<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38172?offset=50</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38172?offset=50" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38310/sisrs-site-identification-from-short-read-sequences</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:56:03 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38310/sisrs-site-identification-from-short-read-sequences</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SISRS: Site Identification from Short Read Sequences]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Next-gen sequence data such as Illumina HiSeq reads. Data must be sorted into folders by taxon (e.g. species or genus). Paired reads in fastq format must be specified by _R1 and _R2 in the (otherwise identical) filenames. Paired and unpaired reads must have a fastq file extension.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/rachelss/SISRS" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rachelss/SISRS</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34394/tulip-the-uncorrected-long-read-itegration-pipeline</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:30:01 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34394/tulip-the-uncorrected-long-read-itegration-pipeline</link>
	<title><![CDATA[TULIP - The Uncorrected Long read Itegration Pipeline]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>#Running TULIP (The Uncorrected Long-read Integration Process), version 0.4 late 2016 (European eel)</p>
<p>TULIP currently consists of to Perl scripts, tulipseed.perl and tulipbulb.perl. These are very much intended as prototypes, and additional components and/or implementations are likely to follow.&nbsp;<br>Tulipseed takes as input alignments files of long reads to sparse short seeds, and outputs a graph and scaffold structures. Tulipbulb adds long read sequencing data to these.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>https://github.com/Generade-nl/TULIP</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/Generade-nl/TULIP" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Generade-nl/TULIP</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36632/tulip-the-uncorrected-long-read-integration-pipeline</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 09:06:37 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36632/tulip-the-uncorrected-long-read-integration-pipeline</link>
	<title><![CDATA[TULIP - The Uncorrected Long read Integration Pipeline]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[TULIP currently consists of two Perl scripts, tulipseed.perl and tulipbulb.perl. These are very much intended as prototypes, and additional components and/or implementations are likely to follow.

Tulipseed takes as input alignments files of long reads to sparse short seeds, and outputs a graph and scaffold structures.<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/Generade-nl/TULIP" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Generade-nl/TULIP</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37473/lsc-a-long-read-error-correction-tool</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:39:46 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37473/lsc-a-long-read-error-correction-tool</link>
	<title><![CDATA[LSC :a long read error correction tool]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h2>Getting Started</h2>
<p>These simple steps will help you integrate LSC into your transcriptomics analysis pipeline.</p>
<ul>
<li>Read the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/LSC_requirements.asp">LSC_requirements</a>&nbsp;for running LSC.</li>
<li><a href="https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/LSC_download.asp">Download</a>&nbsp;and set-up the LSC package.</li>
<li>Follow the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/LSC_tutorial.asp">tutorial</a>&nbsp;to see how LSC works on some example data.</li>
<li>Read the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/LSC_manual.asp">manual</a>&nbsp;if anything is unclear.</li>
<li>You're ready, Happy LSCing!</li>
</ul>
<h2>Latest publication</h2>
<p><span>Kin Fai Au, Jason Underwood, Lawrence Lee and Wing Hung Wong&nbsp;</span><br><strong>Improving PacBio Long Read Accuracy by Short Read Alignment&nbsp;</strong><span>[</span><a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0046679">Manuscript</a><span>]&nbsp;</span><br><em>PLoS ONE</em><span>&nbsp;2012. 7(10): e46679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046679</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/" rel="nofollow">https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/LSC/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:46:47 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39190/chipulate-a-python3-framework-to-simulate-read-counts-in-a-chip-seq-experiment</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ChIPulate: A Python3 framework to simulate read counts in a ChIP-seq experiment]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #202020; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-align: start; background-color: #ffffff; float: none;">ChIP-seq simulation pipeline, ChIPulate, we assess the impact of various biological and experimental sources of variation on several outcomes of a ChIP-seq experiment, viz., the recoverability of the TF binding motif, accuracy of TF-DNA binding detection, the sensitivity of inferred TF-DNA binding strength, and number of replicates needed to confidently infer binding strength.<span> <br></span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43983/must-read-paper-and-books-in-evolution-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Must read paper and books in evolution biology !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/28119/kraken-ultrafast-metagenomic-sequence-classification-using-exact-alignments</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:01:44 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/28119/kraken-ultrafast-metagenomic-sequence-classification-using-exact-alignments</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Kraken is an ultrafast and highly accurate program for assigning taxonomic labels to metagenomic DNA sequences. Previous programs designed for this task have been relatively slow and computationally expensive, forcing researchers to use faster abundance estimation programs, which only classify small subsets of metagenomic data. Using exact alignment of <em>k</em>-mers, Kraken achieves classification accuracy comparable to the fastest BLAST program. In its fastest mode, Kraken classifies 100 base pair reads at a rate of over 4.1 million reads per minute, 909 times faster than Megablast and 11 times faster than the abundance estimation program MetaPhlAn. Kraken is available at <a href="http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/kraken/" target="pmc_ext">http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/kraken/</a>.</p>
<p>Krona</p>
<p>https://sourceforge.net/p/krona/home/krona/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053813/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053813/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42313/crbhits-from-conditional-reciprocal-best-hits-to-codon-alignments-and-kaks-in-r</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:06:03 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42313/crbhits-from-conditional-reciprocal-best-hits-to-codon-alignments-and-kaks-in-r</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CRBHits: From Conditional Reciprocal Best Hits to Codon Alignments and Ka/Ks in R]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>CRBHits is a coding sequence (CDS) analysis pipeline in R (R Core Team, 2019). It reimplements the Conditional Reciprocal Best Hit (CRBH) algorithm crb-blast and covers all necessary steps from sequence similarity searches, codon alignments to Ka/Ks calculations and synteny. The new R package targets ecology, population and evolutionary biologists working in the field of comparative genomics.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://gitlab.gwdg.de/mpievolbio-it/crbhits" rel="nofollow">https://gitlab.gwdg.de/mpievolbio-it/crbhits</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Shruti Paniwala</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/926/list-of-popular-bioinformatics-softwaretools</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:30:30 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/926/list-of-popular-bioinformatics-softwaretools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[List of popular bioinformatics software/tools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://samtools.sourceforge.net/swlist.shtml">I</a>n current genome era, our day to day work is to handle the huge geneome sequences, expression data, several other datasets. This link provide a comprehensive list of commonly used sofware/tools.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://samtools.sourceforge.net/swlist.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://samtools.sourceforge.net/swlist.shtml</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35286/alfred-bam-statistics-and-feature-counting</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 05:28:38 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35286/alfred-bam-statistics-and-feature-counting</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Alfred: BAM Statistics and Feature Counting]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to get Alfred is to download a statically linked binary from the&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/tobiasrausch/alfred/releases/">Alfred github release page</a>. Alternatively, you can build Alfred from source. Alfred dependencies are included as submodules so you need to do a recursive clone.</p>
<p><code>git clone --recursive https://github.com/tobiasrausch/alfred.git</code></p>
<p><code>cd alfred/</code></p>
<p><code>make all</code></p>
<p>https://github.com/tobiasrausch/alfred/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://gear.embl.de/alfred" rel="nofollow">https://gear.embl.de/alfred</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>