<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37574?offset=170</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37574?offset=170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40302/simug-a-general-purpose-genome-simulator</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 04:33:18 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40302/simug-a-general-purpose-genome-simulator</link>
	<title><![CDATA[simuG: a general-purpose genome simulator]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Simulated genomes with pre-defined and random genomic variants can be very useful for benchmarking genomic and bioinformatics analyses. Here we introduce simuG, a lightweight tool for simulating the full-spectrum of genomic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, Insertions/Deletions, copy number variants, inversions and translocations) for any organisms (including human). The simplicity and versatility of simuG make it a unique general-purpose genome simulator for a wide-range of simulation-based applications.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/yjx1217/simuG" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/yjx1217/simuG</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43587/fix-rewritable-error-of-elgg</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 06:23:46 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43587/fix-rewritable-error-of-elgg</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Fix rewritable error of ELGG !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;<code><a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_rewrite.html">mod_rewrite</a></code>&nbsp;module uses a rule-based rewriting engine, based on a PCRE regular-expression parser, to rewrite requested URLs on the fly. By default,&nbsp;<code><a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_rewrite.html">mod_rewrite</a></code>&nbsp;maps a URL to a filesystem path. However, it can also be used to redirect one URL to another URL, or to invoke an internal proxy fetch.</p>
<p><code><a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_rewrite.html">mod_rewrite</a></code>&nbsp;provides a flexible and powerful way to manipulate URLs using an unlimited number of rules. Each rule can have an unlimited number of attached rule conditions, to allow you to rewrite URL based on server variables, environment variables, HTTP headers, or time stamps.</p>
<p><code><a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_rewrite.html">mod_rewrite</a></code>&nbsp;operates on the full URL path, including the path-info section. A rewrite rule can be invoked in&nbsp;<code>httpd.conf</code>&nbsp;or in&nbsp;<code>.htaccess</code>. The path generated by a rewrite rule can include a query string, or can lead to internal sub-processing, external request redirection, or internal proxy throughput.</p>
<p>Further details, discussion, and examples, are provided in the&nbsp;<a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/rewrite/">detailed mod_rewrite documentation</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>sudo a2enmod rewrite</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>sudo systemctl restart apache2</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>sudo nano /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf</li>
</ul>
<p>Write this</p>
<div title="/etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf">/etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf</div>
<div>
<div>
<pre><code><span>&lt;</span>VirtualHost *:8<span><span>0</span>&gt;</span>
    <span></span><span><span>&lt;</span>Directory /var/www/html<span>&gt;</span></span><span></span>
        <span>Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews</span>
        <span>AllowOverride All</span>
        <span>Require all granted</span>
    <span></span><span><span>&lt;</span>/Directory<span>&gt;</span></span><span></span>

    <span>.</span> <span>.</span> <span>.</span>
<span>&lt;</span>/VirtualHost<span>&gt;</span></code></pre>
</div>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-rewrite-urls-with-mod_rewrite-for-apache-on-ubuntu-18-04" rel="nofollow">https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-rewrite-urls-with-mod_rewrite-for-apache-on-ubuntu-18-04</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37524/fmlrc-a-long-read-error-correction-tool-using-the-multi-string-burrows-wheeler-transform</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:29:28 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37524/fmlrc-a-long-read-error-correction-tool-using-the-multi-string-burrows-wheeler-transform</link>
	<title><![CDATA[FMLRC: a long-read error correction tool using the multi-string Burrows Wheeler Transform]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>FMLRC, or FM-index Long Read Corrector, is a tool for performing hybrid correction of long read sequencing using the BWT and FM-index of short-read sequencing data. Given a BWT of the short-read sequencing data, FMLRC will build an FM-index and use that as an implicit de Bruijn graph. Each long read is then corrected independently by identifying low frequency k-mers in the long read and replacing them with the closest matching high frequency k-mers in the implicit de Bruijn graph. In contrast to other de Bruijn graph based implementations, FMLRC is not restricted to a particular k-mer size and instead uses a two pass method with both a short "k-mer" and a longer "K-mer". This allows FMLRC to correct through low complexity regions that are computational difficult for short k-mers.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/holtjma/fmlrc" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/holtjma/fmlrc</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44497/graphpath-a-graph-attention-model-for-molecular-stratification-with-interpretability-based-on-the-pathway-pathway-interaction-network</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 20:51:21 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44497/graphpath-a-graph-attention-model-for-molecular-stratification-with-interpretability-based-on-the-pathway-pathway-interaction-network</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GraphPath: A graph attention model for molecular stratification with interpretability based on the pathway-pathway interaction network]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Achieving accurate and interpretable clinical predictions requires paramount attention to thoroughly characterizing patients at both the molecular and biological pathway levels. In this paper, we present GraphPath, a biological knowledge-driven graph neural network with multi-head self-attention mechanism that implements the pathway-pathway interaction network. We train GraphPath to classify the cancer status of patients with prostate cancer based on their multi-omics profiling.</span></p>
<p><span><img src="https://github.com/amazingma/GraphPath/raw/main/Figures/GraphPath.png" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/amazingma/GraphPath" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/amazingma/GraphPath</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30966/maftools</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:16:01 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30966/maftools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MafTools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>maftools - An R package to summarize, analyze and visualize MAF files. <a href="https://github.com/PoisonAlien/maftools#introduction"></a>Introduction.</p>
<p>With advances in Cancer Genomics, Mutation Annotation Format (MAF) is being widley accepted and used to store variants detected. <a href="http://cancergenome.nih.gov">The Cancer Genome Atlas</a> Project has seqenced over 30 different cancers with sample size of each cancer type being over 200. The <a href="https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/TCGA/TCGA+MAF+Files">resulting data</a> consisting of genetic variants is stored in the form of <a href="https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/TCGA/Mutation+Annotation+Format+%28MAF%29+Specification">Mutation Annotation Format</a>. This package attempts to summarize, analyze, annotate and visualize MAF files in an efficient manner either from TCGA sources or any in-house studies as long as the data is in MAF format. Maftools can also handle ICGC Simple Somatic Mutation format.</p>
<p>maftools is on <img src="https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/icons/emoji/unicode/1f449.png" alt=":point_right:" width="20" height="20" style="border: 0px;"> <a href="http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/11/052662">bioRxiv</a> <img src="https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/icons/emoji/bowtie.png" alt=":bowtie:" title=":bowtie:" width="20" height="20" style="border: 0px; text-align: absmiddle;"></p>
<p>Please cite the below if you find this tool useful for you.</p>
<p>Mayakonda, A. and H.P. Koeffler, Maftools: Efficient analysis, visualization and summarization of MAF files from large-scale cohort based cancer studies. bioRxiv, 2016. doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/052662">http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/052662</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/PoisonAlien/maftools" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/PoisonAlien/maftools</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/35033/bbsplit-read-binning-tool-for-metagenomes-and-contaminated-libraries</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:25:27 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/35033/bbsplit-read-binning-tool-for-metagenomes-and-contaminated-libraries</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BBSplit: Read Binning Tool for Metagenomes and Contaminated Libraries]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>BBSplit internally uses BBMap to map reads to multiple genomes at once, and determine which genome they match best. This is different than with ordinary mapping. If a genome (say, human) contains an exact repeat somewhere, reads mapping to it will be mapped ambiguously. But if you want to determine whether reads are mouse or human, it does not matter whether they map ambiguously within human, only whether they are ambiguous between human and mouse. BBSplit tracks this additional ambiguity information and decides how to use it based on the &ldquo;ambig2&rdquo; flag. The normal use of BBSplit is like Seal, either quantifying how many reads go to each reference, or splitting the reads into multiple output files, one per reference. BBSplit can only be run using references indexed with BBSplit, as they contain additional information regarding which sequences came from which reference file.</p><p><span>BBSplit is a tool that bins reads by mapping to multiple references simultaneously, using&nbsp;</span><a href="http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41057" target="_blank">BBMap</a><span>. The reads go to the bin of the reference they map to best. There are also disambiguation options, such that reads that map to multiple references can be binned with all of them, none of them, one of them, or put in a special "ambiguous" file for each of them. Paired reads will always be kept together.</span><br /><br /><span>For example, if you had a library of something that was contaminated with e.coli and salmonella, you could do this:</span><br /><br /><strong>bbsplit.sh in=reads.fq ref=ecoli.fa,salmonella.fa basename=out_%.fq outu=clean.fq int=t</strong><br /><br /><span>This will produce 3 output files:</span><br /><strong>out_ecoli.fq</strong><span>&nbsp;(ecoli reads)</span><br /><strong>out_salmonella.fq</strong><span>&nbsp;(salmonella reads)</span><br /><strong>clean.fq</strong><span>&nbsp;(unmapped reads)</span><br /><br /><span>In this case, "int=t" means that the input file is paired and interleaved. For single-end reads you would leave that out. For paired reads in 2 files, you would do this:</span><br /><strong>bbsplit.sh in1=reads1.fq in2=reads2.fq ref=ecoli.fa,salmonella.fa basename=out_%.fq outu1=clean1.fq outu2=clean2.fq</strong></p><p><strong><span>BBSplit is available here:</span><br /><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/</a></strong></p><p><span>The sensitivity can be raised to be equivalent to BBMap with these flags: "minratio=0.56 minhits=1 maxindel=16000"</span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/43977/read-simulators</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 06:48:18 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/43977/read-simulators</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Read Simulators]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h1>Short Read Simulators</h1><p>With the popularity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, many NGS read simulators have been developed. Currently, many of the popular short read simulators are designed to simulate reads mimicking many Illumina, 454 and SOLiD platforms. Listed below are some popular short read simulators. Links to their publications are provided as well.</p><ol>
<li><a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0003373" target="_blank">MetaSim</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/lh3/wgsim" target="_blank">wgsim</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/timmassingham/simNGS" target="_blank">SimNGS</a></li>
<li><a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049110" target="_blank">ArtificialFastqGenerator</a></li>
<li id="e943"><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/35/3/521/5055123" target="_blank">InSilicoSeq</a></li>
</ol><h1>Long Read Simulators</h1><p id="d469">With the advancements in sequencing technologies, scientists have shown an increasing interest in using third-generation sequencing (TGS) technologies. Currently, many of the popular long read simulators are designed to simulate reads mimicking the two main TGS technologies; (1)&nbsp;<em>Pacific Biosciences (PacBio)</em>&nbsp;and (2)&nbsp;<em>Oxford Nanopore (ONT)</em>. Listed below are some of the popular and recently introduced PacBio and ONT simulators. Links to their publications are provided as well.</p><h2><span>PacBio Simulators</span></h2><ol>
<li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/29/1/119/273243" target="_blank">PBSIM</a></li>
<li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/32/24/3829/2525710" target="_blank">LongISLND</a></li>
<li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/32/17/2704/2450740" target="_blank">SimLoRD</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-018-2208-0" target="_blank">NPBSS</a></li>
<li id="fed0"><a href="https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2901-7" target="_blank">PaSS</a></li>
</ol><h2><span>ONT Simulators</span></h2><ol>
<li id="f145"><a href="https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/6/4/gix010/3051934" target="_blank">NanoSim</a></li>
<li id="c6f5"><a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8621253" target="_blank">Nanopore SimulatION</a></li>
<li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/34/17/2899/4962495" target="_blank">DeepSimulator</a></li>
<li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/36/8/2578/5698265" target="_blank">DeepSimulator1.5</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35061/proovread-large-scale-high-accuracy-pacbio-correction-through-iterative-short-read-consensus</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 04:12:20 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35061/proovread-large-scale-high-accuracy-pacbio-correction-through-iterative-short-read-consensus</link>
	<title><![CDATA[proovread : large-scale high-accuracy PacBio correction through iterative short read consensus]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>proovread : large-scale high-accuracy PacBio correction through iterative short read consensus</p>
<ul>
<li>outperforms PacBioToCA/LSC in terms of accuracy and contiguity/sensitivity (<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu392">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu392</a>)</li>
<li>is easy to install/run/configure</li>
<li>supports various types of dat
<ul>
<li><strong>HiSeq/MiSeq&nbsp;</strong>(100-500bp)</li>
<li><strong>Unitigs</strong></li>
<li>454, ...</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>proovread maps high coverage data to pacbio reads (bwa mem, blasr, daligner) in multiple iterations.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/BioInf-Wuerzburg/proovread" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/BioInf-Wuerzburg/proovread</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:46:47 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ChIPulate: A Python3 framework to simulate read counts in a ChIP-seq experiment]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #202020; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-align: start; background-color: #ffffff; float: none;">ChIP-seq simulation pipeline, ChIPulate, we assess the impact of various biological and experimental sources of variation on several outcomes of a ChIP-seq experiment, viz., the recoverability of the TF binding motif, accuracy of TF-DNA binding detection, the sensitivity of inferred TF-DNA binding strength, and number of replicates needed to confidently infer binding strength.<span> <br></span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Must read paper and books in evolution biology !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>