, but some time it can be catastrophic. You may get frustrated or direction less. So keep a biologist with you for rescue &hellip;. Sometime an expert computer programmer to handle your server. Remember, the server will always go down when you need it the most.<br /><br />The most common frustrating&nbsp; common line: Why do we do this again?</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34546/comparative-genomics-scripts</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:20:45 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34546/comparative-genomics-scripts</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Comparative genomics scripts]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Comparative genomics educational material and papers bookmarks</p>
<p>https://github.com/iansealy/coursera-comparinggenomes</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/iansealy/coursera-comparinggenomes" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/iansealy/coursera-comparinggenomes</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37259/epiviz-an-interactive-visualization-tool-for-functional-genomics-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 05:27:39 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37259/epiviz-an-interactive-visualization-tool-for-functional-genomics-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Epiviz: an interactive visualization tool for functional genomics data.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Epiviz is an interactive visualization tool for functional genomics data. It supports genome navigation like other genome browsers, but allows multiple visualizations of data within genomic regions using scatterplots, heatmaps and other user-supplied visualizations. It also includes data from the&nbsp;</span><a href="http://barcode.luhs.org/" target="_blank">Gene Expression Barcode project</a><span>&nbsp;for transcriptome visualization. It has a flexible plugin framework so users can add</span><a href="http://d3js.org/" target="_blank">d3</a><span>&nbsp;visualizations. You can see a video tour&nbsp;</span><a href="http://youtu.be/099c4wUxozA" target="_blank">here</a><span>.</span></p>
<p><span>https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/epivizr.html</span></p>
<p><span>https://github.com/epiviz</span></p>
<p><span>https://github.com/epiviz/epiviz</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://epiviz.github.io/" rel="nofollow">https://epiviz.github.io/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/13523/megadock-40</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:08:54 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/13523/megadock-40</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MEGADOCK 4.0]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>An ultra&ndash;high-performance protein&ndash;protein docking software for heterogeneous supercomputers</p>
<p id="p-4"><strong>Summary:</strong> The application of protein&ndash;protein docking in large-scale interactome analysis is a major challenge in structural bioinformatics and requires huge computing resources. In this work, we present MEGADOCK 4.0, an FFT-based docking software that makes extensive use of recent heterogeneous supercomputers and shows powerful, scalable performance of over 97% strong scaling.</p>
<p id="p-5"><strong>Availability and Implementation:</strong> MEGADOCK 4.0 is written in C++ with OpenMPI and NVIDIA CUDA 5.0 (or later) and is freely available to all academic and non-profit users at: <a href="http://www.bi.cs.titech.ac.jp/megadock">http://www.bi.cs.titech.ac.jp/megadock</a>.</p>
<p id="p-6"><strong>Contact:</strong> <a href="mailto:akiyama@cs.titech.ac.jp">akiyama@cs.titech.ac.jp</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/08/06/bioinformatics.btu532.short" rel="nofollow">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/08/06/bioinformatics.btu532.short</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Suleman Khan</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/40305/naab-doak-graduate-fellowship-bovine-genomics-course</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:45:35 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[NAAB Doak Graduate Fellowship bovine genomics course]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a reminder for all that seek a fully funded MSc in bovine genetics, or those that know talented BSc students who want to progress their education.<br /> <br />The deadline for the NAAB Doak Graduate Fellowship is less than a month away.<br /> <br />Applications are accepted until the 1st of December.<br /> <br />Please check the attachment or visit our website for further details:<br /> <br />https://www.naab-css.org/news/-naab-doak-graduate-fellowship<br /> <br />Sophie Eaglen<br />NAAB</p>
]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>