<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37830?offset=20</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37830?offset=20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/40770/scientist-bioinformatics-positions</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 06:53:40 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Scientist Bioinformatics Positions]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Bioinformatics-Multi_Omics_Integration</p>

<p>https://www.researchgate.net/job/939073_Senior_Scientist_Bioinformatics-Multi_Omics_Integration</p>

<p> <br />Senior_Scientist_Bioinformatics-Transcriptomics_Analysis     </p>

<p>https://www.researchgate.net/job/939075_Senior_Scientist_Bioinformatics-Transcriptomics_Analysis-Belgium_France_Switzerland_The_Netherlands</p>

<p>Senior Scientist Bioinformatics - Network Analytics</p>

<p>https://www.researchgate.net/job/939070_Senior_Scientist_Bioinformatics-Network_Analytics_Belgium_France_Switzerland_the_Netherlands</p>

<p>Team Leader Bioinformatics Data Sciences - Mechelen, Belgium</p>

<p>https://www.researchgate.net/job/938787_Team_Leader_Bioinformatics_Data_Sciences-Mechelen_Belgium</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41730/parliament2-runs-a-combination-of-tools-to-generate-structural-variant-calls-on-whole-genome-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 21:57:03 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41730/parliament2-runs-a-combination-of-tools-to-generate-structural-variant-calls-on-whole-genome-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Parliament2: Runs a combination of tools to generate structural variant calls on whole-genome sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Parliament2 identifies structural variants in a given sample relative to a reference genome. These structural variants cover large deletion events that are called as Deletions of a region, Insertions of a sequence into a region, Duplications of a region, Inversions of a region, or Translocations between two regions in the genome.</p>
<p>Parliament2 runs a combination of tools to generate structural variant calls on whole-genome sequencing data. It can run the following callers: Breakdancer, Breakseq2, CNVnator, Delly2, Manta, and Lumpy. Because of synergies in how the programs use computational resources, these are all run in parallel. Parliament2 will produce the outputs of each of the tools for subsequent investigation.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/dnanexus/parliament2" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/dnanexus/parliament2</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39726/jackalope-a-swift-versatile-phylogenomic-and-high-throughput-sequencing-simulator</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:58:12 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39726/jackalope-a-swift-versatile-phylogenomic-and-high-throughput-sequencing-simulator</link>
	<title><![CDATA[jackalope: A swift, versatile phylogenomic and high-throughput sequencing simulator]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><code>jackalope</code> simply and efficiently simulates (i) variants from reference genomes and (ii) reads from both Illumina and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) platforms. It can either read reference genomes from FASTA files or simulate new ones. Genomic variants can be simulated using summary statistics, phylogenies, Variant Call Format (VCF) files, and coalescent simulations&mdash;the latter of which can include selection, recombination, and demographic fluctuations. <code>jackalope</code> can simulate single, paired-end, or mate-pair Illumina reads, as well as reads from Pacific Biosciences These simulations include sequencing errors, mapping qualities, multiplexing, and optical/PCR duplicates. All outputs can be written to standard file formats.</p>
<p><span>A swift, versatile phylogenomic and high-throughput sequencing simulator </span> <span><a href="https://jackalope.lucasnell.com">https://jackalope.lucasnell.com</a></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lucasnell/jackalope" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lucasnell/jackalope</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43801/smudgeplot-inference-of-ploidy-and-heterozygosity-structure-using-whole-genome-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 04:42:09 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43801/smudgeplot-inference-of-ploidy-and-heterozygosity-structure-using-whole-genome-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Smudgeplot: Inference of ploidy and heterozygosity structure using whole genome sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This tool extracts heterozygous kmer pairs from kmer count databases and performs gymnastics with them. We are able to disentangle genome structure by comparing the sum of kmer pair coverages (CovA + CovB) to their relative coverage (CovB / (CovA + CovB)). Such an approach also allows us to analyze obscure genomes with duplications, various ploidy levels, etc.</p>
<p dir="auto">Smudgeplots are computed from raw or even better from trimmed reads and show the haplotype structure using heterozygous kmer pairs. For example:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8181573/45959760-f1032d00-c01a-11e8-8576-ff0512c33da9.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8181573/45959760-f1032d00-c01a-11e8-8576-ff0512c33da9.png" alt="smudgeexample" style="border: 0px;"></a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/KamilSJaron/smudgeplot" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/KamilSJaron/smudgeplot</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37574/simlord-a-read-simulator-for-third-generation-sequencing-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:40:27 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37574/simlord-a-read-simulator-for-third-generation-sequencing-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SimLoRD: A read simulator for third generation sequencing reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>SimLoRD is a read simulator for third generation sequencing reads and is currently focused on the Pacific Biosciences SMRT error model.</p>
<p>Reads are simulated from both strands of a provided or randomly generated reference sequence.</p>
<div id="rst-header-features">
<ul>
<li>The reference can be read from a FASTA file or randomly generated with a given GC content. It can consist of several chromosomes, whose structure is respected when drawing reads. (Simulation of genome rearrangements may be incorporated at a later stage.)</li>
<li>The read lengths can be determined in four ways: drawing from a log-normal distribution (typical for genomic DNA), sampling from an existing FASTQ file (typical for RNA), sampling from a a text file with integers (RNA), or using a fixed length</li>
<li>Quality values and number of passes depend on fragment length.</li>
<li>Provided subread error probabilities are modified according to number of passes</li>
<li>Outputs reads in FASTQ format and alignments in SAM format</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://bitbucket.org/genomeinformatics/simlord/" rel="nofollow">https://bitbucket.org/genomeinformatics/simlord/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Aaryan Lokwani</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2044</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2044</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Does anyone have Nanopore latest updates?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of buzz about&nbsp;<span>Oxford Nanopore Technologies&reg; is developing the GridION&trade; system and miniaturised MinION&trade; device. These are a new generation of electronic molecular analysis system for use in scientific research, personalised medicine, crop science, security/defence and more. The platform technology uses nanopores to analyse single molecules including DNA/RNA and proteins. With a broad patent portfolio, the Oxford Nanopore pipeline includes biological nanopores and solid-state nanopores.</span></p><p>Is this available, or still under trial mode?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.nanoporetech.com/">https://www.nanoporetech.com/</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nanoporetech.com/technology/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system">https://www.nanoporetech.com/technology/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/29500/genomescope-open-source-web-tool-to-rapidly-estimate-the-overall-characteristics-of-a-genome-including-genome-size-heterozygosity-rate-and-repeat-content-from-unprocessed-short-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:46:43 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/29500/genomescope-open-source-web-tool-to-rapidly-estimate-the-overall-characteristics-of-a-genome-including-genome-size-heterozygosity-rate-and-repeat-content-from-unprocessed-short-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GenomeScope: open-source web tool to rapidly estimate the overall characteristics of a genome, including genome size, heterozygosity rate, and repeat content from unprocessed short reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<div id="content-block-markup">
<div>
<div id="abstract-1">
<p id="p-2">Summary: GenomeScope is an open-source web tool to rapidly estimate the overall characteristics of a genome, including genome size, heterozygosity rate, and repeat content from unprocessed short reads. These features are essential for studying genome evolution, and help to choose parameters for downstream analysis. We demonstrate its accuracy on 324 simulated and 16 real datasets with a wide range in genome sizes, heterozygosity levels, and error rates. Availability and Implementation: http://qb.cshl.edu/genomescope/, https://github.com/schatzlab/genomescope.git</p>
</div>
<span></span></div>
<span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://qb.cshl.edu/genomescope/" rel="nofollow">http://qb.cshl.edu/genomescope/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:14:20 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Variant Everyone Ignored]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider a scenario in which a patient's genome has been sequenced. Among billions of DNA bases, a structural alteration may explain the patient's disease. Multiple advanced algorithms analyze the data, yet only one detects the variant, while the others do not. In standard bioinformatics workflows, such a solitary result is often regarded as unreliable and subsequently discarded. Although the solution exists within the data, prevailing computational protocols may overlook it.</p><p>A recent study published in Genome Biology (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y) addressed this challenge by introducing dicast (https://github.com/burgshrimps/dicast), a machine-learning approach for detecting structural variants in short-read sequencing data. Structural variants, such as large deletions, insertions, duplications, and inversions, can have significant biological and clinical implications, yet they are challenging to identify with short-read technologies. Because different detection methods frequently yield divergent results, researchers commonly employ consensus calling, considering a variant valid only if multiple tools detect it. While this approach reduces false positives, it relies on the potentially flawed assumption that the majority is always correct.</p><p>The researchers explored the impact of evaluating the supporting evidence for each variant, rather than simply tallying the number of algorithms that identified it. To establish a ground truth, they analyzed nine genomes using multiple sequencing technologies and 15 detection methods, initially identifying approximately 35 million potential variants. Through extensive filtering, evidence integration, and manual review of over 11,500 variants, they developed a robust benchmark comprising more than 236,000 structural variants. The findings underscored the complexity of the problem: short-read methods detected fewer than half of deletions and less than 10 percent of insertions, with performance declining markedly in repetitive genomic regions. In contrast, long-read technologies demonstrated superior detection capabilities. However, replacing the substantial volume of existing short-read data in clinical and research settings is not immediately feasible. Consequently, the researchers questioned whether short-read data might harbor more information than conventional analytical pipelines currently extract.</p><p>This line of inquiry led to the development of dicast. Rather than merely confirming agreement among multiple tools, dicast identifies patterns in sequencing data, including split and clipped reads, discordant read pairs, alignment characteristics, and the surrounding genomic context. An XGBoost machine-learning model evaluates which combinations of these signals are indicative of genuine structural variants. Thus, the approach shifts from tallying algorithmic consensus to interpreting the underlying evidence.</p><p>The researchers subsequently conducted a targeted evaluation by examining structural variants detected by only a single short-read tool, which are typically missed by consensus-based approaches. dicast successfully recovered approximately 81% of these single-caller deletions, insertions, and duplications. The signals for these variants were present in the data, but conventional filtering methods failed to integrate them effectively.</p><p>The utility of dicast was further demonstrated in cohorts with rare diseases, including congenital limb malformations, atrial fibrillation, and neuromuscular disorders. In one instance, dicast achieved a deletion recall rate of approximately 0.96, compared to 0.74 using consensus calling. The median number of variants requiring manual review was 29 per sample. Among 31 experimentally validated variants that standard filters would have missed, dicast identified 12, whereas consensus calling detected only one.</p><p>Overall, dicast identified approximately 20 percent more potential disease-causing deletions than consensus-based methods. While a 20 percent increase may appear modest, in clinical genomics such improvements can have significant practical implications. Missing a deletion may leave a case unresolved, whereas detecting a structural variant can provide critical diagnostic insights.</p><p>The study does not claim that machine learning has rendered short-read sequencing superior to long-read approaches. Instead, the results underscore the effectiveness of long-read sequencing for structural variant detection. However, dicast highlights a more nuanced perspective: substantial biological information may still be recoverable from the extensive short-read datasets already available.</p><p>The principal lesson extends beyond the detection of structural variants. For many years, bioinformatics pipelines have relied on threshold-based criteria, such as minimum coverage, quality scores, or support from multiple tools. While these rules are useful, biological phenomena do not always conform to rigid checklists; multiple weak signals, when considered collectively, can provide compelling evidence.</p><p>This perspective prompts consideration of the solitary variant: one algorithm identifies it, while several others do not. Traditional consensus techniques might have dismissed it, yet machine learning approaches evaluate the available evidence to determine whether the variant is plausible.</p><p>Occasionally, the most significant variant within a genome is the one that is almost universally overlooked.</p><p>Read more at&nbsp;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27076/ale-a-generic-assembly-likelihood-evaluation-framework-for-assessing-the-accuracy-of-genome-and-metagenome-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:38:43 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27076/ale-a-generic-assembly-likelihood-evaluation-framework-for-assessing-the-accuracy-of-genome-and-metagenome-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ALE: a Generic Assembly Likelihood Evaluation Framework for Assessing the Accuracy of Genome and Metagenome Assemblies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Assembly Likelihood Evaluation (ALE) framework that overcomes these limitations, systematically evaluating the accuracy of an assembly in a reference-independent manner using rigorous statistical methods. This framework is comprehensive, and integrates read quality, mate pair orientation and insert length (for paired-end reads), sequencing coverage, read alignment and k-mer frequency. ALE pinpoints synthetic errors in both single and metagenomic assemblies, including single-base errors, insertions/deletions, genome rearrangements and chimeric assemblies presented in metagenomes. At the genome level with real-world data, ALE identifies three large misassemblies from the Spirochaeta smaragdinae finished genome, which were all independently validated by Pacific Biosciences sequencing. At the single-base level with Illumina data, ALE recovers 215 of 222 (97%) single nucleotide variants in a training set from a GC-rich Rhodobacter sphaeroides genome. Using real Pacific Biosciences data, ALE identifies 12 of 12 synthetic errors in a Lambda Phage genome, surpassing even Pacific Biosciences' own variant caller, EviCons. In summary, the ALE framework provides a comprehensive, reference-independent and statistically rigorous measure of single genome and metagenome assembly accuracy, which can be used to identify misassemblies or to optimize the assembly process.</p>
<p>More at&nbsp;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23303509</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://sc932.github.io/ALE/about.html" rel="nofollow">http://sc932.github.io/ALE/about.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/29407/live-webinar-on-rna-seq-data-analysis-on-9-nov-2016</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:25:27 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/29407/live-webinar-on-rna-seq-data-analysis-on-9-nov-2016</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Live Webinar on RNA-Seq Data Analysis on 9 Nov 2016]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Live Webinar on RNA-Seq Data Analysis</a></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Abstract: </a>Strand NGS supports an extensive workflow for the analysis and visualization of RNA-Seq data. The workflow includes Transcriptome / Genome alignment, Differential expression analysis with Statistical approach and Splicing events detection. Strand NGS also supports novel discovery like identification of novel genes, exons and Novel splice junctions, alongside it can also detect gene fusion events. Further downstream analysis such as GO and pathway analysis can be performed on the set of interesting genes. The product has an option to create pipelines for time consuming jobs which automates analysis and leaves more time for end data interpretation. This webinar will give an overview of the features in the RNA-Seq data analysis workflow in Strand NGS and also highlights on parameters within each feature that can be optimized depending on datasets and analysis needs.</p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Speaker:</a> Mr. Sugandan Sivamani, Senior Application Scientist, Strand Life Sciences</p><p>Date: 9th Nov, <a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Session 1</a> for SAPK/ APFO: 2:30 PM IST Date: 9th Nov, <a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Session 2</a> for AFO/ EMEA: 9:00 AM PST</p><p>Register here <a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Strand</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>