Address of the bookmark: https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/variant-analysis/tutorials/non-dip/tutorial.html

If you are interested in gene prediction, have a look at GenomeThreader.

http://genometools.org/pub/

Address of the bookmark: http://genometools.org/

https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/release/viral/

Address of the bookmark: https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/release/viral/

Address of the bookmark: http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/

Address of the bookmark: https://cmdcolin.github.io/awesome-genome-visualization/?latest=true&selected=%23BRIG&tag=Comparative

https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-6568-2

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/HuffordLab/GenomeQC

1. SPAdes: An assembler specifically designed for single-cell and multi-cell bacterial genomes, as well as small eukaryotic genomes.

2. ABySS: A parallelized assembler for large genomes that uses de Bruijn graphs.

3. Velvet: Another de Bruijn graph-based assembler optimized for short-read sequencing data.

4. SOAPdenovo: A de Bruijn graph-based assembler designed for short reads, widely used for assembling large and complex genomes.

5. MaSuRCA: A hybrid assembler that combines data from multiple sequencing technologies, such as Illumina and PacBio.

6. Canu: A long-read assembler optimized for PacBio and Oxford Nanopore sequencing data.

7. Flye: A long-read assembler suitable for bacterial and small eukaryotic genomes.

8. SMARTdenovo: An assembler designed for long reads, particularly suited for PacBio data.

9. SPAdes Long Read (SPAdesLR): An extension of SPAdes for long-read data, such as those from PacBio or Nanopore.

10. Minia: An assembler optimized for low memory consumption, suitable for small and medium-sized genomes.

11. Unicycler: A hybrid assembler that combines short and long reads for circular bacterial genome assembly.

12. wtdbg2: A de Bruijn graph assembler for long reads, efficient for very large genomes.

13. Shasta: A long-read assembler that uses the Overlap-Layout-Consensus approach, suitable for PacBio and Nanopore data.

14. Sparc: An assembler designed to handle noisy long reads from Nanopore sequencing.

15. CANA: An assembler for metagenomic data, particularly for complex and diverse microbial communities.

16. Ra Assembler: A metagenome assembler for long reads, designed for highly complex metagenomic samples.

Please note that the field of bioinformatics is constantly evolving, and new assembly tools may have emerged since my last update. Additionally, the performance of these tools can vary depending on the characteristics of the sequencing data and the genome being assembled. When selecting an assembly tool, consider the specific requirements of your project, the available data types, and the computational resources at your disposal. Always refer to the respective tool's documentation and publications for the most up-to-date information and recommendations.

• Clustering module Predicts, clusters and annotates the genes of every input genome
• Lifestyle prediction Employs a machine learning model to forecast bacterial lifestyle or other specified metadata
• Analitical module (Shiny app) Results from the previous modules are embedded in a user-friendly interface for comprehensive and interactive comparative genomics.

You can find the complete wiki here [https://github.com/Carrion-lab/bacLIFE/wiki/bacLIFE-wiki]

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/Carrion-lab/bacLIFE

The authors tested the pipeline across 5 datasets from 4 species, spanning an almost 80-fold difference in sample size (from 136 to over 10,700 individuals) and found that the predictive accuracy was within 0.02-0.05 of the standard GBLUP and Bayesian ridge regression approaches, again without the user having to manually select a model. More importantly the pipeline was able to recover known biological signals (FLC, FT and DOG1 in Arabidopsis, Waxy and GW5 in rice and Glu-D1 in wheat) and produced well calibrated association statistics. The most interesting observation though is that prediction accuracy and biological association are not necessarily the same thing. Two traits with identical predictive performance could have association significance that varied by over 60 orders of magnitude. So knowing how well we can predict a trait doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the distribution of the genetic architecture of that trait across the genome. That's where GenoBridge is actually of value. It's not just another machine learning pipeline. It's an example of an adaptive analytical workflow that doesn't just throw algorithms at the data but asks whether the data actually justify the next analytical step. As the amount of genomic data we generate continues to grow and the number of computational methods available to us increases, the bottleneck may not be in finding the right algorithm at all. The bottleneck may be in deciding which algorithm we can actually trust.

GenoBridge offers a potential solution: let the data tell you which model is appropriate, validate the prediction rigorously and only then move from prediction to biological discovery. That may be where computational genomics is heading. Rather than a future in which there is one single 'best' model, we may be heading towards a future of intelligent systems that know when a model is appropriate, when a result is reliable and when the biology is actually telling us something that we should be listening to.

More at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-026-01596-5

Analysis of regulatory sequences (RSAT project)
Classification and analysis of mobile genetic elements (ACLAME project).
Analysis of molecular interaction networks (NeAT project)
Inference of metabolic pathways from genomic and post-genomic data
(metabolic pathfinding, see also metabolic pathfinding in NeAT)
Critical assesment of protein interactions (CAPRI)

Lab Page http://www.bigre.ulb.ac.be/