<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/29601?offset=1370</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/29601?offset=1370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/9602/msc-or-mscphd-combined-or-phd-positions-in-hanyank-university-seoul-korea</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:20:30 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[MSc, or MSc/PhD (combined) or PhD positions in HanYank University Seoul Korea]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>MSc, or MSc/PhD (combined) or PhD positions available for HYU September 2014 intake with full scholarship:</p>

<p>http://www.academia.edu/6564970/MSc_PhD_position_announcement_at_our_Graduate_School</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/10749/memories-can-be-passed-down-through-dna</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 21:24:10 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/10749/memories-can-be-passed-down-through-dna</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Memories Can Be Passed Down Through DNA]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<iframe width="" height="" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/tbPwzII_g6o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>The premise of Assassin's Creed is the reliving of other people's memories stored inside DNA. Well scientists have found that in mice, it actually happens! Anthony is joined by special guest and our friend Tara Long from Hard Science to explain how this process works, and if it might apply to humans as well.

Read More: 
Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations
http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nn.3594.html
"Using olfactory molecular specificity, we examined the inheritance of parental traumatic exposure, a phenomenon that has been frequently observed, but not understood."

What Is Epigenetics?
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6004/611
"The cells in a multicellular organism have nominally identical DNA sequences (and therefore the same genetic instruction sets), yet maintain different terminal phenotypes. This nongenetic cellular memory, which records developmental and environmental cues (and alternative cell states in unicellular organisms), is the basis of epi-(above)-genetics."

Epigenetics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics

Watch More:
How to Change Your Genes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5DU9lgbsSE
TestTube Wild Card
http://testtube.com/dnews/dnews-231-how-too-many-screens-affect-our-brain?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=DNews&utm_campaign=DNWC
Is Sexiness Hereditary?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6STRCncvM8
____________________

DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. 

Watch More DNews on TestTube http://testtube.com/dnews

Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel

DNews on Twitter http://twitter.com/dnews

Anthony Carboni on Twitter http://twitter.com/acarboni

Laci Green on Twitter http://twitter.com/gogreen18

Trace Dominguez on Twitter http://twitter.com/trace501

DNews on Facebook http://facebook.com/dnews

DNews on Google+ http://gplus.to/dnews

Discovery News http://discoverynews.com]]></description>
	
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43681/a-guide-to-machine-learning-for-biologists</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 01:43:25 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43681/a-guide-to-machine-learning-for-biologists</link>
	<title><![CDATA[A guide to machine learning for biologists]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Because of the increasing size and inherent complexity of biological data, there has been an increase in the application of machine learning in biology to create useful and predictive models of the underlying biological processes. All machine learning techniques fit models to data; nevertheless, the specific methods are highly variable and can appear baffling at first glance. In this Review, we hope to give readers a moderate introduction to a few fundamental machine learning techniques, including the most recently created and frequently used deep neural network techniques. We illustrate how different algorithms may be adapted to specific types of biological data, as well as some best practises and points to consider when embarking on machine learning studies. There is also discussion of several upcoming directions in machine learning methodology.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-021-00407-0" rel="nofollow">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-021-00407-0</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34485/phyloxml-xml-for-evolutionary-biology-and-comparative-genomics</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:04:48 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34485/phyloxml-xml-for-evolutionary-biology-and-comparative-genomics</link>
	<title><![CDATA[phyloXML:  XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/356/">phyloXML</a><span>&nbsp;(</span><a href="http://www.phyloxml.org/examples_syntax/phyloxml_syntax_example_1.html">example</a><span>) is an&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML">XML</a><span>&nbsp;language designed to describe phylogenetic trees (or networks) and associated data. PhyloXML provides elements for commonly used features, such as taxonomic information, gene names and identifiers, branch lengths, support values, and gene duplication and speciation events. Using these standardized elements allows interoperability between various applications and databases. Furthermore, both due to extensible nature of XML itself and the provision of &lt;property&gt; elements by phyloXML, extensibility as well as domain specific applications are ensured. The structure of phyloXML is described by&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Schema_%28W3C%29">XML Schema Definition (XSD)</a><span>&nbsp;language.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.phyloxml.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.phyloxml.org/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/12943/a-history-of-bioinformatics-in-the-year-2039</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:37:51 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/12943/a-history-of-bioinformatics-in-the-year-2039</link>
	<title><![CDATA[A History of Bioinformatics (in the Year 2039)]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<iframe width="" height="" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/uwsjwMO-TEA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>C. Titus Brown http://video.open-bio.org/video/1/a-history-of-bioinformatics-in-the-year-2039</p>]]></description>
	
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40832/biocoder-newsletter-of-that-revolution-it%E2%80%99s-about-biology-as-it-moves-from-research-labs-into-startup-incubators-hacker-spaces-and-even-homes</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 07:43:52 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40832/biocoder-newsletter-of-that-revolution-it%E2%80%99s-about-biology-as-it-moves-from-research-labs-into-startup-incubators-hacker-spaces-and-even-homes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BioCoder : newsletter of that revolution. It’s about biology as it moves from research labs into startup incubators, hacker spaces, and even homes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div>
<h3>BioCoder features:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Novel therapeutic discovery strategies</li>
<li>Hardware such as low-cost lab equipment or diagnostics</li>
<li>Open or low&shy;-cost bioinformatics tools</li>
<li>Engineered organisms for the production of small molecules, biologics, or other products</li>
<li>Research projects at a community labspace or projects for science education or public engagement</li>
<li>Hardware or software for lab automation</li>
<li>Citizen science or DIY research projects</li>
<li>Science policy</li>
<li>Tools to increase reproducibility in research, or anything related</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.oreilly.com/biocoder/" rel="nofollow">https://www.oreilly.com/biocoder/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11144/scientists-map-17294-proteins-produced-in-human-body</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 01:57:55 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11144/scientists-map-17294-proteins-produced-in-human-body</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Scientists map 17,294 proteins produced in human body]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Indian scientists missed the genomic profiling bus, but they've more than made up for it by creating the first human proteome map which is an extension of the genomic study. Till now, here is no direct equivalent for the human proteome. But recently two groups present mass spectrometry-based analysis of human tissues, body fluids and cells mapping the large majority of the human proteome.</p><p>The Indian scientists working in Bangalore, along with their American counterparts, have mapped more than 17,000 proteins in 30 organs of the human body. Just like the human genome was sequenced around the turn of the millennium, this is an equivalent mapping of the human proteome.<br /><br />The researcher estimated there are around 20,500 proteins in the human body. These scientists have profiled around 17,294, which account for around 84% of the total proteins. Apart from this, the team also traced around 2,500 of 3,000 proteins that had been categorised as "missing proteins".</p><p>The work, done by group of Indian scientists, and Johns Hopkins University, published in the renowned journal Nature ( http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7502/full/nature13302.html ). Of the 72 people who worked on the project, 46 are Indians.</p><p>Reference:</p><p>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7502/full/nature13302.html</p><p>http://www.proteinatlas.org/ -The antibody-based Human Protein Atlas programme</p><p>http://www.humanproteomemap.org/ -Proteogenomic analysis by identifying translated proteins from annotated pseudogenes, non-coding RNAs and untranslated regions.</p><p>https://www.proteomicsdb.org/ -Assembled protein evidence for 18,097 genes in ProteomicsDB</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43898/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology-for-a-literature-club</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:29:08 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43898/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology-for-a-literature-club</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology, for a literature club]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Shruti Paniwala</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Must read paper and books in evolution biology !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/11354/genomics-and-personalized-medicine</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 23:38:42 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/11354/genomics-and-personalized-medicine</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genomics and Personalized Medicine]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<iframe width="" height="" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/pgHAXCMMcro" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>(October 20, 2009) Michael Snyder, Professor of Genetics and Chair of the Department of Genetics at Stanford, discusses advances in gene sequencing, the impact of genomics on medicine, the potential for personalized medicine. and efforts at Stanford to further study these issues.

Stanford Mini Med School is a series arranged and directed by Stanford's School of Medicine, and presented by the Stanford Continuing Studies program. Featuring more than thirty distinguished, faculty, scientists and physicians from Stanford's medical school, the series offers students a dynamic introduction to the world of human biology, health and disease, and the groundbreaking changes taking place in medical research and health care.

Stanford University
http://www.stanford.edu

Stanford University School of Medicine
http://med.stanford.edu

Stanford Continuing Studies
http://continuingstudies.stanford.edu

Stanford University Channel on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/stanford]]></description>
	
</item>

</channel>
</rss>