GA4GH core funders and sponsors enable our work and allow us to convene the international genomic data sharing community.

https://www.ga4gh.org/

Address of the bookmark: https://www.ga4gh.org/

In addition to the knowledge of the human genome, all these genomes, widely sampled across mammals, can be used to research how particular organisms respond to different conditions. Some otters, for example, have a thick, water-resistant shell, and some rodents, but not all, have adapted to hibernation. These animal traits will help us to understand human traits, such as metabolic diseases.

With climate change and more animal ecosystems being threatened by human activity, the protection of endangered species is becoming increasingly important. Scientists have historically researched several people in various populations of a species to understand the genetic variation that occurs in that species. This is important for understanding how particular species can be protected. In this study, animals on the Red List of Endangered Species of the International Union for Conservation of Nature had fewer differences in their genomes, which is consistent with their endangered status.

Ref @ A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2876-6

 Data at http://zoonomiaproject.org/

Scientist C - Non-Medical (IT Expert- Computer Professional/Genomics/Bioinformatic)No. of posts: 01 (UR)

Salary (Fixed): Rs.51,000/- + HRA

Essential Qualification: Candidate should possess 1st class master degree in relevant subjects from a recognized university with 4 years experience
OR
2nd class M.Sc + Ph.D degree in relevant subjects from a recognized university with 4 years experience.Desirable Qualification: Candidates should possess a PhD degree in any field of science.
Preference will be given to those who have published scientific papers in international journals and who have a track record of working in infectious diseases.

The candidate must know the following for further consideration: (a) data processing and analysis using statistical softwares, (d) programming, (e) presentation of complex data from excel files and related skills.
Understanding of GIS and malaria will be an advantage. Experience and interest in functional genomics and genomic sequencing will be important.

Age Limit: 40 YearsDuration: 30.09.2021

More at http://onlineapply.nimr.org.in/

https://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/cacereslab/

More at https://www.igib.res.in/bdmg/ScientistRecruitmentAdvt2023.pdf

Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?

Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:

• Sequencing depth: Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.

• Gene length: Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.

• Bias reduction: Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.

TPM (Transcripts Per Million)

TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:

Key Features:

1. Proportionality: TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.

2. Intuitive interpretation: TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.

3. Preferred for comparisons: TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.

FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)

FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:

Key Features:

1. Historical significance: FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.

2. Single-end vs. paired-end: In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).

3. Limited utility: FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.

CPM (Counts Per Million)

CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:

Key Features:

1. Simplicity: CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.

2. Application: Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.

3. Gene length agnostic: CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.

When to Use Each Method

• TPM: Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.

• FPKM: Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.

• CPM: Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.

Conclusion

Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM’s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.

References:

1. Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics.

2. Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology.

3. Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology.

More at https://leylab.com/

http://www.i-programmer.info/news/181-algorithms/4537-a-new-dna-sequence-search-compressive-genomics.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_of_Genomic_Re-Sequencing_Data

http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n7/full/nbt.2241.html

http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/29/13/i283.full

http://groups.csail.mit.edu/cb/cast/

Address of the bookmark: http://gtpb.igc.gulbenkian.pt/bicourses/index.html

genomic scale studies
endogenous mechanisms of mutations, germ line and somatic
computational aspects of immunology in cancer
signalling networks
three-dimensional organization of information in the nucleus
gene silencing
metastatic cross-talk
kinase signaling
personalized medicine
detection of biomarkers in cancer
historical DNA variation

From : http://www.ous-research.no/hovig/

Group address:
Eivind Hovig, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo,Norway
Email: ehovig@radium.uio.no