<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42357?offset=110</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42357?offset=110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43898/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology-for-a-literature-club</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:29:08 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/43898/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology-for-a-literature-club</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology, for a literature club]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Shruti Paniwala</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/33006/avid-a-global-alignment-program</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 05:19:28 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/33006/avid-a-global-alignment-program</link>
	<title><![CDATA[AVID: A Global Alignment Program]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A new global alignment method called AVID. The method is designed to be fast, memory efficient, and practical for sequence alignments of large genomic regions up to megabases long. We present numerous applications of the method, ranging from the comparison of assemblies to alignment of large syntenic genomic regions and whole genome human/mouse alignments. We have also performed a quantitative comparison of AVID with other popular alignment tools. To this end, we have established a format for the representation of alignments and methods for their comparison. These formats and methods should be useful for future studies. The tools we have developed for the alignment comparisons, as well as the AVID program, are publicly available. See Web Site References section for AVID Web address and Web addresses for other programs discussed in this paper.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC430967/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC430967/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Archana Malhotra</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39683/gffcompare-program-for-processing-gtfgff-files</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:35:13 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39683/gffcompare-program-for-processing-gtfgff-files</link>
	<title><![CDATA[GffCompare: Program for processing GTF/GFF files]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The program gffcompare can be used to compare, merge, annotate and estimate accuracy of one or more GFF files (the &ldquo;query&rdquo; files), when compared with a reference annotation (also provided as GFF).</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/gffcompare.shtml" rel="nofollow">https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/gffcompare.shtml</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34443/opera-an-optimal-genome-scaffolding-program</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:18:20 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34443/opera-an-optimal-genome-scaffolding-program</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Opera: An optimal genome scaffolding program]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Opera (Optimal Paired-End Read Assembler) is a sequence assembly program (</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_assembly" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_assembly&nbsp;<img src="https://a.fsdn.com/con/img/icons/external_asset.png" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></a><span>). It uses information from paired-end or long reads to optimally order and orient contigs assembled from shotgun-sequencing reads.</span><br><br><span>An updated version called OPERA-LG has been re-engineered with features for the assembly of large and complex genomes.</span><br><br><span>Song Gao, Denis Bertrand, Burton K. H. Chia and Niranjan Nagarajan. OPERA-LG: efficient and exact scaffolding of large, repeat-rich eukaryotic genomes with performance guarantees. Genome Biology, May 2016, doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0951-y.</span><br><br><span>Song Gao, Wing-Kin Sung, Niranjan Nagarajan. Opera: reconstructing optimal genomic scaffolds with high-throughput paired-end sequences. Journal of Computational Biology, Sept. 2011, doi:10.1089/cmb.2011.0170.</span></p>
<p><span>https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-0951-y</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/operasf/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/operasf/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36852/mcmctree-a-phylogenetic-program-for-bayesian-estimation-of-species-divergence-times</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 07:40:06 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36852/mcmctree-a-phylogenetic-program-for-bayesian-estimation-of-species-divergence-times</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MCMCTREE: a phylogenetic program for Bayesian estimation of species divergence times]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html" target="_blank">MCMCTREE</a><span>&nbsp;is a phylogenetic program for Bayesian estimation of species divergence times using soft fossil constraints under various molecular clock models. This is part of the&nbsp;</span><a href="http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html" target="_blank">PAML</a><span>&nbsp;package. In this tutorial I will analyze an easy example modified from dataset of&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20551041" target="_blank">Inoue et al. (2010)</a><span>. Here we conduct a commonly used time estimation method, "Approximate Likelihood Method", for the datasets including more than 10 species.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.fish-evol.com/mcmctreeExampleVert6/text1Eng.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fish-evol.com/mcmctreeExampleVert6/text1Eng.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38623/kallisto-a-program-for-quantifying-abundances-of-transcripts-from-bulk-and-single-cell-rna-seq-data</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:35:14 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38623/kallisto-a-program-for-quantifying-abundances-of-transcripts-from-bulk-and-single-cell-rna-seq-data</link>
	<title><![CDATA[kallisto: a program for quantifying abundances of transcripts from bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq data]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>kallisto</strong>&nbsp;is a program for quantifying abundances of transcripts from bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq data, or more generally of target sequences using high-throughput sequencing reads. It is based on the novel idea of&nbsp;<em>pseudoalignment</em>&nbsp;for rapidly determining the compatibility of reads with targets, without the need for alignment. On benchmarks with standard RNA-Seq data,&nbsp;<strong>kallisto</strong>&nbsp;can quantify 30 million human reads in less than 3 minutes on a Mac desktop computer using only the read sequences and a transcriptome index that itself takes less than 10 minutes to build. Pseudoalignment of reads preserves the key information needed for quantification, and&nbsp;<strong>kallisto</strong>&nbsp;is therefore not only fast, but also as accurate as existing quantification tools. In fact, because the pseudoalignment procedure is robust to errors in the reads, in many benchmarks&nbsp;<strong>kallisto</strong>&nbsp;significantly outperforms existing tools.&nbsp;<strong>kallisto</strong>&nbsp;is described in detail in:</p>
<p>Nicolas L Bray, Harold Pimentel, P&aacute;ll Melsted and Lior Pachter,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v34/n5/full/nbt.3519.html">Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification</a>, Nature Biotechnology&nbsp;<strong>34</strong>, 525&ndash;527 (2016), doi:10.1038/nbt.3519</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://pachterlab.github.io/kallisto/about" rel="nofollow">https://pachterlab.github.io/kallisto/about</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39837/cactus-a-reference-free-whole-genome-multiple-alignment-program</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:52:33 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39837/cactus-a-reference-free-whole-genome-multiple-alignment-program</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Cactus: a reference-free whole-genome multiple alignment program]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Cactus is a reference-free whole-genome multiple alignment program. The principal algorithms are described here:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.123356.111">https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.123356.111</a></p>
<p><span>Cactus uses substantial resources. For primate-sized genomes (3 gigabases each), you should expect Cactus to use approximately 120 CPU-days of compute per genome, with about 120 GB of RAM used at peak. The requirements scale roughly quadratically, so aligning two 1-megabase bacterial genomes takes only 1.5 CPU-hours and 14 GB RAM.</span>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/ComparativeGenomicsToolkit/cactus" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ComparativeGenomicsToolkit/cactus</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43722/crossmap-program-for-genome-coordinates-conversion-between-different-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:59:32 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43722/crossmap-program-for-genome-coordinates-conversion-between-different-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CrossMap: program for genome coordinates conversion between different assemblies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>CrossMap is a program for genome coordinates conversion between&nbsp;</span><em>different assemblies</em><span>&nbsp;(such as&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/2928/">hg18 (NCBI36)</a><span>&nbsp;&lt;=&gt;&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/2758/">hg19 (GRCh37)</a><span>). It supports commonly used file formats including&nbsp;</span><a href="https://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/SAMv1.pdf">BAM</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAM_(file_format)">CRAM</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAM_(file_format)">SAM</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/help/wiggle.html">Wiggle</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/help/bigWig.html">BigWig</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format1">BED</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format3">GFF</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format4">GTF</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/Data/File_Formats/MAF_Format/">MAF</a><span>&nbsp;</span><a href="https://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/VCFv4.2.pdf">VCF</a><span>, and&nbsp;</span><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/gvcftools/home/about-gvcf">gVCF</a><span>.</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41869/hs3d-homo-sapiens-splice-sites-dataset</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:33:17 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41869/hs3d-homo-sapiens-splice-sites-dataset</link>
	<title><![CDATA[HS3D: Homo Sapiens Splice Sites Dataset]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>HS3D (Homo Sapiens Splice Sites Dataset) is a data set of Homo Sapiens Exon, Intron and Splice regions extracted from GenBank Rel.123. The aim of this data set is to give standardized material to train and to assess the prediction accuracy of computational approaches for gene identification and characterization. From the complete GenBank (Primate Sequences Division) Rel.123 (162,557 entries), entries of Human Nuclear DNA including Complete CDS and more than one Exon have been selected, and 4523 exons and 3802 introns have been extracted from these entries. Details about extracted exons and introns are reported (Locus, number, Start and End position in the entry, sequence, length, G+C content, presence of not AGCT data (nucleotide scan check)). Statistics are also reported (overall nucleotides, average G+C content, nucleotide scan check results, number of not GT starting / AG ending introns, minimum /&nbsp; &nbsp;maximum / average length, length standard deviation) . 3799+3799 donor and acceptor sites, as windows of 140 nucleotides around&nbsp; each splice site have been extracted. After discarding sequences not including canonical GT&ndash;AG junctions (65+74),&nbsp; including insufficient data (not enough material for a 140 nucleotide window) (686+589),&nbsp; including not AGCT bases (29+30), and redundant (218+226) there are 2796+ 2880 windows.&nbsp;</p>
<p>1. P.Pollastro, S.Rampone (2002). HS3D, a Dataset of Homo Sapiens Splice Regions, and its Extraction Procedure from a Major Public Database , International Journal of Modern Physics C, 13(8), 1105-1117. (please cite this paper)</p>
<p>2. P.Pollastro, S.Rampone (2003). HS3D: Homo Sapiens Splice Site Data Set , Nucleic Acids Research, 2003 Annual Database Issue.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.sci.unisannio.it/docenti/rampone/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sci.unisannio.it/docenti/rampone/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43685/chipbase-open-database-for-studying-the-transcription-factor-binding-sites-and-motifs</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 05:36:03 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43685/chipbase-open-database-for-studying-the-transcription-factor-binding-sites-and-motifs</link>
	<title><![CDATA[ChIPBase: open database for studying the transcription factor binding sites and motifs]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>ChIPBase v2.0 is an open database for studying the transcription factor binding sites and motifs, and decoding the transcriptional regulatory networks of lncRNAs, miRNAs, other ncRNAs and protein-coding genes from ChIP-seq data. Our database currently contains ~10,200 curated peak datasets derived from ChIP-seq methods in 10 species.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://rna.sysu.edu.cn/chipbase/" rel="nofollow">https://rna.sysu.edu.cn/chipbase/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>