Address of the bookmark: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GeneBreak.html

• hist: Create an histogram of k-mer occurrences from a sequence file. Adds metadata in output for easy plotting.
• gcp: K-mer GC Processor. Creates a matrix of the number of K-mers found given a GC count and a K-mer count.
• comp: K-mer comparison tool. Creates a matrix of shared K-mers between two (or three) sequence files or hashes.
• sect: SEquence Coverage estimator Tool. Estimates the coverage of each sequence in a file using K-mers from another sequence file.
• blob: Given, reads and an assembly, calculates both the read and assembly K-mer coverage along with GC% for each sequence in the assembly.SEquence Coverage estimator Tool.
• filter: Filtering tools. Contains tools for filtering k-mer hashes and FastQ/A files:
  • kmer: Produces a k-mer hash containing only k-mers within specified coverage and GC tolerances.
  • seq: Filters a sequence file based on whether or not the sequences contain k-mers within a provided hash.
• plot: Plotting tools. Contains several plotting tools to visualise K-mer and compare distributions. The following plot tools are available:
  • density: Creates a density plot from a matrix created with the "comp" tool. Typically this is used to compare two K-mer hashes produced by different NGS reads.
  • profile: Creates a K-mer coverage plot for a single sequence. Takes in fasta coverage output coverage from the "sect" tool
  • spectra-cn: Creates a stacked histogram using a matrix created with the "comp" tool. Typically this is used to compare a jellyfish hash produced from a read set to a jellyfish hash produced from an assembly. The plot shows the amount of distinct K-mers absent, as well as the copy number variation present within the assembly.
  • spectra-hist: Creates a K-mer spectra plot for a set of K-mer histograms produced either by jellyfish-histo or kat-histo.
  • spectra-mx: Creates a K-mer spectra plot for a set of K-mer histograms that are derived from selected rows or columns in a matrix produced by the "comp".

In addition, KAT contains a python script for analysing the mathematical distributions present in the K-mer spectra in order to determine how much content is present in each peak.

This README only contains some brief details of how to install and use KAT. For more extensive documentation please visit: https://kat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/

https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/33/4/574/2664339 

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/TGAC/KAT

Run Maq Now

Follow these steps to try Maq. All you need is a reference sequence file in the FASTA format.

1. Prepare a reference sequence (ref.fasta). Better a bacterial genome.
2. Download maq, maq-data and maqview at the download page.
3. Copy maq, maq.pl and maq_eval.pl to the $PATH or to the same directory.
4. Simulate diploid reference and read sequences, map reads, call variants and evaluate the results in one go:

   maq.pl demo ref.fasta calib-30.dat
   

   where calib-30.dat is contained in maq-data.
5. View the alignment:

   cd maqdemo/easyrun;
   maqindex -i -c consensus.cns all.map;
   maqview -c consensus.cns all.map

Even for advanced maq users, running `maq.pl demo' is recommended. You may find something helpful.

Address of the bookmark: http://maq.sourceforge.net

Structural variants (SVs) such as deletions, insertions, duplications, inversions and translocations litter genomes and are often associated with gene expression changes and severe phenotypes (ie. genetic diseases in humans). Recent studies on the functional aspects of different types of SVs have unveiled several cases of adaptive evolution. For example, inversions have been associated with ecological adaptations and may facilitate speciation. Due to their prevalent nature, SVs arguably have a large impact on genome evolution and should not be neglected when studying the genetics of adaptation and speciation. SVs were classically defined as chromosomal rearrangements larger than 1kb, but due to a higher resolution of new detection methods, smaller variants (between 50 and 1000 base pairs) can now be accurately assessed. Besides various methods of detection in next generation sequencing data (paired end mapping, split reads, and depth of coverage), array-based approaches have proven to be particularly useful for detecting copy number variations (CNVs). These technologies have enabled researchers to catalog a wide spectrum of SVs in many organisms and infer the effects of selection shaping their evolutionary trajectories.

Structure variation sequencing signature (Source: NatRev Genetics)

Related tools, databases and publications are listed below. If you know any interesing papers, please let us know in comment section:

Key concepts

Structural variation includes balanced variants such as inversions and translocations, and unbalanced ones such as duplications and deletions (copy number variations or CNVs).

Structural variants can arise by several mechanisms, including nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR), nonhomologous end‐joining (NHEJ) and DNA replication‐based fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS).

CNV is closely linked to segmental duplication, but is not exactly the same. Segmental duplications can stimulate CNV formation by NAHR, and themselves arise from CNVs that have become fixed.

Segmental duplications did not appear uniformly during the evolution of the Great Ape species, but rather during a burst of activity around the time of the divergence of gorilla from the human/chimpanzee ancestor.

Duplicated genes play a critical role in the evolution of a genome as they act as ‘spare parts’ than can evolve to perform new or more specialized functions.

Effects of structural variation on gene expression can be identified but only a few examples of the consequences for species biology have been documented.

Tools

CNVnatora tool for CNV discovery and genotyping from depth of read mapping.2011a,2011b

AGEa tools that implements an algorithm for optimal alignment of sequences with SVs.2011

BreakSeqa pipeline for annotation, classification and analysis of SVs at single nucleotide resolution.2010

PEMera computational and simulation framework for discovering SVs by paired-end read mapping.2009,2007

GASV https://code.google.com/archive/p/gasv/

PAIROSCOPE http://pairoscope.sourceforge.net/

SVDetect http://svdetect.sourceforge.net/Site/Home.html

BreakPtr, discovery of unbalanced structural variants (copy-number variants) with tiling microarrays Link 

R Package https://www.bioconductor.org/help/course-materials/2010/EMBL2010/Practical-4-StructuralVariants.pdf

BreakSeq, structural variant genotyping using split reads Link 

CopySeq, genotyping of unbalanced structural variants (copy-number variants) using read-depth Link 

DELLY2, integrated structural variant discovery, genotyping and visualization in deep sequencing data Link 

PEMer, structural variant discovery in 454 sequencing data by paired-end mapping Link 

TIGER, transduction inference in germline genomes using short read data Link 

MANTA https://github.com/Illumina/manta

SV-Bay https://github.com/InstitutCurie/SV-Bay

BreakDancer http://breakdancer.sourceforge.net/

Variation Hunter http://compbio.cs.sfu.ca/software-variation-hunter

Lumpy https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv

ForestSV http://sebatlab.ucsd.edu/index.php/software-data 

PBSuites for long reads https://sourceforge.net/projects/pb-jelly/

Visualization

The SV visualization tool: http://genomesavant.com/savant/

InGAP-SV (http://ingap.sourceforge.net/) that is nice tools for both detection and visualisation of severals kind of structural variations (Large insertions, translocation, deletion, inversions....) 

Tools table: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n8/fig_tab/nbt.1904_T2.html

Variation Viewer https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/view/

Papers

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v9/n2/full/nmeth.1858.html

http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1412/structural-variations-in-genomes-ecological-and-evolutionary-implications

http://www.mi.fu-berlin.de/wiki/pub/ABI/GenomicsLecture10Materials/structural-variation.pdf

http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-015-1479-3

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/content/overview/

http://www.nature.com/subjects/structural-variation

https://eichlerlab.gs.washington.edu/news/NatMeth_Feb2012.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19477992 ***

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22452995

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/09/06/073833

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479793/

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep18501

http://www.genetics.org/content/202/1/351

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sssykim/teaching/s13/slides/Lecture_SVI.pdf

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/structural-variation-detection-from-next-generation-sequencing-2469-9853-S1-007.php?aid=69055

http://schatzlab.cshl.edu/presentations/2016/2016.01.12.PAG.Structural%20Variations.pdf

• paired-end (PE) and/or mate-pair libraries (NGS-based mode)
• long reads (NGS-based mode)
• synteny to the genome of some related species (reference-based mode)

Scaffolding 

In reference-based mode, pyScaf uses synteny to the genome of closely related species in order to order contigs and estimate distances between adjacent contigs.

Contigs are aligned globally (end-to-end) onto reference chromosomes, ignoring:

• matches not satisfying cut-offs (--identity and --overlap)
• suboptimal matches (only best match of each query to reference is kept)
• and removing overlapping matches on reference.

In preliminary tests, pyScaf performed superbly on simulated heterozygous genomes based on C. parapsilosis (13 Mb; CANPA) and A. thaliana (119 Mb; ARATH) chromosomes, reconstructing correctly all chromosomes always for CANPA and nearly always for ARATH (Figures in dropbox, CANPA table, ARATH table).
Runs took ~0.5 min for CANPA on 4 CPUs and ~2 min for ARATH on 16 CPUs.

Important remarks:

• Reduce your assembly before (fasta2homozygous.py) as any redundancy will likely break the synteny.
• pyScaf works better with contigs than scaffolds, as scaffolds are often affected by mis-assemblies (no de novo assembler / scaffolder is perfect...), which breaks synteny.
• pyScaf works very well if divergence between reference genome and assembled contigs is below 20% at nucleotide level.
• pyScaf deals with large rearrangements ie. deletions, insertion, inversions, translocations. Note however, this is experimental implementation!
• Consider closing gaps after scaffolding.

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/lpryszcz/pyScaf

Address of the bookmark: http://www.mgc.ac.cn/GenomeComp/

Know of any other open source software for PacBio data? Email us.

Software categories:

• De novo assembly
• Structural Variations Detection
• Reference-based alignment
• Consensus and variant calling
• RNA analysis
• Epigenetic base modifications and methylation
• Barcoding
• Genome Browsers
• Run QC
• Frameworks and APIs

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/DevNet/wiki/Compatible-Software

https://sourceforge.net/projects/genobuntu/

Address of the bookmark: https://sourceforge.net/projects/genobuntu/

1. How to perform basic quality checks on the input data
2. How to run a short read assembler on Illumina data
3. How to run a long read assembler on Pacific Biosciences or Oxford Nanopore data
4. How to improve the accuracy of a long read assembly using short reads
5. How to assess the quality of an assembly

https://bioinformaticsdotca.github.io/high-throughput_biology_2017

Address of the bookmark: https://bioinformaticsdotca.github.io/high-throughput_biology_2017_module6_lab

The most used mappers of DNA-seq data are BWA and Bowtie for DNA-Seq data and Tophat, STAR or HISAT for RNA-Seq data. Mappers differ in which options they can take in, how fast and how accurate they are. Bowtie is faster than BWA, but looses some sensitivity (does not map an equal amount of reads to the correct position in the genome).

Address of the bookmark: http://wiki.bits.vib.be/index.php/Mapping_of_NGS_data