<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/33011?offset=20</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/33011?offset=20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36865/perga-a-paired-end-read-guided-de-novo-assembler-for-extending-contigs-using-svm-and-look-ahead-approach</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 09:57:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36865/perga-a-paired-end-read-guided-de-novo-assembler-for-extending-contigs-using-svm-and-look-ahead-approach</link>
	<title><![CDATA[PERGA: A Paired-End Read Guided De Novo Assembler for Extending Contigs Using SVM and Look Ahead Approach]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[PERGA - Paired End Reads Guided Assembler

PERGA is a novel sequence reads guided de novo assembly approach which adopts greedy-like prediction strategy for assembling reads to contigs and scaffolds. Instead of using single-end reads to construct contig, PERGA uses paired-end reads and different read overlap sizes from O ≥ Omax to Omin to resolve the gaps and branches. Moreover, by constructing a decision model using machine learning approach based on branch features, PERGA can determine the correct extension in 99.7% of cases. PERGA will try to extend the contigs by all feasible nucleotides and determine if these multiple extensions due to sequencing errors or repeats by using looking ahead technology, and it also try to separate the different repeats of nearby genomic regions to make the assembly result more longer and accurate.

The simulated E.coli paired-end reads data are generated using GemSim (KE McElroy, F Luciani, T Thomas. Gemsim: General, Error-Model Based Simulator of Next-Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:74), with coverage 50x, 60x, 100x, read lengths 100-bp, and can be downloaded from https://github.com/zhuxiao/data_PERGA.<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/hitbio/PERGA" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/hitbio/PERGA</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43048/coverm-read-coverage-calculator-for-metagenomics</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:39:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43048/coverm-read-coverage-calculator-for-metagenomics</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CoverM: Read coverage calculator for metagenomics]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>CoverM aims to be a configurable, easy to use and fast DNA read coverage and relative abundance calculator focused on metagenomics applications.</p>
<p>CoverM calculates coverage of genomes/MAGs&nbsp;<code>coverm genome</code>&nbsp;(<a href="https://wwood.github.io/CoverM/coverm-genome.html">help</a>) or individual contigs&nbsp;<code>coverm contig</code>&nbsp;(<a href="https://wwood.github.io/CoverM/coverm-contig.html">help</a>). Calculating coverage by read mapping, its input can either be BAM files sorted by reference, or raw reads and reference genomes in various formats.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/wwood/CoverM" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/wwood/CoverM</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36884/halc-high-throughput-algorithm-for-long-read-error-correction</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:47:41 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36884/halc-high-throughput-algorithm-for-long-read-error-correction</link>
	<title><![CDATA[HALC: High throughput algorithm for long read error correction]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[HALC, a high throughput algorithm for long read error correction. HALC aligns the long reads to short read contigs from the same species with a relatively low identity requirement so that a long read region can be aligned to at least one contig region, including its true genome region’s repeats in the contigs sufficiently similar to it (similar repeat based alignment approach)

HALC was able to obtain 6.7-41.1% higher throughput than the existing algorithms while maintaining comparable accuracy. The HALC corrected long reads can thus result in 11.4-60.7% longer assembled contigs than the existing algorithms.<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lanl001/halc" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lanl001/halc</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:46:47 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ChIPulate: A Python3 framework to simulate read counts in a ChIP-seq experiment]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #202020; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-align: start; background-color: #ffffff; float: none;">ChIP-seq simulation pipeline, ChIPulate, we assess the impact of various biological and experimental sources of variation on several outcomes of a ChIP-seq experiment, viz., the recoverability of the TF binding motif, accuracy of TF-DNA binding detection, the sensitivity of inferred TF-DNA binding strength, and number of replicates needed to confidently infer binding strength.<span> <br></span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Must read paper and books in evolution biology !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4099/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:05:35 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4099/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Sequencing Solutions to World Health]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>New technology that quickly, easily and economically reveals the genomes of viruses and pathogens transforms public health and medicine."</em></p>
<p><strong>Source</strong>: Life technologies</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.lifetechnologies.com/global/en/home/communities-social/blog/blogs/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health.html?cid=social_blogseries_20130829_11098264" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifetechnologies.com/global/en/home/communities-social/blog/blogs/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health.html?cid=social_blogseries_20130829_11098264</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/2726/comparison-of-short-read-de-novo-alignment-algorithms</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:56:01 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/2726/comparison-of-short-read-de-novo-alignment-algorithms</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Short Read De Novo Alignment Algorithms]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article to introduce different sequencing methods along with tools for de novo assembly of sequencing reads and their relevant references.</p>
<p>Title:&nbsp;<strong>Comparison of Short Read De Novo Alignment Algorithms&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>Author<strong>: Nikhil Gopal</strong></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://biochem218.stanford.edu/Projects%202011/Gopal%202011.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://biochem218.stanford.edu/Projects%202011/Gopal%202011.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4208/latest-paper-on-comparison-of-mapping-tools</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:00:38 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/4208/latest-paper-on-comparison-of-mapping-tools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Latest paper on comparison of mapping tools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A. Hatem, D. Bozdag, A. E. Toland, U. V. Catalyurek "Benchmarking short sequence mapping tools" BMC Bioinformatics, 14(1):184, 2013.</p>
<p>http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/benchmark/</p>
<p><a href="http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/pmap/pmap.html">http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/pmap/pmap.html</a></p>
<p>Other similiar papers:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/cmb.2012.0022">http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/cmb.2012.0022</a></p>
<p><a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/24/3169">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/24/3169</a></p>
<p>Some new Mapping tool links:<a href="http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/benchmark/"></a></p>
<p><strong>GSNAP</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/"></a><a href="http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/">http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/</a></p>
<p><strong>RMAP</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://rulai.cshl.edu/rmap/"></a><a href="http://rulai.cshl.edu/rmap/">http://rulai.cshl.edu/rmap/</a></p>
<p><strong>mrsFAST</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://mrsfast.sourceforge.net/Home"></a><a href="http://mrsfast.sourceforge.net/Home">http://mrsfast.sourceforge.net/Home</a></p>
<p><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/mrsfast/files/mrsfast-ultra-3.1.0/">http://sourceforge.net/projects/mrsfast/files/mrsfast-ultra-3.1.0/</a></p>
<p><strong>BFAST</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/bfast/index.php?title=Main_Page">http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/bfast/index.php?title=Main_Page</a></p>
<p><strong>SHRiMP (for&nbsp;AB SOLiD color-space reads)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/">http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/</a></p>
<p><strong>RazerA 3</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seqan.de/projects/razers/">http://www.seqan.de/projects/razers/</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/184" rel="nofollow">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/184</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/9400/largest-genome-sequenced</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:57:19 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/9400/largest-genome-sequenced</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Largest Genome Sequenced]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The enormous size of the <strong>loblolly pine genome</strong> having <strong>22 billion base pairs</strong> compared to only 3 billion in the human genome. In other words, it is&nbsp;<strong>seven times</strong> larger than a human&rsquo;s and also the largest and the most complete&nbsp;<strong>conifer<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinophyta" target="_blank"></a></strong>&nbsp;genome ever sequenced.</p>
<p><strong>Related Paper:</strong></p>
<p>http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/3/R59/abstract</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10859" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10859</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/10243/new-rna-seq-tool</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:59:04 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/10243/new-rna-seq-tool</link>
	<title><![CDATA[New RNA Seq tool]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>"<span>By removing the time-consuming step of read mapping, the authors reported, Sailfish able to provide quantification estimates 20&ndash;30 times faster than current methods without loss of accuracy."</span></p>
<p><span>Tool link:</span></p>
<p><span>http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/sailfish/</span></p>
<p><span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.genengnews.com/gen-news-highlights/lightweight-algorithms-sail-through-rna-sequencing-data/81249765/" rel="nofollow">http://www.genengnews.com/gen-news-highlights/lightweight-algorithms-sail-through-rna-sequencing-data/81249765/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>