<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/36621?offset=330</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/36621?offset=330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34416/miniasm-very-fast-olc-based-de-novo-assembler-for-noisy-long-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:58:49 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34416/miniasm-very-fast-olc-based-de-novo-assembler-for-noisy-long-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[miniasm: very fast OLC-based de novo assembler for noisy long reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Miniasm is a very fast OLC-based&nbsp;<em>de novo</em>&nbsp;assembler for noisy long reads. It takes all-vs-all read self-mappings (typically by&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap">minimap</a>) as input and outputs an assembly graph in the&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/pmelsted/GFA-spec/blob/master/GFA-spec.md">GFA</a>&nbsp;format. Different from mainstream assemblers, miniasm does not have a consensus step. It simply concatenates pieces of read sequences to generate the final&nbsp;<a href="http://wgs-assembler.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Celera_Assembler_Terminology">unitig</a>&nbsp;sequences. Thus the per-base error rate is similar to the raw input reads.</p>
<p>So far miniasm is in early development stage. It has only been tested on a dozen of PacBio and Oxford Nanopore (ONT) bacterial data sets. Including the mapping step, it takes about 3 minutes to assemble a bacterial genome. Under the default setting, miniasm assembles 9 out of 12 PacBio datasets and 3 out of 4 ONT datasets into a single contig. The 12 PacBio data sets are&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/DevNet/wiki/E.-coli-Bacterial-Assembly">PacBio E. coli sample</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS473430">ERS473430</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS544009">ERS544009</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS554120">ERS554120</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS605484">ERS605484</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS617393">ERS617393</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS646601">ERS646601</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS659581">ERS659581</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS670327">ERS670327</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS685285">ERS685285</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERS743109">ERS743109</a>&nbsp;and a&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/DevNet/wiki/E.-coli-20kb-Size-Selected-Library-with-P6-C4/ce0533c1d2a957488594f0b29da61ffa3e4627e8">deprecated PacBio E. coli data set</a>. ONT data are acquired from the&nbsp;<a href="http://lab.loman.net/2015/09/24/first-sqk-map-006-experiment/">Loman Lab</a>.</p>
<p>For a&nbsp;<em>C. elegans</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/DevNet/wiki/C.-elegans-data-set">PacBio data set</a>&nbsp;(only 40X are used, not the whole dataset), miniasm finishes the assembly, including reads overlapping, in ~10 minutes with 16 CPUs. The total assembly size is 105Mb; the N50 is 1.94Mb. In comparison, the&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/Bioinformatics-Training/wiki/HGAP">HGAP3</a>produces a 104Mb assembly with N50 1.61Mb.&nbsp;<a href="http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/download/ce-miniasm.png">This dotter plot</a>&nbsp;gives a global view of the miniasm assembly (on the X axis) and the HGAP3 assembly (on Y). They are broadly comparable. Of course, the HGAP3 consensus sequences are much more accurate. In addition, on the whole data set (assembled in ~30 min), the miniasm N50 is reduced to 1.79Mb. Miniasm still needs improvements.</p>
<p>Miniasm confirms that at least for high-coverage bacterial genomes, it is possible to generate long contigs from raw PacBio or ONT reads without error correction. It also shows that&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap">minimap</a>&nbsp;can be used as a read overlapper, even though it is probably not as sensitive as the more sophisticated overlapers such as&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/marbl/MHAP">MHAP</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/thegenemyers/DALIGNER">DALIGNER</a>. Coupled with long-read error correctors and consensus tools, miniasm may also be useful to produce high-quality assemblies.</p>
<p>Minimap and miniasm are ultrafast tools for (i) mapping and (ii) assembly. Designed for long, noisy reads, they do not have a correction or consensus step, and therefore the resulting assemblies are contiguous (i.e. long) but very noisy (i.e. full of errors)</p>
<p>We start with an all against all comparison:</p>
<div>
<pre><code>minimap -Sw5 -L100 -m0 -t8 reads.fq reads.fq | gzip -1 &gt; reads.paf.gz
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>Then we can assemble</p>
<div>
<pre><code>miniasm -f reads.fq reads.paf.gz &gt; reads.gfa
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>Convert GFA to FASTA:</p>
<div>
<pre><code>awk <span>'/^S/{print "&gt;"$2"\n"$3}'</span> reads.gfa | fold &gt; reads.fa
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>And then count how many contigs:</p>
<div>
<pre><code>grep <span>"&gt;"</span> reads.fa | wc -l</code></pre>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<pre><span><span>#</span> Download sample PacBio from the PBcR website</span>
wget -O- http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/PBcR/data/selfSampleData.tar.gz <span>|</span> tar zxf -
ln -s selfSampleData/pacbio_filtered.fastq reads.fq
<span><span>#</span> Install minimap and miniasm (requiring gcc and zlib)</span>
git clone https://github.com/lh3/minimap <span>&amp;&amp;</span> (cd minimap <span>&amp;&amp;</span> make)
git clone https://github.com/lh3/miniasm <span>&amp;&amp;</span> (cd miniasm <span>&amp;&amp;</span> make)
<span><span>#</span> Overlap</span>
minimap/minimap -Sw5 -L100 -m0 -t8 reads.fq reads.fq <span>|</span> gzip -1 <span>&gt;</span> reads.paf.gz
<span><span>#</span> Layout</span>
miniasm/miniasm -f reads.fq reads.paf.gz <span>&gt;</span> reads.gfa</pre><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lh3/miniasm" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lh3/miniasm</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/34707/string-graph-based-genome-assembly-software-and-tools</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:17:38 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/34707/string-graph-based-genome-assembly-software-and-tools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[String graph based genome assembly software and tools !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_theory" title="Graph theory">graph theory</a>, a&nbsp;<strong>string graph</strong>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersection_graph" title="Intersection graph">intersection graph</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve" title="Curve">curves</a>&nbsp;in the plane; each curve is called a "string".&nbsp; String graphs were first proposed by E. W. Myers in a&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/suppl_2/ii79.full.pdf+html">2005 publication</a>.&nbsp;In&nbsp;recent&nbsp;<a href="http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2012/01/22/gr.126953.111">Genome Research paper</a>&nbsp;describing an innovative approach for assembling large genomes from NGS data caught our attention for several reasons. i) it give different "string graph" prospective of long lasting genome assembly problem ii) the&nbsp;paper is coauthored by Jared Simpson, the developer of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694472/">ABySS assembler</a>&nbsp;and Richard Durbin. iii)&nbsp;Simpson-Durbin algorithm is that it does not rely on de Bruijn graphs, and instead employs a different graph construction approach called &lsquo;string graph&rsquo;.</p><p>Following are the genome assembly tools based on string graph:</p><p>1.SGA (String Graph Assembler)&nbsp;https://github.com/jts/sga</p><p>Assembles large genomes from high coverage short read data. SGA is designed as a modular set of programs, which are used to form an assembly pipeline. SGA implements a set of assembly algorithms based on the FM-index. As the FM-index is a compressed data structure, the algorithms are very memory efficient. The SGA assembly has three distinct phases. The first phase corrects base calling errors in the reads. The second phase assembles contigs from the corrected reads. The third phase uses paired end and/or mate pair data to build scaffolds from the contigs. The output of this software is a PDF report that allows the properties of the genome and data quality to be visually explored. By providing more information to the user at the start of an assembly project, this software will help increase awareness of the factors that make a given assembly easy or difficult, assist in the selection of software and parameters and help to troubleshoot an assembly if it runs into problems.</p><p>2.&nbsp;SAGE: String-overlap Assembly of GEnomes&nbsp;https://github.com/lucian-ilie/SAGE2</p><p>SAGE, for de novo genome assembly. As opposed to most assemblers, which are de Bruijn graph based, SAGE uses the string-overlap graph. SAGE builds upon great existing work on string-overlap graph and maximum likelihood assembly, bringing an important number of new ideas, such as the efficient computation of the transitive reduction of the string overlap graph, the use of (generalized) edge multiplicity statistics for more accurate estimation of read copy counts, and the improved use of mate pairs and min-cost flow for supporting edge merging. The assemblies produced by SAGE for several short and medium-size genomes compared favourably with those of existing leading assemblers.</p><p>3. FSG: Fast String Graph</p><p>The new integrated assembler has been assessed on a standard benchmark, showing that fast string graph (FSG) is significantly faster than SGA while maintaining a moderate use of main memory, and showing practical advantages in running FSG on multiple threads. Moreover, we have studied the effect of coverage rates on the running times.</p><p>4.&nbsp;&nbsp;BASE&nbsp;https://github.com/dhlbh/BASE</p><p>It enhances the classic seed-extension approach by indexing the reads efficiently to generate adaptive seeds that have high probability to appear uniquely in the genome. Such seeds form the basis for BASE to build extension trees and then to use reverse validation to remove the branches based on read coverage and paired-end information, resulting in high-quality consensus sequences of reads sharing the seeds. Such consensus sequences are then extended to contigs.&nbsp;BASE is a practically efficient tool for constructing contig, with significant improvement in quality for long NGS reads. It is relatively easy to extend BASE to include scaffolding.</p><p>5.&nbsp;Fermi&nbsp;https://github.com/lh3/fermi/</p><p>Fermi is a de novo assembler with a particular focus on assembling Illumina&nbsp;short sequence reads from a mammal-sized genome. In addition to the role of a&nbsp;typical assembler, fermi also aims to preserve heterozygotes which are often&nbsp;collapsed by other assemblers. Its ultimate goal is to find a minimal set of&nbsp;unitigs to represent all the information in raw reads.</p><p>If you want to learn about String Graph assembler, please read the following papers -</p><p>i)&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/suppl_2/ii79.full.pdf+html">The Fragment Assembly String Graph - E. W. Myers</a></p><p>This paper describes the String Graph concept.</p><p>ii)&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/12/i367.full#ref-20">Efficient construction of an assembly string graph using the FM-index - Jared T. Simpson and Richard Durbin</a></p><p>This earlier paper from Simpson and Durbin</p><p>iii)&nbsp;<a href="http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2012/01/22/gr.126953.111">Efficient de novo assembly of large genomes using compressed data structures - Jared T. Simpson and Richard Durbin</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35762/genome-assembly-stats-plotting</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 03:45:39 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35762/genome-assembly-stats-plotting</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genome assembly stats plotting]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A&nbsp;<em>de novo</em>&nbsp;genome assembly can be summarised b</p>
<p>y a number of metrics, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Overall assembly length</li>
<li>Number of scaffolds/contigs</li>
<li>Length of longest scaffold/contig</li>
<li>Scaffold/contig N50 and N90Assembly base composition, in particular percentage GC and percentage Ns</li>
<li>CEGMA completeness</li>
<li>Scaffold/contig length/count distribution</li>
</ul>
<p>assembly-stats supports two widely used presentations of these values, tabular and cumulative length plots, and introduces an additional circular plot that summarises most commonly used assembly metrics in a single visualisation. Each of these presentations is generated using javascript from a common (JSON) data structure, allowing toggling between alternative views, and each can be applied to a single or multiple assemblies to allow direct comparison of alternate assemblies.</p>
<p>Tabular presentation allows direct comparison of exact values between assemblies, the limitations of this approach lie in the necessary omission of distributions and the challenge of interpreting ratios of values that may vary by several orders of magnitude.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/rjchallis/assembly-stats" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rjchallis/assembly-stats</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36861/eagler-a-scaffolding-tool-for-long-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 05:26:03 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36861/eagler-a-scaffolding-tool-for-long-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[EAGLER: a scaffolding tool for long reads.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>EAGLER is a scaffolding tool for long reads. The scaffolder takes as input a draft genome created by any NGS assembler and a set of long reads. The long reads are used to extend the contigs present in the NGS draft and possibly join overlapping contigs. EAGLER supports both PacBio and Oxford Nanopore reads.</p>
<p>The tool should be compatible with most UNIX flavors and has been successfully tested on the following operating systems:</p>
<ul>
<li>Mac OS X 10.11.1</li>
<li>Mac OS X 10.10.3</li>
<li>Ubuntu 14.04 LTS</li>
</ul>

https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/844447.Diplomski_2015_Luka_terbi.pdf<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/mculinovic/EAGLER" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mculinovic/EAGLER</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36985/swalo-scaffolding-with-assembly-likelihood-optimization</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 02:45:16 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36985/swalo-scaffolding-with-assembly-likelihood-optimization</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SWALO: Scaffolding with assembly likelihood optimization]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[SWALO (scaffolding with assembly likelihood optimization) is a method for scaffolding based on likelihood of genome assemblies computed using generative models for sequencing.

Please email your questions, comments, suggestions, and bug reports to atif.bd@gmail.com.<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://atifrahman.github.io/SWALO/" rel="nofollow">https://atifrahman.github.io/SWALO/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/37396/converting-a-vcf-into-a-fasta-given-some-reference</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:03:53 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/37396/converting-a-vcf-into-a-fasta-given-some-reference</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Converting a VCF into a FASTA given some reference !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Samtools/BCFtools (Heng Li) provides a Perl script&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/lh3/samtools/blob/master/bcftools/vcfutils.pl"><code>vcfutils.pl</code></a>&nbsp;which does this, the function&nbsp;<code>vcf2fq</code>&nbsp;(lines 469-528)</p><p>This script has been modified by others to convert InDels as well, e.g.&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/gringer/bioinfscripts/blob/master/vcf2fq.pl">this</a>&nbsp;by David Eccles</p><pre><code><span>./</span><span>vcf2fq</span><span>.</span><span>pl </span><span>-</span><span>f </span><span>&lt;</span><span>input</span><span>.</span><span>fasta</span><span>&gt;</span><span> </span><span>&lt;</span><span>all</span><span>-</span><span>site</span><span>.</span><span>vcf</span><span>&gt;</span><span> </span><span>&gt;</span><span> </span><span>&lt;</span><span>output</span><span>.</span><span>fastq</span><span>&gt;</span></code></pre><p>https://github.com/gringer/bioinfscripts/blob/master/vcf2fq.pl</p><p>https://github.com/lh3/samtools/blob/master/bcftools/vcfutils.pl</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37840/long-read-assembly-workshop</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 17:23:18 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37840/long-read-assembly-workshop</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Long read assembly workshop !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a tutorial for a workshop on long-read (PacBio) genome assembly.</p>
<p>It demonstrates how to use long PacBio sequencing reads to assemble a bacterial genome, and includes additional steps for circularising, trimming, finding plasmids, and correcting the assembly with short-read Illumina data.</p>
<p>&nbsp;Please comment if you know any other long read addembly tutorial.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://sepsis-omics.github.io/tutorials/modules/cmdline_assembly_v2/" rel="nofollow">http://sepsis-omics.github.io/tutorials/modules/cmdline_assembly_v2/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38210/skesa-strategic-k-mer-extension-for-scrupulous-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:45:41 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38210/skesa-strategic-k-mer-extension-for-scrupulous-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>SKESA is a DeBruijn graph-based de-novo assembler designed for assembling reads of microbial genomes sequenced using Illumina. Comparison with SPAdes and MegaHit shows that SKESA produces assemblies that have high sequence quality and contiguity, handles low-level contamination in reads, is fast, and produces an identical assembly for the same input when assembled multiple times with the same or different compute resources. </span></p>
<p><span>Source code for SKESA is freely available at&nbsp;</span><span><a href="https://github.com/ncbi/SKESA/releases"><span>https://github.com/ncbi/SKESA/releases</span></a></span><span>.</span></p>
<p>Research Paper&nbsp;@ <a href="https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1540-z">Link</a></p>
<p><span><span>SKESA algorithm are as follows:</span><br></span></p>
<p><span><img src="https://media.springernature.com/lw785/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13059-018-1540-z/MediaObjects/13059_2018_1540_Fig4_HTML.png" alt="image" width="785" height="984" style="border: 0px; border: 0px;"></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/ncbi/SKESA/releases" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ncbi/SKESA/releases</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38526/versatile-genome-assembly-evaluation-with-quast-lg</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 22:06:31 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38526/versatile-genome-assembly-evaluation-with-quast-lg</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>QUAST-LG is an extension of&nbsp;<a href="http://cab.spbu.ru/software/quast/">QUAST</a>&nbsp;intended for evaluating large-scale genome assemblies (up to mammalian-size).</p>
<p>QUAST-LG&nbsp;is included in the QUAST&nbsp; package starting from version 5.0.0 (<a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/quast/files/latest/download?source=files">download the latest release</a>). Run QUAST as usual and do not forget to add&nbsp;<span>‐‐large</span>&nbsp;option to your command!</p>
<p>A short list of the new features (see&nbsp;<a href="http://cab.spbu.ru/files/quast/latest-docs/CHANGES.txt">CHANGES</a>&nbsp;for all):</p>
<ul>
<li>Significant speedup achieved by both&nbsp;use of new fast aligner (<a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap2">minimap2</a>) and the refactoring of alignment analyzing&nbsp;modules</li>
<li>New k-mer-based completeness and correctness metrics</li>
<li>BUSCO added for enhanced reference-free analysis</li>
<li>The concept of upper bound&nbsp;assembly (theoretical limits on the assembly&nbsp;completeness and&nbsp;contiguity for a given genome and set of reads)</li>
</ul><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://cab.spbu.ru/software/quast-lg/" rel="nofollow">http://cab.spbu.ru/software/quast-lg/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/38765/list-of-tools-frequently-used-while-genome-assembly</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:39:02 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/38765/list-of-tools-frequently-used-while-genome-assembly</link>
	<title><![CDATA[List of tools frequently used while genome assembly]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h4>List of tools frequently used while genome assembly:</h4><p>I have used the following assemblers</p><ul>
<li><a href="http://bioinf.spbau.ru/spades">Spades</a>&nbsp;(v. 3.10.1)</li>
<li><a href="http://canu.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html">CANU</a>&nbsp;(v. 1.6)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler">Unicycler&nbsp;</a>(v. v0.4.1)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/lh3/miniasm">Miniasm</a>&nbsp;(v. 0.2-r137-dirty)</li>
</ul><p>I have used the following mappers</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap2">minimap2</a>&nbsp;(v.&nbsp;2.0rc1-r232)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap">minimap&nbsp;</a>(v. 0.2-r124-dirty)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/lh3/bwa">bwa</a>&nbsp;(v.&nbsp;0.7.12-r1039)</li>
</ul><p>I have used the following polishing tools</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/isovic/racon">Racon</a>&nbsp;(v. not available)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/broadinstitute/pilon">Pilon</a>&nbsp;(v. 1.18)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/jts/nanopolish">Nanopolish</a>&nbsp;(v. 0.8.3)</li>
</ul><p>I have used the following tools to assess genome assembly characteristics</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/chjp/ANI">ANI.pl</a>&nbsp;(https://github.com/chjp/ANI)</li>
<li><a href="http://ecogenomics.github.io/CheckM/">CheckM</a>&nbsp;(v. 1.0.7)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/tseemann/prokka">Prokka</a>&nbsp;(v. 1.12)</li>
<li><a href="http://bioinf.spbau.ru/en/quast">QUAST</a>&nbsp;(v. 2.3)</li>
<li><a href="http://mummer.sourceforge.net/">mummer&nbsp;</a>(v. not available)</li>
</ul><p>If you have any ideas or superior tools we have missed please let us know in the comments.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>