<![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]> https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/36497?offset=80 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26539/scikit-learn Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:39:24 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26539/scikit-learn <![CDATA[scikit-learn]]> Machine Learning in Python

Simple and efficient tools for data mining and data analysis
Accessible to everybody, and reusable in various contexts
Built on NumPy, SciPy, and matplotlib
Open source, commercially usable - BSD license

More at http://scikit-learn.org/stable/index.html

 

Address of the bookmark: http://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/index.html

]]> Jitendra Prajapati https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/35805/python-learning-resources-for-bioinformatics-and-computational-biologist Fri, 02 Mar 2018 06:54:15 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/35805/python-learning-resources-for-bioinformatics-and-computational-biologist <![CDATA[Python learning resources for bioinformatics and computational biologist !]]> Python is a general-purpose language, which means it can be used to build just about anything, which will be made easy with the right tools/libraries.

Professionally, Python is great for backend web development, data analysis, artificial intelligence, and scientific computing. Many developers have also used Python to build productivity tools, games, and desktop apps, so there are plenty of resources to help you learn how to do those as well.

For pros and cons visit http://www.bestprogramminglanguagefor.me/why-learn-python and http://bioinformaticsonline.com/discussion/view/459/python-vs-perl

More resources at https://github.com/CodementorIO/Python-Learning-Resources

Following are the list of useful python programming resources:

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/37586/julia-programming-language-a-python-and-r-rival Sat, 25 Aug 2018 04:46:39 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/37586/julia-programming-language-a-python-and-r-rival <![CDATA[Julia Programming Language, a Python and R rival]]> Big data has grown to become one of the most lucrative fields. In fact, data scientists are some of the most sought people. They are usually hired to analyze, control and parse large chunks of data. Implementing these actions using traditional techniques is not a walk in the park. This is why most data scientists prefer using programming languages such as R and Python. However, there is one more programming language that can do the job. That is Julia programming language.

What Is Julia Language?

Julia is a programming language that came into the limelight in 2012. It is a general-purpose programming language that was designed for solving scientific computations. Julia was meant to be an alternative to Python, R and other programming languages that were mainly used for manipulating data. This is because it has numerous features that can minimize the complexities of numerical computations. 

Julia optimizes on the best features of Python and R while at the same time overlooks their weaknesses. This explains why it is viewed as an alternative to these programming languages. For instance, it utilizes the readability and simplicity of Python then performs faster.

Julia is the most preferred programming language for data scientists and mathematicians. This is because its core features are similar to the ones that are used on most data software. Also, the language is ideal for these two subjects because its syntax is similar to the standard mathematical formulas.

Key Features Of Julia Language
Uses JIT Compilation
Parallelism
Dynamic Typing
Simple Syntax
Allows Metaprogramming
Accessible to Libraries
-1-Array Indexing

Julia Vs Python And R Programming Languages
1. Speed
Julia is faster than both Python and R. This is a very critical aspect that is given special attention in the big data programming. The high speed of Julia is because of JIT compilers. You will need to install external libraries on Python to achieve similar speed.

2. Syntax
Julia has a math-friendly syntax. The syntax of this programming language is similar to the mathematical formulas hence can be used to perform mathematical and scientific computations. This syntax makes it easier to learn than Python.

3. Parallelism
Although both Python and R use parallelism, Julia uses a top-level parallelism. Julia allows the processor to perform to the optimum level than what Python and R can achieve.

4. Versatility
Julia programming language is more versatile than Python and R. It allows a programmer to move from different codes and functions with ease.

The only area that Python and R are superior to Julia is in terms of community. Given that Julia is a new programming language, it has a small community as compared to others which have been around for years.

In overall Julia programming language is a better alternative that you can use to handle Big data projects. Despite having a small community, it is one of those programming languages that you can easily learn.

]]> Radha Agarkar https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40298/environment-for-tree-exploration-ete-is-a-python-programming-toolkit-that-assists-in-the-recontruction-manipulation-analysis-and-visualization-of-phylogenetic-trees Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:32:33 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40298/environment-for-tree-exploration-ete-is-a-python-programming-toolkit-that-assists-in-the-recontruction-manipulation-analysis-and-visualization-of-phylogenetic-trees <![CDATA[Environment for Tree Exploration (ETE) is a Python programming toolkit that assists in the recontruction, manipulation, analysis and visualization of phylogenetic trees]]> The Environment for Tree Exploration (ETE) is a Python programming toolkit that assists in the recontruction, manipulation, analysis and visualization of phylogenetic trees (although clustering trees or any other tree-like data structure are also supported).

Other tools

https://github.com/shenwei356/taxonkit

 

Address of the bookmark: https://pypi.org/project/ete3/3.1.1/

]]> Rahul Nayak https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41459/jcvipython-utility-libraries-on-genome-assembly-annotation-and-comparative-genomics Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:19:06 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41459/jcvipython-utility-libraries-on-genome-assembly-annotation-and-comparative-genomics <![CDATA[JCVI:Python utility libraries on genome assembly, annotation and comparative genomics]]> Collection of Python libraries to parse bioinformatics files, or perform computation related to assembly, annotation, and comparative genomics.

https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi

More at https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi/wiki

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/14091/subprocess-pkg Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:59:32 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/14091/subprocess-pkg <![CDATA[Subprocess pkg]]> Subprocess is one of simplest way of running linux command from within python code

Example:

if you want to run fastqc for QC of fastq file:

from subprocess import Popen,PIPE,call

p=Popen(["fastqc","-f","fastq","-o", "/home/name/result/","/dev/stdin"],stdin=fopen("read.fastq","r") ,stdout=PIPE,stderr=PIPE)

print p.stderr

p.stdout.close()

More:

http://pymotw.com/2/subprocess/

]]> Rahul Agarwal https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39441/snakepipes-a-toolkit-based-on-snakemake-and-python-for-analysis-of-ngs-data Thu, 30 May 2019 04:06:13 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39441/snakepipes-a-toolkit-based-on-snakemake-and-python-for-analysis-of-ngs-data <![CDATA[snakepipes: A toolkit based on snakemake and python for analysis of NGS data]]> snakePipes are flexible and powerful workflows built using snakemake that simplify the analysis of NGS data.

  • DNA-mapping*
  • ChIP-seq*
  • RNA-seq*
  • ATAC-seq*
  • scRNA-seq
  • Hi-C
  • Whole Genome Bisulfite Seq/WGBS

(*Also available in "allele-specific" mode)

snakePipes can be installed via conda :

'conda install -c mpi-ie -c bioconda -c conda-forge snakePipes'.

Source code (https://github.com/maxplanck-ie/snakepipes) and documentation (https://snakepipes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) are available online.

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/maxplanck-ie/snakepipes

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44179/python-mini-projects Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:14:03 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44179/python-mini-projects <![CDATA[Python Mini Projects !]]> There is a directory for each chapter of the book. Each directory contains a test.py program you can use with pytest to check that you have written the program correctly. I have included a short README to describe each exercise. If you have problems writing code (or if you would like to support this project!), the book contains details about the skills you need.

https://github.com/kyclark/tiny_python_projects

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/kyclark/tiny_python_projects

]]> BioStar https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools Mon, 05 Aug 2013 04:12:32 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools <![CDATA[Five points for bioinformatics software/tools]]> In the bioinformatics sector we mostly spend time on computational analysis of huge amounts of data and try to make sense of it, biologically. But, most of the newbie bioinformaticians are faced with dilemma when they receive biological sequence data for the first time. They mostly found confusing over open source, user friendly GUI, and commercial bioinformatics software. Don’t be surprise this is true and also not an easy task to decide, because analytical step is the most crucial part and believe to be the biggest bottleneck in publishing paper in high impact journals. Through this blog I would like to address the pros and cons of both kind of software/tools and try to assist (Hmmm not really, It looks convince) you to make decision on your software selections.

image

The most common newbie questions are:

Should I try to use these free open source programs?  Why are we not trying GUI software for computational analysis? Should I use commercial bioinformatics programs/software?”

1. Let’s be open

We generally think free and cheap are useless. But this concept is not applicable when we discuss open source software. Mostly, the bioinformatics software is developed by highly competitive biological programmers who believe in open sharing of knowledge. They come under Open Bioinformatics Foundation or O|B|F which is a non-profit, volunteer run organization focused on supporting open source programming in bioinformatics. The best part about open source tools/software is that they’re free to download the source code and read exactly what the program does. If you are so inclined, you can view all of the parts of the program and see the logical flow of the pipeline. In addition, open source makes an excellent learning tool for any beginning bioinformatician. Moreover, you can modify existing open source programs to deal with cutting-edge problems or to customize your pipeline. Apart from your computational and analysis work, most of the reviewer also prefers the open source based results so that they can validate the results if validation required.

2. Code headache

As a bioinformatician you are supposed to know the basics of programming languages, and if you are not good at it, then please learn it as soon as possible because you are not a bio-analyst but biological programmers. The open source programs usually lack dedicated service and support teams (often because they were the product of an overworked doc/postdoc!) so you are responsible for troubleshooting your own errors most of the time. We commonly receive the HELP email to support and assist to setup the pipeline; you can also find this kind of request on any QA forum. I personally believe this coding horror brings the biggest downside of open-source programs; where you need some programming skills in order to implement the program in your pipeline. But, if you are not able to fix the pipeline and modify the open source code according to your requirements them you should re-think on your bioinformatician name tag!!!

3. Dive into the codes

Some of the biologist turn bioinformatician says “if you can do the same thing with commercial software then why to get migraine with weird codes”, well this statement looks to me that guys are keen to learn swimming but still don’t like to get wet. If you are still using paid software and doing your work by customer support and clicking some of the well-designed GUI button then perhaps you are not interested in learning and trying new and challenging bioinformatics works. You are missing the basic flavour of bioinformatics. Let’s dive into the coding world, I am sure your will enjoy it. I recommend your to swim freely in code’s sea, and enjoy the journey; do not merely watch it from the outside.  

4. Paid does not mean better

The bioinformatics company which are specializes in bioinformatics solutions develop well designed/packed, user friendly software by using a large number of specialised scientist, programmers and support staff. They also provide good services to accomplice your biological analysis work. This means that if you hit a ‘snag’ with your data, help is likely only a phone call away! These companies price their products competitively against the cost of a dedicated bioinformatician. You may be able to afford the program, but not the additional staff! Additionally, most of the functionality that you need in your analysis is already coded into the program. Need to plot a graph? Just click this button right here. It is that easy. But, as a bioinformatician this is not generally well encouraged approach in biological analysis work, because the software is not available to everyone and your data can’t be validated. Moreover, there is very less chances that anyone will repeat your work or love to do similar kind of research (because not all the labs in the world are rich like yours).

5. Take a caution

In biological analysis work, in which you deal GB/TB of data are having maximum chances of getting errors, so please be careful and always cross check your data before coming to any conclusion. Even an error in two line code can alter your entire analysis and display weird results. Some of the scientist blindly believes on commercial software, which is entirely wrong. Using proprietary tools does not absolve you of the need to actually read and research the type of analysis that you are doing. This is particularly true in the case of genome assembly and annotation.


At the end, I would like to tell only one think that open source solutions allows you to do more cutting edge analysis than the commercial tools. So let’s go for it.

Disclaimer:

This is my personal view. I have nothing to do with any company or open source community. The views expressed on these pages are mine alone and not those of my current/past employers. I do reserve the right to remove comments left by spammers or off-topic comments.

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/9028/linux-for-bioinformatician Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:59:26 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/9028/linux-for-bioinformatician <![CDATA[Linux for bioinformatician !!!]]> Linux, free operating system for computers, provides several powerful admin tools and utilities which will help you to manage your systems effectively and handle huge amount of genomic/biological data with an ease. The field of bioinformatics relies heavily on Linux-based computers and software. Although most bioinformatics programs can be compiled to run. If you don’t know what these no so user-friendly tools are and how to use them, you could be spending lot of time trying to perform even the basic admin tasks. The focus of this linux series is to help you understand system admin as well as basic tools, which will help you to become an effective bioinformatician and computational biologist.

For knowledge about Linux and their importance amongst bioinformatician plesae read this article "An introduction to Linux for bioinformatics" by Paul Stothard.

Linux cheat sheet at http://bioinformaticsonline.com/file/view/87/linux-cheat-sheet

Please browse for futher useful linux pages on right hand side ...

]]> Rahul Nayak