DBT-Junior Research Fellowship (DBT-JRF) in Biotechnology (2020)

BIOTECHNOLOGY ELIGIBILITY TEST (BET) 2020

Applications are invited from bonafide Indian citizens, residing in India for award of “DBT-Junior Research Fellowship” (DBT-JRF) for pursuing research in frontier areas of Biotechnology and Life Sciences. The candidates will be selected through “Biotechnology Eligibility Test (BET)”. Based on the performance in BET, two categories of merit list will be prepared (Category-I and Category-II). Government of India norms for reservation will be followed for selection. Candidates selected under category-I will be eligible to avail fellowship under the programme. These will be tenable at any University/Institute in India where the selected candidate registers for PhD Programme. Candidates selected under Category-II will be eligible to be appointed in any DBT sponsored project and avail fellowship from the project equivalent to NET/GATE, subject to selection through institutional selection process. There will be no binding on Principal Investigators of DBT sponsored projects to select JRF for their project from category-II list. Selection in category-II will not entitle student for any fellowship from DBT-JRF programme.

ELIGIBILITY

Qualification: M.Sc./ M.Tech./ M.V.Sc. or equivalent degree/ Integrated BS-MS/ B.E./ B.Tech. in any discipline of Biotechnology, M.Sc./ M.Tech. Bioinformatics/ Computational Biology, students admitted under DBT supported Postgraduate Teaching Programs. M.Sc. Life Science/ Bioscience/ Zoology/ Botany/ Microbiology/ Biochemistry/ Biophysics and Masters in Allied areas of Biology/Life Sciences. Candidates appearing in the final year examination are also eligible to apply.

Marks: Minimum 60% marks for General, EWS & OBC category and 55% for SC/ ST/ Differently abled in aggregate (or equivalent grade).

Age Limit: Upto 28 years as on the last date of application for General & EWS category. Age relaxation of up to 5 years (33 years) for SC/ ST/ Differently Abled/ women candidates and upto 3 years (31 years) for OBC (Non-Creamy Layer) candidates.

For detailed procedure for filling the application form, payment of application fee and uploading of required documents/ certificates in the prescribed format, please visit: http://rcb.res.in/BET2020. A non-refundable and non-transferable application fee of Rs. 1000/-is payable online by General/ OBC/ EWS candidates and Rs 250/- by SC/ ST/ Differently abled candidates.

IMPORTANT DATES

University of Ibadan (UIB)­Ibadan:
There has been significant increase in the number of bioinformatics activities in Nigeria (and West Africa) since 2003 when the program was initiated by the West African Biotechnology Workshops Series (WABWS, http://www.wabw.org) at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria (in collaboration with  the South African National Bioinformatics Institute (SANBI, http:/www.sanbi.ac.za). Workshops  that were open to scientists from all African countries have seen a very high number of applications  from scientists based in West Africa. The encouraging desire to acquire cutting­edge skills to  computational process data and extract useful knowledge from genome projects led to the interest of  the West African Biotechnology Workshops (WABW) to develop an agenda to address the  bioinformatics skills gap among scientists in West Africa. An increased commitment from agencies  like NEPAD would be required in the provision of infrastructure to establish and sustain regional  and national networks.

University of Ilorin (UIL)­Ilorin:
The University of Ilorin was established in 1976 by the Federal Government of Nigeria.  Bioinformatics activities started at the University in February 2003 with the establishment of the  West African Bioinformatics Research Initiative (WABRI). However, progress has been rather slow  due to inadequate funding. We are mainly engaged in Bioinformatics training at the introductory  level and proteomics studies on various species of malaria parasites. Recently, we became interested  in comparative genome analysis of various species of  Plasmodium  and the comparison of  chloroquine sensitive and chloroquine resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Other activities  and areas of interest can be seen on our website, http://www.wabri.org, although not all our  proposed interests have been fully implemented due to our level of funding.

Training:
The University of Ilorin has introduced M.Sc. and Ph.D. programmes in Computer Science (with  options in Bioinformatics). The programme is based in the Department of Computer Science and  emphasis is on the development of algorithms to solve problems in bioinformatics. The Covenant University offers M.Sc. and Ph.D in Computer Science with option in Bioinformatics  (Computational Biology). Furthermore, through affiliated departments, the CBBM is been design to award Diploma and Degree certificates in Biotechnology.

Web sites and links: http://www.covenantuniversity.com http://www.run.edu.ng http://www.uniben.edu http://www.wabri.org http://www.wabw.org http://www.unilorin.edu.ng http://www.wabri.org http://www.asopah.org

We use algorithms every day. For example, a recipe for baking a cake is an algorithm. Most programs, with the exception of some artificial intelligence applications, consist of algorithms. Inventing elegant algorithms -- algorithms that are simple and require the fewest steps possible -- is one of the principal challenges in programming. An algorithm is a description of a procedure which terminates with a result. In other words an algorithm is a set of instructions, sometimes called a procedure or a function, that is used to perform a certain task. This can be a simple process, such as adding two numbers together, or a complex function, such as adding effects to an image. For example, in order to sharpen a digital photo, the algorithm would need to process each pixel in the image and determine which ones to change and how much to change them in order to make the image look sharper.

In mathematics, computer science, and related subjects, an algorithm is an effective method for solving a problem using a finite sequence of instructions. Algorithms are used for calculation, data processing, and many other fields.
Each algorithm is a list of well-defined instructions for completing a task. Starting from an initial state, the instructions describe a computation that proceeds through a well-defined series of successive states, eventually terminating in a final ending state. The transition from one state to the next is not necessarily deterministic; some algorithms, known as randomized algorithms, incorporate randomness.

History

The origin of the term comes from the ancients. The concept becomes more precise with the use of variables in mathematics. Algorithm in the sense of what is now used by computers appeared as soon as first mechanical engines were invented.
The word algorithm comes from the name of the 9th century Persian Muslim mathematician Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Musa Al-Khwarizmi. The word algorism originally referred only to the rules of performing arithmetic using Hindu-Arabic numerals but evolved via European Latin translation of Al-Khwarizmi's name into algorithm by the 18th century. The use of the word evolved to include all definite procedures for solving problems or performing tasks.
The algorithm of Archimedes gives an approximation of the Pi number.
Eratosthenes has defined an algorithim for retrieving prime numbers.
Averroès (1126-1198) was using algorithmic methods for calculations.
Adelard de Bath (12 th) introduces the algorismus term, from Al-Khwarizmi.
During the 1800's up to the mid-1900's:

- George Boole (1847) has invented the binary algebra, the basis of computers. Actually he has unified logic and calculation in a common symbolism.

- Gottlob Frege (1879) formula language's, that is a lingua characterica, a language written with special symbols, "for pure thought", that is free from rhetorical embellishments... constructed from specific symbols that are manipulated according to definite rules.

- Giuseppe Peano (1888) It's The principles of arithmetic, presented by a new method was the first attempt at an axiomatization of mathematics in a symbolic language.

- Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell in their Principia Mathematica (1910-1913) has further simplified and amplified the work of Frege.

- Kurt Goëdel (1931) cites the paradox of the liar that completely reduces rules of recursion to numbers.

The concept of algorithm was formalized in 1936 through Alan Turing's Turing machines and Alonzo Church's lambda calculus, which in turn formed the foundation of computer science.
Stephen C. Kleene (1943) defined his now-famous thesis known as the "Church-Turing Thesis". In this context:

" Algorithmic theories... In setting up a complete algorithmic theory, what we do is to describe a procedure, performable for each set of values of the independent variables, which procedure necessarily terminates and in such manner that from the outcome we can read a definite answer, "yes" or "no," to the question, "is the predicate value true?"

Classification

Classification by purpose

Each algorithm has a goal, for example, the purpose of the Quick Sort algorithm is to sort data in ascending or descending order. But the number of goals is infinite, and we have to group them by kind of purposes:

Classification by implementation

An algorithm may be implemeted according to different basical principles.

• Recursive or iterative

A recursive algorithm is one that calls itself repeatedly until a certain condition matches. It is a method common to functional programming. 
Iterative algorithms use repetitive constructs like loops.
Some problems are better suited for one implementation or the other. For example, the towers of hanoi problem is well understood in recursive implementation. Every recursive version has an iterative equivalent iterative, and vice versa.

• Logical or procedural

An algorithm may be viewed as controlled logical deduction. 
A logic component expresses the axioms which may be used in the computation and a control component determines the way in which deduction is applied to the axioms. 
This is the basis of the logic programming. In pure logic programming languages the control component is fixed and algorithms are specified by supplying only the logic component.

• Serial or parallel

Algorithms are usually discussed with the assumption that computers execute one instruction of an algorithm at a time. This is a serial algorithm, as opposed to parallel algorithms, which take advantage of computer architectures to process several instructions at once. They divide the problem into sub-problems and pass them to several processors. Iterative algorithms are generally parallelizable. Sorting algorithms can be parallelized efficiently.

• Deterministic or non-deterministic

Deterministic algorithms solve the problem with a predefined process whereas non-deterministic algorithm must perform guesses of best solution at each step through the use of heuristics.

Classification by design paradigm

A design paradigm is a domain in research or class of problems that requires a dedicated kind of algorithm:

• Divide and conquer

A divide and conquer algorithm repeatedly reduces an instance of a problem to one or more smaller instances of the same problem (usually recursively), until the instances are small enough to solve easily. One such example of divide and conquer is merge sorting. Sorting can be done on each segment of data after dividing data into segments and sorting of entire data can be obtained in conquer phase by merging them.
The binary search algorithm is an example of a variant of divide and conquer called decrease and conquer algorithm, that solves an identical subproblem and uses the solution of this subproblem to solve the bigger problem.

• Dynamic programming

The shortest path in a weighted graph can be found by using the shortest path to the goal from all adjacent vertices. 
When the optimal solution to a problem can be constructed from optimal solutions to subproblems, using dynamic programming avoids recomputing solutions that have already been computed. 
- The main difference with the "divide and conquer" approach is, subproblems are independent in divide and conquer, where as the overlap of subproblems occur in dynamic programming. 
- Dynamic programming and memoization go together. The difference with straightforward recursion is in caching or memoization of recursive calls. Where subproblems are independent, this is useless. By using memoization or maintaining a table of subproblems already solved, dynamic programming reduces the exponential nature of many problems to polynomial complexity.

• The greedy method

A greedy algorithm is similar to a dynamic programming algorithm, but the difference is that solutions to the subproblems do not have to be known at each stage. Instead a "greedy" choice can be made of what looks the best solution for the moment. 
The most popular greedy algorithm is finding the minimal spanning tree as given by Kruskal.

• Linear programming

The problem is expressed as a set of linear inequalities and then an attempt is made to maximize or minimize the inputs. This can solve many problems such as the maximum flow for directed graphs, notably by using the simplex algorithm. 
A complex variant of linear programming is called integer programming, where the solution space is restricted to all integers.

• Reduction also called transform and conquer

Solve a problem by transforming it into another problem. A simple example: finding the median in an unsorted list is first translating this problem into sorting problem and finding the middle element in sorted list. The main goal of reduction is finding the simplest transformation possible.

• Using graphs

Many problems, such as playing chess, can be modeled as problems on graphs. A graph exploration algorithms are used. 
This category also includes the search algorithms and backtracking.

The probabilistic and heuristic paradigm

• Probabilistic

Those that make some choices randomly.

• Genetic

Attempt to find solutions to problems by mimicking biological evolutionary processes, with a cycle of random mutations yielding successive generations of "solutions". Thus, they emulate reproduction and "survival of the fittest".

• Heuristic

Whose general purpose is not to find an optimal solution, but an approximate solution where the time or resources to find a perfect solution are not practical.

Classification by complexity

Some algorithms complete in linear time, and some complete in exponential amount of time, and some never complete.

Algorithms resources on net.

Graph Algorithms in Bioinformatics

Bioinformatics Algorithms Description

Bioinformatics Algorithms Course Page

Bioinformatics Algorithm Demonstrations

Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms Lectures 1-2 by Dr. Max Alekseyev USC, 2009

Online Lectures on Bioinformatics

Sequence Alignment Algorithms

Algorithm for sequence alignment: dynamic programming

Network Protocol Analysis using Bioinformatics Algorithms

Bioinformatics Algorithms Links

Dynamic Programming

Particularly good sites...

•http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~sahuguet/MSA/
•http://www.blc.arizona.edu/courses/bioinformatics/align.html
•http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeStrings/Notes/DPA.html
•http://www.cs.orst.edu/~schut/cs325/dynamic.htm
•http://www.catalase.com/dprog.htm
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~bioph490/BIOPH2.html#SEQUENCE_COMP
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/javascript/dp1/index.html
Other sites...
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~bioph490/dynamic_programming_demo.html
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/365overheads.html
•http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/home/cisc365/dp/dp.p01.html
•http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/csc270/tut_dp.html
•http://queue.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jshu/knapsack/DP/dp.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/dynamic/dynamic.html
•http://www.cs.sandia.gov/~scistra/class_3
•http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/Econ101/dynamic.htm
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/stoch_dynamic/stoch_dynamic.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/classes/dynamic/node8.html
•http://www.maths.mu.oz.au/~moshe/dp/bibl/bibliography.html
•http://cartan.gmd.de/PAPER/ismb95/ismb_html.html
•http://screwdriver.bu.edu/bibliography/dynamic_programming.htm
•http://www.norvig.com/design-patterns/
•http://tome.cbs.univ-montp1.fr/htmltxt/Doc/manual/node137.html
•http://poem.princeton.edu/~verdu/dynamic.html
•http://www.orca1.com/opushelpweb/opusDynamic_Programming.html
•http://screwdriver.bu.edu/cn760-lectures/l7/index.htm
•http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~moshe/dp/dp.html
•http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/ORCS/0255.html
•http://aae.wisc.edu/e703/notes/a13dynpr.htm
•http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/docs/modeller/node137.html
•http://www2.uwindsor.ca/~lama/my470/ddynamic.htm
•http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~papagel/project/ex5_6_1.htm
•http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/lectures-good/node12.html
•http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/lectures-good/node12.html
•http://www.utdallas.edu/~scniu/documents/7315.htm
•http://www.ii.uib.no/~pinar/seminar/larry.html
•http://www.deakin.edu.au/~gecole/books.html
•http://www.cseg.engr.uark.edu/~wessels/algs/notes/dynamic.html
•http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~ped/teachadmin/algor/dyprog.html
•http://www.eli.sdsu.edu/courses/fall96/cs660/notes/dynamicProg/dynamicProg.html
•http://www.cs.indiana.edu/l/www/ftp/techreports/TR514.html
•http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~mairson/poems/node3.html
•http://www.cis.tu-graz.ac.at/igi/oaich/animations/Dynamic2.html
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~workshop/

Smith Waterman
•http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/help/sw_alignment.html
•http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/help/sw_details.html
•http://www.stanford.edu/~sntaylor/bioc218/final.htm
•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/sld009.htm
•http://bioweb.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~workshop/Lab_3/Smith-Waterman.htm
•http://www.tigem.it/LOCAL/SW/threshold.html
•http://sgbcd.weizmann.ac.il/genweb/help/smith-waterman.html
•http://cbrg.ethz.ch/ServerBooklet/section2_3_5.html
Needleman & Wunsch
•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/sld003.htm
•http://acer.gen.tcd.ie/~amclysag/nwswat.html
•http://www.nada.kth.se/~erikw/thesis/chapter2_3.html
•http://www.irbm.it/irbm-course95/gb/docs/amps/subsection3_6_1.html
•http://www.ibc.wustl.edu/~zuker/Bio-5495/align-html/node3.html

General (NW vs. SW vs. HMM, etc.)

•http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~lily/pres2/
•http://acer.gen.tcd.ie/~amclysag/nwswat.html
•http://laguerre.psc.edu/biomed/TUTORIALS/SEQUENCE/MULTIPLE/tutorial.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/

Hmms

•http://www.medmicro.mds.qmw.ac.uk/HMMER/main.html
•http://alfredo.wustl.edu/ismb96/abs/p02.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/html_format_papers/hughkrogh96/cabios.html
•http://wwwsyseng.anu.edu.au/~jason/hmmlinks.html
•http://www.breadfan.com/markov.html
•http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey/ch1node34.html
•http://www.ibc.wustl.edu/service/hmmalign/glocal.html
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/html_format_papers/ismb94/node5.html
•http://www.iscs.nus.edu.sg/~luakt/ic3222/lecture/nlp18new/index.htm
•http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html SAM Software for HMMs

Genetic Algorithms

•http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~carroll/ga.html
•http://kal-el.ugr.es/gags.html
•http://kal-el.ugr.es/~jmerelo/GAJS.html
•http://www.genetic-programming.org/
•http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/deb_tut.shtml

Classificier of reads from metagenomic sequencing experiments.

•  Kawulok, J., Deorowicz, S., CoMeta: Classification of Metagenomes Using k-mers, PLOS ONE, 2015; 10(4):1–23,

CoMSA

Compressor of multiple sequence alignments of proteins.

•  Deorowicz, S., Walczyszyn, J., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., CoMSA: compression of protein multiple sequence alignment files, Bioinformatics, 2019; 35(2):22–234,

DSRC

Compressor of sequencing reads.

•  Roguski, L., Deorowicz, S., DSRC 2: Industry-oriented compression of FASTQ files, Bioinformatics, 2014; 30(15):2213–2215,
•  Deorowicz, S., Grabowski, Sz., Compression of DNA sequences in FASTQ format, Bioinformatics, 2011; 27(6):860–862,

FAMSA

Multiple sequence alignment designed for huge families of proteins (even containing hundreds of thousands of sequences).

•  Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., Gudys, A., FAMSA: Fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment of huge protein families, Scientific Reports, 2016; 6(33964):

FaStore

Compressor of FASTQ files.

•  Roguski, L., Ochoa, I., Hernaez, M., Deorowicz, S., FaStore - a space-saving solution for raw sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 2018; 34(16):2748–2756,

FQSqueezer

Experimental high-end compressor of FASTQ files.

•  Deorowicz, S., FQSqueezer: k-mer-based compression of sequencing data, Scientific Reports, 2020; 10(578):

GDC

Compressor of collections of genome sequences.

•  Deorowicz, S., Danek, A., Niemiec, M., GDC 2: Compression of large collections of genomes, Scientific Reports, 2015; 5(11565):1–12,
•  Deorowicz, S., Grabowski, Sz., Robust relative compression of genomes with random access, Bioinformatics, 2011; 27(21):2979–2986,

GTC

Genotype databases compressor with support for fast queries.

•  Danek, A., Deorowicz, S., GTC: how to maintain huge genotype collections in a compressed form, Bioinformatics, 2018; 34(11):1834–1840,

GTShark

Genotypes compressor.

•  Deorowicz, S., Danek, A., GTShark: Genotype compression in large projects, Bioinformatics, 2019; 35(22):4791–4793,

KMC

Memory frugal k-mer counter.

•  Kokot, M., Długosz, M., Deorowicz, S., KMC 3: counting and manipulating k -mer statistics, Bioinformatics, 2017; 33(17):2759–2761,
•  Deorowicz, S., Kokot, M., Grabowski, Sz., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., KMC 2: Fast and resource-frugal k-mer counting, Bioinformatics, 2015; 31(10):1569–1576,
•  Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., Grabowski, Sz., Disk-based k-mer counting on a PC, BMC Bioinformatics, 2013; 14():Article no. 160,

Kmer-db

Tool for estimation of evolutionary distances in a collection of genomes.

•  Deorowicz, S., Gudys, A., Dlugosz, M., Kokot, M., Danek, A., Kmer-db: instant evolutionary distance estimation, Bioinformatics, 2019; 35(1):133–136,

MuGI

Index allowing queries for a collection of multiple genome sequences.

•  Danek, A., Deorowicz, S., Grabowski, Sz., Indexes of Large Genome Collections on a PC, PLOS ONE, 2014; 9(10):e109384,

ORCOM

Experimental compressor of sequencing reads.

•  Grabowski, Sz., Deorowicz, S., Roguski, L., Disk-based compression of data from genome sequencing, Bioinformatics, 2014; 31(9):1389–1395,

PgSA

Index allowing queries for a collection of sequencing reads.

•  Kowalski, T., Grabowski, Sz., Deorowicz, S., Indexing arbitrary-length k-mers in sequencing reads, PLOS ONE, 2015; 10(7):1–16,

QuickProbs

Multiple sequence alignment designed especially for GPU.

•  Gudys, A., Deorowicz, S., QuickProbs 2: towards rapid construction of high-quality alignments of large protein families, Scientific Reports, 2017; 7(41553):
•  Gudys, A., Deorowicz, S., QuickProbs – A Fast Multiple Sequence Alignment Algorithm Designed for Graphics Processors, PLOS ONE, 2014; 9(2):e88901,

RECKONER

Read error corrector.

•  Maciej Długosz, M., Deorowicz, S., RECKONER: read error corrector based on KMC, Bioinformatics, 2017; 33(7):1086–1089,

TGC

Compressor of collections of genomes given in Variant Call Format (VCF) files.

•  Deorowicz, S., Danek, A., Grabowski, Sz., Genome compression: a novel approach for large collections, Bioinformatics, 2013; 29(20):2572–2578,

VCFShark

Compressor of VCF files.

•  Deorowicz, S., Danek, A., GTShark: Genotype compression in large projects, biorxiv.org, 2020; ():

Whisper

Experimental mapper of whole genome sequencing data.

•  Deorowicz, S., Gudys, A., Whisper 2: indel-sensitive short read mapping, bioRxiv.org, 2019; :
•  Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., Gudys, A., Grabowski, Sz., Whisper: read sorting allows robust robust mapping of DNA sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 2019; 35(12):2043–2050,
•  Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A., Gudys, A., Grabowski, Sz., Robust mapping of whole genome sequencing data, Poster at The Biology of Genomes Conference, 2017;

This course is organized with support from the IAP “Belgian Medical Genomics Initiative”, SymBioSys and the Genomics Core.

For inquiries, please email Ms Narcisse Opdekamp ( narcisse.opdekamp@uzleuven.be ).

More at >> http://gc.uzleuven.be/

Genomics in India
www.ganitlabs.in
www.sandor.co.in
www.igib.res.in
www.genotypic.co.in
www.ocimumbio.com
www.abcgenomics.com
www.xcelrisgenomics.com
www.ayugen.com
www.geneombiotech.com

Blog : http://blogs.plos.org/biologue/2012/12/28/translational-bioinformatics-plos-computational-biology-presents-an-educational-resource-for-an-emerging-field/

Educational Material : http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browseIssue.action?issue=info:doi/10.1371/issue.pcol.v03.i11

Address of the bookmark: http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browseIssue.action?issue=info:doi/10.1371/issue.pcol.v03.i11

Main mission:

Develop and implement strategies for whole-genome sequencing of non-model
species
Generate high-quality de novo genome assemblies using short- and long-read
sequencing technologies
Perform genome annotation and structural/functional characterization
Conduct comparative genomic analyses across related species or populations
Design and implement genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify
loci associated with phenotypic or adaptive traits
Integrate genomic, phenotypic, and environmental datasets
Contribute to the development of reproducible bioinformatics pipelines

Activités (Activities):

Lead the genomic component of the research project
High-molecular-weight DNA extraction optimization
Long-read genome assembly (PacBio HiFi / ONT)
Genome polishing and quality assessment (BUSCO, QUAST)
Structural and functional annotation
Variant discovery (SNPs, indels, SVs)
Population genomic analyses (FST, demographic inference)
Mixed-model GWAS accounting for structure
Workflow development (Snakemake/Nextflow)
HPC-based pipeline implementation
Publish results in peer-reviewed journals
Present findings at international conferences
Collaborate with experimental and computational team members
Contribute to project development
Mentor graduate students when appropriate

More at https://evol.mcmaster.ca/brian/evoldir/PostDocs//MontpellierU.ComparativeGenomics