<![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]> https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/20437?offset=0 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/20015/illumina-smartphone-chip Tue, 30 Dec 2014 23:19:54 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/20015/illumina-smartphone-chip <![CDATA[Illumina Smartphone Chip !!!]]> Illumina, the company that claims it brought human genome sequencing down to $1000 prices, has now turned its attention to a consumer product - a chip that you can plug into your smartphone and have it read your genetic information.

The biggest challenge ahead of Illumina is simplifying the process of genetic sequencing. Currently, Illumina’s DNA sequencers are gigantic machines that use techinques like colorimetry to work, but while the core technology is computational, it takes some 30 steps to extract genetic data and run it through. This process will likely have to be hugely simplified on mobile devices, given the fact that some studies require extracting 10 mililiters of blood. Illumina researchers are also working on finding the optimal technology for this on-chip DNA sequencing - be it electrical, optical, or other.

Illumina is one of the most prominent names in genetics, often said to be the Intel of genetic sequencing, as just like Intel it provides the algorithms, the processing brain that runs a DNA reading task.

In other recent smartphone-related biotech news, drug company Pfizer launched its REMOTE project, a new type of clinical trial that does not require going to a hospital for checks - targeted at patients with overactive bladder problems, the FDA-approved REMOTE project allowed to gather data from patients from over 10 states remotely, via mobile devices.

This is indeed the Illumina answer to Apple's Health app, HealthBook, Google HealthFit.

]]> Robert M Willioms https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30147/cisa-contig-integrator-for-sequence-assembly Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:42:21 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30147/cisa-contig-integrator-for-sequence-assembly <![CDATA[CISA: Contig Integrator for Sequence Assembly]]> A plethora of algorithmic assemblers have been proposed for the de novo assembly of genomes, however, no individual assembler guarantees the optimal assembly for diverse species. Optimizing various parameters in an assembler is often performed in order to generate the most optimal assembly. However, few efforts have been pursued to take advantage of multiple assemblies to yield an assembly of high accuracy. In this study, we employ various state-of-the-art assemblers to generate different sets of contigs for bacterial genomes. A tool, named CISA, has been developed to integrate the assemblies into a hybrid set of contigs, resulting in assemblies of superior contiguity and accuracy, compared with the assemblies generated by the state-of-the-art assemblers and the hybrid assemblies merged by existing tools. This tool is implemented in Python and requires MUMmer and BLAST+ to be installed on the local machine. The source code of CISA and examples of its use are available at http://sb.nhri.org.tw/CISA/.

Address of the bookmark: http://sb.nhri.org.tw/CISA/en/CISA

]]> Neel https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30214/megamerge-a-tool-to-merge-assembled-contigs-long-reads-from-metagenomic-sequencing-runs Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:42:15 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30214/megamerge-a-tool-to-merge-assembled-contigs-long-reads-from-metagenomic-sequencing-runs <![CDATA[MeGAMerge: A tool to merge assembled contigs, long reads from metagenomic sequencing runs]]> MeGAMerge

MeGAMerge (A tool to merge assembled contigs, long reads from metagenomic sequencing runs)

Description

MeGAMerge is a perl based wrapper/tool that can accept any number of sequence (FASTA) files containing assembled contigs of any length in Multi-FASTA format to produce an improved contig set based on OLC based assembly. All overlap parameters (Minimum Overlap Length, Identity, etc) are user-declarable at runtime. It is written to run on Linux.

Requirements:

You will need to have the following tools installed and in $PATH, or added to $binpath in the tool:

Newbler (specifically runAssembly)
Minimus2 (part of AMOS, also requires MUMmer)

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/LANL-Bioinformatics/MeGAMerge

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/920/bioinformatics-algorithms Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:35:15 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/920/bioinformatics-algorithms <![CDATA[Bioinformatics Algorithms]]> An algorithm is a computable set of steps to achieve a desired result.

We use algorithms every day. For example, a recipe for baking a cake is an algorithm. Most programs, with the exception of some artificial intelligence applications, consist of algorithms. Inventing elegant algorithms -- algorithms that are simple and require the fewest steps possible -- is one of the principal challenges in programming. An algorithm is a description of a procedure which terminates with a result. In other words an algorithm is a set of instructions, sometimes called a procedure or a function, that is used to perform a certain task. This can be a simple process, such as adding two numbers together, or a complex function, such as adding effects to an image. For example, in order to sharpen a digital photo, the algorithm would need to process each pixel in the image and determine which ones to change and how much to change them in order to make the image look sharper.

In mathematics, computer science, and related subjects, an algorithm is an effective method for solving a problem using a finite sequence of instructions. Algorithms are used for calculation, data processing, and many other fields.
Each algorithm is a list of well-defined instructions for completing a task. Starting from an initial state, the instructions describe a computation that proceeds through a well-defined series of successive states, eventually terminating in a final ending state. The transition from one state to the next is not necessarily deterministic; some algorithms, known as randomized algorithms, incorporate randomness.

History

The origin of the term comes from the ancients. The concept becomes more precise with the use of variables in mathematics. Algorithm in the sense of what is now used by computers appeared as soon as first mechanical engines were invented.
The word algorithm comes from the name of the 9th century Persian Muslim mathematician Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Musa Al-Khwarizmi. The word algorism originally referred only to the rules of performing arithmetic using Hindu-Arabic numerals but evolved via European Latin translation of Al-Khwarizmi's name into algorithm by the 18th century. The use of the word evolved to include all definite procedures for solving problems or performing tasks.
The algorithm of Archimedes gives an approximation of the Pi number.
Eratosthenes has defined an algorithim for retrieving prime numbers.
Averroès (1126-1198) was using algorithmic methods for calculations.
Adelard de Bath (12 th) introduces the algorismus term, from Al-Khwarizmi.
During the 1800's up to the mid-1900's:

- George Boole (1847) has invented the binary algebra, the basis of computers. Actually he has unified logic and calculation in a common symbolism.

- Gottlob Frege (1879) formula language's, that is a lingua characterica, a language written with special symbols, "for pure thought", that is free from rhetorical embellishments... constructed from specific symbols that are manipulated according to definite rules.

- Giuseppe Peano (1888) It's The principles of arithmetic, presented by a new method was the first attempt at an axiomatization of mathematics in a symbolic language.

- Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell in their Principia Mathematica (1910-1913) has further simplified and amplified the work of Frege.

- Kurt Goëdel (1931) cites the paradox of the liar that completely reduces rules of recursion to numbers.

The concept of algorithm was formalized in 1936 through Alan Turing's Turing machines and Alonzo Church's lambda calculus, which in turn formed the foundation of computer science.
Stephen C. Kleene (1943) defined his now-famous thesis known as the "Church-Turing Thesis". In this context:

" Algorithmic theories... In setting up a complete algorithmic theory, what we do is to describe a procedure, performable for each set of values of the independent variables, which procedure necessarily terminates and in such manner that from the outcome we can read a definite answer, "yes" or "no," to the question, "is the predicate value true?"

Classification

Classification by purpose

Each algorithm has a goal, for example, the purpose of the Quick Sort algorithm is to sort data in ascending or descending order. But the number of goals is infinite, and we have to group them by kind of purposes:

Classification by implementation

An algorithm may be implemeted according to different basical principles.

  • Recursive or iterative

A recursive algorithm is one that calls itself repeatedly until a certain condition matches. It is a method common to functional programming. 
Iterative algorithms use repetitive constructs like loops.
Some problems are better suited for one implementation or the other. For example, the towers of hanoi problem is well understood in recursive implementation. Every recursive version has an iterative equivalent iterative, and vice versa.

  • Logical or procedural

An algorithm may be viewed as controlled logical deduction. 
A logic component expresses the axioms which may be used in the computation and a control component determines the way in which deduction is applied to the axioms. 
This is the basis of the logic programming. In pure logic programming languages the control component is fixed and algorithms are specified by supplying only the logic component.

  • Serial or parallel

Algorithms are usually discussed with the assumption that computers execute one instruction of an algorithm at a time. This is a serial algorithm, as opposed to parallel algorithms, which take advantage of computer architectures to process several instructions at once. They divide the problem into sub-problems and pass them to several processors. Iterative algorithms are generally parallelizable. Sorting algorithms can be parallelized efficiently.

  • Deterministic or non-deterministic

Deterministic algorithms solve the problem with a predefined process whereas non-deterministic algorithm must perform guesses of best solution at each step through the use of heuristics.

Classification by design paradigm

A design paradigm is a domain in research or class of problems that requires a dedicated kind of algorithm:

  • Divide and conquer

A divide and conquer algorithm repeatedly reduces an instance of a problem to one or more smaller instances of the same problem (usually recursively), until the instances are small enough to solve easily. One such example of divide and conquer is merge sorting. Sorting can be done on each segment of data after dividing data into segments and sorting of entire data can be obtained in conquer phase by merging them.
The binary search algorithm is an example of a variant of divide and conquer called decrease and conquer algorithm, that solves an identical subproblem and uses the solution of this subproblem to solve the bigger problem.

  • Dynamic programming

The shortest path in a weighted graph can be found by using the shortest path to the goal from all adjacent vertices. 
When the optimal solution to a problem can be constructed from optimal solutions to subproblems, using dynamic programming avoids recomputing solutions that have already been computed. 
- The main difference with the "divide and conquer" approach is, subproblems are independent in divide and conquer, where as the overlap of subproblems occur in dynamic programming. 
- Dynamic programming and memoization go together. The difference with straightforward recursion is in caching or memoization of recursive calls. Where subproblems are independent, this is useless. By using memoization or maintaining a table of subproblems already solved, dynamic programming reduces the exponential nature of many problems to polynomial complexity.

  • The greedy method

A greedy algorithm is similar to a dynamic programming algorithm, but the difference is that solutions to the subproblems do not have to be known at each stage. Instead a "greedy" choice can be made of what looks the best solution for the moment. 
The most popular greedy algorithm is finding the minimal spanning tree as given by Kruskal.

  • Linear programming

The problem is expressed as a set of linear inequalities and then an attempt is made to maximize or minimize the inputs. This can solve many problems such as the maximum flow for directed graphs, notably by using the simplex algorithm. 
A complex variant of linear programming is called integer programming, where the solution space is restricted to all integers.

  • Reduction also called transform and conquer

Solve a problem by transforming it into another problem. A simple example: finding the median in an unsorted list is first translating this problem into sorting problem and finding the middle element in sorted list. The main goal of reduction is finding the simplest transformation possible.

  • Using graphs

Many problems, such as playing chess, can be modeled as problems on graphs. A graph exploration algorithms are used. 
This category also includes the search algorithms and backtracking.

The probabilistic and heuristic paradigm

  • Probabilistic

Those that make some choices randomly.

  • Genetic

Attempt to find solutions to problems by mimicking biological evolutionary processes, with a cycle of random mutations yielding successive generations of "solutions". Thus, they emulate reproduction and "survival of the fittest".

  • Heuristic

Whose general purpose is not to find an optimal solution, but an approximate solution where the time or resources to find a perfect solution are not practical.

Classification by complexity

Some algorithms complete in linear time, and some complete in exponential amount of time, and some never complete.

Algorithms resources on net.

Graph Algorithms in Bioinformatics

Bioinformatics Algorithms Description

Bioinformatics Algorithms Course Page

Bioinformatics Algorithm Demonstrations

Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms Lectures 1-2 by Dr. Max Alekseyev USC, 2009

Online Lectures on Bioinformatics

Sequence Alignment Algorithms

Algorithm for sequence alignment: dynamic programming

Network Protocol Analysis using Bioinformatics Algorithms

Bioinformatics Algorithms Links

Dynamic Programming

Particularly good sites...

•http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~sahuguet/MSA/
•http://www.blc.arizona.edu/courses/bioinformatics/align.html
•http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeStrings/Notes/DPA.html
•http://www.cs.orst.edu/~schut/cs325/dynamic.htm
•http://www.catalase.com/dprog.htm
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~bioph490/BIOPH2.html#SEQUENCE_COMP
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/javascript/dp1/index.html
Other sites...
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~bioph490/dynamic_programming_demo.html
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/365overheads.html
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/dp/dp.p01.html
•http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/csc270/tut_dp.html
•http://queue.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jshu/knapsack/DP/dp.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/dynamic/dynamic.html
•http://www.cs.sandia.gov/~scistra/class_3
•http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/Econ101/dynamic.htm
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/stoch_dynamic/stoch_dynamic.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/dynamic/node8.html
•http://www.maths.mu.oz.au/~moshe/dp/bibl/bibliography.html
•http://cartan.gmd.de/PAPER/ismb95/ismb_html.html
•http://screwdriver.bu.edu/bibliography/dynamic_programming.htm
•http://www.norvig.com/design-patterns/
•http://tome.cbs.univ-montp1.fr/htmltxt/Doc/manual/node137.html
•http://poem.princeton.edu/~verdu/dynamic.html
•http://www.orca1.com/opushelpweb/opusDynamic_Programming.html
•http://screwdriver.bu.edu/cn760-lectures/l7/index.htm
•http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~moshe/dp/dp.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/ORCS/0255.html
•http://aae.wisc.edu/e703/notes/a13dynpr.htm
•http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/docs/modeller/node137.html
•http://www2.uwindsor.ca/~lama/my470/ddynamic.htm
•http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~papagel/project/ex5_6_1.htm
•http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/lectures-good/node12.html
•http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/lectures-good/node12.html
•http://www.utdallas.edu/~scniu/documents/7315.htm
•http://www.ii.uib.no/~pinar/seminar/larry.html
•http://www.deakin.edu.au/~gecole/books.html
•http://www.cseg.engr.uark.edu/~wessels/algs/notes/dynamic.html
•http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~ped/teachadmin/algor/dyprog.html
•http://www.eli.sdsu.edu/courses/fall96/cs660/notes/dynamicProg/dynamicProg.html
•http://www.cs.indiana.edu/l/www/ftp/techreports/TR514.html
•http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~mairson/poems/node3.html
•http://www.cis.tu-graz.ac.at/igi/oaich/animations/Dynamic2.html
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~workshop/


Smith Waterman
•http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/help/sw_alignment.html
•http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/help/sw_details.html
•http://www.stanford.edu/~sntaylor/bioc218/final.htm
•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/sld009.htm
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~workshop/Lab_3/Smith-Waterman.htm
•http://www.tigem.it/LOCAL/SW/threshold.html
•http://sgbcd.weizmann.ac.il/genweb/help/smith-waterman.html
•http://cbrg.ethz.ch/ServerBooklet/section2_3_5.html
Needleman & Wunsch
•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/sld003.htm
•http://acer.gen.tcd.ie/~amclysag/nwswat.html
•http://www.nada.kth.se/~erikw/thesis/chapter2_3.html
•http://www.irbm.it/irbm-course95/gb/docs/amps/subsection3_6_1.html
•http://www.ibc.wustl.edu/~zuker/Bio-5495/align-html/node3.html

General (NW vs. SW vs. HMM, etc.)

•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/
•http://acer.gen.tcd.ie/~amclysag/nwswat.html
•http://laguerre.psc.edu/biomed/TUTORIALS/SEQUENCE/MULTIPLE/tutorial.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/

Hmms

•http://www.medmicro.mds.qmw.ac.uk/HMMER/main.html
•http://alfredo.wustl.edu/ismb96/abs/p02.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/html_format_papers/hughkrogh96/cabios.html
•http://wwwsyseng.anu.edu.au/~jason/hmmlinks.html
•http://www.breadfan.com/markov.html
•http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey/ch1node34.html
•http://www.ibc.wustl.edu/service/hmmalign/glocal.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/html_format_papers/ismb94/node5.html
•http://www.iscs.nus.edu.sg/~luakt/ic3222/lecture/nlp18new/index.htm
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html SAM Software for HMMs

Genetic Algorithms

•http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~carroll/ga.html
•http://kal-el.ugr.es/gags.html
•http://kal-el.ugr.es/~jmerelo/GAJS.html
•http://www.genetic-programming.org/
•http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/deb_tut.shtml

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/1515/list-of-pharmacogenomics-companies-in-india Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:26:56 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/1515/list-of-pharmacogenomics-companies-in-india <![CDATA[List of pharmacogenomics companies in India]]> pharmacogenomics companies in India are making their good impacts. Here is the list of few pharmacogenomics companies. Please add more if not mentioned here.

Genomics in India
www.ganitlabs.in
www.sandor.co.in
www.igib.res.in
www.genotypic.co.in
www.ocimumbio.com
www.abcgenomics.com
www.xcelrisgenomics.com
www.ayugen.com
www.geneombiotech.com

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/2001/the-ontario-institute-for-cancer-research-oicr-genomics-lab-toronto-canada Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:43:13 -0500 <![CDATA[The Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR) Genomics Lab , Toronto, Canada.]]> The Human Genome Project led to the development of a wide array of technologies to screen the genome and its products (genes, proteins, metabolites) and molecules that interact with these products (chemicals, RNAi). The existence of these tools resulted in the creation of facilities that use robotics and informatics to generate high-throughput screens of DNA, RNA, protein, tissue, chemicals and other substances.

The genomics platform uses cancer genome sequencing and other high-throughput techniques to identify genes critical to the development of cancer and anomalies in the genomic profile of the tumours.

For more info visit : http://oicr.on.ca/

]]> https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/35257/india-and-germany-to-begin-joint-research-in-the-area-of-bioinformatics-in-health-research Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:10:36 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/35257/india-and-germany-to-begin-joint-research-in-the-area-of-bioinformatics-in-health-research <![CDATA[India and Germany to begin joint research in the area of 'Bioinformatics in Health Research']]> To facilitate bilateral cooperation in biotechnology between the scientific communities of India and Germany, the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) will soon begin collaborative research in the identified priority area of 'Bioinformatics in Health Research' under the programme of Indo-German Cooperation in Health Research. 

The purpose of the programme is to stimulate new collaborations, e.g. the preparation of joint projects under national funding programmes. The programme facilitates bilateral cooperation in biotechnology between the scientific communities of India and Germany by way of joint research projects which will encompass bilateral workshops/seminar and exchange visits of scientists. 

The programme is being implemented within the agreement of Indo-German cooperation in S&T of 1974, under which the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and Forschungszentrum Julich BMBH (FZJ), Federal Republic of Germany, have agreed for cooperative programme in biotechnology.

DBT of the Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India and the Project Management Agency at the German Aerospace Center (DLR-PT, European and International Cooperation), Bonn are the nodal implementing agencies from the Indian and German side respectively.

Through this programme, it is expected that the funded cooperation enables the partners to develop applicable scientific results which can be published and/ or could be commercialised and may lead to formation of joint ventures. All publications, patents coming out of these projects, need to be jointly authored by both Indian and German scientists. All necessary approvals like ethical clearance, HMSC approval from Indian point of view as well as EU, if applicable, from German point of view, e.g. before conducting animal experimentation if any needs to be obtained by PIs before undertaking the project. 

Now, both the nodal agencies have invited research proposals in identified priority area of 'Bioinformatics in Health Research' from eligible scientists.  Joint research projects are required to be submitted to both the nodal agencies by 15 January 2018. Scientists/faculty members working in regular capacity in universities, national R&D laboratories/institutes and private R&D institutes can be part of this joint research programme.   For the private sector, partners from all kind of private sectors are eligible, but financing is limited. For Indian scientists from the private sector, only local hospitality in Germany as part of the exchange visit is available from the German side.  For German scientists from the private sector, only travel costs are available for small and medium size enterprises (for definition of SME ref. to 2003/361/EC) as well as local hospitality in India will be borne by themselves.

]]> Rahul Nayak https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/6458/bigre-lab Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:35:49 -0600 <![CDATA[BIGRE Lab]]> The Laboratoire de Bioinformatique des Génomes et des Réseaux (Genome and Network Bioinformatics) is specialized in the conception, implementation, evaluation and application of bioinformatics approaches for the analysis of genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolism.
Our main activities include

Analysis of regulatory sequences (RSAT project)
Classification and analysis of mobile genetic elements (ACLAME project).
Analysis of molecular interaction networks (NeAT project)
Inference of metabolic pathways from genomic and post-genomic data
(metabolic pathfinding, see also metabolic pathfinding in NeAT)
Critical assesment of protein interactions (CAPRI)

Lab Page http://www.bigre.ulb.ac.be/

]]> https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/2492/plos-computational-biology-translational-bioinformatics-educational-resources Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:24:56 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/2492/plos-computational-biology-translational-bioinformatics-educational-resources <![CDATA[PLOS Computational Biology: Translational Bioinformatics educational resources]]> PLOS present collection of Education articles:  “Translational Bioinformatics”. This collection is presented as an online “book” which could serve as a reference tool for a graduate level introductory course, marking a step in an exciting new direction for the Education section of the journal.

Blog : http://blogs.plos.org/biologue/2012/12/28/translational-bioinformatics-plos-computational-biology-presents-an-educational-resource-for-an-emerging-field/

Educational Material : http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browseIssue.action?issue=info:doi/10.1371/issue.pcol.v03.i11

Address of the bookmark: http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browseIssue.action?issue=info:doi/10.1371/issue.pcol.v03.i11

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/2699/translational-bioinformatics-transforming-300-billion-points-of-data Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:03:47 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/2699/translational-bioinformatics-transforming-300-billion-points-of-data <![CDATA[Translational Bioinformatics: Transforming 300 Billion Points of Data]]> Translational Bioinformatics: Transforming 300 Billion Points of Data into Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and New Insights into Disease Air date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 3:00:00 PM Time displayed is Eastern Time, Washington DC Local Description: There is an urgent need to translate genome-era discoveries into clinical utility, but the difficulties in making bench-to-bedside translations haven't been well described. The nascent field of translational bioinformatics may help. Dr. Butte's lab at Stanford University builds and applies tools that convert more than 300 billion points of molecular, clinical, and epidemiological data (measured by researchers and clinicians over the past decade) into diagnostics, therapeutics, and new insights into disease. Dr. Butte, a bioinformatician and pediatric endocrinologist, will highlight his lab's work on using publicly available molecular measurements to find new uses for drugs, discovering new treatable mechanisms of disease in type 2 diabetes, and evaluating patients presenting with whole genomes sequenced. The NIH Wednesday Afternoon Lecture Series includes weekly scientific talks by some of the top researchers in the biomedical sciences worldwide. For more information, visit: The NIH Director's Wednesday Afternoon Lecture Series Author: Atul Butte, M.D., Ph.D., Stanford University Runtime: 01:07:42 Permanent link: http://videocast.nih.gov/launch.asp?17321]]>