<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/33741?offset=1000</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/33741?offset=1000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/19248/bioinformatics-jrfrasrf-position-at-institute-of-cytology-and-preventive-oncology-icpo</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:16:32 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Bioinformatics JRF/RA/SRF position at Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICPO)]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICPO) I-7, Sector-39, Noida-201301</p>

<p>Candidates having the below mentioned qualifications may appear for walk in interview at ICPO on 2nd December 2014 between 10.00 AM and 12:00 PM under the below time bound projects under Dr. Subhash M. Agarwal, Scientist C. The post is purely temporary and co-terminus with the project.</p>

<p>Research Assistant (One)<br />25650/- consolidated<br />Discovery of EGFR secondary mutant inhibitors using structure based screening approach (ICMR)<br />Duration: 7 months</p>

<p>Essential: M.Sc./ M.Tech in Bioinformatics or any other related subject with good academic record.</p>

<p>Desirable: Experience in scripting and molecular docking.<br />	<br />Below 30 years</p>

<p>Junior Research Fellow (One)</p>

<p>16,000 + 30% HRA = Rs. 20800/-</p>

<p>Identification of novel inhibitors targeting EGFR using an integrated ligand and structure based approach (DBT)</p>

<p>Duration: 9 months</p>

<p>Essential: M.Sc./ M.Tech in Bioinformatics or any other related subject with good academic record. Candidates with CSIR-UGC / ICMR, NET qualification will be preferred</p>

<p>Desirable: Experience in scripting, QSAR and molecular docking.<br />	<br />Below 28 years</p>

<p>Interested eligible candidates may send their applications with Bio-data by email at (smagarwal@gmail.com) or by post addressed to Dr. Subhash M Agarwal, Scientist C, Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICPO) I-7, Sector-39, Noida-201301 so as to reach latest by 1st December, 2014. The candidates may appear for interview at ICPO along with 3 copies of CV, photo and relevant certificates of qualifications in original and reprints of publications at the time of interview. It should be noted that No TA/DA will be paid for the walk in Interview.</p>

<p>Advertisement: www.icpo.org.in/advt-walk-in-interview.docx</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43828/understanding-hifi-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43828/understanding-hifi-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Understanding HiFi Reads !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>While little public data is available for either of the new synthetic long read approaches, Illumina showed an example comparison earlier this year at the&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.festivalofgenomics.com/rami-mehio" target="_blank">Festival of Genomics &amp; Biodata conference</a><span>&nbsp;(FoG 2022). In the IGV screenshot presented (below), synthetic Infinity reads &ndash; labeled &ldquo;Longas&rdquo; &ndash; are at the top, followed by standard Illumina short reads, and PacBio HiFi reads labeled &ldquo;CCS&rdquo; depicted at the bottom:</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://pacb.com/blog/the-hifi-difference-true-long-reads-vs-synthetic-long-reads/" rel="nofollow">http://pacb.com/blog/the-hifi-difference-true-long-reads-vs-synthetic-long-reads/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/19556/genome-origami</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:48:17 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/19556/genome-origami</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genome Origami]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>There are several interesting factoid about our genomes, one of them is their folding. If we stretched out the DNA in a single cell, which is only a few millionths of an inch wide, it would span more than six feet. In other word, the size of six feet DNA fold themself to fit in a few millionths of an inch wide space. These DNA folding is a dynamic process that changes over time (!!). Researchers around the world have been trying to understand how DNA folds itself up so efficiently, and a recent post on the NIH Director&rsquo;s Blog highlights new research illustrating how the human genome folds inside the cell&rsquo;s nucleus, as well as how DNA folding affects gene regulation. The research team created this delightful video that demonstrates the principles involved using origami art.</p><p>http://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/19555/a-3d-map-of-the-human-genome<br /><br />Researchers have been working to determine how cells regulate gene expression for nearly as long as we&rsquo;ve known about DNA. How, for example, do nerve cells know to turn off only nerve cell genes and turn off bone cell genes? DNA folding loops are part of the answer. This research team, which published their findings in a paper in Cell http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674%2814%2901497-4 , found that the number of loops is much lower than expected. There are only 10,000 loops instead of the predicted millions, and they form on/off switches in DNA.<br /><br /></p><p>More at http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-12/ru-3mr121114.php</p><p>Reference http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674%2814%2901497-4</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:14:20 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Variant Everyone Ignored]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider a scenario in which a patient's genome has been sequenced. Among billions of DNA bases, a structural alteration may explain the patient's disease. Multiple advanced algorithms analyze the data, yet only one detects the variant, while the others do not. In standard bioinformatics workflows, such a solitary result is often regarded as unreliable and subsequently discarded. Although the solution exists within the data, prevailing computational protocols may overlook it.</p><p>A recent study published in Genome Biology (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y) addressed this challenge by introducing dicast (https://github.com/burgshrimps/dicast), a machine-learning approach for detecting structural variants in short-read sequencing data. Structural variants, such as large deletions, insertions, duplications, and inversions, can have significant biological and clinical implications, yet they are challenging to identify with short-read technologies. Because different detection methods frequently yield divergent results, researchers commonly employ consensus calling, considering a variant valid only if multiple tools detect it. While this approach reduces false positives, it relies on the potentially flawed assumption that the majority is always correct.</p><p>The researchers explored the impact of evaluating the supporting evidence for each variant, rather than simply tallying the number of algorithms that identified it. To establish a ground truth, they analyzed nine genomes using multiple sequencing technologies and 15 detection methods, initially identifying approximately 35 million potential variants. Through extensive filtering, evidence integration, and manual review of over 11,500 variants, they developed a robust benchmark comprising more than 236,000 structural variants. The findings underscored the complexity of the problem: short-read methods detected fewer than half of deletions and less than 10 percent of insertions, with performance declining markedly in repetitive genomic regions. In contrast, long-read technologies demonstrated superior detection capabilities. However, replacing the substantial volume of existing short-read data in clinical and research settings is not immediately feasible. Consequently, the researchers questioned whether short-read data might harbor more information than conventional analytical pipelines currently extract.</p><p>This line of inquiry led to the development of dicast. Rather than merely confirming agreement among multiple tools, dicast identifies patterns in sequencing data, including split and clipped reads, discordant read pairs, alignment characteristics, and the surrounding genomic context. An XGBoost machine-learning model evaluates which combinations of these signals are indicative of genuine structural variants. Thus, the approach shifts from tallying algorithmic consensus to interpreting the underlying evidence.</p><p>The researchers subsequently conducted a targeted evaluation by examining structural variants detected by only a single short-read tool, which are typically missed by consensus-based approaches. dicast successfully recovered approximately 81% of these single-caller deletions, insertions, and duplications. The signals for these variants were present in the data, but conventional filtering methods failed to integrate them effectively.</p><p>The utility of dicast was further demonstrated in cohorts with rare diseases, including congenital limb malformations, atrial fibrillation, and neuromuscular disorders. In one instance, dicast achieved a deletion recall rate of approximately 0.96, compared to 0.74 using consensus calling. The median number of variants requiring manual review was 29 per sample. Among 31 experimentally validated variants that standard filters would have missed, dicast identified 12, whereas consensus calling detected only one.</p><p>Overall, dicast identified approximately 20 percent more potential disease-causing deletions than consensus-based methods. While a 20 percent increase may appear modest, in clinical genomics such improvements can have significant practical implications. Missing a deletion may leave a case unresolved, whereas detecting a structural variant can provide critical diagnostic insights.</p><p>The study does not claim that machine learning has rendered short-read sequencing superior to long-read approaches. Instead, the results underscore the effectiveness of long-read sequencing for structural variant detection. However, dicast highlights a more nuanced perspective: substantial biological information may still be recoverable from the extensive short-read datasets already available.</p><p>The principal lesson extends beyond the detection of structural variants. For many years, bioinformatics pipelines have relied on threshold-based criteria, such as minimum coverage, quality scores, or support from multiple tools. While these rules are useful, biological phenomena do not always conform to rigid checklists; multiple weak signals, when considered collectively, can provide compelling evidence.</p><p>This perspective prompts consideration of the solitary variant: one algorithm identifies it, while several others do not. Traditional consensus techniques might have dismissed it, yet machine learning approaches evaluate the available evidence to determine whether the variant is plausible.</p><p>Occasionally, the most significant variant within a genome is the one that is almost universally overlooked.</p><p>Read more at&nbsp;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/19545/walk-%E2%80%93-in-%E2%80%93-interview-agricultural-knowledge-management-unit-indian-agricultural-research-institute-new-delhi-110012</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:33:02 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[WALK – IN – INTERVIEW @ Agricultural Knowledge Management Unit Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Walk-in-interview for the following temporary positions will be conducted on 20th December 2014 (between 10:00 AM to 01:00 PM) at Agricultural Knowledge Management Unit, A0 block (Ground Floor), LBS Building, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012:</p>

<p>1 Dr. A.K.Mishra Coordinator &amp; PI (BTISnet)</p>

<p>Traineeship (two) for one year</p>

<p>Rs. 5000/- (consolidated)</p>

<p>M.Sc. (Bioinformatics) with 60 % marks from a recognized University</p>

<p>20-12-2014 (10:00 AM -11:00 AM)</p>

<p>Studentship (four) for one year</p>

<p>Rs. 2500/- (consolidated)</p>

<p>Final year M.Sc./ M.Tech (Bioinformatics) Students from a recognized University</p>

<p>20-12-2014 (11:00 AM- 1:00 PM)</p>

<p>The positions are purely temporary and co-terminus with the DBT Programme. Eligible candidates are requested to submit the application form in the prescribed format along with original certificates/ documents (Degree, Marks sheets, Work experience, if any) at the time of interview. No TA/DA will be paid. Maximum age limit is 28 years for all positions. Age relaxation of 5 yrs for SC/ST and woman candidates and 3 years for OBC candidates will be given. Canvassing in any form invites disqualification.</p>

<p>Advertisement: http://www.iari.res.in/files/BIC-08122014-20141208-172344.pdf</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/37411/my-commonly-used-commands-in-bioinformatics</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 04:58:45 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/37411/my-commonly-used-commands-in-bioinformatics</link>
	<title><![CDATA[My commonly used commands in Bioinformatics]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>FYI, I've found it useful to use MUMmer to extract the specific changes that Racon makes, so I can evaluate them individually:</p><pre><code>minimap -t 24 assembly.fasta long_reads.fastq.gz | racon -t 24 long_reads.fastq.gz - assembly.fasta racon_assembly.fasta
nucmer -p nucmer assembly.fasta racon_assembly.fasta
show-snps -C -T -r nucmer.delta
</code></pre><p>This reports Racon's changes in a table. You can exclude indels with the&nbsp;<code>-I</code>&nbsp;option in&nbsp;<code>show-snps</code>.&nbsp;</p><p>This process (Racon -&gt; MUMmer -&gt; SNP table) solves the problem I originally raised in this issue. So as far as I'm concerned, you can close this issue (or keep it open if you still want to implement some kind of variant table).</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38063/referee-genome-assembly-quality-scores</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2018 16:44:30 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38063/referee-genome-assembly-quality-scores</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Referee: Genome assembly quality scores]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Modern genome sequencing technologies provide a succint measure of quality at each position in every read, however all of this information is lost in the assembly process. Referee summarizes the quality information from the reads that map to a site in an assembled genome to calculate a quality score for each position in the genome assembly.</p>
<p>We accomplish this by first calculating genotype likelihoods for every site. For a given site in a diploid genome, there are 10 possible genotypes (AA, AC, AG, AT, CC, CG, CT, GG, GT, TT). Referee takes as input the genotype likelihoods calculated for all 10 genotypes given the called reference base at each position.</p>
<h3>Referee is a program to calculate a quality score for every position in a genome assembly. This allows for easy filtering of low quality sites for any downstream analysis.</h3>
<p>https://github.com/gwct/referee</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://gwct.github.io/referee/#" rel="nofollow">https://gwct.github.io/referee/#</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/19600/studentship-at-nagaland-university</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:35:00 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Studentship at Nagaland University]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Nagaland University<br />(A Central University Estd. By the Act of Parliament No. 35 of 1989)<br />Lumami 798 627, Nagaland<br />DBT Sponsored ‘Bioinformatics Infrastructure Facility’ Centre</p>

<p>Applications in plain paper are invited for the posts of (1) Traineeship (2 Nos.) and (2) Studentship – (2 Nos.) in the DBT funded-Bioinformatics Infrastructure Facility (BIF), Nagaland University, Lumami-798627, Nagaland. Details are given below. Interested candidates may submit the application along with self attested copies of certificates in support of the candidature to Prof. Chitta Ranjan Deb, Coordinator or Dr. L. N. Kakati, Deputy Coordinator, BIF Centre, Nagaland University, Lumami-798627, Nagaland on or before 15th January 2015.</p>

<p>The scanned application with relevant documents may be sent by email attachment to bifnulumami@gmail.com. Shortlisted candidates will be informed by email if called for interview. No TA/DA is admissible for attending the interview.</p>

<p>Traineeship (Two nos.)</p>

<p>    Post Graduate degree in any branch of Life Sciences from UGC recognized Universities</p>

<p>    Knowledge of computers and bioinformatics</p>

<p>    Rs.8000/- p.m. fixed.</p>

<p>    6 months</p>

<p>Studentship (Two nos.)</p>

<p>    Pursuing Post Graduate degree in any branch of Life Sciences from UGC recognized Universities</p>

<p>    Knowledge of computers and bioinformatics</p>

<p>    Rs.8000/- p.m. fixed.</p>

<p>    6 months</p>

<p>Terms and Conditions:</p>

<p>i) Applicants need to produce all original documents if call for interview.<br />ii) The posts are purely temporary and the appointment does not confer any entitlement or right over the job and will not be considered as formal service.<br />iii) No TA &amp; DA will be paid for appearing in the walk-in-interview.<br />iv) The stipend/salary amount is subject to the sanction of DBT, New Delhi.</p>

<p>Advertisement: http://www.nagauniv.org.in/files/BIF%20Advt.pdf</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39726/jackalope-a-swift-versatile-phylogenomic-and-high-throughput-sequencing-simulator</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:58:12 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39726/jackalope-a-swift-versatile-phylogenomic-and-high-throughput-sequencing-simulator</link>
	<title><![CDATA[jackalope: A swift, versatile phylogenomic and high-throughput sequencing simulator]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><code>jackalope</code> simply and efficiently simulates (i) variants from reference genomes and (ii) reads from both Illumina and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) platforms. It can either read reference genomes from FASTA files or simulate new ones. Genomic variants can be simulated using summary statistics, phylogenies, Variant Call Format (VCF) files, and coalescent simulations&mdash;the latter of which can include selection, recombination, and demographic fluctuations. <code>jackalope</code> can simulate single, paired-end, or mate-pair Illumina reads, as well as reads from Pacific Biosciences These simulations include sequencing errors, mapping qualities, multiplexing, and optical/PCR duplicates. All outputs can be written to standard file formats.</p>
<p><span>A swift, versatile phylogenomic and high-throughput sequencing simulator </span> <span><a href="https://jackalope.lucasnell.com">https://jackalope.lucasnell.com</a></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lucasnell/jackalope" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lucasnell/jackalope</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/19729/senior-scientist-agricultural-bio-informatics-one-post</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:01:02 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Senior Scientist (Agricultural Bio-informatics) (One post)]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Agricultural Scientists Recruitment Board</p>

<p>Qualifications Essential:<br />Doctoral degree in Bio-informatics/ Biotechnology/Molecular Biology and Biotechnology/Life Sciences/ Computer Sciences with specialization in Bio-informatics including relevant basic sciences with 8 years’ experience in the relevant subject as Scientist/Lecturer or in an equivalent position in the Pay Band- 3 of 15600-39100 with Grade Pay of 5400/6000/7000/8000 having made contribution to research/teachin/extension education as evidenced by published work/innovations and impact. </p>

<p>OR </p>

<p>Doctoral degree in the above subject(s) including relevant basic sciences with minimum 8 years’ experience of high quality post-doctoral research in an institution/organization as evidenced by at least 6 publications in journals with NAAS rating of 7.5 or above.</p>

<p>Desirable:<br />(i) Specialization and experience: Knowledge of software development and its application in crop bioinformatics, experience in handling ‘omies’data. <br />(ii) Teaching experience in relevant subject</p>

<p>The Secretary, Agricultural Scientists Recruitment Board, Indian Council of Agricultural Research Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, Pusa New Delhi –110 012, India</p>

<p>Detailed eligibility criteria with how to apply information can be had at:<br />http://www.indiastudychannel.com/jobs/333467-Indian-Council-of-Agricultural-Research-looking-for-Assistant-Director-General.aspx</p>

<p>More at http://asrb.org.in/administrator/uploads_dir/1418978057english.pdf</p>
]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>