BOL: Related items

Andi

Jit — Fri, 13 May 2016 05:16:35 -0500

This is the andi program for estimating the evolutionary distance between closely related genomes. These distances can be used to rapidly infer phylogenies for big sets of genomes. Because andi does not compute full alignments, it is so efficient that it scales even up to thousands of bacterial genomes.

This readme covers all necessary instructions for the impatient to get andi up and running. For extensive instructions please consult the manual.

More at https://github.com/evolbioinf/andi/

Address of the bookmark: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/01/13/bioinformatics.btu815.full

Hagfish - assess an assembly through creative use of coverage plots

Abhi — Fri, 20 May 2016 19:08:17 -0500

Hagfish is a tool that is to be used in data analysis of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) experiments. Hagfish builds on the concept of coverage plots and aims to assist (amongst others) in quality control of de novo genome assembly or identification of structural variation in a genome re-sequencing experiment.

Hagfish requires a reference sequence and a paired end re-sequencing data set. Hagfish has more power the larger the insert size of the paired end library is.

Quick links: Installation,Operation, Read mappers, Hagfish scripts, Hagfish plots

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/mfiers/hagfish

Blobology

Jit — Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:18:33 -0500

Tools for making blobplots or Taxon-Annotated-GC-Coverage plots (TAGC plots) to visualise the contents of genome assembly data sets as a QC step

Blaxter Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh

Goal: To create blobplots or Taxon-Annotated-GC-Coverage plots (TAGC plots) to visualise the contents of genome assembly data sets as a QC step.

This repository accompanies the paper:
Blobology: exploring raw genome data for contaminants, symbionts and parasites using taxon-annotated GC-coverage plots. Sujai Kumar, Martin Jones, Georgios Koutsovoulos, Michael Clarke, Mark Blaxter
(submitted 2013-10-01 to Frontiers in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology special issue : Quality assessment and control of high-throughput sequencing data).

It contains bash/perl/R scripts for running the analysis presented in the paper to create a preliminary assembly, and to create and collate GC content, read coverage and taxon annotation for the preliminary assembly, which can be visualised, such as Figure 2a from the paper showing TAGC plots/blobplots for Caenorhabditis sp. 5:

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/blaxterlab/blobology

Samtools Primer !!

Jit — Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:18:17 -0500

SAMtools: Primer / Tutorial by Ethan Cerami, Ph.D.

keywords: samtools, next-gen, next-generation, sequencing, bowtie, sam, bam, primer, tutorial, how-to, introduction
Revisions

    1.0: May 30, 2013: First public release on biobits.org.
    1.1: July 24, 2013: Updated with Disqus Comments / Feedback section.
    1.2: December 19, 2014: Multiple updates, including:
        Updated to use samtools 1.1 and bcftools 1.2.
        Updated usage for bcftools.

About

SAMtools is a popular open-source tool used in next-generation sequence analysis. This primer provides an introduction to SAMtools, and is geared towards those new to next-generation sequence analysis. The primer is also designed to be self-contained and hands-on, meaning that you only need to install SAMtools, and no other tools, and sample data sets are provided. Terms in bold are also explained in the glossary at the end of the document.

Address of the bookmark: http://biobits.org/samtools_primer.html

Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments

Jit — Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:01:44 -0500

Kraken is an ultrafast and highly accurate program for assigning taxonomic labels to metagenomic DNA sequences. Previous programs designed for this task have been relatively slow and computationally expensive, forcing researchers to use faster abundance estimation programs, which only classify small subsets of metagenomic data. Using exact alignment of k-mers, Kraken achieves classification accuracy comparable to the fastest BLAST program. In its fastest mode, Kraken classifies 100 base pair reads at a rate of over 4.1 million reads per minute, 909 times faster than Megablast and 11 times faster than the abundance estimation program MetaPhlAn. Kraken is available at http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/kraken/.

Krona

https://sourceforge.net/p/krona/home/krona/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053813/

GeneBreak: a tool to systematically identify genes recurrently affected by the genomic location of chromosomal CNA-associated breaks by a genome-wide approach

Jit — Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:15:29 -0500

Development of cancer is driven by somatic alterations, including numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations. Currently, several computational methods are available and are widely applied to detect numerical copy number aberrations (CNAs) of chromosomal segments in tumor genomes. However, there is lack of computational methods that systematically detect structural chromosomal aberrations by virtue of the genomic location of CNA-associated chromosomal breaks and identify genes that appear non-randomly affected by chromosomal breakpoints across (large) series of tumor samples. ‘GeneBreak’ is developed to systematically identify genes recurrently affected by the genomic location of chromosomal CNA-associated breaks by a genome-wide approach, which can be applied to DNA copy number data obtained by array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) or by (low-pass) whole genome sequencing (WGS). First, ‘GeneBreak’ collects the genomic locations of chromosomal CNA-associated breaks that were previously pinpointed by the segmentation algorithm that was applied to obtain CNA profiles. Next, a tailored annotation approach for breakpoint-to-gene mapping is implemented. Finally, dedicated cohort-based statistics is incorporated with correction for covariates that influence the probability to be a breakpoint gene. In addition, multiple testing correction is integrated to reveal recurrent breakpoint events. This easy-to-use algorithm, ‘GeneBreak’, is implemented in R (www.cran.r-project.org) and is available from Bioconductor (www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GeneBreak.html).

Address of the bookmark: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GeneBreak.html

Statistics Using R with Biological Examples

Neel — Thu, 03 Nov 2016 04:55:41 -0500

This book is a manifestation of my desire to teach researchers in biology a bit more about statistics than an ordinary introductory course covers and to introduce the utilization of R as a tool for analyzing their data. My goal is to reach those with little or no training in higher level statistics so that they can do more of their own data analysis, communicate more with statisticians, and appreciate the great potential statistics has to offer as a tool to answer biological questions.

This is necessary in light of the increasing use of higher level statistics in biomedical research. I hope it accomplishes this mission and encourage its free distribution and use as a course text or supplement.

K Seefeld, May 2007

HGA

Jit — Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:25:53 -0600

HGA tool version 1.0 This tool helps to apply the Hierarchical Genome Assembly (HGA) method. The tool will apply: 1. Partitioning a given reads dataset into a given number of partitions. 2. Assembling each partitions using a pre-specified assembler (Velvet or SPAdes in this version) and using a given kmer size. 3. Merging all the assemblies of the partition. 4. Combining all the assemblies of the partition (using velvet with kmer value of 31). 5. Finaly, re-assembling the whole dataset with the merged contigs or the combined contigs, using a given kmer size.

https://github.com/aalokaily/Hierarchical-Genome-Assembly-HGA

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/aalokaily/Hierarchical-Genome-Assembly-HGA

Structural variation: the hidden genomic treasure

Jit — Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:19:09 -0600

Genome re-sequencing projects have revealed substantial amounts of genetic variation between individuals extending beyond single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and short indels. Structural Variations (SVs) and Copy Number Variations (CNVs) are a major source of genomic variation. However, compared to SNPs, accurate detection, genotyping and understanding of CNVs is lagging behind due to much greater analytical challenges related to SV/CNV detection and analysis. In our lab we analyse SVs/CNVs using high-throughput sequencing and different analytical approaches. The most‐studied structural variants are copy number variations (CNVs) which can be generated by several different mechanisms including non‐allelic homologous recombination, non‐homologous end‐joining and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication‐related fork stalling and template switching. CNVs are closely related to segmental duplications (SDs): SDs can stimulate the formation of CNVs and themselves started out as CNVs, but became fixed in a species. Structural variation can be neutral but has also influenced our phenotypic evolution, for example our susceptibility to disease and our ability to digest certain types of food. Our understanding of the extent of structural variation is increasing rapidly, but it will be much more difficult to understand its phenotypic consequences.

Structural variants (SVs) such as deletions, insertions, duplications, inversions and translocations litter genomes and are often associated with gene expression changes and severe phenotypes (ie. genetic diseases in humans). Recent studies on the functional aspects of different types of SVs have unveiled several cases of adaptive evolution. For example, inversions have been associated with ecological adaptations and may facilitate speciation. Due to their prevalent nature, SVs arguably have a large impact on genome evolution and should not be neglected when studying the genetics of adaptation and speciation. SVs were classically defined as chromosomal rearrangements larger than 1kb, but due to a higher resolution of new detection methods, smaller variants (between 50 and 1000 base pairs) can now be accurately assessed. Besides various methods of detection in next generation sequencing data (paired end mapping, split reads, and depth of coverage), array-based approaches have proven to be particularly useful for detecting copy number variations (CNVs). These technologies have enabled researchers to catalog a wide spectrum of SVs in many organisms and infer the effects of selection shaping their evolutionary trajectories.

Structure variation sequencing signature (Source: NatRev Genetics)

Related tools, databases and publications are listed below. If you know any interesing papers, please let us know in comment section:

Key concepts

Structural variation includes balanced variants such as inversions and translocations, and unbalanced ones such as duplications and deletions (copy number variations or CNVs).

Structural variants can arise by several mechanisms, including nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR), nonhomologous end‐joining (NHEJ) and DNA replication‐based fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS).

CNV is closely linked to segmental duplication, but is not exactly the same. Segmental duplications can stimulate CNV formation by NAHR, and themselves arise from CNVs that have become fixed.

Segmental duplications did not appear uniformly during the evolution of the Great Ape species, but rather during a burst of activity around the time of the divergence of gorilla from the human/chimpanzee ancestor.

Duplicated genes play a critical role in the evolution of a genome as they act as ‘spare parts’ than can evolve to perform new or more specialized functions.

Effects of structural variation on gene expression can be identified but only a few examples of the consequences for species biology have been documented.

Tools

CNVnatora tool for CNV discovery and genotyping from depth of read mapping.2011a,2011b

AGEa tools that implements an algorithm for optimal alignment of sequences with SVs.2011

BreakSeqa pipeline for annotation, classification and analysis of SVs at single nucleotide resolution.2010

PEMera computational and simulation framework for discovering SVs by paired-end read mapping.2009,2007

GASV https://code.google.com/archive/p/gasv/

PAIROSCOPE http://pairoscope.sourceforge.net/

SVDetect http://svdetect.sourceforge.net/Site/Home.html

BreakPtr, discovery of unbalanced structural variants (copy-number variants) with tiling microarrays Link

R Package https://www.bioconductor.org/help/course-materials/2010/EMBL2010/Practical-4-StructuralVariants.pdf

BreakSeq, structural variant genotyping using split reads Link

CopySeq, genotyping of unbalanced structural variants (copy-number variants) using read-depth Link

DELLY2, integrated structural variant discovery, genotyping and visualization in deep sequencing data Link

PEMer, structural variant discovery in 454 sequencing data by paired-end mapping Link

TIGER, transduction inference in germline genomes using short read data Link

MANTA https://github.com/Illumina/manta

SV-Bay https://github.com/InstitutCurie/SV-Bay

BreakDancer http://breakdancer.sourceforge.net/

Variation Hunter http://compbio.cs.sfu.ca/software-variation-hunter

Lumpy https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv

ForestSV http://sebatlab.ucsd.edu/index.php/software-data

PBSuites for long reads https://sourceforge.net/projects/pb-jelly/

Visualization

The SV visualization tool: http://genomesavant.com/savant/

InGAP-SV (http://ingap.sourceforge.net/) that is nice tools for both detection and visualisation of severals kind of structural variations (Large insertions, translocation, deletion, inversions....)

Tools table: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n8/fig_tab/nbt.1904_T2.html

Variation Viewer https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/view/

Papers

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v9/n2/full/nmeth.1858.html

http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1412/structural-variations-in-genomes-ecological-and-evolutionary-implications

http://www.mi.fu-berlin.de/wiki/pub/ABI/GenomicsLecture10Materials/structural-variation.pdf

http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-015-1479-3

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/content/overview/

http://www.nature.com/subjects/structural-variation

https://eichlerlab.gs.washington.edu/news/NatMeth_Feb2012.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19477992 ***

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22452995

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/09/06/073833

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479793/

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep18501

http://www.genetics.org/content/202/1/351

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sssykim/teaching/s13/slides/Lecture_SVI.pdf

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/structural-variation-detection-from-next-generation-sequencing-2469-9853-S1-007.php?aid=69055

http://schatzlab.cshl.edu/presentations/2016/2016.01.12.PAG.Structural%20Variations.pdf

pyScaf

Bulbul — Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:20:33 -0600

pyScaf orders contigs from genome assemblies utilising several types of information:

paired-end (PE) and/or mate-pair libraries (NGS-based mode)
long reads (NGS-based mode)
synteny to the genome of some related species (reference-based mode)

Scaffolding

In reference-based mode, pyScaf uses synteny to the genome of closely related species in order to order contigs and estimate distances between adjacent contigs.

Contigs are aligned globally (end-to-end) onto reference chromosomes, ignoring:

matches not satisfying cut-offs (--identity and --overlap)
suboptimal matches (only best match of each query to reference is kept)
and removing overlapping matches on reference.

In preliminary tests, pyScaf performed superbly on simulated heterozygous genomes based on C. parapsilosis (13 Mb; CANPA) and A. thaliana (119 Mb; ARATH) chromosomes, reconstructing correctly all chromosomes always for CANPA and nearly always for ARATH (Figures in dropbox, CANPA table, ARATH table).
Runs took ~0.5 min for CANPA on 4 CPUs and ~2 min for ARATH on 16 CPUs.

Important remarks:

Reduce your assembly before (fasta2homozygous.py) as any redundancy will likely break the synteny.
pyScaf works better with contigs than scaffolds, as scaffolds are often affected by mis-assemblies (no de novo assembler / scaffolder is perfect...), which breaks synteny.
pyScaf works very well if divergence between reference genome and assembled contigs is below 20% at nucleotide level.
pyScaf deals with large rearrangements ie. deletions, insertion, inversions, translocations. Note however, this is experimental implementation!
Consider closing gaps after scaffolding.

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/lpryszcz/pyScaf