BOL: Related items

LncPipe:A Nextflow-based pipeline for comprehensive analyses of long non-coding RNAs from RNA-seq datasets

LEGE — Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:57:02 -0500

The pipeline was developed based on a popular workflow framework Nextflow, composed of four core procedures including reads alignment, assembly, identification and quantification. It contains various unique features such as well-designed lncRNAs annotation strategy, optimized calculating efficiency, diversified classification and interactive analysis report. LncPipe allows users additional control in interuppting the pipeline, resetting parameters from command line, modifying main script directly and resume analysis from previous checkpoint.

Ref https://www.lncrnablog.com/lncpipe-a-nextflow-based-pipeline-for-identification-and-analysis-of-long-non-coding-rnas-from-rna-seq-data/

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/likelet/LncPipe

Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments

Jit — Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:01:44 -0500

Kraken is an ultrafast and highly accurate program for assigning taxonomic labels to metagenomic DNA sequences. Previous programs designed for this task have been relatively slow and computationally expensive, forcing researchers to use faster abundance estimation programs, which only classify small subsets of metagenomic data. Using exact alignment of k-mers, Kraken achieves classification accuracy comparable to the fastest BLAST program. In its fastest mode, Kraken classifies 100 base pair reads at a rate of over 4.1 million reads per minute, 909 times faster than Megablast and 11 times faster than the abundance estimation program MetaPhlAn. Kraken is available at http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/kraken/.

Krona

https://sourceforge.net/p/krona/home/krona/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053813/

Classification of SARS-CoV2 Variant !

Jit — Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:53:12 -0600

The scientists established some guidelines for determining whether a variant is a legitimate branch of an existing lineage:

The variant should be transmitted from its original location to another "geographically distinct population"—say, another country or a province of a large and populous country.
It should differ from its ancestor by at least one nucleotide.
At least 95% of its genetic code should have been sequenced at least five times from different samples.

PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing

Jit — Thu, 09 Aug 2018 04:09:37 -0500

This package estimates tumor purity, copy number, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and classifies single nucleotide variants (SNVs) by somatic status and clonality. PureCN is designed for targeted short read sequencing data, integrates well with standard somatic variant detection and copy number pipelines, and has support for tumor samples without matching normal samples.

Author: Markus Riester [aut, cre], Angad P. Singh [aut]

Maintainer: Markus Riester

Citation (from within R, enter citation("PureCN")):

Riester M, Singh A, Brannon A, Yu K, Campbell C, Chiang D, Morrissey M (2016). “PureCN: Copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing.” Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 11, 13. doi: 10.1186/s13029-016-0060-z.

Address of the bookmark: http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/PureCN.html

Understanding pango networks !

Abhi — Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:02:36 -0500

In the vast majority of instances it is expected that Pango lineage names and designations will conform to the following rules. These rules also act as guidelines for the decisions made by the Lineage Designation Committee.

https://www.pango.network/the-pango-nomenclature-system/statement-of-nomenclature-rules/

https://www.pango.network/how-does-the-system-work/what-are-pango-lineages/

Reference paper

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-0770-5

Address of the bookmark: https://www.pango.network/the-pango-nomenclature-system/statement-of-nomenclature-rules/

Type of SSR

BioStar — Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:35:41 -0600

Types of SSRs (simple sequence repeats), SSRs are short DNA sequences consisting of a tandem repeat of a few nucleotides, typically 2-6 nucleotides in length. There are different types of SSRs based on the length and pattern of the repeated sequence, as well as the presence or absence of interruptions of non-repeated nucleotides within the repeat array. The four types of SSRs are:

Perfect SSR: This is the simplest type of SSR, where the same repeat motif is present adjacent to each other without any interruption of any other nucleotide. For example, a perfect SSR with the repeat motif "CAT" would be "CATCATCATCAT", where the "CAT" sequence is repeated four times.
Imperfect SSR: This type of SSR contains repeat motifs that are interrupted by one or a few non-repeat nucleotides. For example, an imperfect SSR with the repeat motif "CAT" would be "CATCATGGCATCATCAT", where the "CAT" sequence is repeated twice, but interrupted by "GG".
Compound perfect SSR: This type of SSR contains two or more repeat motifs lying adjacent to each other, separated by no or very few intervening nucleotides. For example, a compound perfect SSR with the repeat motifs "CAT" and "GTC" would be "CATCATCATGTCGTC", where the "CAT" sequence is repeated three times, followed by the "GTC" sequence repeated twice.
Compound imperfect SSR: This type of SSR contains two or more repeat motifs interrupted by several non-repeat nucleotides. For example, a compound imperfect SSR with the repeat motifs "CAT" and "GTC" would be "CATCATCATNNNNNNNGTCGTCGTC", where the "CAT" sequence is repeated three times, interrupted by several non-repeat nucleotides, followed by the "GTC" sequence repeated three times.

Hoffman Lab

Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:47:41 -0600

They develop machine learning techniques to better understand chromatin biology. These models and algorithms transform high-dimensional functional genomics data into interpretable patterns and lead to new biological insight.

https://www.pmgenomics.ca/hoffmanlab/

PolyPhen-2: Prediction of functional effects of human nsSNPs

Anjana — Mon, 23 May 2016 02:27:25 -0500

PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2) is a tool which predicts possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a human protein using straightforward physical and comparative considerations.

Address of the bookmark: http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/

Prodigal (Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm)

Abhimanyu Singh — Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:26:45 -0600

Prodigal (Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm) is a microbial (bacterial and archaeal) gene finding program developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of Tennessee. Key features of Prodigal include:

Speed: Prodigal is an extremely fast gene recognition tool (written in very vanilla C). It can analyze an entire microbial genome in 30 seconds or less.
Accuracy: Prodigal is a highly accurate gene finder. It correctly locates the 3' end of every gene in the experimentally verified Ecogene data set (except those containing introns). It possesses a very sophisticated ribosomal binding site scoring system that enables it to locate the translation initiation site with great accuracy (96% of the 5' ends in the Ecogene data set are located correctly).
Specificity: Prodigal's false positive rate compares favorably with other gene identification programs, and usually falls under 5%.
GC-Content Indifferent: Prodigal performs well even in high GC genomes, with over a 90% perfect match (5'+3') to the Pseudomonas aeruginosa curated annotations.
Metagenomic Version: Prodigal can run in metagenomic mode and analyze sequences even when the organism is unknown.
Ease of Use: Prodigal can be run in one step on a single genomic sequence or on a draft genome containing many sequences. It does not need to be supplied with any knowledge of the organism, as it learns all the properties it needs to on its own.
Open Source: Prodigal source code is freely available under the General Public License.

Download the latest version of Prodigal at the Prodigal github page.
or
Browse the wiki documenation.

Address of the bookmark: http://prodigal.ornl.gov/

Tools for Protein-Protein Docking !

Poonam Mahapatra — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:15:53 -0500

Predicting the structure of protein–protein complexes using docking approaches is a difficult problem whose major challenges include identifying correct solutions, and properly dealing with molecular flexibility and conformational changes. Following are the tools to predict the structure of protein–protein complexes:

3D-Dock Suite

Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity and electrostatics

Re-scoring and clustering. Refinement of interface side-chains

3D-Garden

Global rigid search in ensamble

Shape complementarity and Lennard–Jones potential

Side chain and backbone dihedral refinement

DOT

Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity, electrostatics and VDWNone

Escher NG

Global rigid searchShape complementarity, hydrogen bonds and electrostatic

Integrated in VEGA

GRAMM

Global rigid search: FFT. smooth protein surface representation for soft docking

Shape complementarity and Lennard-Jones potential

Clustering of conformations

GRAMM-X

Global rigid search: FFT. smooth protein surface representation for soft docking

Shape complementarity and Lennard-Jones potentialminimization and re-scoring with multiple filters

HEX

Global rigid search: Fourier correlation of spherical harmonics

Shape complementarity

HADDOCK

Global rigid searchElectrostatic ,VDW and desolvation energy termsMD simulated annealing refinement . Filtering based on external data.

ICM

Global rigid search: Monte CarloEmpirical scoring function

Clustering and selection of conformations. Refinement of interface side-chains and re-scoring

MolFit

Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity

Clustering of good solutions, filtering using a priori information and small, local rigid rotations around selected conformations

PatchDock

Global rigid searchShape complementarity and atomic desolvation energy

Clustering of conformations

PyDock

Global rigid search:FFTShape complementarity

rescoring by binding electrostatics and desolvation energy

RosettaDock

Local rigid search: Monte Carlo with low and high resolution structure representation levels

Different scoring parameters for the different resolutions

ZDOCK

Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity, desolvation energy, and electrostatics.

Energy minimization and re-scoringFree for academics

Point to note:

The proper treatment of flexibility in protein–protein docking is still an active field of research. You first should analyzed your proteins in order to define their conformational space and then choose the most suitable method for your docking problem.