http://software.broadinstitute.org/viral/docs/vicuna_v1.0.pdf

Address of the bookmark: https://www.broadinstitute.org/viral-genomics/vicuna

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy

More at https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3

Address of the bookmark: http://www.interactivenn.net/

• standardizes VCF records for compatibility with both germline and somatic SV callers,
• benchmarks against a single VCF input file, or
• benchmarks against an ensemble call set created from multiple VCF input files.

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/KolmogorovLab/minda

LoVis4u is a bioinformatics tool for Loci Visualisation.

LoVis4u, a command-line tool and Python API designed for highly customizable and fast visualisation of multiple genomic loci. LoVis4u generates vector images in PDF format based on annotation data from GenBank or GFF files. It is capable of visualising entire genomes of bacteriophages as well as plasmids and user-defined regions of longer prokaryotic genomes. Additionally, LoVis4u offers optional data processing steps to identify and highlight accessory and core genes in input sequences.

https://art-egorov.github.io/lovis4u/

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/art-egorov/lovis4u

• A compiled program delivering high performance analyses
• Supports FASTA/FASTQ files, also Gzip compressed
• A growing collection of handy utilities, also for quick inspection of the datasets

Can be easily installed via conda:

conda install -c bioconda seqfu

Address of the bookmark: https://telatin.github.io/seqfu2/

ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/

https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/downloads.html

Address of the bookmark: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/

As with most programs that run on UNIX, the text output is in some specific format. If the program is popular enough, there will be one or more parsers written for that format – these are just utilities written to help you retrieve whatever information you are interested in from the output.

Let’s conclude this tutorial by converting the BLAST output in out.txt into a spreadsheet format, using a Python script. 

First, we need to get the script. We’ll do that using the ‘git’ program:

git clone https://github.com/ngs-docs/ngs-scripts.git /root/ngs-scripts

We’ll discuss ‘git’ more later; for now, just think of it as a way to get ahold of a particular set of files. In this case, we’ve placed the files in /root/ngs-scripts/, and you’re looking to run the script blast/blast-to-csv.py using Python:

python /root/ngs-scripts/blast/blast-to-csv.py out.txt

This outputs a spread-sheet like list of names and e-values. To save this to a file, do:

python /root/ngs-scripts/blast/blast-to-csv.py out.txt > ~out.csv

If you have Excel installed, try double clicking on it.

Address of the bookmark: https://cov-lineages.org/resources/pangolin/output.html

1. Learn and get updated

Some of the bad biological programmers only learn new technical or non-technical things when it’s absolutely necessary. The good biological programmers learn new technical skills proactively. But great biological programmers not only learn new technical skills on their own but also learn non-technical skills, and have an open mind to sources of knowledge that others may shut out.

In other concrete term, the bad biological programmer learn Perl's regular expression when they started a project on comparative genomics; the good biological programmer learned it a year before because it looked interesting; and the great biological programmer also read about the BioPerl packages, genomics, DNA string, genomic theories, or some similar course of study so that they could understand the results and explain it biologically.

2. Not a merely coder!!!

I often encountered with biological programmer who call themself a hard-core computer programmer and avoid biology. I can almost guarantee that if you are one of them then you are not doing research but merely writing "dry" codes.

According to my supervisor most of the computational biologist, don't know what they are doing biologically. Even they struggle to explain their own programs output and results. Therefore, It is highly advisable to learn basic of biology which can assist you to explain the result and understand your discovery. Always remember you are a researcher not a coder.

3. Be Social with biologist

The computational biologist spends most of the time in from of computers, writing codes. They always think their job is to produce working codes, not technical research perfections. But, they are completely wrong. You should not forget that apart from your computational skills you also need some biologist, other than your supervisor, to explain and make you understand the complex biological mechanism.

I highly recommend your to interact with biotech researchers and learn how do they explain their one graph (which they generally produce after one year of work) biologically. Remember, the origin of your research project is complex biological phenomenon, which is more complex than that of your limited programming rules.

4. Do not search, research for answers

Researching for answers means more than typing several keywords into a search engine or posting a question at Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums. I have entered problems into search engines that generate no results, and every question I posted on Stack Overflow or the BioStars forums never got anything resembling an answer, yet I solved the issues and moved on. I’m not a magician — I just know how to find answers or discover root causes.

Many problems are situational, and if you depend on search engines and forums, you can waste a lot of time going down a rabbit hole and possibly never getting a solution. Learn to perform root cause analysis, learn enough about the underlying system to look for other clues and solutions, and learn to take a long distance view of an issue before deep diving into it.

5. Love and defend your research

You cannot rise to the top in this research profession without loving your work. There are some very good “it’s just a job” biological programmers (I’ve been one at times), but if that is your outlook, you won’t be willing to do whatever it takes to succeed. This idea gets a lot of folks in a huff, because they feel it is a personal insult. “I’m a good programmer, but I have other priorities and can’t make work my life.” I understand completely; I have other priorities too. As much as I hate to say it, when I am passionate about my work, I am willing (though not eager) to abandon my other priorities to finish the job. It is not an insult to say that if you aren’t willing to pull out all the stops you can’t be the best, it is a fact.

You must be passionate about more than programming — you must also be excited about your research, the tools and technology you are using, and so on. I have seen very good and even great biological programmers operating at mediocre levels because something was not a good fit, such as they hated the project or were using a technology they disliked. Therefore, like your research project and get excited about your discoveries. You have not only to discover but also defend your finding with scientific words.

Thanks to all of you for reading.