<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37835?offset=10</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/37835?offset=10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32946/grass-a-generic-algorithm-for-scaffolding-next-generation-sequencing-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 05:20:32 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32946/grass-a-generic-algorithm-for-scaffolding-next-generation-sequencing-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GRASS: a generic algorithm for scaffolding next-generation sequencing assemblies.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>GRASS (GeneRic ASsembly Scaffolder)-a novel algorithm for scaffolding second-generation sequencing assemblies capable of using diverse information sources. GRASS offers a mixed-integer programming formulation of the contig scaffolding problem, which combines contig order, distance and orientation in a single optimization objective. The resulting optimization problem is solved using an expectation-maximization procedure and an unconstrained binary quadratic programming approximation of the original problem. We compared GRASS with existing HTS scaffolders using Illumina paired reads of three bacterial genomes. Our algorithm constructs a comparable number of scaffolds, but makes fewer errors. This result is further improved when additional data, in the form of related genome sequences, are used.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/AlexeyG/GRASS" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/AlexeyG/GRASS</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37457/nanofilt-filtering-and-trimming-of-long-read-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:01:52 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37457/nanofilt-filtering-and-trimming-of-long-read-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[nanofilt: Filtering and trimming of long read sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Filtering on quality and/or read length, and optional trimming after passing filters.<br>Reads from stdin, writes to stdout.</p>
<p>Intended to be used:</p>
<ul>
<li>directly after fastq extraction</li>
<li>prior to mapping</li>
<li>in a stream between extraction and mapping</li>
</ul>
<p>https://github.com/wdecoster/nanofilt</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/wdecoster/nanofilt" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/wdecoster/nanofilt</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38169/amstat-display-statistics-of-large-sequence-files-from-next-generation-sequencing-projects</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 13:34:56 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38169/amstat-display-statistics-of-large-sequence-files-from-next-generation-sequencing-projects</link>
	<title><![CDATA[AMStat: display statistics of large sequence files from next generation sequencing projects]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>SAMStat is an efficient C program to quickly display statistics of large sequence files from next generation sequencing projects. When applied to&nbsp;</span><a href="http://samstat.sourceforge.net/#about">SAM/BAM</a><span>&nbsp;files all statistics are reported for unmapped, poorly and accurately mapped reads separately. This allows for identification of a variety of problems, such as remaining linker and adaptor sequences, causing poor mapping. Apart from this SAMStat can be used to verify individual processing steps in large analysis pipelines.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://samstat.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://samstat.sourceforge.net/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:14:20 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45358/the-variant-everyone-ignored</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Variant Everyone Ignored]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider a scenario in which a patient's genome has been sequenced. Among billions of DNA bases, a structural alteration may explain the patient's disease. Multiple advanced algorithms analyze the data, yet only one detects the variant, while the others do not. In standard bioinformatics workflows, such a solitary result is often regarded as unreliable and subsequently discarded. Although the solution exists within the data, prevailing computational protocols may overlook it.</p><p>A recent study published in Genome Biology (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y) addressed this challenge by introducing dicast (https://github.com/burgshrimps/dicast), a machine-learning approach for detecting structural variants in short-read sequencing data. Structural variants, such as large deletions, insertions, duplications, and inversions, can have significant biological and clinical implications, yet they are challenging to identify with short-read technologies. Because different detection methods frequently yield divergent results, researchers commonly employ consensus calling, considering a variant valid only if multiple tools detect it. While this approach reduces false positives, it relies on the potentially flawed assumption that the majority is always correct.</p><p>The researchers explored the impact of evaluating the supporting evidence for each variant, rather than simply tallying the number of algorithms that identified it. To establish a ground truth, they analyzed nine genomes using multiple sequencing technologies and 15 detection methods, initially identifying approximately 35 million potential variants. Through extensive filtering, evidence integration, and manual review of over 11,500 variants, they developed a robust benchmark comprising more than 236,000 structural variants. The findings underscored the complexity of the problem: short-read methods detected fewer than half of deletions and less than 10 percent of insertions, with performance declining markedly in repetitive genomic regions. In contrast, long-read technologies demonstrated superior detection capabilities. However, replacing the substantial volume of existing short-read data in clinical and research settings is not immediately feasible. Consequently, the researchers questioned whether short-read data might harbor more information than conventional analytical pipelines currently extract.</p><p>This line of inquiry led to the development of dicast. Rather than merely confirming agreement among multiple tools, dicast identifies patterns in sequencing data, including split and clipped reads, discordant read pairs, alignment characteristics, and the surrounding genomic context. An XGBoost machine-learning model evaluates which combinations of these signals are indicative of genuine structural variants. Thus, the approach shifts from tallying algorithmic consensus to interpreting the underlying evidence.</p><p>The researchers subsequently conducted a targeted evaluation by examining structural variants detected by only a single short-read tool, which are typically missed by consensus-based approaches. dicast successfully recovered approximately 81% of these single-caller deletions, insertions, and duplications. The signals for these variants were present in the data, but conventional filtering methods failed to integrate them effectively.</p><p>The utility of dicast was further demonstrated in cohorts with rare diseases, including congenital limb malformations, atrial fibrillation, and neuromuscular disorders. In one instance, dicast achieved a deletion recall rate of approximately 0.96, compared to 0.74 using consensus calling. The median number of variants requiring manual review was 29 per sample. Among 31 experimentally validated variants that standard filters would have missed, dicast identified 12, whereas consensus calling detected only one.</p><p>Overall, dicast identified approximately 20 percent more potential disease-causing deletions than consensus-based methods. While a 20 percent increase may appear modest, in clinical genomics such improvements can have significant practical implications. Missing a deletion may leave a case unresolved, whereas detecting a structural variant can provide critical diagnostic insights.</p><p>The study does not claim that machine learning has rendered short-read sequencing superior to long-read approaches. Instead, the results underscore the effectiveness of long-read sequencing for structural variant detection. However, dicast highlights a more nuanced perspective: substantial biological information may still be recoverable from the extensive short-read datasets already available.</p><p>The principal lesson extends beyond the detection of structural variants. For many years, bioinformatics pipelines have relied on threshold-based criteria, such as minimum coverage, quality scores, or support from multiple tools. While these rules are useful, biological phenomena do not always conform to rigid checklists; multiple weak signals, when considered collectively, can provide compelling evidence.</p><p>This perspective prompts consideration of the solitary variant: one algorithm identifies it, while several others do not. Traditional consensus techniques might have dismissed it, yet machine learning approaches evaluate the available evidence to determine whether the variant is plausible.</p><p>Occasionally, the most significant variant within a genome is the one that is almost universally overlooked.</p><p>Read more at&nbsp;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-026-04280-y</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40544/ngs-bits-short-read-sequencing-tools</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:14:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40544/ngs-bits-short-read-sequencing-tools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ngs-bits - Short-read sequencing tools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Binaries of&nbsp;<em>ngs-bits</em>&nbsp;are available via Bioconda. Alternatively,&nbsp;<em>ngs-bits</em>&nbsp;can be built from sources:</p>
<ul>
<li><span>Binaries</span>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/master/doc/install_bioconda.md">Linux/macOS</a></li>
<li>From&nbsp;<span>sources</span>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/master/doc/install_unix.md">Linux/macOS</a></li>
<li>From&nbsp;<span>sources</span>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits/blob/master/doc/install_win.md">Windows</a></li>
</ul><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34292/automatic-filtering-trimming-error-removing-and-quality-control-for-fastq-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:10:23 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34292/automatic-filtering-trimming-error-removing-and-quality-control-for-fastq-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Automatic Filtering, Trimming, Error Removing and Quality Control for fastq data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Automatic Filtering, Trimming, Error Removing and Quality Control for fastq data</span><br><code>AfterQC</code><span>&nbsp;can simply go through all fastq files in a folder and then output three folders:&nbsp;</span><span>good</span><span>,&nbsp;</span><span>bad</span><span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span><span>QC</span><span>&nbsp;folders, which contains good reads, bad reads and the QC results of each fastq file/pair.</span><br><span>Currently it supports processing data from HiSeq 2000/2500/3000/4000, Nextseq 500/550, MiniSeq...and other&nbsp;</span><a href="http://support.illumina.com/help/SequencingAnalysisWorkflow/Content/Vault/Informatics/Sequencing_Analysis/CASAVA/swSEQ_mCA_FASTQFiles.htm">Illumina 1.8 or newer formats</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/OpenGene/AfterQC" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/OpenGene/AfterQC</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36518/mix-combining-multiple-assemblies-from-ngs-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 04:58:05 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36518/mix-combining-multiple-assemblies-from-ngs-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MIX: Combining multiple assemblies from NGS data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Mix is a tool that combines two or more draft assemblies, without relying on a reference genome and has the goal to reduce contig fragmentation and thus speed-up genome finishing. The proposed algorithm builds an extension graph where vertices represent extremities of contigs and edges represent existing alignments between these extremities. These alignment edges are used for contig extension. The resulting output assembly corresponds to a path in the extension graph that maximizes the cumulative contig length.</p>
<p>The Mix algorithm, approach and results were published in BMC bioinformatics :&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/S15/S16">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/S15/S16</a>.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/cbib/MIX" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/cbib/MIX</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37498/nextsv-a-meta-caller-for-structural-variants-from-low-coverage-long-read-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 17:24:53 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37498/nextsv-a-meta-caller-for-structural-variants-from-low-coverage-long-read-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[NextSV: a meta-caller for structural variants from low-coverage long-read sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>NextSV, a meta SV caller and a computational pipeline to perform SV calling from low coverage long-read sequencing data. NextSV integrates three aligners and three SV callers and generates two integrated call sets (sensitive/stringent) for different analysis purpose. The output of NextSV is in ANNOVAR-compatible bed format. Users can easily perform downstream annotation using ANNOVAR and disease gene discovery using Phenolyzer.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>&nbsp;</h2><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/Nextomics/NextSV" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Nextomics/NextSV</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40707/vt-a-variant-tool-set-that-discovers-short-variants-from-next-generation-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:44:43 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40707/vt-a-variant-tool-set-that-discovers-short-variants-from-next-generation-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[vt: a variant tool set that discovers short variants from Next Generation Sequencing data.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>vt is a variant tool set that discovers short variants from Next Generation Sequencing data.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/Vt">https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/Vt</a></span></p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/atks/vt">https://github.com/atks/vt</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/Vt" rel="nofollow">https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/Vt</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43801/smudgeplot-inference-of-ploidy-and-heterozygosity-structure-using-whole-genome-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 04:42:09 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43801/smudgeplot-inference-of-ploidy-and-heterozygosity-structure-using-whole-genome-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Smudgeplot: Inference of ploidy and heterozygosity structure using whole genome sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This tool extracts heterozygous kmer pairs from kmer count databases and performs gymnastics with them. We are able to disentangle genome structure by comparing the sum of kmer pair coverages (CovA + CovB) to their relative coverage (CovB / (CovA + CovB)). Such an approach also allows us to analyze obscure genomes with duplications, various ploidy levels, etc.</p>
<p dir="auto">Smudgeplots are computed from raw or even better from trimmed reads and show the haplotype structure using heterozygous kmer pairs. For example:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8181573/45959760-f1032d00-c01a-11e8-8576-ff0512c33da9.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8181573/45959760-f1032d00-c01a-11e8-8576-ff0512c33da9.png" alt="smudgeexample" style="border: 0px;"></a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/KamilSJaron/smudgeplot" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/KamilSJaron/smudgeplot</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>