<![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]> https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/36516?offset=380 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45267/when-thousands-of-bacterial-genomes-become-one-giant-map Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:56:47 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45267/when-thousands-of-bacterial-genomes-become-one-giant-map <![CDATA[When Thousands of Bacterial Genomes Become One Giant Map]]> Imagine trying to understand a city by studying just one house.

You might learn a lot about that house—the rooms, the doors, the furniture—but you would miss the bigger story: the streets, the neighborhoods, and all the ways the city changes from one place to another.

Something similar happens when scientists study bacterial genomes one at a time.

Over the past decade, researchers have collected thousands of bacterial genomes. These genomes contain an enormous amount of information about how bacteria survive, adapt, and evolve. But comparing thousands of individual genomes can quickly become a computational maze.

That is where PANORAMA enters the story.

Developed by Jérôme Arnoux and colleagues, PANORAMA is a computational tool designed to explore bacterial pangenomes—the complete collection of genetic possibilities found across a species or group of related organisms. Instead of looking at every genome as an isolated object, the approach represents their shared and variable genetic features as a graph.

Think of this graph as a giant subway map.

Some stations appear on almost every route. These represent genes that are highly conserved. Other stations appear only on certain routes, representing genes that some bacteria possess while others do not. By looking at the entire network, scientists can begin to see not just *what genes exist*, but how they are organized and how biological systems are distributed across populations.

The researchers put PANORAMA to the test using 941 genomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacterium important in human health. They used the tool to investigate biological systems, including bacterial defense mechanisms against viruses known as bacteriophages. They then expanded the analysis to more than 6,000 genomes from four Enterobacteriaceae species.

The result is more than a faster way to process data.

PANORAMA allows researchers to ask a bigger question: What can an entire microbial species do, genetically speaking?

By comparing pangenomes, the researchers could identify systems shared between species as well as distinctive features. They could also find recurring genomic locations where genetic material is inserted—clues that may reveal common evolutionary processes.

And this is perhaps the most exciting part of the story.

Every bacterial genome is like a page in a huge evolutionary book. Until recently, reading thousands of those pages together was difficult. PANORAMA provides a way to turn those pages into a map, allowing scientists to see patterns that might disappear when each genome is studied separately.

The study, published in PLOS Computational Biology in July 2026, presents PANORAMA as a foundation for large-scale comparative pangenomics. The software and accompanying analysis resources are openly available, giving other researchers the opportunity to explore microbial diversity themselves.

So the story is not really about one bacterium or one genome.

It is about changing the way we look at life.

Instead of asking, “What is inside this genome?”, scientists can increasingly ask, “What is the full genetic landscape of this species—and how did it become this way?”

And sometimes, when you stop looking at one house and finally see the whole city, the most interesting discoveries are hiding in the streets between them.

Read more at https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013856

]]> LEGE https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45303/the-tree-that-learned-to-read-genomes Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:51:02 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45303/the-tree-that-learned-to-read-genomes <![CDATA[The Tree That Learned to Read Genomes]]> Imagine trying to reconstruct a family tree when many family photographs are missing, some names are unclear, and different relatives remember the past differently. This is similar to the challenge scientists face when trying to understand how organisms are related. Their family records are genomes, and the family tree is a phylogenetic tree. With modern sequencing technologies, scientists now have access to thousands of genomes, but comparing them can be difficult, especially when genomes are incomplete or poorly annotated.

A recent study by Webster and Chapman introduces Buscogeny (https://github.com/Jwebster89/Buscogeny), an open-source bioinformatics pipeline designed to make this process easier. The tool uses BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs), which identifies conserved genes that are expected to occur as single copies in particular groups of organisms. These genes act like evolutionary landmarks, allowing researchers to compare genomes and investigate their relationships.

Buscogeny brings several steps of phylogenomic analysis into one workflow. It identifies BUSCO genes, extracts and aligns their sequences, removes unreliable regions, combines information from multiple genes, and uses the resulting data to construct a phylogenetic tree. It also provides quality-control information, helping researchers identify genomes that may be too incomplete for reliable analysis.

The authors demonstrate the usefulness of Buscogeny with bacterial and fungal genomes, including Alternaria. This is particularly valuable because fungal genomes can vary greatly in quality and annotation. Ultimately, Buscogeny helps transform massive amounts of genomic data into an understandable evolutionary story. Each DNA sequence becomes a clue, each conserved gene becomes a landmark, and together these clues reveal a picture of how life is connected.

More at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10123-025-00752-6?

]]> BioStar https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32905/bigmac-breaking-inaccurate-genomes-and-merging-assembled-contigs-for-long-read-metagenomic-assembly Mon, 22 May 2017 05:43:51 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32905/bigmac-breaking-inaccurate-genomes-and-merging-assembled-contigs-for-long-read-metagenomic-assembly <![CDATA[BIGMAC : breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly]]> This tool is for users to upgrade their metagenomics assemblies using long reads. This includes fixing mis-assemblies and scaffolding/gap-filling. If you encounter any issues, please contact me at kklam@eecs.berkeley.edu. My name is Ka-Kit Lam.

https://github.com/kakitone/MetaFinisherSC

https://github.com/kakitone/BIGMAC

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/kakitone/BIGMAC

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools Mon, 05 Aug 2013 04:12:32 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools <![CDATA[Five points for bioinformatics software/tools]]> In the bioinformatics sector we mostly spend time on computational analysis of huge amounts of data and try to make sense of it, biologically. But, most of the newbie bioinformaticians are faced with dilemma when they receive biological sequence data for the first time. They mostly found confusing over open source, user friendly GUI, and commercial bioinformatics software. Don’t be surprise this is true and also not an easy task to decide, because analytical step is the most crucial part and believe to be the biggest bottleneck in publishing paper in high impact journals. Through this blog I would like to address the pros and cons of both kind of software/tools and try to assist (Hmmm not really, It looks convince) you to make decision on your software selections.

image

The most common newbie questions are:

Should I try to use these free open source programs?  Why are we not trying GUI software for computational analysis? Should I use commercial bioinformatics programs/software?”

1. Let’s be open

We generally think free and cheap are useless. But this concept is not applicable when we discuss open source software. Mostly, the bioinformatics software is developed by highly competitive biological programmers who believe in open sharing of knowledge. They come under Open Bioinformatics Foundation or O|B|F which is a non-profit, volunteer run organization focused on supporting open source programming in bioinformatics. The best part about open source tools/software is that they’re free to download the source code and read exactly what the program does. If you are so inclined, you can view all of the parts of the program and see the logical flow of the pipeline. In addition, open source makes an excellent learning tool for any beginning bioinformatician. Moreover, you can modify existing open source programs to deal with cutting-edge problems or to customize your pipeline. Apart from your computational and analysis work, most of the reviewer also prefers the open source based results so that they can validate the results if validation required.

2. Code headache

As a bioinformatician you are supposed to know the basics of programming languages, and if you are not good at it, then please learn it as soon as possible because you are not a bio-analyst but biological programmers. The open source programs usually lack dedicated service and support teams (often because they were the product of an overworked doc/postdoc!) so you are responsible for troubleshooting your own errors most of the time. We commonly receive the HELP email to support and assist to setup the pipeline; you can also find this kind of request on any QA forum. I personally believe this coding horror brings the biggest downside of open-source programs; where you need some programming skills in order to implement the program in your pipeline. But, if you are not able to fix the pipeline and modify the open source code according to your requirements them you should re-think on your bioinformatician name tag!!!

3. Dive into the codes

Some of the biologist turn bioinformatician says “if you can do the same thing with commercial software then why to get migraine with weird codes”, well this statement looks to me that guys are keen to learn swimming but still don’t like to get wet. If you are still using paid software and doing your work by customer support and clicking some of the well-designed GUI button then perhaps you are not interested in learning and trying new and challenging bioinformatics works. You are missing the basic flavour of bioinformatics. Let’s dive into the coding world, I am sure your will enjoy it. I recommend your to swim freely in code’s sea, and enjoy the journey; do not merely watch it from the outside.  

4. Paid does not mean better

The bioinformatics company which are specializes in bioinformatics solutions develop well designed/packed, user friendly software by using a large number of specialised scientist, programmers and support staff. They also provide good services to accomplice your biological analysis work. This means that if you hit a ‘snag’ with your data, help is likely only a phone call away! These companies price their products competitively against the cost of a dedicated bioinformatician. You may be able to afford the program, but not the additional staff! Additionally, most of the functionality that you need in your analysis is already coded into the program. Need to plot a graph? Just click this button right here. It is that easy. But, as a bioinformatician this is not generally well encouraged approach in biological analysis work, because the software is not available to everyone and your data can’t be validated. Moreover, there is very less chances that anyone will repeat your work or love to do similar kind of research (because not all the labs in the world are rich like yours).

5. Take a caution

In biological analysis work, in which you deal GB/TB of data are having maximum chances of getting errors, so please be careful and always cross check your data before coming to any conclusion. Even an error in two line code can alter your entire analysis and display weird results. Some of the scientist blindly believes on commercial software, which is entirely wrong. Using proprietary tools does not absolve you of the need to actually read and research the type of analysis that you are doing. This is particularly true in the case of genome assembly and annotation.


At the end, I would like to tell only one think that open source solutions allows you to do more cutting edge analysis than the commercial tools. So let’s go for it.

Disclaimer:

This is my personal view. I have nothing to do with any company or open source community. The views expressed on these pages are mine alone and not those of my current/past employers. I do reserve the right to remove comments left by spammers or off-topic comments.

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/9028/linux-for-bioinformatician Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:59:26 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/9028/linux-for-bioinformatician <![CDATA[Linux for bioinformatician !!!]]> Linux, free operating system for computers, provides several powerful admin tools and utilities which will help you to manage your systems effectively and handle huge amount of genomic/biological data with an ease. The field of bioinformatics relies heavily on Linux-based computers and software. Although most bioinformatics programs can be compiled to run. If you don’t know what these no so user-friendly tools are and how to use them, you could be spending lot of time trying to perform even the basic admin tasks. The focus of this linux series is to help you understand system admin as well as basic tools, which will help you to become an effective bioinformatician and computational biologist.

For knowledge about Linux and their importance amongst bioinformatician plesae read this article "An introduction to Linux for bioinformatics" by Paul Stothard.

Linux cheat sheet at http://bioinformaticsonline.com/file/view/87/linux-cheat-sheet

Please browse for futher useful linux pages on right hand side ...

]]> Rahul Nayak https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26356/spines Tue, 09 Feb 2016 05:07:15 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26356/spines <![CDATA[Spines]]>

Spines

Spines is a collection of software tools, developed and used by the Vertebrate Genome Biology Group at the Broad Institute. It provides basic data structures for efficient data manipulation (mostly genomic sequences, alignments, variation etc.), as well as specialized tool sets for various analyses. It also features three sequence alignment packages: Satsuma, a highly parallelized program for high-sensitivity, genome-wide synteny; Papaya, an all-purpose alignment tool for less diverged sequences; and SLAP, a context-sensitive local aligner for diverged sequences with large gaps.

Access Spines here.

http://www.broadinstitute.org/science/programs/genome-biology/spines

Address of the bookmark: http://www.broadinstitute.org/science/programs/genome-biology/spines

]]> Jitendra Narayan https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26852/awesome-bioinformatics-pipelines Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:50:41 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26852/awesome-bioinformatics-pipelines <![CDATA[Awesome bioinformatics pipelines !]]> A curated list of awesome pipeline toolkits ...

https://github.com/pditommaso/awesome-pipeline

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/pditommaso/awesome-pipeline

]]> Jitendra Prajapati https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/42188/tools-and-method-for-haplotype-phasing Fri, 04 Sep 2020 20:41:40 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/42188/tools-and-method-for-haplotype-phasing <![CDATA[Tools and Method for Haplotype phasing !]]> Huge amounts of genotype data are being produced with recent technological advances, both from increasingly  comprehensive and inexpensive genome-wide SNP microarrays and from ever more accessible whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing methods. The vast amount of knowledge contained in these results, however, is best  exploited through phased haplotypes, which classify the alleles co-located on the same chromosome. Since sequence and SNP array data normally take the form of unphased genotypes, one does not specifically observe which of the two parental chromosomes, or haplotypes, falls on a specific allele. Fortunately, new advances in both computational and laboratory methods promise improved determination of haplotype phase. Following are useful tools :
 

Arlequin: http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3/

BEAGLE: http://faculty.washington.edu/browning/beagle/beagle.html

fastPHASE: http://stephenslab.uchicago.edu/software.html

GENEHUNTER: http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/soft/gh/

The Genome Analysis Toolkit:

http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wiki/index.php/The_Genome_Analysis_Toolkit

IMPUTE2: https://mathgen.stats.ox.ac.uk/impute/impute_v2.html

MACH: http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/MACH/

MERLIN: http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/Merlin/

PHASE: http://stephenslab.uchicago.edu/software.html

PL-EM: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~junliu/plem/

“Read-backed phasing” algorithm: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wiki/index.php/Read-backed_phasing_algorithm

SHAPE-IT: http://www.griv.org/shapeit/

]]> Manisha Mishra https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30336/finding-patterns-in-biological-sequences Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:30:49 -0600 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30336/finding-patterns-in-biological-sequences <![CDATA[Finding Patterns in Biological Sequences]]> In this report we provide an overview of known techniques for discovery of patterns of biological sequences (DNA and proteins). We also provide biological motivation, and methods of biological verification of such patterns. Finally we list publicly available tools and databases for pattern discovery. On-line supplement is available through http://genetics.uwaterloo.ca/∼tvinar/cs798g/motif.

Address of the bookmark: http://engr.case.edu/li_jing/papers/00798gpattern.pdf

]]> Jit https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32131/wgs-celera-assembler-version-83rc2 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 04:45:40 -0500 https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32131/wgs-celera-assembler-version-83rc2 <![CDATA[WGS Celera Assembler version 8.3rc2]]> These are release notes for Celera Assembler version 8.3rc2, which was released on May 24, 2015.

This distribution package provides a stable, tested, documented version of the software.  The distribution is usable on most Unix-like platforms, and some platforms have pre-compiled binary distributions ready for installation.

The source code package includes full source code (revision 4627), Makefiles, and scripts.  A subset of the kmer package (http://kmer.sourceforge.net/, version r1994), used by some modules of Celera Assembler, is included.  This distribution includes [http://samtools.sourceforge.net/ SAMtools], [http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/jellyfish/ Jellyfish 2.0], [https://github.com/pbjd/pbutgcns PBUTGCNS], [https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbdagcon PBDAGCON], [https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/BLASR BLASR], and parts of the [https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/tree/v0.1.3 Falcon assembler].

Full documentation can be found online at http://wgs-assembler.sourceforge.net/.

Interesting scripts within it

urbe@urbo214b[bin] ls                                                        []
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  11K Apr 10 11:41 addCNSToStore
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 575K Apr 10 11:41 addReadsToUnitigs
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 128K Apr 10 11:41 analyzeBest
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 257K Apr 10 11:41 analyzePosMap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,5M Apr 10 11:41 analyzeScaffolds
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 224K Apr 10 11:41 asmOutputFasta
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 448K Apr 10 11:41 asmOutputStatistics
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 2,4K Apr 10 11:41 asmToAGP.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 7,6M Apr 10 11:41 blasr
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,6M Apr 10 11:41 bogart
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 183K Apr 10 11:41 bogus
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 272K Apr 10 11:41 bogusness
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 247K Apr 10 11:41 buildPosMap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 213K Apr 10 11:41 buildRefContigs
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 990K Apr 10 11:41 buildUnitigs
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  18K Apr 10 11:41 ca2ace.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  12K Apr 10 11:41 caqc_help.ini
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  61K Apr 10 11:41 caqc.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  23K Apr 10 11:41 cat-corrects
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  24K Apr 10 11:41 cat-erates
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,9M Apr 10 11:41 cgw
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,4M Apr 10 11:41 cgwDump
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 204K Apr 10 11:41 chimChe
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 201K Apr 10 11:40 chimera
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 220K Apr 10 11:41 classifyMates
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 201K Apr 10 11:41 classifyMatesApply
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 215K Apr 10 11:41 classifyMatesPairwise
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 366K Apr 10 11:41 computeCoverageStat
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 9,8K Apr 10 11:41 convert-fasta-to-v2.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  48K Apr 10 11:41 convertOverlap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 119K Apr 10 11:41 convertSamToCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  20K Apr 10 11:41 convertToPBCNS
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 197K Apr 10 11:41 correct-frags
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 259K Apr 10 11:41 correct-olaps
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 520K Apr 10 11:41 correctPacBio
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 540K Apr 10 11:41 ctgcns
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 162K Apr 10 11:40 deduplicate
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  37K Apr 10 11:41 demotePosMap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,5M Apr 10 11:41 dumpCloneMiddles
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 124K Apr 10 11:41 dumpPBRLayoutStore
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,3M Apr 10 11:41 dumpSingletons
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 171K Apr 10 11:41 erate-estimate
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 221K Apr 10 11:40 estimate-mer-threshold
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,5M Apr 10 11:41 extendClearRanges
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,3M Apr 10 11:41 extendClearRangesPartition
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 205K Apr 10 11:40 extractmessages
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 7,2M Apr 10 11:41 falcon_sense
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 9,8K Apr 10 11:41 fastaToCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 124K Apr 10 11:40 fastqAnalyze
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 137K Apr 10 11:40 fastqSample
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  62K Apr 10 11:40 fastqSimulate
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 121K Apr 10 11:40 fastqSimulate-sort
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 246K Apr 10 11:40 fastqToCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 140K Apr 10 11:41 filterOverlap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 341K Apr 10 11:40 finalTrim
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 228K Apr 10 11:41 fixUnitigs
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 147K Apr 10 11:40 fragmentDepth
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  29K Apr 10 11:41 fragsInVars
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 545K Apr 10 11:41 frgs2clones
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 398K Apr 10 11:40 gatekeeper
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 139K Apr 10 11:40 gatekeeperbench
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 167K Apr 10 11:40 gkpStoreCreate
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 147K Apr 10 11:40 gkpStoreDumpFASTQ
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 184K Apr 10 11:41 greedyFragmentTiling
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,6K Apr 10 11:41 greedy_layout_to_IUM
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 142K Apr 10 11:40 initialTrim
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 967K Apr 10 11:41 jellyfish
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 219K Apr 10 11:41 markRepeatUnique
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 273K Apr 10 11:40 markUniqueUnique
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 114K Apr 10 11:40 mercy
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 3,8K Apr 10 11:41 mergeqc.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 422K Apr 10 11:40 merTrim
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 125K Apr 10 11:40 merTrimApply
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 376K Apr 10 11:40 meryl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 176K Apr 10 11:41 metagenomics_ovl_analyses
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 297K Apr 10 11:41 olap-from-seeds
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 275K Apr 10 11:41 outputLayout
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 229K Apr 10 11:41 overlapInCore
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 144K Apr 10 11:40 overlap_partition
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 179K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStats
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 179K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStore
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 153K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStoreBucketizer
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 175K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStoreBuild
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  33K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStoreIndexer
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  48K Apr 10 11:41 overlapStoreSorter
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 604K Apr 10 11:40 overmerry
lrwxrwxrwx 1 urbe urbe    4 Apr 10 11:41 pacBioToCA -> PBcR
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 131K Apr 10 11:41 PBcR
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 2,9M Apr 10 11:41 pbdagcon
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,9M Apr 10 11:41 pbutgcns
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 201K Apr 10 11:40 remove_fragment
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 153K Apr 10 11:40 removeMateOverlap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 2,5K Apr 10 11:41 replaceUIDwithName-fastq
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,2K Apr 10 11:41 replaceUIDwithName-posmap
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,3M Apr 10 11:41 resolveSurrogates
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 139K Apr 10 11:41 rewriteCache
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 232K Apr 10 11:41 runCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  88K Apr 10 11:41 runCA-dedupe
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  14K Apr 10 11:41 runCA-overlapStoreBuild
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 3,6K Apr 10 11:41 run_greedy.csh
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 297K Apr 10 11:40 sffToCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  13K Apr 10 11:40 show-corrects
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 557K Apr 10 11:41 splitUnitigs
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 1,4M Apr 10 11:41 terminator
drwxrwxr-x 2 urbe urbe 4,0K Apr 10 11:41 TIGR
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 526K Apr 10 11:41 tigStore
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  35K Apr 10 11:41 tracearchiveToCA
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  35K Apr 10 11:41 tracedb-to-frg.pl
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  44K Apr 10 11:41 trimFastqByQVWindow
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  18K Apr 10 11:40 uidclient
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 589K Apr 10 11:41 unitigger
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  42K Apr 10 11:40 upgrade-v8-to-v9
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  42K Apr 10 11:40 upgrade-v9-to-v10
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe  854 Apr 10 11:41 utg2fasta
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 731K Apr 10 11:41 utgcns
-rwxrwxr-x 1 urbe urbe 561K Apr 10 11:41 utgcnsfix


Address of the bookmark: http://wgs-assembler.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

]]> Jit