For the full list of features, improvements and fixes, see the release notes:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/gbench/releasenotes

New Features

• BLAST Tool: added support for local custom BLAST databases
• Graphical Sequence View: added log scaling option for graph tracks
• Generic Table View: new tutorial added

Bug Fixes and Improvements

• Project Tree View: Genomic Collections/Assemblies now show accessions, not just names
• Tree View: layout updated to better accommodate nodes of different sizes
• Table Import Dialog (MacOS): fixed issue with table visibility
• Fixed bug where different molecules IDs in GenBank could resolve to the same sequence
• Graphical Sequence View: fixed issue where sequence track was not shown for some sequences
• Graphical Sequence View: fixed protein coloration methods
• Graphical Sequence View: improved rendering of Markers to better indicate boundaries and produce higher quality PDF images
• Create Gene Model tool: fixed scenario when gene model tool failed with local sequences
• Search View: ORF Finder – fixed incorrect protein lengths
• Fixed bug with not opening project file (.gbp) on a click
• Fixed issues in GVF import
• Fixed BLAST Search tool against NCBI databases not working
• Fixed tblastn (protein BLAST) not working in standalone mode
• Fixed GTF export failure

Address of the bookmark: http://wishart.biology.ualberta.ca/cgview/

• exteremely fast (17 CPU hours for whole Human x Mouse genome (with 40 nodes: 35 wall minutes), or 8 mammals in 21 CPU hours (42 wall minutes))
• scalable (Arbitrarily parallelizable across multiple nodes using MPI)
• memory efficient. (Even a single node with 16GB of ram can handle over 1Gbp of sequence)
• unlimited by pattern length or selection
• repeat tolerant

Address of the bookmark: http://murasaki.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/wiki/index.php?Murasaki

• For each genome, obtain a set of exon annotations. These annotations can be a combination of both exon predictions (e.g. Genscan) and annotations that have been experimentally verified (e.g. RefSeq). Ideally, we would like to have these annotations be as sensitive as possible. Specificity is not a concern, as incorrect annotations are not likely not have significant alignments with other gene annotations.
• Compare all exons against all exons in other genomes and record significant alignments between exons. Currently, we use BLAT to do this all-vs-all comparison with alignments being performed in protein space.
• Construct a graph with each vertex corresponding to a exon and edges between vertices whose corresponding exons have significant alignments.
• Identify cliques in this graph. These cliques are potential anchors to be used in the map.
• Starting with the largest cliques (those that have exons in all or most of the genomes), join neighboring (adjacent in genomic coordinates, in each genome) cliques to form runs. Smaller cliques that are inconsistent with runs formed by larger cliques are filtered out. After the smallest cliques have been considered, cliques that are not part of a run are discarded.
• The extents of each run in each genome are outputted as orthologous segments. The cliques from each run are used to output the exact genomic coordinates of anchors within each orthologous segment. These anchors can be used by genomic alignment programs (such as MAVID) to do a detailed alignment of each orthologous segment.

https://www.biostat.wisc.edu/~cdewey/mercator/

Address of the bookmark: https://www.biostat.wisc.edu/~cdewey/mercator/

http://www.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/chromosomeinformatics/rnakato/cgaln/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/chromosomeinformatics/rnakato/cgaln/

We describe a new method for predicting the ancestral order and orientation of those intervals from their observed adjacencies in modern species. We combine the results from this method with data from chromosome painting experiments to produce a map of an early mammalian genome that accounts for 96.8% of the available human genome sequence data. The precision is further increased by mapping inversions as small as 31 bp. Analysis of the predicted evolutionary breakpoints in the human lineage confirms certain published observations but disagrees with others. Although only a few mammalian genomes are currently sequenced to high precision, our theoretical analyses and computer simulations indicate that our results are reasonably accurate and that they will become highly accurate in the foreseeable future. Our methods were developed as part of a project to reconstruct the genome sequence of the last ancestor of human, dogs, and most other placental mammals;

Address of the bookmark: http://www.bx.psu.edu/miller_lab/car/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/groups/koonin/

Courses

Old courses (2012-2014)

Metagenomics Workshop

2015 November - Uppsala
2016 November - Uppsala
2017 November - Uppsala

Introduction to Bioinformatics Using NGS Data

2015 February - Uppsala 
2015 May - Gothenburg
2015 September - Uppsala
2015 November - Lund
2016 January - Uppsala
2016 April - Linköping
2016 September - Uppsala
2016 November - Umeå
2017 January - Uppsala
2017 May - Gothenburg
2017 September - Lund
2017 November - Uppsala
2018 February - Uppsala

Introduction to Genome Annotation

2015 April - Uppsala
2016 April - Uppsala
2017 April - Uppsala
2018 May - Uppsala

De Novo Genome Assembly

2016 November - Uppsala
2017 November - Uppsala

RNA-seq course

2015 October - Uppsala
2016 April - Uppsala
2016 October - Uppsala
2017 March - Uppsala
2017 November - Uppsala
RNAseq tutorials

R Programming Foundations for Life Scientists

2016 November - Uppsala
2017 Mars - Uppsala

Single cell RNA sequencing analysis

2017 October - Uppsala

Address of the bookmark: https://scilifelab.github.io/courses/

Address of the bookmark: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783527/