Address of the bookmark: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20260/

Developing New Molecular Methods

Genomic Approaches to Developmental Biology

Massively Parallel Functional Genomics

Translating Genomics to the Clinic

Genetic Basis of Human Disease

Genome Sequencing Technologies

http://krishna.gs.washington.edu/index.html
http://www.gs.washington.edu/faculty/shendure.htm

Our capacity building activities covers both general and specialized topics in translational genetics, and is designed to better acquaint scientists and clinicians with the tools and technologies of genetics and genomics.

OUR RESEARCH ACTIVITIES INCLUDE:

Address of the bookmark: http://www.nabda.gov.ng/departments/genetics-genomics-and-bioinformatics

We also develop web-based applications that integrate data across domains to facilitate the forest geneticist or ecologist’s ability to analyze, share, and visualize their data. Such integration requires the implementation of semantic technologies and ontologies to connect genotype, phenotype, and environmental data.

http://plantcompgenomics.com/

a) Scientist-B – UR (2 posts-Bioinformatics) on consolidated salary of Rs.48,000/- pm + HRA

b) Scientist C – UR (1 post -Bioinformatics) on consolidated salary of Rs. 51,000 pm+ HRA

c) Scientist B- UR (2 post-Statistics) on a consolidated salary of Rs.48,000/- pm +HRA

d) Computer Programmer 1 post UR & 1 post SC on a consolidated salary of Rs. 32,500/- pm

e) Research Assistant -UR 1 post on a consolidated salary of Rs. 31,000/- pm

More at https://projectjobs.icmr.org.in/sccbioinformatics/uploads/recruitment/Adv_BMI_24122020.pdf

More at https://leidosbiomed.csod.com/ats/careersite/jobdetails.aspx?site=4&c=leidosbiomed&id=2040

GIC2024 focuses on "Advances In Genomics From AI-ML To Targeted
Therapies". GIC2024 encourages researchers to present original
contributions for poster presentations.

Note: Early bird registration closes on 1st December 2023.

Kindly, register at GIC 2024 Earlybird registartion

https://genomicsindia.co.in/

Ant / bacteria co-evolution, landscape genomics, and population genomics
Vertebrate and/or invertebrate genome evolution

If you might be interested in joining our research group, send an email with your intent and why this group would potentially be a good fit for your future goals along with a CV / Resume to jdmanthey (at) gmail (dot) com

More at https://mantheylab.org/

Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?

Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:

• Sequencing depth: Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.

• Gene length: Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.

• Bias reduction: Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.

TPM (Transcripts Per Million)

TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:

Key Features:

1. Proportionality: TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.

2. Intuitive interpretation: TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.

3. Preferred for comparisons: TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.

FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)

FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:

Key Features:

1. Historical significance: FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.

2. Single-end vs. paired-end: In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).

3. Limited utility: FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.

CPM (Counts Per Million)

CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:

Key Features:

1. Simplicity: CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.

2. Application: Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.

3. Gene length agnostic: CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.

When to Use Each Method

• TPM: Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.

• FPKM: Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.

• CPM: Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.

Conclusion

Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM’s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.

References:

1. Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics.

2. Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology.

3. Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology.

Address of the bookmark: http://www.ogt.com/assets/0000/3190/NGS_Survey_2013_Infographic_Web.pdf