<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/41501?offset=210</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/41501?offset=210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27973/wgsim</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:49 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27973/wgsim</link>
	<title><![CDATA[WgSim]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Reads simulator</p>
<p>Wgsim is a small tool for simulating sequence reads from a reference genome. It is able to simulate diploid genomes with SNPs and insertion/deletion (INDEL) polymorphisms, and simulate reads with uniform substitution sequencing errors. It does not generate INDEL sequencing errors, but this can be partly compensated by simulating INDEL polymorphisms.<br><br>Wgsim outputs the simulated polymorphisms, and writes the true read coordinates as well as the number of polymorphisms and sequencing errors in read names. One can evaluate the accuracy of a mapper or a SNP caller with wgsim_eval.pl that comes with the package.<br><br></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/lh3/wgsim" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lh3/wgsim</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30144/bima-v3-an-aligner-customized-for-mate-pair-library-sequencing</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30144/bima-v3-an-aligner-customized-for-mate-pair-library-sequencing</link>
	<title><![CDATA[BIMA V3: an aligner customized for mate pair library sequencing]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Summary: Mate pair library sequencing is an effective and economical method for detecting genomic structural variants and chromosomal abnormalities. Unfortunately, the mapping and alignment of mate pair read pairs to a reference genome is a challenging and <br>time consuming process for most NGS alignment programs. Large insert sizes, introduction of library preparation protocol artifacts (biotin junction reads, paired-end read contamination, chimeras, etc.), and presence of structural variant breakpoints within reads increases mapping and alignment complexity. We describe an algorithm that is up to 20 times faster and 25% more accurate than popular NGS alignment programs when processing mate pair sequencing. <br>Availability: http://bioinformaticstools.mayo.edu/research/bima/ <br>Contact: vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/12/bioinformatics.btu078.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/12/bioinformatics.btu078.full.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31714/krona</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 04:47:35 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/31714/krona</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Krona]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Krona allows hierarchical data to be explored with zooming, multi-layered pie charts. Krona charts can be created using an <a href="https://github.com/marbl/Krona/wiki/ExcelTemplate">Excel template</a> or <a href="https://github.com/marbl/Krona/wiki/KronaTools">KronaTools</a>, which includes support for several bioinformatics tools and raw data formats. The interactive charts are self-contained and can be viewed with any modern web browser (see <a href="https://github.com/marbl/Krona/wiki/Browser%20support">Browser support</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://marbl.github.io/Krona/img/screen_mgrast.png"><img src="https://camo.githubusercontent.com/27b71b1f1832523723c3d14dec764e7ad098438c/687474703a2f2f6d6172626c2e6769746875622e696f2f4b726f6e612f696d672f7468756d625f6d67726173742e706e67" width="210" height="167" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/marbl/Krona/wiki" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/marbl/Krona/wiki</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43828/understanding-hifi-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43828/understanding-hifi-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Understanding HiFi Reads !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>While little public data is available for either of the new synthetic long read approaches, Illumina showed an example comparison earlier this year at the&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.festivalofgenomics.com/rami-mehio" target="_blank">Festival of Genomics &amp; Biodata conference</a><span>&nbsp;(FoG 2022). In the IGV screenshot presented (below), synthetic Infinity reads &ndash; labeled &ldquo;Longas&rdquo; &ndash; are at the top, followed by standard Illumina short reads, and PacBio HiFi reads labeled &ldquo;CCS&rdquo; depicted at the bottom:</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://pacb.com/blog/the-hifi-difference-true-long-reads-vs-synthetic-long-reads/" rel="nofollow">http://pacb.com/blog/the-hifi-difference-true-long-reads-vs-synthetic-long-reads/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44848/trust-but-verify-sequencing-your-cell-lines-might-reveal-an-uninvited-guest</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:07:57 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44848/trust-but-verify-sequencing-your-cell-lines-might-reveal-an-uninvited-guest</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Trust But Verify: Sequencing Your Cell Lines Might Reveal an Uninvited Guest]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>High-throughput sequencing has become indispensable in cell biology, enabling detailed insights into chromatin structure, gene expression, and regulatory dynamics. Yet, when faced with unexpectedly low mapping rates to the human genome, researchers often rush to troubleshoot technical parameters&mdash;sequencer quality, adapter trimming, or aligner settings.</p><p>Before you go down that path, consider this critical biological question:<br /> <strong>Are you sequencing human cells&mdash;or bacterial contamination?</strong></p><h2>The Silent Saboteur: Mycoplasma in Cell Cultures</h2><p><em>Mycoplasma</em> contamination remains one of the most widespread and underdiagnosed issues in tissue culture work. Studies suggest that <strong>15&ndash;35% of cell lines in use may be contaminated</strong>, often without visible signs. Unlike other microbial infections, <em>Mycoplasma</em> does not produce cloudiness, odor, or a change in pH. Many researchers won&rsquo;t detect it unless they specifically test for it.</p><p>The consequences, however, are profound. <em>Mycoplasma</em> can significantly alter:</p><ul>
<li>
<p>Host gene expression patterns</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cell proliferation rates</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Epigenetic profiles and chromatin accessibility</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cytokine signaling and immune responses</p>
</li>
</ul><p>In short, it can skew your results, compromise your biological conclusions, and invalidate weeks or months of research.</p><h2>A Simple Diagnostic Step: Map Against <em>Mycoplasma</em> Genomes</h2><p>If you encounter poor alignment rates to the human genome, consider mapping your reads to a <em>Mycoplasma</em> reference genome&mdash;or better yet, use a <strong>combined human + <em>Mycoplasma</em></strong> reference. There have been cases where over half of all reads, initially assumed to be from human cells, were in fact bacterial in origin. This check is fast, easy, and could save your project.</p><h2>How Contamination Happens&mdash;and Persists</h2><p><em>Mycoplasma</em> is small (0.1&ndash;0.3 &mu;m), lacks a cell wall, and can pass through standard filters undetected. Common sources include:</p><ul>
<li>
<p>Contaminated reagents (e.g., FBS)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Infected cell lines obtained from other labs</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Poor aseptic technique or shared equipment</p>
</li>
</ul><p>Once present, it spreads quickly between cultures and can persist for months, silently affecting results.</p><h2>Why Treatment Is Difficult</h2><p>While antibiotics such as Plasmocin or BM-Cyclin are sometimes used, they often offer only partial resolution and may themselves alter cell behavior. In many cases, the best course of action is to <strong>discard the contaminated culture</strong> and start with a fresh, verified stock.</p><h2>Practical Recommendations for Researchers</h2><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Routinely test for <em>Mycoplasma</em></strong> using PCR, qPCR, or fluorescence-based assays</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Incorporate contamination screens into your sequencing QC pipeline</strong></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Use combined reference genomes</strong> when mapping ambiguous reads</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Practice strict aseptic technique</strong> and monitor all incoming cell lines</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Don&rsquo;t ignore unexplained data anomalies</strong>&mdash;they might point to contamination</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>Closing Thought: Contamination Is a Biological Variable</h2><p>It&rsquo;s easy to view poor mapping as a technical issue, but sometimes the problem lies deeper&mdash;in the biology itself. <em>Mycoplasma</em> contamination doesn&rsquo;t just interfere with sequencing; it interferes with science. As a research community, we must treat contamination not as an afterthought, but as a key variable to control.</p><p>So next time your reads won&rsquo;t align, don&rsquo;t just tune the aligner. Ask if your cells are telling the truth&mdash;or if they're hiding something.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/23253/resolving-the-complexity-of-the-human-genome-using-single-molecule-sequencing</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:47:34 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/23253/resolving-the-complexity-of-the-human-genome-using-single-molecule-sequencing</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The human genome is arguably the most complete mammalian reference assembly yet more than 160 euchromatic gaps remain and aspects of its structural variation remain poorly understood ten years after its completion. The results in this paper https://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/team-uses-single-molecule-sequencing-close-gaps-chart-complexity-human-reference suggest a greater complexity of the human genome in the form of variation of longer and more complex repetitive DNA that can now be largely resolved with the application of this longer-read sequencing technology.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v517/n7536/full/nature13907.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v517/n7536/full/nature13907.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38593/excavator-detecting-copy-number-variants-from-whole-exome-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 10:10:48 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38593/excavator-detecting-copy-number-variants-from-whole-exome-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[EXCAVATOR: detecting copy number variants from whole-exome sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>EXCAVATOR, for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from whole-exome sequencing data. EXCAVATOR combines a three-step normalization procedure with a novel heterogeneous hidden Markov model algorithm and a calling method that classifies genomic regions into five copy number states. We validate EXCAVATOR on three datasets and compare the results with three other methods. These analyses show that EXCAVATOR outperforms the other methods and is therefore a valuable tool for the investigation of CNVs in largescale projects, as well as in clinical research and diagnostics. EXCAVATOR is freely available at&nbsp;</span><span><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/excavatortool/" target="_blank"><span>http://sourceforge.net/projects/excavatortool/</span></a></span><span>.</span><br><br><br><span>EXCAVATOR is a novel software package for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from whole-exome sequencing data.</span><br><span>EXCAVATOR has been published on Genome Biology (</span><a href="http://genomebiology.com/2013/14/10/R120/abstract" target="_blank">http://genomebiology.com/2013/14/10/R120/abstract<span></span></a><span>).</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/excavatortool/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/excavatortool/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Radha Agarkar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41144/seqmule-automated-human-exomegenome-variants-detection</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 03:22:54 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41144/seqmule-automated-human-exomegenome-variants-detection</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SeqMule: Automated human exome/genome variants detection]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>SeqMule takes single-end or paird-end FASTQ or BAM files, generates a script consisting of more than 10 popular alignment, analysis tools and runs the script line by line. Users can change the pipeline or fine-tune the parameters by modifying its configuration file.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://doc-openbio.readthedocs.io/projects/seqmule/en/latest/" rel="nofollow">https://doc-openbio.readthedocs.io/projects/seqmule/en/latest/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34493/plast-a-fast-accurate-and-ngs-scalable-bank-to-bank-sequence-similarity-search-tool</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 04:10:54 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34493/plast-a-fast-accurate-and-ngs-scalable-bank-to-bank-sequence-similarity-search-tool</link>
	<title><![CDATA[PLAST: A fast, accurate and NGS scalable bank-to-bank sequence similarity search tool]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>PLAST is a fast, accurate and NGS scalable bank-to-bank sequence similarity search tool providing significant accelerations of seeds-based heuristic comparison methods, such as the Blast suite of algorithms.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Relying on unique software architecture, PLAST takes full advantage of recent multi-core personal computers without requiring any additional hardware devices.</strong></p>
<p>PLAST stands for&nbsp;<em>Parallel Local Sequence Alignment Search Tool&nbsp;</em>and is was&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/329" target="_blank">published in BMC Bioinformatics.</a></p>
<p>PLAST is a general purpose sequence comparison tool providing the following benefits:</p>
<ul>
<li>PLAST is a high-performance sequence comparison tool designed to compare two sets of sequences (query vs. reference),</li>
<li>Reduces the processing time of sequences comparisons while providing highest quality results,</li>
<li>Contains a fully integrated data filtering engine capable of selecting relevant hits with user-defined criteria (E-Value, identity, coverage, alignment length, etc.),</li>
<li>Does not require any additional hardware, since it is a software solution. It is easy to install, cost-effective, takes full advantage of multi-core processors and uses a small RAM footprint,</li>
<li>Ready to be used on desktop computer, cluster, cloud as well as within distributed system running Hadoop.</li>
</ul>
<p>https://plast.inria.fr/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://plast.inria.fr/" rel="nofollow">https://plast.inria.fr/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/40497/artificial-intelligence-is-more-accurate-than-doctors-in-diagnosing-breast-cancer</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:12:34 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/40497/artificial-intelligence-is-more-accurate-than-doctors-in-diagnosing-breast-cancer</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence is more accurate than doctors in diagnosing breast cancer]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence is more accurate than doctors in diagnosing breast cancer from mammograms, a study in the journal Nature suggests.</p><p>An international team, including researchers from&nbsp;<a href="https://health.google/" target="_blank">Google Health</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/183293/research-collaboration-aims-improve-breast-cancer/" target="_blank">Imperial College London</a>, designed and trained a computer model on X-ray images from nearly 29,000 women.</p><p>The algorithm&nbsp;<a href="https://nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1799-6" target="_blank">outperformed six radiologists</a>&nbsp;in reading mammograms.</p><p>AI was still as good as two doctors working together.</p><p>Unlike humans, AI is tireless. Experts say it could improve detection. Read More:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50857759" target="_blank">https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50857759</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>