<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42139?offset=20</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42139?offset=20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:26:55 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40893/quorum-an-error-corrector-for-illumina-reads</link>
	<title><![CDATA[QuorUM: An Error Corrector for Illumina Reads]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>We produce trimmed and error-corrected reads that result in assemblies with longer contigs and fewer errors. We compared QuorUM against several published error correctors and found that it is the best performer in most metrics we use. QuorUM is efficiently implemented making use of current multi-core computing architectures and it is suitable for large data sets (1 billion bases checked and corrected per day per core)</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.genome.umd.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.genome.umd.edu/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44229/common-steps-for-reads-mapping</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 02:48:02 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44229/common-steps-for-reads-mapping</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Common steps for reads mapping !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p>Mapping reads to a reference genome is an essential step in many types of genomic analysis, such as variant calling and gene expression analysis. Here are some general steps to follow for mapping reads to a genome:</p><ol>
<li>
<p>Choose a read mapper: There are many read mappers available, such as BWA, Bowtie, and HISAT2. Choose a mapper that is appropriate for your type of data and research question.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Index the reference genome: Before mapping reads, the reference genome needs to be indexed. This involves creating an index of the genome sequence that allows the mapper to quickly find matches to the reads. Most mappers have their own indexing tools.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Prepare the read data: The reads should be in a format that is compatible with the mapper. Most mappers accept FASTQ or BAM files. Depending on the quality of the data, it may need to be filtered or trimmed before mapping.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Run the mapper: The mapper is run with the command-line interface or using a graphical user interface. The specific command depends on the mapper being used, but typically involves specifying the input data, reference genome, and output file format.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Evaluate the mapping results: After the mapping is complete, the results should be evaluated. This includes assessing the quality of the mapping, such as the mapping rate, the number of mapped reads, and the mapping quality score.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Post-processing: Depending on the analysis being performed, post-processing of the mapped reads may be necessary. This can include filtering reads based on quality, removing duplicate reads, and calling variants.</p>
</li>
</ol><p>Overall, mapping reads to a reference genome is a complex process that requires careful consideration of the type of data, the research question, and the specific mapper being used.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45343/simulating-the-unseen-new-tools-reshaping-metagenomic-research</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45343/simulating-the-unseen-new-tools-reshaping-metagenomic-research</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Simulating the Unseen: New Tools Reshaping Metagenomic Research]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>When benchmarking a new metagenomic pipeline the first step is generally to face a simple problem. A bioinformatician might have a good deal of real sequencing data, but there's a drawback in that the actual biological composition underlying those reads is almost never known. What organisms really were there? In what quantities? How many sequencing errors occurred? Can the pipeline correctly reconstruct the community? Since the true answers are unknown, it is difficult to deal with these questions.</p><p>Metagenomic simulators are a way of dealing with this issue; they produce artificial sequencing datasets in which both the composition of the microorganisms and the expected results are known. Researchers can then test a pipeline on such a controlled dataset and see precisely how well it functions. However, as metagenomic studies have become larger, more diverse, and more complex, simply generating artificial reads is no longer sufficient. The simulators now have to replicate community variation, sequencing errors, different sequencing platforms, massive data volumes, and even laboratory-based biases.</p><p>MIDASim (2024) was designed with a particular emphasis on microbial community dynamics. Unlike previous tools which regarded each simulated sample as individual, MIDASim is able to efficiently generate realistic multi-sample microbiome datasets, covering the cases where changes over time are being tracked. This feature is particularly useful when investigating how microbial communities vary between people, different experimental setups, or at various times. By overcoming the computational limitations of earlier simulation methods, MIDASim has made it easier to carry out large and complex microbiome simulation studies.</p><p>A major challenge is scale. Since modern metagenomic projects can involve millions or even billions of sequencing reads, generating such large synthetic datasets can become a significant computational problem. In order to tackle this issue, Izzy (2025) was developed. As a high-throughput metagenomic read simulator, Izzy is designed with speed in mind while still reproducing the typical patterns of sequencing errors. The people who developed it stated that it can be as much as 60 times faster than earlier tools, which makes large-scale simulations far more practical. Now, researchers can begin to ask not how long a simulation will take but rather what size dataset they want to test.</p><p>At the same time, the sequencing technology became more diverse. Researchers were not any longer restricted to using Illumina short reads since Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long-read sequencing also became important in the field of metagenomic research. In order to address these new requirements, MeSS (Metagenomic Sequence Simulator, 2025) was developed. The programme is based on a Snakemake framework and is therefore compatible with the Illumina, Oxford Nanopore and PacBio platforms. MeSS has also been designed to operate efficiently and to use less memory than earlier tools; it provides ready-made templates for the microbiomes of different sites in the human body, thus giving researchers a simple means of beginning to generate realistic simulated communities.</p><p>The simulation problem became even more specialized. Suppose that sequencing is not based on uniform sampling of DNA? In the case of targeted sequencing and hybridization-capture experiments, particular sequences are deliberately enriched, and the probability of capturing a target depends on both the probe and the target sequence. A standard model based on uniform sampling might fail to take into account this important feature of real experiments. That is why RAmpSim has been designed specifically to handle simulations for capture-based and targeted sequencing. Instead of depending solely on the assumption of uniform sampling, it includes a thermodynamic nearest-neighbor energy model to represent probe&ndash;target interactions and sequence-dependent enrichment. As a result, it is especially suitable for applications such as hybridization capture in metagenomics, where the efficiency of recovering a sequence can depend strongly on how it relates to the capture probes. RAmpSim thus reflects a wider trend towards simulations that aim not only to reproduce sequencing output but also key aspects of the experimental process itself.</p><p>MIDASim, Izzy, MeSS and RAmpSim all demonstrate how fast metagenomic simulation is evolving. MIDASim is able to deal with realistic variation within a large number of and changing microbial communities. Izzy overcomes the problem of generating very large datasets. MeSS provides support for a number of sequencing technologies in an efficient and repeatable manner. RAmpSim increases the experimental realism for capture-based sequencing. Although each of these tools addresses a separate issue, they all contribute to advancing the field.</p><p>Modern metagenomic simulation therefore aims not only at producing artificial FASTQ files. Researchers nowadays desire simulated datasets that reflect community changes, incorporate the characteristics of the sequencing platform, include real error patterns, take into account computational scale, and account for experimental biases. As metagenomic workflows become more advanced, the simulators have to keep up with this development. The tools are now going beyond that of simple data generators; they produce controlled versions of complex metagenomic experiments and thus provide researchers with something that ordinary sequencing data seldom does: a dataset in which the answer is known before any analysis takes place.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/33720/deschrambler</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:54:59 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/33720/deschrambler</link>
	<title><![CDATA[DESCHRAMBLER]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>DESCHRAMBLER is shown to produce highly accurate reconstructions using data simulation and by benchmarking it against other reconstruction tools</p>
<p>You can find the detail of reconstructed data at http://bioinfo.konkuk.ac.kr/DESCHRAMBLER/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/jkimlab/DESCHRAMBLER" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/jkimlab/DESCHRAMBLER</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40505/decostar-reconstructing-the-ancestral-organization-of-genes-or-genomes-using-reconciled-phylogenies</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 13:28:19 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/40505/decostar-reconstructing-the-ancestral-organization-of-genes-or-genomes-using-reconciled-phylogenies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[DeCoSTAR: Reconstructing the Ancestral Organization of Genes or Genomes Using Reconciled Phylogenies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>DeCoSTAR computes adjacency evolutionary scenarios using a scoring scheme based on a weighted sum of adjacency gains and breakages. Solutions, both optimal and near-optimal, are sampled according to the Boltzmann&ndash;Gibbs distribution centered around parsimonious solutions, and statistical supports on ancestral and extant adjacencies are provided. DeCoSTAR supports the features of previously contributed tools that reconstruct ancestral adjacencies, namely DeCo, DeCoLT, ART-DeCo, and DeClone. In a few minutes, DeCoSTAR can reconstruct the evolutionary history of domains inside genes, of gene fusion and fission events, or of gene order along chromosomes, for large data sets including dozens of whole genomes from all kingdoms of life.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/YoannAnselmetti/DeCoSTAR_pipeline" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/YoannAnselmetti/DeCoSTAR_pipeline</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Shruti Paniwala</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36711/ancestral-sequence-reconstruction-steps</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 08:28:26 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/36711/ancestral-sequence-reconstruction-steps</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Ancestral sequence reconstruction steps !]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Ancestral sequence reconstruction</strong>&nbsp;(<strong>ASR</strong>) &ndash; also known as&nbsp;<strong>ancestral gene</strong>/<strong>sequence reconstruction</strong>/<strong>resurrection</strong>&nbsp;&ndash; is a technique used in the study of&nbsp;molecular evolution. The method consists of the synthesis of an ancestral&nbsp;gene&nbsp;and expression of the corresponding ancestral&nbsp;protein.&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-thornton-1"></a>The idea of protein 'resurrection' was suggested in 1963 by Pauling and Zuckerkandl.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-2"></a>&nbsp;Some early efforts were made in the eighties-nineties, led by the laboratory of&nbsp;Steven A. Benner, showing the potential of this technique &ndash; one that only started to be fulfilled in the post-genomic era.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-3"></a>&nbsp;Thanks to the improvement of algorithms and of better sequencing and synthesis techniques, the method was developed further in the early 2000s to allow the resurrection of a greater variety of and much more ancient genes.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-4"></a>&nbsp;Over the last decade, ancestral protein resurrection has developed as a strategy to reveal the mechanisms and dynamics of protein evolution.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>BEAST is the best way to predict the ancestral structure. but, I suggest following steps?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>1- Alignments "Mafft -&nbsp;<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fmafft.cbrc.jp%2Falignment%2Fsoftware%2Fsource.html" target="_blank">http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/source.html</a>"</div><div>mafft --maxiterate 1000 --reorder --thread 24 --genafpair Dataset.fasta &gt; Dataset_Alig.fasta</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>2- Your dataset has a good phylogenetic signal, is possible to perform with Tree-Puzzle "<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tree-puzzle.de" target="_blank">http://www.tree-puzzle.de</a>";</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div id="yui_3_14_1_1_1526649596608_1443">3 - This dataset which the saturation index, I perform with "<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdambe.bio.uottawa.ca%2Fdambe.asp" target="_blank">http://dambe.bio.uottawa.ca/dambe.asp</a>";</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4- Has evidence of possible recombination in your dataset, the evaluate if this presence or absence, because this may to influence the grouping of clades, I perform with</div><div>---recombination</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4.1- Phi-test, implemented in SplitTree4"<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splitstree.org" target="_blank">http://www.splitstree.org</a>", (.nex file)</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4.2- GARD deployed in webserver in the DataMonkey "<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.datamonkey.org%2F" target="_blank">http://www.datamonkey.org/</a>" - turning to the amino acid seaview -&gt; view proteins -&gt; save as ...) Ideally do a tree-based groups.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4.3- RDP4 for download and installation on Windows in "<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fweb.cbio.uct.ac.za%2F~darren%2Frdp.html" target="_blank">http://web.cbio.uct.ac.za/~darren/rdp.html</a>"</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4.4- Hyphy (Mac, Windows, Linux) in "<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fhyphy.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%2FDownload" target="_blank">http://hyphy.org/w/index.php/Download</a>"</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>4.5- Path-o-Gen (temporal structure of a tree input file -&gt; arquivo.tre)</div><div>These steps above, I call of pre-processing to inferences phylogenetic...</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>5- Perform phylogenetic tree, used Bayesian Inference with Molecular Clock, but is necessary Clock Testing:</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>- This step is performed with program Beast (Beauti, Beast and TreeAnnotator), and Tracer_v1.5 more FigTree to inspection.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>- Tutorials:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fbeast.bio.ed.ac.uk%2Ftutorials" target="_blank">http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/tutorials</a></div><div>- Downloads:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fbeast.bio.ed.ac.uk%2Fdownloads" target="_blank">http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/downloads</a></div>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Surabhi Chaudhary</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/14191/scalpel</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 02:07:58 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/14191/scalpel</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Scalpel]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A team from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory has released an algorithm, called Scalpel, for finding insertions and deletions in next generation sequencing data sets. Scalpel, which is open source and <a href="http://scalpel.sourceforge.net/" title="available for download">available for download</a> on SourceForge,&nbsp;<span>outperformed the popular tools GATK HaplotypeCaller and SOAPindel in test runs on both simulated and real whole human exomes.</span></p><p>Like other indel callers, Scalpel works by performing <em>de novo</em>&nbsp;assembly of regions of interest, so that misalignment to the reference genome cannot obscure the presence of an insertion or deletion. Scalpel's innovation is to repeatedly check its assembly before comparing to the reference genome, to account for simple sequence repeats that are a regular source of error in indel calling. When Scalpel assembles an exon, it collects reads that map to that exon (including partial matches), splits them into k-mers, and creates a de Bruijn graph to span the exon; however, if it detects repeats in the map, it iteratively increases the size of the k-mers by one base until the repeats are eliminated. This ensures that the final assembly of the exon is highly accurate while minimizing compute time.</p><p>The Cold Spring Harbor team's validation of Scalpel, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmeth.3069.html" title="published over the weekend in Nature Methods">published over the weekend in <em>Nature Methods</em></a>, compares Scalpel's performance on a live whole exome against HaplotypeCaller and SOAPindel. The donor is an individual with serious neurological disorders, which may be linked to a high incidence of indels. One thousand indels from this individual's exome, called by one or more of the informatics pipelines, were selected for focused resequencing. This resequencing revealed a 77% true positive rate for Scalpel calls, dramatically better than the rates for either of the competing tools; Scalpel performed especially well with indels longer than five base pairs, a traditional weak point for indel callers.</p><p>Finally, the authors demonstrate Scalpel's use on a large set of genetic data from nearly 600 families who donated samples to the Simons Simplex Collection, a project of the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative. Scalpel found a very high enrichment for indels in children affected by autism, compared with their unaffected siblings, a pattern that persisted even after excluding common variants.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Shruti Paniwala</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27113/picard</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:21:54 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27113/picard</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Picard]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Picard is a set of command line tools for manipulating high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data and formats such as SAM/BAM/CRAM and VCF. These file formats are defined in the <a href="http://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/">Hts-specs</a> repository. See especially the <a href="http://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/SAMv1.pdf">SAM specification</a> and the <a href="http://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/VCFv4.3.pdf">VCF specification</a>.</p>
<p>Note that the information on this page is targeted at end-users. For developers, the source code, building instructions and implementation/development resources are available on <a href="https://github.com/broadinstitute/picard">GitHub</a>.</p>
<p>The Picard toolkit is open-source under the <a href="https://tldrlegal.com/license/mit-license">MIT license</a> and free for all uses.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/" rel="nofollow">http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27331/andi</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 05:16:35 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27331/andi</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Andi]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the <code>andi</code> program for estimating the evolutionary distance between closely related genomes. These distances can be used to rapidly infer phylogenies for big sets of genomes. Because <code>andi</code> does not compute full alignments, it is so efficient that it scales even up to thousands of bacterial genomes.</p>
<p>This readme covers all necessary instructions for the impatient to get <code>andi</code> up and running. For extensive instructions please consult the <a href="https://github.com/EvolBioInf/andi/blob/master/andi-manual.pdf">manual</a>.</p>
<p>More at https://github.com/evolbioinf/andi/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/01/13/bioinformatics.btu815.full" rel="nofollow">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/01/13/bioinformatics.btu815.full</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27463/bpipe-a-tool-for-running-and-managing-bioinformatics-pipelines</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 22:42:16 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27463/bpipe-a-tool-for-running-and-managing-bioinformatics-pipelines</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Bpipe - a tool for running and managing bioinformatics pipelines]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Bpipe provides a platform for running big bioinformatics jobs that consist of a series of processing stages - known as 'pipelines'.</p>
<ul>
<li>January 20th, 2016 - New! Bpipe 0.9.9 released!</li>
<li>Download <a href="http://download.bpipe.org/versions/bpipe-0.9.9.tar.gz">latest</a>, <a href="http://download.bpipe.org">all</a></li>
<li><a href="http://docs.bpipe.org">Documentation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/bpipe-discuss">Mailing List</a> (Google Group)</li>
</ul>
<p>Bpipe has been published in <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/04/11/bioinformatics.bts167.abstract">Bioinformatics</a>! If you use Bpipe, please cite:</p>
<p><em>Sadedin S, Pope B &amp; Oshlack A, Bpipe: A Tool for Running and Managing Bioinformatics Pipelines, Bioinformatics</em></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://docs.bpipe.org/" rel="nofollow">http://docs.bpipe.org/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Radha Agarkar</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>