<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37737?offset=200</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37737?offset=200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27035/spades</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:37:08 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27035/spades</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SPAdes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>SPAdes &ndash; St. Petersburg genome assembler &ndash; is intended for both standard isolates and single-cell MDA bacteria assemblies. This manual will help you to install and run SPAdes. SPAdes version 3.7.1 was released under GPLv2 on March 8, 2016 and can be downloaded from <a href="http://bioinf.spbau.ru/en/spades" target="_blank">http://bioinf.spbau.ru/en/spades</a>.</p>
<p>Manual at http://spades.bioinf.spbau.ru/release3.7.1/manual.html</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinf.spbau.ru/spades" rel="nofollow">http://bioinf.spbau.ru/spades</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27323/cutadapt</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 04:54:50 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27323/cutadapt</link>
	<title><![CDATA[cutadapt]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Cutadapt finds and removes adapter sequences, primers, poly-A tails and other types of unwanted sequence from your high-throughput sequencing reads.</p>
<p>Cleaning your data in this way is often required: Reads from small-RNA sequencing contain the 3&rsquo; sequencing adapter because the read is longer than the molecule that is sequenced. Amplicon reads start with a primer sequence. Poly-A tails are useful for pulling out RNA from your sample, but often you don&rsquo;t want them to be in your reads.</p>
<p>Cutadapt helps with these trimming tasks by finding the adapter or primer sequences in an error-tolerant way. It can also modify and filter reads in various ways. Adapter sequences can contain IUPAC wildcard characters. Also, paired-end reads and even colorspace data is supported. If you want, you can also just demultiplex your input data, without removing adapter sequences at all.</p>
<p>Cutadapt comes with an extensive suite of automated tests and is available under the terms of the MIT license.</p>
<p>If you use cutadapt, please cite <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200">DOI:10.14806/ej.17.1.200</a> .</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/installation.html#quickstart" rel="nofollow">https://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/installation.html#quickstart</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Radha Agarkar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27973/wgsim</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:49 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27973/wgsim</link>
	<title><![CDATA[WgSim]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Reads simulator</p>
<p>Wgsim is a small tool for simulating sequence reads from a reference genome. It is able to simulate diploid genomes with SNPs and insertion/deletion (INDEL) polymorphisms, and simulate reads with uniform substitution sequencing errors. It does not generate INDEL sequencing errors, but this can be partly compensated by simulating INDEL polymorphisms.<br><br>Wgsim outputs the simulated polymorphisms, and writes the true read coordinates as well as the number of polymorphisms and sequencing errors in read names. One can evaluate the accuracy of a mapper or a SNP caller with wgsim_eval.pl that comes with the package.<br><br></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lh3/wgsim" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lh3/wgsim</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30144/bima-v3-an-aligner-customized-for-mate-pair-library-sequencing</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30144/bima-v3-an-aligner-customized-for-mate-pair-library-sequencing</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BIMA V3: an aligner customized for mate pair library sequencing]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Summary: Mate pair library sequencing is an effective and economical method for detecting genomic structural variants and chromosomal abnormalities. Unfortunately, the mapping and alignment of mate pair read pairs to a reference genome is a challenging and <br>time consuming process for most NGS alignment programs. Large insert sizes, introduction of library preparation protocol artifacts (biotin junction reads, paired-end read contamination, chimeras, etc.), and presence of structural variant breakpoints within reads increases mapping and alignment complexity. We describe an algorithm that is up to 20 times faster and 25% more accurate than popular NGS alignment programs when processing mate pair sequencing. <br>Availability: http://bioinformaticstools.mayo.edu/research/bima/ <br>Contact: vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/12/bioinformatics.btu078.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/12/bioinformatics.btu078.full.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31302/multi-metagenome-assembly</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:14:18 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31302/multi-metagenome-assembly</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Multi-metagenome assembly]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>This project contains scripts and tutorials on how to assemble individual microbial genomes from metagenomes, as described in:</p>
<p>Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes<br><br>Mads Albertsen, Philip Hugenholtz, Adam Skarshewski, Gene W. Tyson, K&aring;re L. Nielsen and Per .H. Nielsen</p>
<p>Nature Biotechnology 2013, doi:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nbt.2579.html">10.1038/nbt.2579</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/MadsAlbertsen/multi-metagenome" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/MadsAlbertsen/multi-metagenome</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Radha Agarkar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34235/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:40:41 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34235/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[QuorUM: An Error Corrector for Illumina Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span><span>Illumina Sequencing data can provide high coverage of a genome by relatively short (most often 100 bp to 150 bp) reads at a low cost. Even with low (advertised 1%) error rate, 100 &times; coverage Illumina data on average has an error in some read at every base in the genome. These errors make handling the data more complicated because they result in a large number of low-count erroneous&nbsp;</span><em>k</em><span>-mers in the reads. However, there is enough information in the reads to correct most of the sequencing errors, thus making subsequent use of the data (e.g. for mapping or assembly) easier. Here we use the term &ldquo;error correction&rdquo; to denote the reduction in errors due to both changes in individual bases and trimming of unusable sequence. We developed an error correction software called QuorUM. QuorUM is mainly aimed at error correcting Illumina reads for subsequent assembly. It is designed around the novel idea of minimizing the number of distinct erroneous&nbsp;</span><em>k</em><span>-mers in the output reads and preserving the most true&nbsp;</span><em>k</em><span>-mers, and we introduce a composite statistic &pi; that measures how successful we are at achieving this dual goal. We evaluate the performance of QuorUM by correcting actual Illumina reads from genomes for which a reference assembly is available.</span></span></p>
<p><span>QuorUM is distributed as an independent software package and as a module of the MaSuRCA assembly software. Both are available under the GPL open source license at&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.genome.umd.edu/">http://www.genome.umd.edu</a><span>.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130821" rel="nofollow">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130821</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:26:55 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[QuorUM: An Error Corrector for Illumina Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>We produce trimmed and error-corrected reads that result in assemblies with longer contigs and fewer errors. We compared QuorUM against several published error correctors and found that it is the best performer in most metrics we use. QuorUM is efficiently implemented making use of current multi-core computing architectures and it is suitable for large data sets (1 billion bases checked and corrected per day per core)</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.genome.umd.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.genome.umd.edu/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44229/common-steps-for-reads-mapping</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 02:48:02 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44229/common-steps-for-reads-mapping</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Common steps for reads mapping !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p>Mapping reads to a reference genome is an essential step in many types of genomic analysis, such as variant calling and gene expression analysis. Here are some general steps to follow for mapping reads to a genome:</p><ol>
<li>
<p>Choose a read mapper: There are many read mappers available, such as BWA, Bowtie, and HISAT2. Choose a mapper that is appropriate for your type of data and research question.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Index the reference genome: Before mapping reads, the reference genome needs to be indexed. This involves creating an index of the genome sequence that allows the mapper to quickly find matches to the reads. Most mappers have their own indexing tools.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Prepare the read data: The reads should be in a format that is compatible with the mapper. Most mappers accept FASTQ or BAM files. Depending on the quality of the data, it may need to be filtered or trimmed before mapping.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Run the mapper: The mapper is run with the command-line interface or using a graphical user interface. The specific command depends on the mapper being used, but typically involves specifying the input data, reference genome, and output file format.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Evaluate the mapping results: After the mapping is complete, the results should be evaluated. This includes assessing the quality of the mapping, such as the mapping rate, the number of mapped reads, and the mapping quality score.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Post-processing: Depending on the analysis being performed, post-processing of the mapped reads may be necessary. This can include filtering reads based on quality, removing duplicate reads, and calling variants.</p>
</li>
</ol><p>Overall, mapping reads to a reference genome is a complex process that requires careful consideration of the type of data, the research question, and the specific mapper being used.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45343/simulating-the-unseen-new-tools-reshaping-metagenomic-research</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45343/simulating-the-unseen-new-tools-reshaping-metagenomic-research</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Simulating the Unseen: New Tools Reshaping Metagenomic Research]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>When benchmarking a new metagenomic pipeline the first step is generally to face a simple problem. A bioinformatician might have a good deal of real sequencing data, but there's a drawback in that the actual biological composition underlying those reads is almost never known. What organisms really were there? In what quantities? How many sequencing errors occurred? Can the pipeline correctly reconstruct the community? Since the true answers are unknown, it is difficult to deal with these questions.</p><p>Metagenomic simulators are a way of dealing with this issue; they produce artificial sequencing datasets in which both the composition of the microorganisms and the expected results are known. Researchers can then test a pipeline on such a controlled dataset and see precisely how well it functions. However, as metagenomic studies have become larger, more diverse, and more complex, simply generating artificial reads is no longer sufficient. The simulators now have to replicate community variation, sequencing errors, different sequencing platforms, massive data volumes, and even laboratory-based biases.</p><p>MIDASim (2024) was designed with a particular emphasis on microbial community dynamics. Unlike previous tools which regarded each simulated sample as individual, MIDASim is able to efficiently generate realistic multi-sample microbiome datasets, covering the cases where changes over time are being tracked. This feature is particularly useful when investigating how microbial communities vary between people, different experimental setups, or at various times. By overcoming the computational limitations of earlier simulation methods, MIDASim has made it easier to carry out large and complex microbiome simulation studies.</p><p>A major challenge is scale. Since modern metagenomic projects can involve millions or even billions of sequencing reads, generating such large synthetic datasets can become a significant computational problem. In order to tackle this issue, Izzy (2025) was developed. As a high-throughput metagenomic read simulator, Izzy is designed with speed in mind while still reproducing the typical patterns of sequencing errors. The people who developed it stated that it can be as much as 60 times faster than earlier tools, which makes large-scale simulations far more practical. Now, researchers can begin to ask not how long a simulation will take but rather what size dataset they want to test.</p><p>At the same time, the sequencing technology became more diverse. Researchers were not any longer restricted to using Illumina short reads since Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long-read sequencing also became important in the field of metagenomic research. In order to address these new requirements, MeSS (Metagenomic Sequence Simulator, 2025) was developed. The programme is based on a Snakemake framework and is therefore compatible with the Illumina, Oxford Nanopore and PacBio platforms. MeSS has also been designed to operate efficiently and to use less memory than earlier tools; it provides ready-made templates for the microbiomes of different sites in the human body, thus giving researchers a simple means of beginning to generate realistic simulated communities.</p><p>The simulation problem became even more specialized. Suppose that sequencing is not based on uniform sampling of DNA? In the case of targeted sequencing and hybridization-capture experiments, particular sequences are deliberately enriched, and the probability of capturing a target depends on both the probe and the target sequence. A standard model based on uniform sampling might fail to take into account this important feature of real experiments. That is why RAmpSim has been designed specifically to handle simulations for capture-based and targeted sequencing. Instead of depending solely on the assumption of uniform sampling, it includes a thermodynamic nearest-neighbor energy model to represent probe&ndash;target interactions and sequence-dependent enrichment. As a result, it is especially suitable for applications such as hybridization capture in metagenomics, where the efficiency of recovering a sequence can depend strongly on how it relates to the capture probes. RAmpSim thus reflects a wider trend towards simulations that aim not only to reproduce sequencing output but also key aspects of the experimental process itself.</p><p>MIDASim, Izzy, MeSS and RAmpSim all demonstrate how fast metagenomic simulation is evolving. MIDASim is able to deal with realistic variation within a large number of and changing microbial communities. Izzy overcomes the problem of generating very large datasets. MeSS provides support for a number of sequencing technologies in an efficient and repeatable manner. RAmpSim increases the experimental realism for capture-based sequencing. Although each of these tools addresses a separate issue, they all contribute to advancing the field.</p><p>Modern metagenomic simulation therefore aims not only at producing artificial FASTQ files. Researchers nowadays desire simulated datasets that reflect community changes, incorporate the characteristics of the sequencing platform, include real error patterns, take into account computational scale, and account for experimental biases. As metagenomic workflows become more advanced, the simulators have to keep up with this development. The tools are now going beyond that of simple data generators; they produce controlled versions of complex metagenomic experiments and thus provide researchers with something that ordinary sequencing data seldom does: a dataset in which the answer is known before any analysis takes place.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>