<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42633?offset=580</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/42633?offset=580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30557/speedseq</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 06:05:43 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/30557/speedseq</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SpeedSeq]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A flexible framework for rapid genome analysis and interpretation</p>
<p>C Chiang, R M Layer, G G Faust, M R Lindberg, D B Rose, E P Garrison, G T Marth, A R Quinlan, and I M Hall. SpeedSeq: ultra-fast personal genome analysis and interpretation. Nat Meth (2015). doi:10.1038/nmeth.3505.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmeth.3505.html">http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmeth.3505.html</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/hall-lab/speedseq" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/hall-lab/speedseq</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38563/hecil-a-hybrid-error-correction-algorithm-for-long-reads-with-iterative-learning</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 12:01:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/38563/hecil-a-hybrid-error-correction-algorithm-for-long-reads-with-iterative-learning</link>
	<title><![CDATA[HECIL: A Hybrid Error Correction Algorithm for Long Reads with Iterative Learning]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>HECIL&mdash;Hybrid Error Correction with Iterative Learning&mdash;a hybrid error correction framework that determines a correction policy for erroneous long reads, based on optimal combinations of decision weights obtained from short read alignments.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span><span>HECIL&rsquo;s core algorithm by introducing an iterative learning paradigm that enhances the correction policy at each iteration by incorporating knowledge gathered from previous iterations via data-driven confidence metrics assigned to prior corrections.</span></span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/NDBL/HECIL" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/NDBL/HECIL</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Abhimanyu Singh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44758/the-ifs-and-buts-of-ngs-quality-control-and-trimming</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:11:07 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44758/the-ifs-and-buts-of-ngs-quality-control-and-trimming</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The &quot;Ifs&quot; and &quot;Buts&quot; of NGS Quality Control and Trimming]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized biological research, providing vast amounts of data for a wide range of applications. However, the reliability of NGS analyses heavily depends on the quality of raw sequencing data. Quality control (QC) and trimming are critical preprocessing steps that can make or break your downstream analyses. In this blog, we explore the "ifs" (why you should perform QC and trimming) and the "buts" (challenges or considerations) of this vital step in NGS workflows.</p><h3><strong>The "Ifs" of NGS QC and Trimming</strong></h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Ensures Data Integrity</strong><br />If you want to minimize errors in downstream analyses, QC and trimming remove low-quality reads and bases, ensuring high-confidence data. This step is essential for reliable variant calling, assembly, and other applications.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Removes Contaminants</strong><br />If adapter sequences or contaminants are present in the raw reads, trimming can eliminate them. This prevents issues like misalignment or incorrect biological interpretations, ensuring cleaner data for analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Improves Mapping and Assembly</strong><br />If your goal is better alignment to a reference genome or improved de novo assembly, trimming low-quality bases and adapters is critical. High-quality reads map more efficiently and generate more accurate assemblies.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reduces Computational Load</strong><br />If you want to save computational resources, trimming reduces the dataset size, which speeds up processing and analysis. Clean datasets mean less computational time spent on processing low-quality data.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Prepares for Standardized Analyses</strong><br />If your project involves multiple datasets, QC and trimming ensure uniformity across them. This standardization makes comparisons valid and reproducible, particularly in large collaborative studies.</p>
</li>
</ol><h3><strong>The "Buts" of NGS QC and Trimming</strong></h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Risk of Over-Trimming</strong><br />But excessive trimming can lead to the loss of informative sequences, reducing read depth and potentially discarding biologically relevant data. This is especially critical in studies with limited sequencing depth.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Bias Introduction</strong><br />But trimming algorithms might introduce biases, especially if they inadvertently remove sequences with specific biological patterns. This can skew results and compromise biological insights.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Loss of Context in Paired-End Reads</strong><br />But trimming one read in a pair more than the other can lead to loss of pairing information. This complicates downstream analyses that rely on paired-end data, such as structural variant detection.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Time and Resource Intensive</strong><br />But running QC and trimming for large datasets can be computationally expensive and time-consuming. As sequencing depth increases, preprocessing becomes a bottleneck in the analysis pipeline.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Variable Standards</strong><br />But the criteria for trimming (e.g., quality threshold, minimum read length) can vary between tools and datasets. This variability may affect reproducibility and comparability of results across studies.</p>
</li>
</ol><h3><strong>Balancing the "Ifs" and "Buts"</strong></h3><p>To maximize the benefits of QC and trimming while mitigating the challenges, consider the following best practices:</p><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Use QC Tools Wisely:</strong> Start with tools like <strong>FastQC</strong> to identify quality issues in your raw data. Visualizing quality metrics helps tailor your trimming parameters.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Choose Reliable Trimming Tools:</strong> Tools like <strong>Trimmomatic</strong>, <strong>Cutadapt</strong>, and <strong>BBduk</strong> offer adaptive and customizable trimming options. Select one that aligns with your dataset and project goals.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Set Reasonable Parameters:</strong> Avoid over-trimming by setting quality thresholds and minimum read lengths that balance data retention and quality improvement.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Test Downstream Effects:</strong> Validate the impact of QC and trimming on downstream analyses, such as alignment efficiency, variant calling accuracy, or assembly quality.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Document Your Workflow:</strong> Maintain detailed records of the parameters and tools used for QC and trimming. This ensures reproducibility and enables better troubleshooting.</p>
</li>
</ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>NGS quality control and trimming are essential steps to ensure reliable and accurate data for analysis. While the "ifs" highlight the clear benefits of these steps, the "buts" remind us of the potential pitfalls. By adopting best practices and carefully balancing these considerations, you can optimize your preprocessing workflow and unlock the full potential of your sequencing data.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34501/dnapipete-de-novo-assembly-annotation-pipeline-for-transposable-elements</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:25:44 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34501/dnapipete-de-novo-assembly-annotation-pipeline-for-transposable-elements</link>
	<title><![CDATA[dnaPipeTE: de-novo assembly &amp; annotation Pipeline for Transposable Elements]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>dnaPipeTE (for de-novo assembly &amp; annotation Pipeline for Transposable Elements), is a pipeline designed to find, annotate and quantify Transposable Elements in small samples of NGS datasets. It is very useful to quantify the proportion of TEs in newly sequenced genomes since it does not require genome assembly and works on small datasets (&lt; 1X).</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>dnaPipeTE is developped by Cl&eacute;ment Goubert, Laurent Modolo and the TREEP team of the LBBE:&nbsp;<a href="http://lbbe.univ-lyon1.fr/-Equipe-Elements-transposables-.html?lang=en">http://lbbe.univ-lyon1.fr/-Equipe-Elements-transposables-.html?lang=en</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>You can find the original publication in GBE here:&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/7/4/1192/533768">https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/7/4/1192/533768</a></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://github.com/clemgoub/dnaPipeTE/blob/dev/dnaPipefront.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://github.com/clemgoub/dnaPipeTE/raw/dev/dnaPipefront.png" alt="Front" style="border: 0px;"></a><em>output examples of quantification and TE landscape (relative age) produced by dnaPipeTE</em></p>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/clemgoub/dnaPipeTE" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/clemgoub/dnaPipeTE</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36985/swalo-scaffolding-with-assembly-likelihood-optimization</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 02:45:16 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/36985/swalo-scaffolding-with-assembly-likelihood-optimization</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SWALO: Scaffolding with assembly likelihood optimization]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[SWALO (scaffolding with assembly likelihood optimization) is a method for scaffolding based on likelihood of genome assemblies computed using generative models for sequencing.

Please email your questions, comments, suggestions, and bug reports to atif.bd@gmail.com.<p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://atifrahman.github.io/SWALO/" rel="nofollow">https://atifrahman.github.io/SWALO/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39856/tritex-sequence-assembly-pipeline-for-triticeae-genomes</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:47:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/39856/tritex-sequence-assembly-pipeline-for-triticeae-genomes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[TRITEX sequence assembly pipeline for Triticeae genomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The pipeline is open-source and hosted in a public Bitbucket&nbsp;<a href="https://bitbucket.org/tritexassembly/tritexassembly.bitbucket.io/src/master/">repository</a>.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>TRITEX has been run on highly inbred genotypes of barley (<em>Hordeum vulgare</em>), tetraploid wheat (<em>Triticum turgidum</em>) and hexaploid wheat (<em>T. aestivum</em>) with reasonable results: super-scaffold N50 values in the range of dozens of Mb and pseudomolecules with better gene space representation than a BAC-by-BAC assembly. It has never been tested and is not expected to work on heterozygous or autopolyploid genomes.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>A protocol for generating chromosome-conformation capture sequencing (Hi-C) data suitable for use with the pipeline is described in&nbsp;<a href="https://bio-protocol.org/e2955">Himmelbach et al. 2018</a>. Refer to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/technical-notes/">technical notes</a>&nbsp;of 10X Genomics on how to generate Chromium data.</p>
</div><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://tritexassembly.bitbucket.io/" rel="nofollow">https://tritexassembly.bitbucket.io/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42941/csa-a-high-throughput-chromosome-scale-assembly-pipeline-for-vertebrate-genomes</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:13:49 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42941/csa-a-high-throughput-chromosome-scale-assembly-pipeline-for-vertebrate-genomes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CSA: A high-throughput chromosome-scale assembly pipeline for vertebrate genomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The pipeline can use information from scaffolded assemblies (for example from HiC or 10X Genomics), or even from diverged (~65-100 Mya) reference genomes for ordering the contigs and thus support the assembly process. This typically results in improved contig N50 when compared to current state of the art methods.</p>
<p><img src="https://github.com/HMPNK/CSA2.6/raw/master/Fig1.png" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></p>
<p>For smaller vertebrate genomes (~1 Gbp) chromosome scale assemblies can be achieved within 12h on high-end Desktop computers (Intel i7, 12 CPU threads, 128 GB RAM). Larger mammalian genomes (~3Gbp) can be processed within 15-18 h on server equipment (Xeon, 96 CPU threads, 1TB RAM).</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/HMPNK/CSA2.6" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/HMPNK/CSA2.6</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26325/crossmap</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26325/crossmap</link>
	<title><![CDATA[CrossMap]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>CrossMap is a program for convenient conversion of genome coordinates (or annotation files) between <em>different assemblies</em> (such as Human <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/2928/">hg18 (NCBI36)</a> &lt;&gt; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/2758/">hg19 (GRCh37)</a>, Mouse <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/165668/">mm9 (MGSCv37)</a> &lt;&gt; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/327618/">mm10 (GRCm38)</a>).</p>
<p>It supports most commonly used file formats including SAM/BAM, Wiggle/BigWig, BED, GFF/GTF, VCF.</p>
<p>CrossMap is designed to liftover genome coordinates between assemblies. It&rsquo;s <em>not</em> a program for aligning sequences to reference genome.</p>
<p>We <em>do not</em> recommend using CrossMap to convert genome coordinates between species.</p>
<p>More at http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://crossmap.sourceforge.net/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27110/easyfig</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:49:39 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/27110/easyfig</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Easyfig]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Easyfig has moved to github, for newer releases of Easyfig please visit our new webpage - https://mjsull.github.io/Easyfig.&nbsp; Easyfig is a Python application for creating linear comparison figures of multiple genomic loci with an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI).</p>
<p>More at http://easyfig.sourceforge.net/</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://easyfig.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://easyfig.sourceforge.net/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26923/quast-quality-assessment-tool-for-genome-assemblies</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26923/quast-quality-assessment-tool-for-genome-assemblies</link>
	<title><![CDATA[QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>QUAST evaluates genome assemblies. For metagenomes, please see&nbsp;<a href="http://bioinf.spbau.ru/metaquast">MetaQUAST</a>&nbsp;project.</span><br><span>It can works both with and without a given reference genome.</span><br><span>The tool accepts multiple assemblies, thus is suitable for comparison.</span></p>
<p><span>More at&nbsp;http://bioinf.spbau.ru/quast</span></p>
<p><span>http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/09/bioinformatics.btt086.long</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/09/bioinformatics.btt086.long" rel="nofollow">http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/09/bioinformatics.btt086.long</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Prajapati</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>