<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37502?offset=500</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37502?offset=500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37737/rebaler-program-for-conducting-reference-based-assemblies-using-long-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 07:52:41 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37737/rebaler-program-for-conducting-reference-based-assemblies-using-long-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Rebaler: program for conducting reference-based assemblies using long reads.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Rebaler is a program for conducting reference-based assemblies using long reads. It relies mainly on&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/lh3/minimap2">minimap2</a>&nbsp;for alignment and&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/isovic/racon">Racon</a>&nbsp;for making consensus sequences.</p>
<p>I made Rebaler for bacterial genomes (specifically for the task of&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Basecalling-comparison">testing basecallers</a>). It should in principle work for non-bacterial genomes as well, but I haven't tested it.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Rebaler" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rrwick/Rebaler</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38299/deepbinner-a-signal-level-demultiplexer-for-oxford-nanopore-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:38:49 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38299/deepbinner-a-signal-level-demultiplexer-for-oxford-nanopore-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Deepbinner: a signal-level demultiplexer for Oxford Nanopore reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Deepbinner is a tool for demultiplexing barcoded&nbsp;<a href="https://nanoporetech.com/">Oxford Nanopore</a>&nbsp;sequencing reads. It does this with a deep&nbsp;<a href="https://adeshpande3.github.io/adeshpande3.github.io/A-Beginner's-Guide-To-Understanding-Convolutional-Neural-Networks/">convolutional neural network</a>&nbsp;classifier, using many of the&nbsp;<a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/neural-network-architectures-156e5bad51ba">architectural advances</a>&nbsp;that have proven successful in image classification. Unlike other demultiplexers (e.g. Albacore and&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop">Porechop</a>), Deepbinner identifies barcodes from the raw signal (a.k.a. squiggle) which gives it greater sensitivity and fewer unclassified reads.</p>
<ul>
<li><span>Reasons to use Deepbinner</span>:
<ul>
<li>To minimise the number of unclassified reads (use Deepbinner by itself).</li>
<li>To minimise the number of misclassified reads (use Deepbinner in conjunction with Albacore demultiplexing).</li>
<li>You plan on running signal-level downstream analyses, like&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/jts/nanopolish">Nanopolish</a>. Deepbinner can&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner#using-deepbinner-before-basecalling">demultiplex the fast5 files</a>which makes this easier.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span>Reasons to&nbsp;<em>not</em>&nbsp;use Deepbinner</span>:
<ul>
<li>You only have basecalled reads not the raw fast5 files (which Deepbinner requires).</li>
<li>You have a small/slow computer. Deepbinner is more computationally intensive than&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop">Porechop</a>.</li>
<li>You used a sequencing/barcoding kit other than&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner/blob/master/models">the ones Deepbinner was trained on</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38892/wtdbg2-a-fuzzy-bruijn-graph-approach-to-long-noisy-reads-assembly</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 04:53:47 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38892/wtdbg2-a-fuzzy-bruijn-graph-approach-to-long-noisy-reads-assembly</link>
	<title><![CDATA[wtdbg2: A fuzzy Bruijn graph approach to long noisy reads assembly]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Wtdbg2 is a&nbsp;</span><em>de novo</em><span>&nbsp;sequence assembler for long noisy reads produced by PacBio or Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). It assembles raw reads without error correction and then builds the consensus from intermediate assembly output.&nbsp;</span></p>
<pre>./wtdbg2 -x rs -g 4.6m -t 16 -i reads.fa.gz -fo prefix
./wtpoa-cns -t 16 -i prefix.ctg.lay.gz -fo prefix.ctg.fa</pre><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/ruanjue/wtdbg2" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ruanjue/wtdbg2</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40701/fastgt-an-alignment-free-method-for-calling-common-snvs-directly-from-raw-sequencing-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:27:33 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40701/fastgt-an-alignment-free-method-for-calling-common-snvs-directly-from-raw-sequencing-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[FastGT: an alignment-free method for calling common SNVs directly from raw sequencing reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>FastGT is a program package for whole-genome genotyping of genome variants directly from raw sequencing reads. It is written in C and runs in Linux. FastGT uses a list of variant-specific k-mer pairs that are unique in human genome, counts the frequency of k-mers in sequencing data and predicts the genotype. All this takes less than 1 hour on average low-cost Linux server.</p>
<p><a href="http://bioinfo.ut.ee/FastGT/">http://bioinfo.ut.ee/FastGT/</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://github.com/bioinfo-ut/GenomeTester4/">https://github.com/bioinfo-ut/GenomeTester4/</a></strong></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinfo.ut.ee/FastGT/" rel="nofollow">http://bioinfo.ut.ee/FastGT/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40972/deepbinner-a-signal-level-demultiplexer-for-oxford-nanopore-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 02:45:53 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40972/deepbinner-a-signal-level-demultiplexer-for-oxford-nanopore-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Deepbinner: a signal-level demultiplexer for Oxford Nanopore reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Deepbinner is a tool for demultiplexing barcoded <a href="https://nanoporetech.com/">Oxford Nanopore</a> sequencing reads. It does this with a deep <a href="https://adeshpande3.github.io/adeshpande3.github.io/A-Beginner's-Guide-To-Understanding-Convolutional-Neural-Networks/">convolutional neural network</a> classifier, using many of the <a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/neural-network-architectures-156e5bad51ba">architectural advances</a> that have proven successful in image classification. Unlike other demultiplexers (e.g. Albacore and <a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop">Porechop</a>), Deepbinner identifies barcodes from the raw signal (a.k.a. squiggle) which gives it greater sensitivity and fewer unclassified reads.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44171/hairsplitter-assembling-long-reads-in-an-unknown-number-of-haplotypes</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:13:40 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44171/hairsplitter-assembling-long-reads-in-an-unknown-number-of-haplotypes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[HairSplitter: assembling long reads in an unknown number of haplotypes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Pros and cons of HairSplitter Limitations of HairSplitter:</p>
<p>Not very fast: it re-polishes the whole assembly&nbsp;</p>
<p>Limited in the number of haplotypes</p>
<p>Strengths of HairSplitter:</p>
<p>Very modular, can be used with any assembler</p>
<p>Naive: makes no assumption on ploidy, parameter-free</p>
<p>Safe: won&rsquo;t artificially duplicate contigs</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>HairSplitter splits collapsed assemblies from &ldquo;draft&rdquo; assemblies obtained by any means</p>
<p>HairSplitter can recover haplotypes and distinguish repeated elements</p>
<p>Only needs sequencing reads, potentially error-prone</p>
<p>HairSplitter splits collapsed assemblies from &ldquo;draft&rdquo; assemblies obtained by any means</p>
<p>HairSplitter can recover haplotypes and distinguish repeated elements</p>
<p>Only needs sequencing reads, potentially error-prone</p>
<p>Not really available yet (github.com/RolandFaure/HairSplitter)</p>
<p>https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03864075/file/RolandFaure_presentation_SeqBIM_2022.pdf</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03817928/document" rel="nofollow">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03817928/document</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31302/multi-metagenome-assembly</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:14:18 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31302/multi-metagenome-assembly</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Multi-metagenome assembly]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>This project contains scripts and tutorials on how to assemble individual microbial genomes from metagenomes, as described in:</p>
<p>Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes<br><br>Mads Albertsen, Philip Hugenholtz, Adam Skarshewski, Gene W. Tyson, K&aring;re L. Nielsen and Per .H. Nielsen</p>
<p>Nature Biotechnology 2013, doi:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nbt.2579.html">10.1038/nbt.2579</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/MadsAlbertsen/multi-metagenome" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/MadsAlbertsen/multi-metagenome</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Radha Agarkar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35055/jabba-hybrid-error-correction-for-long-sequencing-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 03:58:14 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35055/jabba-hybrid-error-correction-for-long-sequencing-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Jabba: Hybrid Error Correction for Long Sequencing Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Jabba is a hybrid error correction tool to correct third generation (PacBio / ONT) sequencing data, using second generation (Illumina) data.</p>
<p>Input</p>
<p>Jabba takes as input a concatenated de Bruijn graph and a set of sequences:</p>
<p>the de Bruijn graph should appear in fasta format with 1 entry per node, the meta information should be in the format:<br>&gt;NODE <br>the set of sequences should be in fasta or fastq format. These sequences will be corrected (e.g. PacBio reads). The corrections will be written to a file Jabba fasta.<br>The output is a file in fasta format with corrections of the long reads, and additionally a file in the input format containing uncorrected reads.</p>
<p>https://github.com/biointec/jabba/wiki</p>
<p>https://almob.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13015-016-0075-7</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/biointec/jabba" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/biointec/jabba</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:26:55 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[QuorUM: An Error Corrector for Illumina Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>We produce trimmed and error-corrected reads that result in assemblies with longer contigs and fewer errors. We compared QuorUM against several published error correctors and found that it is the best performer in most metrics we use. QuorUM is efficiently implemented making use of current multi-core computing architectures and it is suitable for large data sets (1 billion bases checked and corrected per day per core)</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.genome.umd.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.genome.umd.edu/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44848/trust-but-verify-sequencing-your-cell-lines-might-reveal-an-uninvited-guest</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:07:57 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44848/trust-but-verify-sequencing-your-cell-lines-might-reveal-an-uninvited-guest</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Trust But Verify: Sequencing Your Cell Lines Might Reveal an Uninvited Guest]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>High-throughput sequencing has become indispensable in cell biology, enabling detailed insights into chromatin structure, gene expression, and regulatory dynamics. Yet, when faced with unexpectedly low mapping rates to the human genome, researchers often rush to troubleshoot technical parameters&mdash;sequencer quality, adapter trimming, or aligner settings.</p><p>Before you go down that path, consider this critical biological question:<br /> <strong>Are you sequencing human cells&mdash;or bacterial contamination?</strong></p><h2>The Silent Saboteur: Mycoplasma in Cell Cultures</h2><p><em>Mycoplasma</em> contamination remains one of the most widespread and underdiagnosed issues in tissue culture work. Studies suggest that <strong>15&ndash;35% of cell lines in use may be contaminated</strong>, often without visible signs. Unlike other microbial infections, <em>Mycoplasma</em> does not produce cloudiness, odor, or a change in pH. Many researchers won&rsquo;t detect it unless they specifically test for it.</p><p>The consequences, however, are profound. <em>Mycoplasma</em> can significantly alter:</p><ul>
<li>
<p>Host gene expression patterns</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cell proliferation rates</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Epigenetic profiles and chromatin accessibility</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cytokine signaling and immune responses</p>
</li>
</ul><p>In short, it can skew your results, compromise your biological conclusions, and invalidate weeks or months of research.</p><h2>A Simple Diagnostic Step: Map Against <em>Mycoplasma</em> Genomes</h2><p>If you encounter poor alignment rates to the human genome, consider mapping your reads to a <em>Mycoplasma</em> reference genome&mdash;or better yet, use a <strong>combined human + <em>Mycoplasma</em></strong> reference. There have been cases where over half of all reads, initially assumed to be from human cells, were in fact bacterial in origin. This check is fast, easy, and could save your project.</p><h2>How Contamination Happens&mdash;and Persists</h2><p><em>Mycoplasma</em> is small (0.1&ndash;0.3 &mu;m), lacks a cell wall, and can pass through standard filters undetected. Common sources include:</p><ul>
<li>
<p>Contaminated reagents (e.g., FBS)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Infected cell lines obtained from other labs</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Poor aseptic technique or shared equipment</p>
</li>
</ul><p>Once present, it spreads quickly between cultures and can persist for months, silently affecting results.</p><h2>Why Treatment Is Difficult</h2><p>While antibiotics such as Plasmocin or BM-Cyclin are sometimes used, they often offer only partial resolution and may themselves alter cell behavior. In many cases, the best course of action is to <strong>discard the contaminated culture</strong> and start with a fresh, verified stock.</p><h2>Practical Recommendations for Researchers</h2><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Routinely test for <em>Mycoplasma</em></strong> using PCR, qPCR, or fluorescence-based assays</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Incorporate contamination screens into your sequencing QC pipeline</strong></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Use combined reference genomes</strong> when mapping ambiguous reads</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Practice strict aseptic technique</strong> and monitor all incoming cell lines</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Don&rsquo;t ignore unexplained data anomalies</strong>&mdash;they might point to contamination</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>Closing Thought: Contamination Is a Biological Variable</h2><p>It&rsquo;s easy to view poor mapping as a technical issue, but sometimes the problem lies deeper&mdash;in the biology itself. <em>Mycoplasma</em> contamination doesn&rsquo;t just interfere with sequencing; it interferes with science. As a research community, we must treat contamination not as an afterthought, but as a key variable to control.</p><p>So next time your reads won&rsquo;t align, don&rsquo;t just tune the aligner. Ask if your cells are telling the truth&mdash;or if they're hiding something.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>