BOL: Related items

GIPSy2 Detect Hidden Islands Inside Bacteria

BioStar — Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:15:58 -0500

Imagine a tiny bacterium living in a crowded environment.

It looks simple, but inside its microscopic body is a huge library of DNA. Most of this DNA has been passed down from its parents. But sometimes, bacteria can pick up new pieces of DNA from other bacteria.

These new pieces can give them useful abilities — such as surviving antibiotics, causing disease, or adapting to a new environment.

Scientists call some of these special DNA regions genomic islands.

But there is a problem: How do we find these hidden islands?

That is where GIPSy2 comes in.

Researchers developed GIPSy2, a computer tool that acts like a detective. It scans bacterial DNA and looks for unusual patterns that might show where a genomic island is hiding.

Instead of looking at just one clue, GIPSy2 uses several methods to investigate the DNA. It can also study many bacterial genomes, making it useful when researchers have large amounts of genetic data.

In their study, the researchers tested GIPSy2 on different bacteria. The tool was able to identify genomic regions connected with important features such as antibiotic resistance, disease-causing abilities, metabolism, and relationships with other organisms.

Think of it like searching for hidden islands on a huge map. The DNA is the ocean, and genomic islands are the small pieces of land that may contain valuable information.

GIPSy2 does not give scientists the final answer by itself. Its predictions still need to be carefully checked and, when possible, confirmed through experiments.

But it gives researchers a faster way to explore bacterial genomes and discover clues about how bacteria change and survive.

And that is why this small piece of software could help scientists better understand the invisible world of bacteria — one hidden genomic island at a time.

GIPSy2 is currently available on Zenodo repository at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10222587

Gupta Lab

Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:18:31 -0600

Work include (i) understanding the evolutionary relationships among different prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms; (ii) Understanding the cellular functions of these lineage-specific signature proteins as well as lineage-specific conserved inserts and deletions in important housekeeping proteins by genetic and biochemical studies; (iii) Development of novel diagnostic methods (PCR based and immunological) for identification of different groups of organisms based upon these signature proteins and conserved indels; (iv) The use of these lineage-specific probes with predicitive ability to identify/explore the presence of different groups of organisms in metagenomic sequences from various environments.

https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/gupta-lab/index.html

Comparative genomics of gene expression lab

Wed, 09 Sep 2026 03:35:46 -0500

The core expertise of the lab is comparative genomics. We combine evolutionary bioinformatics and molecular biology to understand the mechanism, function and evolution of genes.
We study the processes of gene expression and protein synthesis, and we are particularly interested in the phenomenon of translational recoding (programmed exceptions to the genetic code). For more information, see Research.

More at https://www.mariottigenomicslab.com/

Genomic Impact

Jitendra Narayan — Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:33:50 -0500

The ongoing genomic research in USA contributed $31 billion to the U.S. gross national product and helped support 152,000 jobs.

Reference: http://www.unitedformedicalresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/The-Impact-of-Genomics-on-the-US-Economy.pdf

When NGS gives you more data than you ever asked for!

BioStar — Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:16:43 -0500

Five unique traits of effective computational biologist

Jitendra Narayan — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:12:51 -0500

Bioinformatics research is driven by large set of software, scripts, and tools to analyse gigantic biological data. Being a great biological programmer or bioinformatician involves more than writing code that works. The biological programmers who rise to the top ranks of their profession are not only good programmer but also expert in biological stuff. Moreover, In order to be a good and effective biological programmer, you need to possess a combination of traits that allow your computational as well as biological skill, experience, and knowledge to produce working code. There are some technically skilled biological programmers who will never be effective because they lack the other important traits needed. Here are top five traits that are necessary to become a great biological programmer.

1. Learn and get updated

Some of the bad biological programmers only learn new technical or non-technical things when it’s absolutely necessary. The good biological programmers learn new technical skills proactively. But great biological programmers not only learn new technical skills on their own but also learn non-technical skills, and have an open mind to sources of knowledge that others may shut out.

In other concrete term, the bad biological programmer learn Perl's regular expression when they started a project on comparative genomics; the good biological programmer learned it a year before because it looked interesting; and the great biological programmer also read about the BioPerl packages, genomics, DNA string, genomic theories, or some similar course of study so that they could understand the results and explain it biologically.

2. Not a merely coder!!!

I often encountered with biological programmer who call themself a hard-core computer programmer and avoid biology. I can almost guarantee that if you are one of them then you are not doing research but merely writing "dry" codes.

According to my supervisor most of the computational biologist, don't know what they are doing biologically. Even they struggle to explain their own programs output and results. Therefore, It is highly advisable to learn basic of biology which can assist you to explain the result and understand your discovery. Always remember you are a researcher not a coder.

3. Be Social with biologist

The computational biologist spends most of the time in from of computers, writing codes. They always think their job is to produce working codes, not technical research perfections. But, they are completely wrong. You should not forget that apart from your computational skills you also need some biologist, other than your supervisor, to explain and make you understand the complex biological mechanism.

I highly recommend your to interact with biotech researchers and learn how do they explain their one graph (which they generally produce after one year of work) biologically. Remember, the origin of your research project is complex biological phenomenon, which is more complex than that of your limited programming rules.

4. Do not search, research for answers

Researching for answers means more than typing several keywords into a search engine or posting a question at Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums. I have entered problems into search engines that generate no results, and every question I posted on Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums never got anything resembling an answer, yet I solved the issues and moved on. I’m not a magician — I just know how to find answers or discover root causes.

Many problems are situational, and if you depend on search engines and forums, you can waste a lot of time going down a rabbit hole and possibly never getting a solution. Learn to perform root cause analysis, learn enough about the underlying system to look for other clues and solutions, and learn to take a long distance view of an issue before deep diving into it.

5. Love and defend your research

You cannot rise to the top in this research profession without loving your work. There are some very good “it’s just a job” biological programmers (I’ve been one at times), but if that is your outlook, you won’t be willing to do whatever it takes to succeed. This idea gets a lot of folks in a huff, because they feel it is a personal insult. “I’m a good programmer, but I have other priorities and can’t make work my life.” I understand completely; I have other priorities too. As much as I hate to say it, when I am passionate about my work, I am willing (though not eager) to abandon my other priorities to finish the job. It is not an insult to say that if you aren’t willing to pull out all the stops you can’t be the best, it is a fact.

You must be passionate about more than programming — you must also be excited about your research, the tools and technology you are using, and so on. I have seen very good and even great biological programmers operating at mediocre levels because something was not a good fit, such as they hated the project or were using a technology they disliked. Therefore, like your research project and get excited about your discoveries. You have not only to discover but also defend your finding with scientific words.

Thanks to all of you for reading.

Great Place to Study Bioinformatics in Europe

Rahul Agarwal — Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:41:34 -0500

Study bioinformatics is like being jack of all trade so it is important you choose where it will be good backup of computer science, and natural science infrastructure and faculty. Especially having a good teachers in computer science is indispensible.

Few places in Europe where good (and @some places no tution fees) master bioinformatics courses and recommended are:

KU Leuven, Belgium

http://onderwijsaanbod.kuleuven.be/opleidingen/e/CQ_50269018.htm

ETH, Zurich

http://www.cbb.ethz.ch/

University of Copenhagen, Denmark

http://studies.ku.dk/masters/bioinformatics/

University of Helsinki, Finland

http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/en/mbi/

Stockholm University, Sweden

http://www.sbc.su.se/masters/

Universities in Netherlands