Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?

Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:

• Sequencing depth: Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.

• Gene length: Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.

• Bias reduction: Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.

TPM (Transcripts Per Million)

TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:

Key Features:

1. Proportionality: TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.

2. Intuitive interpretation: TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.

3. Preferred for comparisons: TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.

FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)

FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:

Key Features:

1. Historical significance: FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.

2. Single-end vs. paired-end: In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).

3. Limited utility: FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.

CPM (Counts Per Million)

CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:

Key Features:

1. Simplicity: CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.

2. Application: Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.

3. Gene length agnostic: CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.

When to Use Each Method

• TPM: Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.

• FPKM: Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.

• CPM: Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.

Conclusion

Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM’s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.

References:

1. Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics.

2. Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology.

3. Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology.

Annotation

https://bigd.big.ac.cn/ncov/variation/annotation

Genome wharehouse 

https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/browse/index

Released Genome

https://bigd.big.ac.cn/ncov/release_genome

Download data 

ftp://download.big.ac.cn/Genome/Viruses/Coronaviridae/

Raw data

https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa/browse/run/?tag=Coronaviridae

Address of the bookmark: https://bigd.big.ac.cn/ncov/about

Source: Life technologies

Address of the bookmark: http://www.lifetechnologies.com/global/en/home/communities-social/blog/blogs/sequencing-solutions-to-world-health.html?cid=social_blogseries_20130829_11098264

Following are the weblink for different available browsers:

http://www.ensembl.org/index.html

http://ensemblgenomes.org/

http://genome.ucsc.edu/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/genomes/

http://flybase.org/

http://cmr.jcvi.org/tigr-scripts/CMR/CmrHomePage.cgi

http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/

http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/benchmark/

http://bmi.osu.edu/hpc/software/pmap/pmap.html

Other similiar papers:

http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/cmb.2012.0022

http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/24/3169

Some new Mapping tool links:

GSNAP

http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/

RMAP

http://rulai.cshl.edu/rmap/

mrsFAST

http://mrsfast.sourceforge.net/Home

http://sourceforge.net/projects/mrsfast/files/mrsfast-ultra-3.1.0/

BFAST

http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/bfast/index.php?title=Main_Page

SHRiMP (for AB SOLiD color-space reads)

http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/

RazerA 3

http://www.seqan.de/projects/razers/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/184

Related Paper:

http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/3/R59/abstract

Address of the bookmark: http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10859

Tool link:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/sailfish/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.genengnews.com/gen-news-highlights/lightweight-algorithms-sail-through-rna-sequencing-data/81249765/

GENXPRO GMBH, ALTENHÖFERALLEE 3, 60438 FRANKFURT MAIN, GERMANY

Website: http://www.genxpro.info/products_and_services/

PHONE: +49 (0)69- 95 73 97 10, FAX: +49 (0)69- 95 73 97 06

EMAIL: info@genxpro.de

Address of the bookmark: http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150707/srep11996/full/srep11996.html