<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42040?offset=30</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42040?offset=30" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/17843/pathway-analysis</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:51:13 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/17843/pathway-analysis</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Pathway Analysis]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Pathway Analysis is usually performed with aim to enrich the genes with their functional information and reveal the underlying biological mechanisms pursue by genes. Pathway Analysis is not only limited to what biological pathways a particular set of expressed genes follow but also to disclose the relationships between these genes. With availability of more genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics data, interactions between genes involve in multiple pathways become more clear and also relationships between the genes, their transcripts, and their gene products. However, existing tools and dbs mainly based on knowledge driven approach in which pathways will be identified by finding the correlation between the&nbsp;<span>information in one of the pathway knowledge databases (KEGG,Reactome,Panther,BioCarta, Panther,GO,NCI,WikiPathways,etc) and gene expression result for a specific conditions for instance tumor, obesity , cold resistant crops/plants, etc.</span></p><p><span><strong>Introductory Articles/ppt/sources</strong>:</span></p><p><a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1002375"><span>http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1002375</span></a></p><p><a href="http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/MicroarrayCourse/Lectures09/Pathway%20Analysis.pdf"><span>http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/MicroarrayCourse/Lectures09/Pathway%20Analysis.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="http://gettinggeneticsdone.blogspot.de/2012/03/pathway-analysis-for-high-throughput.html"><span>http://gettinggeneticsdone.blogspot.de/2012/03/pathway-analysis-for-high-throughput.html</span></a></p><p><a href="http://davetang.org/muse/tag/pathway/"><span>http://davetang.org/muse/tag/pathway/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.biostars.org/p/42219/"><span>https://www.biostars.org/p/42219/</span></a></p><p><a href="http://bioinformatics.ca//files/public/Pathways_2014_Module4_v2.pdf"><span>http://bioinformatics.ca//files/public/Pathways_2014_Module4_v2.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="http://bioinformatics.ca//files/public/Pathways_2014_Module2.pdf"><span>http://bioinformatics.ca//files/public/Pathways_2014_Module2.pdf</span></a></p><p><span><strong>Impotant Database and Tools</strong>:</span></p><p>GeneMANIA, Cytoscape,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ingenuity.com/products/ipa">IPA</a>&nbsp;and <a href="http://thomsonreuters.com/metacore/">Metacore</a> (Commerical ),&nbsp;<span>Pathway Commons, Reactome ,Panther, BioCyc, WikiPathways, Pathvisio, KEGG, NCI, Stringdb, Amigo,&nbsp;<span>WebGestalt ,<span>ConsensusPathDB ,GSEA,Blast2go</span></span></span></p><p><span><strong>Popular R based tools</strong>:</span></p><p><span>Reactome.db, ReactomePA, ClusterProfiler, Gage, SPIA, topGO, Pathview,DOSE,GOStat</span></p><p><span><strong>More</strong>:</span></p><p><a href="http://www.bioconductor.org/help/search/index.html?q=Enrichment+analysis+"><span>http://www.bioconductor.org/help/search/index.html?q=Enrichment+analysis+</span></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/23582/integrative-rna-and-chip-seq-analysis-of-regulatory-t-cells</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:03:19 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/23582/integrative-rna-and-chip-seq-analysis-of-regulatory-t-cells</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Integrative RNA and ChIP-Seq analysis of regulatory T-cells]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/learn/white-papers#rna-chip" target="_blank" title="strand ngs white paper">Integrative RNA and ChIP-Seq analysis of regulatory T-cells&nbsp;</a><span>, a Strand NGS application note describes how integrated multi-omics functionality in Strand NGS was used to find the regulatory role of FoxP3 in T-regulatory and T-helper cells. Learn how the gene expression profiles from RNA-Seq and FoxP3 DNA-protein binding sites from ChIP-Seq are integrated. For mor information,&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/contact/sales" target="_blank" title="strand ngs contact">please write to us</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Strand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/34212/webinar-on-unique-molecular-identifier-umi-powered-ultra-sensitive-variant-calling-using-strand-ngs-case-study</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 03:55:52 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/34212/webinar-on-unique-molecular-identifier-umi-powered-ultra-sensitive-variant-calling-using-strand-ngs-case-study</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Webinar on Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI)-powered Ultra-sensitive Variant Calling using Strand NGS - Case Study]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h2><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Webinar on Unique Molecular Identifier-powered Ultra-sensitive Variant Calling using Strand NGS - Case Study</a></h2><p>by&nbsp;Dr. Pandurang Kolekar, Bioinformatics Engineer, Strand Life Sciences</p><h3><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration">Abstract</a>:</h3><p>Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are short random nucleotide sequences that are increasingly being used in high-throughput sequencing experiments. In this webinar, we will highlight the UMI-friendly features of Strand NGS v3.1 including support for handling well known and customised UMI libraries, QC metrics, consensus alignment, UMI-based family size filters for read list, genome browser enabled with UMI-specific features and filters, UMI-aware variant calling parameters, and exporting UMI-tagged aligned samples. These all features together empower users to harness the potential of UMI-tagged NGS data for deeper insights. A case study demonstrating application of these UMI-based features in Strand NGS for low frequency variant calling in cfDNA sample will be presented.</p><p>UMI-tagged NGS libraries allow, ultra-sensitive detection of low frequency variants from liquid biopsy samples using DNA-Seq and accurate quantification of transcript-level expression using RNA-Seq. The recent release of Strand NGS v3.1, is equipped with the necessary features to efficiently analyse UMI-tagged NGS data helping researchers and labs involved in rare variant calling like in cfDNA based cancer diagnostics, and accurate transcript quantification with RNA-Seq.</p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Webinar Details:</strong></a></p><p><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Session 1:</strong></a> 13 Dec 2017, 2:30 PM IST<br /><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Session 2:</strong></a> 13 Dec 2017, 9:30 PM IST</p><p><br /><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration"><strong>Register here:</strong></a> http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration</p><h3>&nbsp;</h3>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Strand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44713/understanding-rna-seq-normalization-methods-tpm-vs-fpkm-vs-cpm</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:59:15 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44713/understanding-rna-seq-normalization-methods-tpm-vs-fpkm-vs-cpm</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Understanding RNA-Seq Normalization Methods: TPM vs. FPKM vs. CPM]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful technology used to study transcriptomes, providing insights into gene expression levels. However, raw RNA-Seq data requires normalization to account for sequencing depth and gene length, enabling accurate comparisons between genes and samples. Among the most widely used normalization methods are TPM (Transcripts Per Million), FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million), and CPM (Counts Per Million). Each method has its unique principles and applications, which we&rsquo;ll explore in this blog.</p><h2>Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?</h2><p>Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:</p><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Sequencing depth:</strong> Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gene length:</strong> Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Bias reduction:</strong> Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>TPM (Transcripts Per Million)</h2><p>TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Proportionality:</strong> TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Intuitive interpretation:</strong> TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Preferred for comparisons:</strong> TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)</h2><p>FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Historical significance:</strong> FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Single-end vs. paired-end:</strong> In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Limited utility:</strong> FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>CPM (Counts Per Million)</h2><p>CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Simplicity:</strong> CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Application:</strong> Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gene length agnostic:</strong> CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>When to Use Each Method</h2><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>TPM:</strong> Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>FPKM:</strong> Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CPM:</strong> Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM&rsquo;s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.</p><h3>References:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p>Li, B., &amp; Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. <em>BMC Bioinformatics.</em></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. <em>Nature Biotechnology.</em></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. <em>Genome Biology.</em></p>
</li>
</ol>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35437/dupradar-package</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:28:57 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35437/dupradar-package</link>
	<title><![CDATA[dupRadar package]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The&nbsp;</span><em>dupRadar</em><span>&nbsp;package gives an insight into the duplication problem by graphically relating the gene expression level and the duplication rate present on it. Thus, failed experiments can be easily identified at a glance</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.7/bioc/vignettes/dupRadar/inst/doc/dupRadar.html" rel="nofollow">https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.7/bioc/vignettes/dupRadar/inst/doc/dupRadar.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35418/karyoploter-plot-whole-genomes-with-arbitrary-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 03:24:28 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35418/karyoploter-plot-whole-genomes-with-arbitrary-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[karyoploteR: plot whole genomes with arbitrary data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="http://bioconductor.org/packages/karyoploteR">karyoploteR</a></span><span>&nbsp;is an R package to create karyoplots, that is, representations of whole genomes with arbitrary data plotted on them. It is inspired by the R base graphics system and does not depend on other graphics packages. The aim of karyoploteR is to offer the user an easy way to plot data along the genome to get broad genome-wide view to facilitate the identification of genome wide relations and distributions.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://bernatgel.github.io/karyoploter_tutorial/" rel="nofollow">https://bernatgel.github.io/karyoploter_tutorial/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34488/scripts-for-the-analysis-of-hgt-in-genome-sequence-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:44:10 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34488/scripts-for-the-analysis-of-hgt-in-genome-sequence-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Scripts for the analysis of HGT in genome sequence data.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Scripts for the analysis of HGT in genome sequence data</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/reubwn/hgt" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/reubwn/hgt</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36271/heap-a-highly-sensitive-and-accurate-snp-detection-tool-for-low-coverage-high-throughput-sequencing-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:06:03 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36271/heap-a-highly-sensitive-and-accurate-snp-detection-tool-for-low-coverage-high-throughput-sequencing-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Heap: a highly sensitive and accurate SNP detection tool for low-coverage high-throughput sequencing data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Heap, that enables robustly sensitive and accurate calling of SNPs, particularly with a low coverage NGS data, which must be aligned to the reference genome sequences in advance. To reduce false positive SNPs, Heap determines genotypes and calls SNPs at each site except for sites at the both end of reads or containing a minor allele supported by only one read. Performance comparison with existing tools showed that Heap achieved the highest F-scores with low coverage (7X) restriction-site associated DNA sequencing reads of sorghum and rice individuals. This will facilitate cost-effective GWAS and GP studies in this NGS era. Code and documentation of Heap are freely available from&nbsp;</span><a href="https://github.com/meiji-bioinf/heap">https://github.com/meiji-bioinf/heap</a><span>&nbsp;and our web site (</span><a href="http://bioinf.mind.meiji.ac.jp/lab/en/tools.html">http://bioinf.mind.meiji.ac.jp/lab/en/tools.html</a><span>).</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/meiji-bioinf/heap" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/meiji-bioinf/heap</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37259/epiviz-an-interactive-visualization-tool-for-functional-genomics-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 05:27:39 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37259/epiviz-an-interactive-visualization-tool-for-functional-genomics-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Epiviz: an interactive visualization tool for functional genomics data.]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Epiviz is an interactive visualization tool for functional genomics data. It supports genome navigation like other genome browsers, but allows multiple visualizations of data within genomic regions using scatterplots, heatmaps and other user-supplied visualizations. It also includes data from the&nbsp;</span><a href="http://barcode.luhs.org/" target="_blank">Gene Expression Barcode project</a><span>&nbsp;for transcriptome visualization. It has a flexible plugin framework so users can add</span><a href="http://d3js.org/" target="_blank">d3</a><span>&nbsp;visualizations. You can see a video tour&nbsp;</span><a href="http://youtu.be/099c4wUxozA" target="_blank">here</a><span>.</span></p>
<p><span>https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/epivizr.html</span></p>
<p><span>https://github.com/epiviz</span></p>
<p><span>https://github.com/epiviz/epiviz</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://epiviz.github.io/" rel="nofollow">https://epiviz.github.io/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37835/variantbam-filtering-and-profiling-of-next-generational-sequencing-data-using-region-specific-rules</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:30:44 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37835/variantbam-filtering-and-profiling-of-next-generational-sequencing-data-using-region-specific-rules</link>
	<title><![CDATA[VariantBam: Filtering and profiling of next-generational sequencing data using region-specific rules]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>VariantBam is a tool to extract/count specific sets of sequencing reads from next-generational sequencing files. To save money, disk space and I/O, one may not want to store an entire BAM on disk. In many cases, it would be more efficient to store only those read-pairs or reads who intersect some region around the variant locations. Alternatively, if your scientific question is focused on only one aspect of the data (e.g. breakpoints), many reads can be removed without losing the information relevant to the problem.</p>
<h5>&nbsp;</h5><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/broadinstitute/VariantBam" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/broadinstitute/VariantBam</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>