<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38475?offset=270</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38475?offset=270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42038/pyparanoid-a-pipeline-for-rapid-identification-of-homologous-gene-families-in-a-set-of-genomes</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:06:19 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42038/pyparanoid-a-pipeline-for-rapid-identification-of-homologous-gene-families-in-a-set-of-genomes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[PyParanoid: a pipeline for rapid identification of homologous gene families in a set of genomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>PyParanoid is a pipeline for rapid identification of homologous gene families in a set of genomes - a central task of any comparative genomics analysis. The "gold standard" for identifying homologs is to use reciprocal best hits (RBHs) which depends on performing a all-vs-all sequence comparison, usually using BLAST, to determine homology. However, these methods are computationally expensive, requiring&nbsp;O(n2)&nbsp;resources to identify RBHs. This is problematic, as the modern deluge of sequencing data means that comparative genomics analyses could be performed on datasets of thousands of strains.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/ryanmelnyk/PyParanoid" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ryanmelnyk/PyParanoid</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42946/aligngraph2-similar-genome-assisted-reassembly-pipeline-for-pacbio-long-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:42:47 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42946/aligngraph2-similar-genome-assisted-reassembly-pipeline-for-pacbio-long-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[AlignGraph2: similar genome-assisted reassembly pipeline for PacBio long reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>AlignGraph2 is the second version of&nbsp;</span><a href="https://github.com/baoe/AlignGraph">AlignGraph</a><span>&nbsp;for PacBio long reads. It extends and refines contigs assembled from the long reads with a published genome similar to the sequencing genome.</span></p>
<p><span>More at&nbsp;https://academic.oup.com/bib/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/bib/bbab022/6146772</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/huangs001/AlignGraph2" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/huangs001/AlignGraph2</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44472/pipesnake-bioinformatics-best-practice-analysis-pipeline-for-phylogenomic-reconstruction</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:19:41 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44472/pipesnake-bioinformatics-best-practice-analysis-pipeline-for-phylogenomic-reconstruction</link>
	<title><![CDATA[pipesnake: bioinformatics best-practice analysis pipeline for phylogenomic reconstruction]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><span>ausarg/pipesnake</span>&nbsp;is a bioinformatics best-practice analysis pipeline for phylogenomic reconstruction starting from short-read 'second-generation' sequencing data.</p>
<p dir="auto">The pipeline is built using&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nextflow.io/">Nextflow</a>, a workflow tool to run tasks across multiple compute infrastructures in a very portable manner. It uses Docker/Singularity containers making installation trivial and results highly reproducible. The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nextflow.io/docs/latest/dsl2.html">Nextflow DSL2</a>&nbsp;implementation of this pipeline uses one container per process which makes it much easier to maintain and update software dependencies.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/AusARG/pipesnake" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/AusARG/pipesnake</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44768/tritex-a-computational-pipeline-for-chromosome-scale-assembly-of-plant-genomes</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:53:48 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44768/tritex-a-computational-pipeline-for-chromosome-scale-assembly-of-plant-genomes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[TRITEX, a computational pipeline for chromosome-scale assembly of plant genomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This is the documentation of TRITEX, a computational pipeline for chromosome-scale assembly of plant genomes. It was developed in the research group Domestication Genomics at the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Research (IPK) Gatersleben.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://tritexassembly.bitbucket.io/" rel="nofollow">https://tritexassembly.bitbucket.io/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32946/grass-a-generic-algorithm-for-scaffolding-next-generation-sequencing-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 05:20:32 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/32946/grass-a-generic-algorithm-for-scaffolding-next-generation-sequencing-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GRASS: a generic algorithm for scaffolding next-generation sequencing assemblies.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>GRASS (GeneRic ASsembly Scaffolder)-a novel algorithm for scaffolding second-generation sequencing assemblies capable of using diverse information sources. GRASS offers a mixed-integer programming formulation of the contig scaffolding problem, which combines contig order, distance and orientation in a single optimization objective. The resulting optimization problem is solved using an expectation-maximization procedure and an unconstrained binary quadratic programming approximation of the original problem. We compared GRASS with existing HTS scaffolders using Illumina paired reads of three bacterial genomes. Our algorithm constructs a comparable number of scaffolds, but makes fewer errors. This result is further improved when additional data, in the form of related genome sequences, are used.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/AlexeyG/GRASS" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/AlexeyG/GRASS</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41920/liftoff-an-accurate-tool-that-maps-annotations-in-gff-or-gtf-between-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 21:40:52 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41920/liftoff-an-accurate-tool-that-maps-annotations-in-gff-or-gtf-between-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Liftoff: an accurate tool that maps annotations in GFF or GTF between assemblies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;Liftoff, an accurate tool that maps annotations in GFF or GTF between assemblies of the same, or closely-related species. Unlike current coordinate lift-over tools which require a pre-generated &ldquo;chain&rdquo; file as input, Liftoff is a standalone tool that takes two genome assemblies and a reference annotation as input and outputs an annotation of the target genome.&nbsp;</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/agshumate/Liftoff" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/agshumate/Liftoff</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42987/public-databases-for-bioinformatics</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:32:15 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42987/public-databases-for-bioinformatics</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Public Databases for Bioinformatics !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17155-y<br><br>Server Infrastructure:

File Server:

dhara: Synology 3614 Storage Appliance
4 Core Xeon
108TB disk storage
10Gb ethernet to SCG3
Access atx: dhara:5000
Has btsync server (try it - its much better than dropbox)

Compute Servers:

nandi: Kundaje and Phi Server
24 intel cores
256GB RAM
500GB of SSD storage 
36TB RAID6 local storage
4 Intel Phi's (space for 4 more GPU's)


durga: Montgomery and sensitive data
24 intel cores
256GB RAM
500GB of SSD RAID0 storage 
60TB RAID6 local storage

mitra: Bassik and Web/DB Server
24 core
256GB RAM 
500GB of SSD RAID0 storage 
36TB RAID6 local storage

vayu: Kundaje GPU server
4 core
64GB RAM 
200GB of SSD storage 
8TB RAID10 local storage
4 Nvidia GTX 970 4GB GPUs

amold: Bickel and SGE server
32 AMD core
128GB RAM 
200GB of SSD storage 
12TB RAID5 local storage

wotan: Bickel and SGE server
64 AMD core
256GB RAM 
200GB of SSD storage 
12TB RAID5 local storage

Filesystem:

/users/$USER
default home directory
full backups nightly 
nfs mount to dhara
should store code, papers, and other highly processed data here

/mnt/data/
globally accessible data
should store common data here
e.g. genomes and indexes, annotations, ENCODE data  
if you dont want this to count towards your quote you must chown

/mnt/lab_data/$LAB/
lab accessible data
should store lab project data here 
e.g. ATAC-seq prediction data, enhancer prediction, motif calls

/srv/scratch/$USER
fast local storage
not backed up, but on raid and data will never be deleted
most analysis should be performed here

/srv/persistent/$USER
fast local storage
synced nightly, but not backed up
       ie if the hard drives fail or you delete something and notice 
       within 24 hours we can recover. Otherwise not. (vs home which is 
       properly backed up )  
intermediate analysis products that would be hard to recover should be stored here 
       e.g. stochastic analysis results that need to be kept so that paper 
       results can be reproduced

/srv/www/$LABNAME/
web accessible from mitra.stanford.edu
*NOT BACKED UP*

Some parallel programming patterns:

# gzip a bunch of files
parallel gzip -- *.FILESTOGZIP

# fork example in python:
(for more detailed examples look at 
 https://github.com/nboley/grit/ grit/lib/multiprocessing_utils.py)

import os
import time
import random

import multiprocessing

class ProcessSafeOPStream( object ):
    def __init__( self, writeable_obj ):
        self.writeable_obj = writeable_obj
        self.lock = multiprocessing.Lock()
        self.name = self.writeable_obj.name
        return
    
    def write( self, data ):
        self.lock.acquire()
        self.writeable_obj.write( data )
        self.writeable_obj.flush()
        self.lock.release()
        return
    
    def close( self ):
        self.writeable_obj.close()

def worker(queue, ofp):
    # Try without this
    random.seed()
    while True:
        i = queue.get()
        if i == 'FINISHED': return
        # simulate an expensive function
        x = random.random()
        time.sleep(x/10)
        print i, x
        ofp.write("%i\t%s\n" % (i, x))

NSIMS = 10000
NPROC = 25

# populate queue
todo = multiprocessing.Queue()
for i in xrange(NSIMS): todo.put(i)
for i in xrange(NPROC): todo.put('FINISHED')

ofp = ProcessSafeOPStream( open("output.txt", "w") )

pids = []
for i in xrange(NPROC):
    pid = os.fork()
    if pid == 0:
       worker(todo, ofp)
       os._exit(0)
    else:
       pids.append(pid)  

for pid in pids:
    os.waitpid(pid, 0)

ofp.close()

print "FINISHED"<br><br></pre>
<p>For use case 1 we obtained the following ENCODE and ROADMAP datasets&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF446WOD/@@download/ENCFF446WOD.bed.gz">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF446WOD/@@download/ENCFF446WOD.bed.gz</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF546PJU/@@download/ENCFF546PJU.bam">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF546PJU/@@download/ENCFF546PJU.bam</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF059BEU/@@download/ENCFF059BEU.bam">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF059BEU/@@download/ENCFF059BEU.bam</a>. Blacklisted regions were obtained from&nbsp;<a href="http://mitra.stanford.edu/kundaje/akundaje/release/blacklists/hg38-human/hg38.blacklist.bed.gz">http://mitra.stanford.edu/kundaje/akundaje/release/blacklists/hg38-human/hg38.blacklist.bed.gz</a>. The human genome version hg38 was obtained from&nbsp;<a href="http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg38/bigZips/hg38.fa.gz">http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg38/bigZips/hg38.fa.gz</a>.</p>
<p>For use case 2 we used the set of narrowPeak files summarized in&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/wkopp/janggu_usecases/tree/master/extra/urls.txt">https://github.com/wkopp/janggu_usecases/tree/master/extra/urls.txt</a>&nbsp;(archived version v1.0.1). The human genome version hg19 was obtained from&nbsp;<a href="http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/bigZips/hg19.fa.gz">http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/bigZips/hg19.fa.gz</a></p>
<p>For use case 3 we used the ENCODE datasets&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF591XCX/@@download/ENCFF591XCX.bam">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF591XCX/@@download/ENCFF591XCX.bam</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF736LHE/@@download/ENCFF736LHE.bigWig">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF736LHE/@@download/ENCFF736LHE.bigWig</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF177HHM/@@download/ENCFF177HHM.bam">https://www.encodeproject.org/files/ENCFF177HHM/@@download/ENCFF177HHM.bam</a>&nbsp;as we as the GENCODE annotation v29 from&nbsp;<a href="ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gencode/Gencode_human/release_29/gencode.v29.annotation.gtf.gz">ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gencode/Gencode_human/release_29/gencode.v29.annotation.gtf.gz</a>.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://mitra.stanford.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://mitra.stanford.edu/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34482/ribbon-visualizing-complex-genome-alignments-and-structural-variation</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:40:22 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34482/ribbon-visualizing-complex-genome-alignments-and-structural-variation</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Ribbon: Visualizing complex genome alignments and structural variation:]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Ribbon can be used for long reads, short reads, paired-end reads, and assembly/genome alignments. Instructions for each data format are available by clicking on "instructions" in each tab on the right.</p>
<p>Local installation:</p>
<p>You can install Ribbon locally from Github by following the instructions here:&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/MariaNattestad/ribbon" target="_blank">https://github.com/MariaNattestad/Ribbon</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://genomeribbon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://genomeribbon.com/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34569/ksnp30-snp-detection-and-phylogenetic-analysis-of-genomes-without-genome-alignment-or-reference-genome</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:48:40 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34569/ksnp30-snp-detection-and-phylogenetic-analysis-of-genomes-without-genome-alignment-or-reference-genome</link>
	<title><![CDATA[kSNP3.0: SNP detection and phylogenetic analysis of genomes without genome alignment or reference genome]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Sept. 20, 2017 Version 3.1 released. Major upgrade. Version 3.1 fixes the problems with SNP annotation that arose when NCBI discontinued use of GI numbers. Please read carefully the Preface (page 3) and the File of annotated genomes section (pages 9-10) in the version 3.1 User Guide. Thanks to Tom Slezak for revsing the get_genbank_file3 script and to Tod Stuber (USDA) for testing version 3.1 even though he doesn't need the annotation feature. All users are encouraged to upgrade to version 3.1.&nbsp;<br></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/ksnp/files/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/ksnp/files/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/34707/string-graph-based-genome-assembly-software-and-tools</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:17:38 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/34707/string-graph-based-genome-assembly-software-and-tools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[String graph based genome assembly software and tools !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_theory" title="Graph theory">graph theory</a>, a&nbsp;<strong>string graph</strong>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersection_graph" title="Intersection graph">intersection graph</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve" title="Curve">curves</a>&nbsp;in the plane; each curve is called a "string".&nbsp; String graphs were first proposed by E. W. Myers in a&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/suppl_2/ii79.full.pdf+html">2005 publication</a>.&nbsp;In&nbsp;recent&nbsp;<a href="http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2012/01/22/gr.126953.111">Genome Research paper</a>&nbsp;describing an innovative approach for assembling large genomes from NGS data caught our attention for several reasons. i) it give different "string graph" prospective of long lasting genome assembly problem ii) the&nbsp;paper is coauthored by Jared Simpson, the developer of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694472/">ABySS assembler</a>&nbsp;and Richard Durbin. iii)&nbsp;Simpson-Durbin algorithm is that it does not rely on de Bruijn graphs, and instead employs a different graph construction approach called &lsquo;string graph&rsquo;.</p><p>Following are the genome assembly tools based on string graph:</p><p>1.SGA (String Graph Assembler)&nbsp;https://github.com/jts/sga</p><p>Assembles large genomes from high coverage short read data. SGA is designed as a modular set of programs, which are used to form an assembly pipeline. SGA implements a set of assembly algorithms based on the FM-index. As the FM-index is a compressed data structure, the algorithms are very memory efficient. The SGA assembly has three distinct phases. The first phase corrects base calling errors in the reads. The second phase assembles contigs from the corrected reads. The third phase uses paired end and/or mate pair data to build scaffolds from the contigs. The output of this software is a PDF report that allows the properties of the genome and data quality to be visually explored. By providing more information to the user at the start of an assembly project, this software will help increase awareness of the factors that make a given assembly easy or difficult, assist in the selection of software and parameters and help to troubleshoot an assembly if it runs into problems.</p><p>2.&nbsp;SAGE: String-overlap Assembly of GEnomes&nbsp;https://github.com/lucian-ilie/SAGE2</p><p>SAGE, for de novo genome assembly. As opposed to most assemblers, which are de Bruijn graph based, SAGE uses the string-overlap graph. SAGE builds upon great existing work on string-overlap graph and maximum likelihood assembly, bringing an important number of new ideas, such as the efficient computation of the transitive reduction of the string overlap graph, the use of (generalized) edge multiplicity statistics for more accurate estimation of read copy counts, and the improved use of mate pairs and min-cost flow for supporting edge merging. The assemblies produced by SAGE for several short and medium-size genomes compared favourably with those of existing leading assemblers.</p><p>3. FSG: Fast String Graph</p><p>The new integrated assembler has been assessed on a standard benchmark, showing that fast string graph (FSG) is significantly faster than SGA while maintaining a moderate use of main memory, and showing practical advantages in running FSG on multiple threads. Moreover, we have studied the effect of coverage rates on the running times.</p><p>4.&nbsp;&nbsp;BASE&nbsp;https://github.com/dhlbh/BASE</p><p>It enhances the classic seed-extension approach by indexing the reads efficiently to generate adaptive seeds that have high probability to appear uniquely in the genome. Such seeds form the basis for BASE to build extension trees and then to use reverse validation to remove the branches based on read coverage and paired-end information, resulting in high-quality consensus sequences of reads sharing the seeds. Such consensus sequences are then extended to contigs.&nbsp;BASE is a practically efficient tool for constructing contig, with significant improvement in quality for long NGS reads. It is relatively easy to extend BASE to include scaffolding.</p><p>5.&nbsp;Fermi&nbsp;https://github.com/lh3/fermi/</p><p>Fermi is a de novo assembler with a particular focus on assembling Illumina&nbsp;short sequence reads from a mammal-sized genome. In addition to the role of a&nbsp;typical assembler, fermi also aims to preserve heterozygotes which are often&nbsp;collapsed by other assemblers. Its ultimate goal is to find a minimal set of&nbsp;unitigs to represent all the information in raw reads.</p><p>If you want to learn about String Graph assembler, please read the following papers -</p><p>i)&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/suppl_2/ii79.full.pdf+html">The Fragment Assembly String Graph - E. W. Myers</a></p><p>This paper describes the String Graph concept.</p><p>ii)&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/12/i367.full#ref-20">Efficient construction of an assembly string graph using the FM-index - Jared T. Simpson and Richard Durbin</a></p><p>This earlier paper from Simpson and Durbin</p><p>iii)&nbsp;<a href="http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2012/01/22/gr.126953.111">Efficient de novo assembly of large genomes using compressed data structures - Jared T. Simpson and Richard Durbin</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>