<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38886?offset=580</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/38886?offset=580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27839/lorma-a-tool-for-correcting-sequencing-errors-in-long-reads-such-those-produced-by-pacific-biosciences-sequencing-machines</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:18:36 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27839/lorma-a-tool-for-correcting-sequencing-errors-in-long-reads-such-those-produced-by-pacific-biosciences-sequencing-machines</link>
	<title><![CDATA[LoRMA: a tool for correcting sequencing errors in long reads such those produced by Pacific Biosciences sequencing machines]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>LoRMA is a tool for correcting sequencing errors in long reads such those produced by Pacific Biosciences sequencing machines.</p>
<p>Publication:</p>
<ul>
<li>L. Salmela, R. Walve, E. Rivals, and E. Ukkonen: Accurate selfcorrection of errors in long reads using de Bruijn graphs. Accepted to RECOMB-Seq 2016.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/lmsalmel/LoRMA/LoRMA-0.3.tar.gz">LoRMA 0.3 source files</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/lmsalmel/LoRMA/README.txt">README</a></li>
</ul><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/lmsalmel/LoRMA/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/lmsalmel/LoRMA/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30555/yaha</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:38:05 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30555/yaha</link>
	<title><![CDATA[YAHA]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>YAHA, a fast and flexible hash-based aligner. YAHA is as fast and accurate as BWA-SW at finding the single best alignment per query and is dramatically faster and more sensitive than both SSAHA2 and MegaBLAST at finding all possible alignments. Unlike other aligners that report all, or one, alignment per query, or that use simple heuristics to select alignments, YAHA uses a directed acyclic graph to find the optimal set of alignments that cover a query using a biologically relevant breakpoint penalty. YAHA can also report multiple mappings per defined segment of the query. We show that YAHA detects more breakpoints in less time than BWA-SW across all SV classes, and especially excels at complex SVs comprising multiple breakpoints.</p>
<p><strong>Availability:</strong> YAHA is currently supported on 64-bit Linux systems. Binaries and sample data are freely available for download from <a href="http://faculty.virginia.edu/irahall/YAHA" target="pmc_ext">http://faculty.virginia.edu/irahall/YAHA</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Contact:</strong></p>
<p>http://genome.wustl.edu/people/groups/detail/hall-lab/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463118/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463118/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/35621/bbtools-for-bioinformatician</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:45:52 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/35621/bbtools-for-bioinformatician</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BBTools for bioinformatician !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span></span><br /><strong>BBMap.sh</strong><br /><br /></p><ul>
<li><strong>Mapping Nanopore reads</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>BBMap.sh has a length cap of 6kbp. Reads longer than this will be broken into 6kbp pieces and mapped independently.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ mapPacBio.sh -Xmx20g k=7 in=reads.fastq ref=reference.fa maxlen=1000 minlen=200 idtag ow int=f qin=33 out=mapped1.sam minratio=0.15 ignorequality slow ordered maxindel1=40 maxindel2=400</pre></div><p><br /><span>The "maxlen" flag shreds them to a max length of 1000; you can set that up to 6000. But I found 1000 gave a higher mapping rate.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><ul>
<li><strong>Using Paired-end and single-end reads at the same time</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>BBMap itself can only run single-ended or paired-ended in a single run, but it has a wrapper that can accomplish it, like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbwrap.sh in1=read1.fq,singletons.fq in2=read2.fq,null out=mapped.sam append</pre></div><p><span>This will write all the reads to the same output file but only print the headers once. I have not tried that for bam output, only sam output</span><br /><br /><span>Note about alignment stats: For paired reads, you can find the total percent mapped by adding the read 1 percent (where it says "mapped: N%") and read 2 percent, then dividing by 2. The different columns tell you the count/percent of each event. Considering the cigar strings from alignment, "Match Rate" is the number of symbols indicating a reference match (=) and error rate is the number indicating substitution, insertion, or deletion (X, I, D).</span><br /><br /></p><ul>
<li><strong>Exact matches when mapping small reads (e.g. miRNA)</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>When mapping small RNA's with BBMap use the following flags to report only perfect matches.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">ambig=all vslow perfectmode maxsites=1000</pre></div><p><span>It should be very fast in that mode (despite the vslow flag). Vslow mainly removes masking of low-complexity repetitive kmers, which is not usually a problem but can be with extremely short sequences like microRNAs.</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Important note about BBMap alignments</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>BBMap is always nondeterministic when run in paired-end mode with multiple threads, because the insert-size average is calculated on a per-thread basis, which affects mapping; and which reads are assigned to which thread is nondeterministic. The only way to avoid that would be to restrict it to a single thread (threads=1), or map the reads as single-ended and then fix pairing afterward:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">bbmap.sh in=reads.fq outu=unmapped.fq int=f
repair.sh in=unmapped.fq out=paired.fq fint outs=singletons.fq</pre></div><p><span>In this case you'd want to only keep the paired output.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>BBSplit is based on BBMap, so it is also nondeterministic in paired mode with multiple threads. BBDuk and Seal (which can be used similarly to BBSplit) are always deterministic.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>Reformat.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Count k-mers/find unknown primers</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.fq out=trimmed.fq ftr=19</pre></div><p><span>This will trim all but the first 20 bases (all bases after position 19, zero-based).</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ kmercountexact.sh in=trimmed.fq out=counts.txt fastadump=f mincount=10 k=20 rcomp=f</pre></div><p><span>This will generate a file containing the counts of all 20-mers that occurred at least 10 times, in a 2-column format that is easy to sort in Excel.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">ACCGTTACCGTTACCGTTAC	100
AAATTTTTTTCCCCCCCCCC	85</pre></div><p><span>...etc. If the primers are 20bp long, they should be pretty obvious.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Convert SAM format from 1.4 to 1.3 (required for many programs)</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.sam out=out.sam sam=1.3</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Removing N basecalls</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>You can use BBDuk or Reformat with "qtrim=rl trimq=1". That will only trim trailing and leading bases with Q-score below 1, which means Q0, which means N (in either fasta or fastq format). The BBMap package automatically changes q-scores of Ns that are above 0 to 0 and called bases with q-scores below 2 to 2, since occasionally some Illumina software versions produces odd things like a handful of Q0 called bases or Ns with Q&gt;0, neither of which make any sense in the Phred scale.</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Sampling reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.fq out=sampled.fq sample=3000</pre></div><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">To sample 10% of the reads:
reformat.sh in1=reads1.fq in2=reads2.fq out1=sampled1.fq out2=sampled2.fq samplerate=0.1

or more concisely:
reformat.sh in=reads#.fq out=sampled#.fq samplerate=0.1

and for exact sampling:
reformat.sh in=reads#.fq out=sampled#.fq samplereadstarget=100k</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Changing fasta headers</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>Remove anything after the first space in fasta header.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr"> reformat.sh in=sequences.fasta out=renamed.fasta trd</pre></div><p><span>"trd" stands for "trim read description" and will truncate everything after the first whitespace.</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Extract reads from a sam file</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.sam out=reads.fastq</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Verify pairing and optionally de-interleave the reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.fastq verifypairing</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Verify pairing if the reads are in separate files</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq vpair</pre></div><p><span>If that completes successfully and says the reads were correctly paired, then you can simply de-interleave reads into two files like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.fastq out1=r1.fastq out2=r2.fastq</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Base quality histograms</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=reads.fq qchist=qchist.txt</pre></div><p><span>That stands for "quality count histogram".&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Filter SAM/BAM file by read length</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=x.sam out=y.sam minlength=50 maxlength=200</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Filter SAM/BAM file to detect/filter spliced reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=mapped.bam out=filtered.bam maxdellen=50</pre></div><p><span>You can set "maxdellen" to whatever length deletion event you consider the minimum to signify splicing, which depends on the organism.</span><br /><span>-------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Repair.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>"Re-pair" out-of-order reads from paired-end data files</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ repair.sh in1=r1.fq.gz in2=r2.fq.gz out1=fixed1.fq.gz out2=fixed2.fq.gz outsingle=singletons.fq.gz</pre></div><p><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>BBMerge.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>BBMerge now has a new flag - "outa" or "outadapter". This allows you to automatically detect the adapter sequence of reads with short insert sizes, in case you don't know what adapters were used. It works like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbmerge.sh in=reads.fq outa=adapters.fa reads=1m</pre></div><p><span>Of course, it will only work for paired reads! The output fasta file will look like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">&gt;Read1_adapter
GATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCACATCACGATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG
&gt;Read2_adapter
GATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCACCGATGTATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG</pre></div><p><span>If you have multiplexed things with different barcodes in the adapters, the part with the barcode will show up as Ns, like this:</span><br /><br /><span>GATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCACNNNNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>Note: For BBMerge with micro-RNA, you need to add the flag&nbsp;</span><strong>mininsert=17</strong><span>. The default is 35, which is too long for micro-RNA libraries.&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Identifying adapters</strong></li>
</ul><p><span>If you have paired reads, and enough of the reads have inserts shorter than read length, you can identify adapter sequences with BBMerge, like this (they will be printed to adapters.fa):</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbmerge.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq outa=adapters.fa</pre></div><p><br /><span>-----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>BBDuk.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Note: BBDuk is strictly deterministic on a per-read basis, however it does by default reorder the reads when run multithreaded. You can add the flag "ordered" to keep output reads in the same order as input reads</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Finding reads with a specific sequence at the beginning of read</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbduk.sh -Xmx1g in=reads.fq outm=matched.fq outu=unmatched.fq restrictleft=25 k=25 literal=AAAAACCCCCTTTTTGGGGGAAAAA</pre></div><p><span>In this case, all reads starting with "AAAAACCCCCTTTTTGGGGGAAAAA" will end up in "matched.fq" and all other reads will end up in "unmatched.fq". Specifically, the command means "look for 25-mers in the leftmost 25 bp of the read", which will require an exact prefix match, though you can relax that if you want.</span><br /><br /><span>So you could bin all the reads with your known sequence, then look at the remaining reads to see what they have in common. You can do the same thing with the tail of the read using "restrictright" instead, though you can't use both restrictions at the same time.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbduk.sh in=reads.fq outm=matched.fq literal=NNNNNNCCCCGGGGGTTTTTAAAAA k=25 copyundefined</pre></div><p><span>With the "copyundefined" flag, a copy of each reference sequence will be made representing every valid combination of defined letter. So instead of increasing memory or time use by 6^75, it only increases them by 4^6 or 4096 which is completely reasonable, but it only allows substitutions at predefined locations. You can use the "copyundefined", "hdist", and "qhdist" flags together for a lot of flexibility - for example, hdist=2 qhdist=1 and 3 Ns in the reference would allow a hamming distance of 6 with much lower resource requirements than hdist=6. Just be sure to give BBDuk as much memory as possible.</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Removing illumina adapters (if exact adapters not known)</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>If you're not sure which adapters are used, you can add "ref=truseq.fa.gz,truseq_rna.fa.gz,nextera.fa.gz" and get them all (this will increase the amount of overtrimming, though it should still be negligible).&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Removing illumina control sequences/phiX reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">bbduk.sh in=trimmed.fq.gz out=filtered.fq.gz k=31 ref=artifacts,phix ordered cardinality</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Identify certain reads that contain a specific sequence</strong></li>
</ul><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbduk.sh in=reads.fq out=unmatched.fq outm=matched.fq literal=ACGTACGTACGTACGTAC k=18 mm=f hdist=2</pre></div><p><span>Make sure "k" is set to the exact length of the sequence. "hdist" controls the number of substitutions allowed. "outm" gets the reads that match. By default this also looks for the reverse-complement; you can disable that with "rcomp=f".&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Extract sequences that share kmers with your sequences with BBDuk</strong></li>
</ul><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbduk.sh in=a.fa ref=b.fa out=c.fa mkf=1 mm=f k=31</pre></div><p><span>This will print to C all the sequences in A that share 100% of their 31-mers with sequences in B.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><ul>
<li><strong>Extract sequences that contain N's with BBDuk</strong></li>
</ul><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">bbduk.sh in=reads.fq out=readsWithoutNs.fq outm=readsWithNs.fq maxns=0</pre></div><p><span>If you have, say, 100bp reads and only want to separate reads containing all 100 Ns, change that to "maxns=99".</span><br /><br /><strong>General notes for BBDuk.sh</strong><span>&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>BBDuk can operate in one of 4 kmer-matching modes:</span><br /><span>Right-trimming (ktrim=r), left-trimming (ktrim=l), masking (ktrim=n), and filtering (default). But it can only do one at a time because all kmers are stored in a single table. It can still do non-kmer-based operations such as quality trimming at the same time.</span><br /><br /><span>BBDuk2 can do all 4 kmer operations at once and is designed for integration into automated pipelines where you do contaminant removal and adapter-trimming in a single pass to minimize filesystem I/O. Personally, I never use BBDuk2 from the command line. Both have identical capabilities and functionality otherwise, but the syntax is different.</span><br /><br /><span>------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>Randomreads.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Generate random reads in various formats</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ randomreads.sh ref=genome.fasta out=reads.fq len=100 reads=10000</pre></div><p><span>You can specify paired reads, an insert size distribution, read lengths (or length ranges), and so forth. But because I developed it to benchmark mapping algorithms, it is specifically designed to give excellent control over mutations. You can specify the number of snps, insertions, deletions, and Ns per read, either exactly or probabilistically; the lengths of these events is individually customizable, the quality values can alternately be set to allow errors to be generated on the basis of quality; there's a PacBio error model; and all of the reads are annotated with their genomic origin, so you will know the correct answer when mapping.</span><br /><br /><span>Bear in mind that 50% of the reads are going to be generated from the plus strand and 50% from the minus strand. So, either a read will match the reference perfectly, OR its reverse-complement will match perfectly.</span><br /><br /><span>You can generate the same set of reads with and without SNPs by fixing the seed to a positive number, like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ randomreads.sh maxsnps=0 adderrors=false out=perfect.fastq reads=1000 minlength=18 maxlength=55 seed=5

$ randomreads.sh maxsnps=2 snprate=1 adderrors=false out=2snps.fastq reads=1000 minlength=18 maxlength=55 seed=5</pre></div><p><span>[As of BBmap v. 36.59] rendomreads.sh gains the ability to simulate metagenomes.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>coverage=X will automatically set "reads" to a level that will give X average coverage (decimal point is allowed).</span><br /><br /><span>metagenome will assign each scaffold a random exponential variable, which decides the probability that a read be generated from that scaffold. So, if you concatenate together 20 bacterial genomes, you can run randomreads and get a metagenomic-like distribution. It could also be used for RNA-seq when using a transcriptome reference.</span><br /><br /><span>The coverage is decided on a per-reference-sequence level, so if a bacterial assembly has more than one contig, you may want to glue them together first with fuse.sh before concatenating them with the other references.&nbsp;</span><br /><br /></p><ul>
<li><strong>Simulate a jump library</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>You can simulate a 4000bp jump library from your existing data like this.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ cat assembly1.fa assembly2.fa &gt; combined.fa
$ bbmap.sh ref=combined.fa
$ randomreads.sh reads=1000000 length=100 paired interleaved mininsert=3500 maxinsert=4500 bell perfect=1 q=35 out=jump.fq.gz</pre></div><p><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Shred.sh</strong><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ shred.sh in=ref.fasta out=reads.fastq length=200</pre></div><p><span>The difference is that RandomReads will make reads in a random order from random locations, ensuring flat coverage on average, but it won't ensure 100% coverage unless you generate many fold depth. Shred, on the other hand, gives you exactly 1x depth and exactly 100% coverage (and is not capable of modelling errors). So, the use-cases are different.&nbsp;</span><br /><span>---------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Demuxbyname.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Demultiplex fastq files when the tag is present in the fastq read header (illumina)</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ demuxbyname.sh in=r#.fq out=out_%_#.fq prefixmode=f names=GGACTCCT+GCGATCTA,TAAGGCGA+TCTACTCT,...
outu=filename</pre></div><p><span>"Names" can also be a text file with one barcode per line (in exactly the format found in the read header). You do have to include all of the expected barcodes, though.</span><br /><br /><span>In the output filename, the "%" symbol gets replaced by the barcode; in both the input and output names, the "#" symbol gets replaced by 1 or 2 for read 1 or read 2. It's optional, though; you can leave it out for interleaved input/output, or specify in1=/in2=/out1=/out2= if you want custom naming.</span><br /><br /><span>----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>Readlength.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Plotting the length distribution of reads</strong></li>
</ul><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ readlength.sh in=file out=histogram.txt bin=10 max=80000</pre></div><p><span>That will plot the result in bins of size 10, with everything above 80k placed in the same bin. The defaults are set for relatively short sequences so if they are many megabases long you may need to add the flag "-Xmx8g" and increase "max=" to something much higher.</span><br /><br /><span>Alternatively, if these are assemblies and you're interested in continuity information (L50, N50, etc), you can run stats on each or statswrapper on all of them:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">stats.sh in=file</pre></div><p><span>or</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">statswrapper.sh in=file,file,file,file&hellip;</pre></div><p><span>----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Filterbyname.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>By default, "filterbyname" discards reads with names in your name list, and keeps the rest. To include them and discard the others, do this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ filterbyname.sh in=003.fastq out=filter003.fq names=names003.txt include=t</pre></div><p><span>----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>getreads.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>If you only know the number(s) of the fasta/fastq record(s) in a file (records start at 0) then you can use the following command to extract those reads in a new file.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ getreads.sh in= id=&lt;number,number,number...&gt; out=</pre></div><p><span>The first read (or pair) has ID 0, the second read (or pair) has ID 1, etc.</span><br /><br /><span>Parameters:</span><br /><span>in= Specify the input file, or stdin.</span><br /><span>out= Specify the output file, or stdout.</span><br /><span>id= Comma delimited list of numbers or ranges, in any order.</span><br /><span>For example: id=5,93,17-31,8,0,12-13&nbsp;</span><br /><span>----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Splitsam.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Splits a sam file into forward and reverse reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">splitsam.sh mapped.sam plus.sam minus.sam unmapped.sam
reformat.sh in=plus.sam out=plus.fq
reformat.sh in=minus.sam out=minus.fq rcomp</pre></div><p><span>----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>BBSplit.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>BBSplit now has the ability to output paired reads in dual files using the # symbol. For example:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbsplit.sh ref=x.fa,y.fa in1=read1.fq in2=read2.fq basename=o%_#.fq</pre></div><p><span>will produce ox_1.fq, ox_2.fq, oy_1.fq, and oy_2.fq</span><br /><br /><span>You can use the # symbol for input also, like "in=read#.fq", and it will get expanded into 1 and 2.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><strong>Added feature:&nbsp;</strong><span>One can specify a directory for the "ref=" argument. If anything in the list is a directory, it will use all fasta files in that directory. They need a fasta extension, like .fa or .fasta, but can be compressed with an additional .gz after that. Reason this is useful is to use BBSplit is to have it split input into one output file per reference file.</span><br /><br /><br /><strong>NOTE: 1</strong><span>&nbsp;By default BBSplit uses fairly strict mapping parameters; you can get the same sensitivity as BBMap by adding the flags "minid=0.76 maxindel=16k minhits=1". With those parameters it is extremely sensitive.</span><br /><br /><strong>NOTE: 2</strong><span>&nbsp;BBSplit has different ambiguity settings for dealing with reads that map to multiple genomes. In any case, if the alignment score is higher to one genome than another, it will be associated with that genome only (this considers the combined scores of read pairs - pairs are always kept together). But when a read or pair has two identically-scoring mapping locations, on different genomes, the behavior is controlled by the "ambig2" flag - "ambig2=toss" will discard the read, "all" will send it to all output files, and "split" will send it to a separate file for ambiguously-mapped reads (one per genome to which it maps).</span><br /><br /><strong>NOTE: 3</strong><span>&nbsp;Zero-count lines are suppressed by default, but they should be printed if you include the flag "nzo=f" (nonzeroonly=false).&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><strong>NOTE: 4</strong><span>&nbsp;BBSplit needs multiple reference files as input; one per organism, or one for target and another for everything else. It only outputs one file per reference file.</span><br /><br /><span>Seal.sh, on the other hand, which is similar, can use a single concatenated file, as it (by default) will output one file per reference sequence within a concatenated set of references.&nbsp;</span><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Pileup.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>To generate transcript coverage stats</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ pileup.sh in=mapped.sam normcov=normcoverage.txt normb=20 stats=stats.txt</pre></div><p><span>That will generate coverage per transcript, with 20 lines per transcript, each line showing the coverage for that fraction of the transcript. "stats" will contain other information like the fraction of bases in each transcript that was covered.&nbsp;</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>To calculate physical coverage stats (region covered by paired-end reads)&nbsp;</strong></li>
</ul><p><span>BBMap has a "physcov" flag that allows it to report physical rather than sequenced coverage. It can be used directly in BBMap, or with pileup, if you already have a sam file. For example:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ pileup.sh in=mapped.sam covstats=coverage.txt</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Calculating coverage of the genome</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>Program will take sam or bam, sorted or unsorted.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ pileup.sh in=mapped.sam out=stats.txt hist=histogram.txt</pre></div><p><span>stats.txt will contain the average depth and percent covered of each reference sequence; the histogram will contain the exact number of bases with a each coverage level. You can also get per-base coverage or binned coverage if you want to plot the coverage. It also generates median and standard deviation, and so forth.</span><br /><br /><span>It's also possible to generate coverage directly from BBMap, without an intermediate sam file, like this:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbmap.sh in=reads.fq ref=reference.fasta nodisk covstats=stats.txt covhist=histogram.txt</pre></div><p><span>We use this a lot in situations where all you care about is coverage distributions, which is somewhat common in metagenome assemblies. It also supports most of the flags that pileup.sh supports, though the syntax is slightly different to prevent collisions. In each case you can see all the possible flags by running the shellscript with no arguments.</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>To bin aligned reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ pileup.sh in=mapped.sam out=stats.txt bincov=coverage.txt binsize=1000</pre></div><p><span>That will give coverage within each bin. For read density regardless of read length, add the "startcov=t" flag.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Dedupe.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Dedupe ensures that there is at most one copy of any input sequence, optionally allowing contaminants (substrings) to be removed, and a variable hamming or edit distance to be specified. Usage:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ dedupe.sh in=assembly1.fa,assembly2.fa out=merged.fa</pre></div><p><span>That will absorb exact duplicates and containments. You can use "hdist" and "edist" flags to allow mismatches, or get a complete list of flags by running the shellscript with no arguments.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>Dedupe&nbsp;</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">will merge assemblies</span><span>, but it&nbsp;</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">will not produce consensus sequences or join overlapping reads</span><span>; it only removes sequences that are fully contained within other sequences (allowing the specified number of mismatches or edits).</span><br /><br /><span>Dedupe can remove duplicate reads from multiple files simultaneously, if they are comma-delimited (e.g. in=file1.fastq,file2.fastq,file3.fastq). And if you set the flag "uniqueonly=t" then ALL copies of duplicate reads will be removed, as opposed to the default behavior of leaving one copy of duplicate reads.</span><br /><br /><span>However, it does not care which file a read came from; in other words, it can't remove only reads that are duplicates across multiple files but leave the ones that are duplicates within a file. That can still be accomplished, though, like this:</span><br /><br /><span>1) Run dedupe on each sample individually, so now there are at most 1 copy of a read per sample.</span><br /><span>2) Run dedupe again on all of the samples together, with "uniqueonly=t". The only remaining duplicate reads will be the ones duplicated between samples, so that's all that will be removed.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Generate ROC curves from any aligner</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><strong>[*]index the reference<br /><br /></strong></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbmap.sh ref=reference.fasta</pre></div><p><br /><strong>[*]Generate random reads</strong><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ randomreads.sh reads=100000 length=100 out=synth.fastq maxq=35 midq=25 minq=15</pre></div><p><strong>[*]Map to produce a sam file</strong><br /><br /><span>...substitute this command with the appropriate one from your aligner of choice</span></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbmap.sh in=synth.fq out=mapped.sam</pre></div><p><strong>[*]Generate ROC curve</strong><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ samtoroc.sh in=mapped.sam reads=100000</pre></div><p><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Calculate heterozygous rate for sequence data</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ kmercountexact.sh in=reads.fq khist=histogram.txt peaks=peaks.txt</pre></div><p><span>You can examine the histogram manually, or use the "peaks" file which tells you the number of unique kmers in each peak on the histogram. For a diploid, the first peak will be the het peak, the second will be the homozygous peak, and the rest will be repeat peaks. The peak caller is not perfect, though, so particularly with noisy data I would only rely on it for the first two peaks, and try to quantify the higher-order peaks manually if you need to (which you generally don't).</span><br /><br /><span>-----------------------------------------------------------------</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Compare mapped reads between two files</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>To see how many mapped reads (can be mapped concordant or discordant, doesn't matter) are shared between the two alignment files and how many mapped reads are unique to one file or the other.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ reformat.sh in=file1.sam out=mapped1.sam mappedonly
$ reformat.sh in=file2.sam out=mapped2.sam mappedonly</pre></div><p><span>That gets you the mapped reads only. Then:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ filterbyname.sh in=mapped1.sam names=mapped2.sam out=shared.sam include=t</pre></div><p><span>...which gets you the set intersection;</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ filterbyname.sh in=mapped1.sam names=mapped2.sam out=only1.sam include=f
$ filterbyname.sh in=mapped2.sam names=mapped1.sam out=only2.sam include=f</pre></div><p><span>...which get you the set subtractions.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>BBrename.sh</strong></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbrename.sh in=old.fasta out=new.fasta</pre></div><p><span>That will rename the reads as 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 222.</span><br /><br /><span>You can also give a custom prefix if you want. The input has to be text format, not .doc.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>---------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>BBfakereads.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Generating &ldquo;fake&rdquo; paired end reads from a single end read file</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bfakereads.sh in=reads.fastq out1=r1.fastq out2=r2.fastq length=100</pre></div><p><span>That will generate fake pairs from the input file, with whatever length you want (maximum of input read length). We use it in some cases for generating a fake LMP library for scaffolding from a set of contigs. Read 1 will be from the left end, and read 2 will be reverse-complemented and from the right end; both will retain the correct original qualities. And " /1" " /2" will be suffixed after the read name.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br /><br /><span>------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Randomreads.sh</strong></p><ul>
<li><strong>Generate random reads</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ randomreads.sh ref=genome.fasta out=reads.fq len=100 reads=10000</pre></div><p><span>"seed=-1" will use a random seed; any other value will use that specific number as the seed</span><br /><br /><span>You can specify paired reads, an insert size distribution, read lengths (or length ranges), and so forth. But because I developed it to benchmark mapping algorithms, it is specifically designed to give excellent control over mutations. You can specify the number of snps, insertions, deletions, and Ns per read, either exactly or probabilistically; the lengths of these events is individually customizable, the quality values can alternately be set to allow errors to be generated on the basis of quality; there's a PacBio error model; and all of the reads are annotated with their genomic origin, so you will know the correct answer when mapping.</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------------</span></p><ul>
<li><strong>Generate saturation curves to assess sequencing depth</strong></li>
</ul><p>&nbsp;</p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ bbcountunique.sh in=reads.fq out=histogram.txt</pre></div><p><span>It works by pulling kmers from each input read, and testing whether it has been seen before, then storing it in a table.</span><br /><br /><span>The bottom line, "first", tracks whether the first kmer of the read has been seen before (independent of whether it is read 1 or read 2).</span><br /><br /><span>The top line, "pair", indicates whether a combined kmer from both read 1 and read 2 has been seen before. The other lines are generally safe to ignore but they track other things, like read1- or read2-specific data, and random kmers versus the first kmer.</span><br /><br /><span>It plots a point every X reads (configurable, default 25000).</span><br /><br /><span>In noncumulative mode (default), a point indicates "for the last X reads, this percentage had never been seen before". In this mode, once the line hits zero, sequencing more is not useful.</span><br /><br /><span>In cumulative mode, a point indicates "for all reads, this percentage had never been seen before", but still only one point is plotted per X reads.</span><br /><br /><span>-----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>CalcTrueQuality.sh</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=170904" target="_blank">http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=170904</a><br /><br /><span>In light of the quality-score issues with the NextSeq platform, and the possibility of future Illumina platforms (HiSeq 3000 and 4000) also using quantized quality scores, I developed it for recalibrating the scores to ensure accuracy and restore the full range of values.</span><br /><br /><span>-----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>BBMapskimmer.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>BBMap is designed to find the best mapping, and heuristics will cause it to ignore mappings that are valid but substantially worse. Therefore, I made a different version of it, BBMapSkimmer, which is designed to find all of the mappings above a certain threshold. The shellscript is bbmapskimmer.sh and the usage is similar to bbmap.sh or mapPacBio.sh. For primers, which I assume will be short, you may wish to use a lower than default K of, say, 10 or 11, and add the "slow" flag.</span><br /><br /><span>--------------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>msa.sh and curprimers.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Quoted from Brian's response directly.</span><br /><br /><span>I also wrote another pair of programs specifically for working with primer pairs, msa.sh and cutprimers.sh. msa.sh will forcibly align a primer sequence (or a set of primer sequences) against a set of reference sequences to find the single best matching location per reference sequence - in other words, if you have 3 primers and 100 ref sequences, it will output a sam file with exactly 100 alignments - one per ref sequence, using the primer sequence that matched best. Of course you can also just run it with 1 primer sequence.</span><br /><br /><span>So you run msa twice - once for the left primer, and once for the right primer - and generate 2 sam files. Then you feed those into cutprimers.sh, which will create a new fasta file containing the sequence between the primers, for each reference sequence. We used these programs to synthetically cut V4 out of full-length 16S sequences.</span><br /><br /><span>I should say, though, that the primer sites identified are based on the normal BBMap scoring, which is not necessarily the same as where the primers would bind naturally, though with highly conserved regions there should be no difference.</span><br /><br /><span>------------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>testformat.sh</strong><br /><br /><strong>Identify type of Q-score encoding in sequence files</strong><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ testformat.sh in=seq.fq.gz
sanger    fastq    gz    interleaved    150bp</pre></div><p><span>--------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>kcompress.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Newest member of BBTools. Identify constituent k-mers.&nbsp;</span><br /><a href="http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63258" target="_blank">http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63258</a><br /><br /><span>----------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>commonkmers.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Find all k-mers for a given sequence.</span></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ commonkmers.sh in=reads.fq out=kmers.txt k=4 count=t display=999</pre></div><p><span>Will produce output that looks like</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">MISEQ05:239:000000000-A74HF:1:2110:14788:23085	ATGA=8	ATGC=6	GTCA=6	AAAT=5	AAGC=5	AATG=5	AGCA=5	ATAA=5	ATTA=5	CAAA=5	CATA=5	CATC=5	CTGC=5	AACC=4	AACG=4	AAGA=4	ACAT=4	ACCA=4	AGAA=4	ATCA=4	ATGG=4	CAAG=4	CCAA=4	CCTC=4	CTCA=4	CTGA=4	CTTC=4	GAGC=4	GGTA=4	GTAA=4	GTTA=4	AAAA=3	AAAC=3	AAGT=3	ACCG=3	ACGG=3	ACTG=3	AGAT=3	AGCT=3	AGGA=3	AGTA=3	AGTC=3	CAGC=3	CATG=3	CGAG=3	CGGA=3	CGTC=3	CTAA=3	CTCC=3	CTTA=3	GAAA=3	GACA=3	GACC=3	GAGA=3	GCAA=3	GGAC=3	TCAA=3	TGCA=3	AAAG=2	AACA=2	AATA=2	AATC=2	ACAA=2	ACCC=2	ACCT=2	ACGA=2	ACGC=2	AGAC=2	AGCG=2	AGGC=2	CAAC=2	CAGG=2	CCGC=2	GCCA=2	GCTA=2	GGAA=2	GGCA=2	TAAA=2	TAGA=2	TCCA=2	TGAA=2	AAGG=1	AATT=1	ACGT=1	AGAG=1	AGCC=1	AGGG=1	ATAC=1	ATAG=1	ATTG=1	CACA=1	CACG=1	CAGA=1	CCAC=1	CCCA=1	CCGA=1	CCTA=1	CGAC=1	CGCA=1	CGCC=1	CGCG=1	CGTA=1	CTAC=1	GAAC=1	GCGA=1	GCGC=1	GTAC=1	GTGA=1	TTAA=1</pre></div><p><span>-----------------------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>Mutate.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Simulate multiple mutants from a known reference (e.g.&nbsp;</span><em>E. coli</em><span>).</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">$ mutate.sh in=e_coli.fasta out=mutant.fasta id=99 
$ randomreads.sh ref=mutant.fasta out=reads.fq.gz reads=5m length=150 paired adderrors</pre></div><p><span>That will create a mutant version of E.coli with 99% identity to the original, and then generate 5 million simulated read pairs from the new genome. You can repeat this multiple times; each mutant will be different.</span><br /><br /><span>------------------------------------</span><br /><br /><strong>Partition.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>One can partition a large dataset with partition.sh into smaller subsets (example below splits data into 8 chunks).</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">partition.sh in=r1.fq in2=r2.fq out=r1_part%.fq out2=r2_part%.fq ways=8</pre></div><p><span>-----------------------------------</span><br /><strong>clumpify.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>If you are concerned about file size and want the files to be as small as possible, give Clumpify a try. It can reduce filesize by around 30% losslessly by reordering the reads. I've found that this also typically accelerates subsequent analysis pipelines by a similar factor (up to 30%). Usage:</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">clumpify.sh in=reads.fastq.gz out=clumped.fastq.gz</pre></div><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">clumpify.sh in1=reads_R1.fastq.gz in2=reads_R2.fastq.gz out1=clumped_R1.fastq.gz out2=clumped_R2.fastq.gz</pre></div><ul>
<li><strong>Clumpify.sh can now mark/remove sequence duplicates (optical/PCR/otherwise) from NGS data</strong></li>
</ul><p><br /><span>This does NOT require alignments so it should prove more useful compared to Picard MarkDuplicates. Relevant options for clumpify.sh command are listed below.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">dedupe=f optical=f (default)
Nothing happens with regards to duplicates.

dedupe=t optical=f
All duplicates are detected, whether optical or not.  All copies except one are removed for each duplicate.

dedupe=f optical=t
Nothing happens.

dedupe=t optical=t

Only optical duplicates (those with an X or Y coordinate within dist) are detected.  All copies except one are removed for each duplicate.
The allduplicates flag makes all copies of duplicates removed, rather than leaving a single copy.  But like optical, it has no effect unless dedupe=t.

Note: If you set "dupedist" to anything greater than 0, "optical" gets enabled automatically.</pre></div><p><span>-------------------------------------</span><br /><strong>fuse.sh</strong><br /><br /><span>Fuse will automatically reverse-complement read 2. Pad (N) amount can be adjusted as necessary. This will for example create a full size amplicon that can be used for alignments.</span><br /><br /></p><div><div>Code:</div><pre dir="ltr">fuse.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq pad=130 out=fused.fq fusepairs</pre></div>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Surabhi Chaudhary</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44593/bear-better-emulation-for-artificial-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 04:27:53 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44593/bear-better-emulation-for-artificial-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BEAR: Better Emulation for Artificial Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Created by Stephen Johnson, Brett Trost, Dr. Jeffrey R. Long, Dr. Anthony Kusalik University of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science</p>
<p dir="auto">BEAR is intended to be an easy-to-use collection of scripts for generating simulated WGS metagenomic reads with read lengths, quality scores, error profiles, and species abundances derived from real user-supplied WGS data.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/sej917/BEAR" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/sej917/BEAR</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 04:12:32 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/1295/five-points-for-bioinformatics-softwaretools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Five points for bioinformatics software/tools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In the bioinformatics sector we mostly spend time on computational analysis of huge amounts of data and try to make sense of it, biologically. But, most of the newbie bioinformaticians are faced with dilemma when they receive biological sequence data for the first time. They mostly found confusing over open source, user friendly GUI, and commercial bioinformatics software. Don&rsquo;t be surprise this is true and also not an easy task to decide, because analytical step is the most crucial part and believe to be the biggest bottleneck in publishing paper in high impact journals. Through this blog I would like to address the pros and cons of both kind of software/tools and try to assist (Hmmm not really, It looks convince) you to make decision on your software selections.</span></p><p><span><img src="http://bioinformaticsonline.com/mod/photo/five.jpg" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></span></p><p><span>The most common newbie questions are:</span><span></span></p><p><span>Should I try to use these free open source programs? &nbsp;Why are we not trying GUI software for computational analysis? Should I use commercial bioinformatics programs/software?&rdquo;</span><span><br /></span><span><br />1. Let&rsquo;s be open</span><span></span></p><p><span>We generally think free and cheap are useless. But this concept is not applicable when we discuss open source software. Mostly, the bioinformatics software is developed by highly competitive biological programmers who believe in open sharing of knowledge. They come under Open Bioinformatics Foundation or O|B|F which is a non-profit, volunteer run organization focused on supporting open source programming in bioinformatics. The best part about open source tools/software is that they&rsquo;re free to download the source code and read exactly what the program does. If you are so inclined, you can view all of the parts of the program and see the logical flow of the pipeline. In addition, open source makes an excellent learning tool for any beginning bioinformatician. Moreover, you can modify existing open source programs to deal with cutting-edge problems or to customize your pipeline.</span><span>&nbsp;</span><span>Apart from your computational and analysis work, most of the reviewer also prefers the open source based results so that they can validate the results if validation required.</span></p><p><span>2. Code headache</span><span></span></p><p><span>As a bioinformatician you are supposed to know the basics of programming languages, and if you are not good at it, then please learn it as soon as possible because you are not a bio-analyst but biological programmers. The<span>&nbsp;</span>open source programs usually lack dedicated service and support teams (often because they were the product of an overworked doc/postdoc!) so you are responsible for troubleshooting your own errors most of the time.<span>&nbsp;</span>We commonly receive the HELP email to support and assist to setup the pipeline; you can also find this kind of request on any QA forum. I personally believe this coding horror brings the biggest downside of open-source programs; where you need some programming skills in order to implement the program in your pipeline. But, if you are not able to fix the pipeline and modify the open source code according to your requirements them you should re-think on your bioinformatician name tag!!!</span><span></span></p><p><span>3. Dive into the codes</span><span></span></p><p><span>Some of the biologist turn bioinformatician says &ldquo;if you can do the same thing with commercial software then why to get migraine with weird codes&rdquo;, well this statement looks to me that guys are keen to learn swimming but still don&rsquo;t like to get wet. If you are still using paid software and doing your work by customer support and clicking some of the well-designed GUI button then perhaps you are not interested in learning and trying new and challenging bioinformatics works. You are missing the basic flavour of bioinformatics. Let&rsquo;s dive into the coding world, I am sure your will enjoy it. I recommend your to swim freely in code&rsquo;s sea, and enjoy the journey; do not merely watch it from the outside. &nbsp;</span></p><p><span>4. Paid does not mean better</span><span></span></p><p><span>The bioinformatics company which are specializes in bioinformatics solutions develop well designed/packed, user friendly software by using a large number of specialised scientist, programmers and support staff. They also provide good services to accomplice your biological analysis work. This means that if you hit a &lsquo;snag&rsquo; with your data, help is likely only a phone call away! These companies price their products competitively against the cost of a dedicated bioinformatician. You may be able to afford the program, but not the additional staff! Additionally, most of the functionality that you need in your analysis is already coded into the program. Need to plot a graph? Just click this button right here. It is that easy.</span><span>&nbsp;</span><span>But, as a bioinformatician this is not generally well encouraged approach in biological analysis work, because the software is not available to everyone and your data can&rsquo;t be validated. Moreover, there is very less chances that anyone will repeat your work or love to do similar kind of research (because not all the labs in the world are rich like yours).</span></p><p><span>5. Take a caution<br /><br />In biological analysis work, in which you deal GB/TB of data are having maximum chances of getting errors, so please be careful and always cross check your data before coming to any conclusion. Even an error in two line code can alter your entire analysis and display weird results. Some of the scientist blindly believes on commercial software, which is entirely wrong. Using proprietary tools does not absolve you of the need to actually read and research the type of analysis that you are doing. This is particularly true in the case of genome assembly and annotation.</span></p><p><span><br />At the end, I would like to tell only one think that open source solutions allows you to do more cutting edge analysis than the commercial tools. So let&rsquo;s go for it.</span></p><p>Disclaimer:</p><p>This is my personal view. I have nothing to do with any company or open source community.&nbsp;The views expressed on these pages are mine alone and not those of my current/past employers. I do reserve the right to remove comments left by spammers or off-topic comments.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/file/view/10563/funny-software-engineer</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 06:57:04 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/file/view/10563/funny-software-engineer</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Funny software engineer]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Ram Yash Pal</dc:creator>
	<enclosure url="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/file/download/10563" length="74959" type="image/jpeg" />
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27432/gkno</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 18:56:37 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27432/gkno</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GKNO]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>gkno opens the world of complex bioinformatic analysis to people of all level of computational expertise. This site contains documentation, tutorials and information on all the tools that comprise gkno.</span></p>
<p><span>http://gkno.me/how-to/install.html</span></p>
<p><span>http://gkno.me/software.html</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://gkno.me/" rel="nofollow">http://gkno.me/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30680/easybuild</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:00:43 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30680/easybuild</link>
	<title><![CDATA[EasyBuild]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild">EasyBuild</a><span>&nbsp;is a software build and installation framework that allows you to manage (scientific) software on High Performance Computing (HPC) systems in an efficient way.</span><br><span>A full list of supported software packages is available&nbsp;</span><a href="http://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/version-specific/Supported_software.html">here</a><span>.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://hpcugent.github.io/easybuild/" rel="nofollow">https://hpcugent.github.io/easybuild/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34324/orthognc-a-software-for-accurate-identification-of-orthologs-based-on-gene-neighborhood-conservation</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:30:35 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34324/orthognc-a-software-for-accurate-identification-of-orthologs-based-on-gene-neighborhood-conservation</link>
	<title><![CDATA[OrthoGNC: A Software for Accurate Identification of Orthologs Based on Gene Neighborhood Conservation]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div>
<p id="sp0005">Orthology relations can be used to transfer annotations from one gene (or protein) to another. Hence, detecting orthology relations has become an important task in the post-genomic era. Various genomic events, such as duplication and horizontal gene transfer, can cause erroneous assignment of orthology relations. In closely-related species, gene neighborhood information can be used to resolve many ambiguities in orthology inference. Here we present OrthoGNC, a software for accurately predicting pairwise orthology relations based on gene neighborhood conservation. Analyses on simulated and real data reveal the high accuracy of OrthoGNC. In addition to orthology detection, OrthoGNC can be employed to investigate the conservation of genomic context among potential orthologs detected by other methods. OrthoGNC is freely available online at http://bs.ipm.ir/softwares/orthognc and http://tinyurl.com/orthoGNC.</p>
<p>http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~wongls/projects/orthoGNC/</p>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672022917301663" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672022917301663</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36398/tools-for-protein-protein-docking</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:15:53 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36398/tools-for-protein-protein-docking</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Tools for Protein-Protein Docking !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Predicting the structure of protein&ndash;protein complexes using docking approaches is a difficult problem whose major challenges include identifying correct solutions, and properly dealing with molecular flexibility and conformational changes. Following are the tools to predict&nbsp;<span>the structure of protein&ndash;protein complexes:</span></p><p><a href="http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/docking/index.html" target="_blank">3D-Dock Suite</a></p><p>Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity and electrostatics</p><p>Re-scoring and clustering. Refinement of interface side-chains</p><p><a href="http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~3dgarden/" target="_blank">3D-Garden</a></p><p>Global rigid search in ensamble</p><p>Shape complementarity and Lennard&ndash;Jones potential</p><p>Side chain and backbone dihedral refinement</p><p><a href="http://www.sdsc.edu/CCMS/DOT/" target="_blank">DOT</a></p><p>Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity, electrostatics and VDWNone</p><p><a href="http://users.unimi.it/~ddl/escherng/index.htm" target="_blank">Escher NG</a></p><p>Global rigid searchShape complementarity, hydrogen bonds and electrostatic</p><p>Integrated in&nbsp;<a href="http://users.unimi.it/~ddl/vega/download.htm" target="_blank">VEGA</a></p><p><a href="http://vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/gramm1" target="_blank">GRAMM</a>&nbsp;</p><p>Global rigid search: FFT. smooth protein surface representation for soft docking</p><p>Shape complementarity and Lennard-Jones potential</p><p>Clustering of conformations</p><p><a href="http://vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/grammx/" target="_blank">GRAMM-X</a>&nbsp;</p><p>Global rigid search: FFT. smooth protein surface representation for soft docking</p><p>Shape complementarity and Lennard-Jones potentialminimization and re-scoring with multiple filters</p><p><a href="http://www.loria.fr/~ritchied/hex_server/" target="_blank">HEX</a></p><p>Global rigid search: Fourier correlation of spherical harmonics</p><p>Shape complementarity</p><p><a href="http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/hex/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://haddock.chem.uu.nl/Haddock/haddock.php" target="_blank">HADDOCK</a></p><p>Global rigid searchElectrostatic ,VDW and desolvation energy termsMD simulated annealing refinement . Filtering based on external data.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.molsoft.com/docking.html">ICM</a></p><p>Global rigid search: Monte CarloEmpirical scoring function</p><p>Clustering and selection of conformations. Refinement of interface side-chains and re-scoring</p><p><a href="http://www.weizmann.ac.il/Chemical_Research_Support/molfit/" target="_blank">MolFit&nbsp;</a></p><p>Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity</p><p>Clustering of good solutions, filtering using&nbsp;<em>a priori&nbsp;</em>information and small, local rigid rotations around selected conformations</p><p><a href="http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/PatchDock/" target="_blank">PatchDock</a></p><p>Global rigid searchShape complementarity and atomic desolvation energy</p><p>Clustering of conformations</p><p><a href="http://inb.bsc.es/gn6/PyDock" target="_blank">PyDock</a></p><p>Global rigid search:FFTShape complementarity</p><p>rescoring by binding electrostatics and desolvation energy</p><p><a href="http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/PatchDock/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://rosettadock.graylab.jhu.edu/" target="_blank">RosettaDock</a></p><p>Local rigid search: Monte Carlo with low and high resolution structure representation levels</p><p>Different scoring parameters for the different resolutions&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://zlab.bu.edu/zdock/" target="_blank">ZDOCK</a></p><p>Global rigid search: FFTShape complementarity, desolvation energy, and electrostatics.</p><p>Energy minimization and re-scoringFree for academics</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Point to note:</p><p>The proper treatment of flexibility in protein&ndash;protein docking is still an active field of research. You first should analyzed your proteins in order to define their conformational space and then choose the most suitable method for your docking problem.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>