Our present objectives is to identify and isolate the substances secreted by Spalax cells, resolve with which components they interact that are active only on cancer cells, in order to unravel the biological mechanisms and pathways that evolved in Spalax cell machinery and ultimately lead to the death of cancer-cells. The study could attest to be a breakthrough in cancer research, using the long lived, hypoxia- and cancer-tolerant Spalax as a significant biological resource for biomedical research that hopefully could open new horizons in treatment and prevention of cancer in humans.

Contact: The applications should be submitted, together with extended CV and bibliography, summary of past accomplishments, and contact information of 3 referees, to Prof of Research Aaron Avivi (aaron@research.haifa.ac.il) AND Dr. Imad Shams (imadshams@gmail.com). (http://bit.ly/1lywShk) aaron@research.haifa.ac.il

More at http://evolution.haifa.ac.il/index.php/29-people/personal-websites/77-personal-site-avivi

More at http://compbio.mit.edu

This readme covers all necessary instructions for the impatient to get andi up and running. For extensive instructions please consult the manual.

More at https://github.com/evolbioinf/andi/

Address of the bookmark: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/01/13/bioinformatics.btu815.full

SYMPOSIUM DESCRIPTION: Genomics of Adaptation [S16] Model organisms for life-history research are mainly studied in the lab where functional genetics is assessable. In general, however, knowledge about their eco-evolutionary dynamics, such as biotic interactions, is rare. By contrast, in organisms for which the ecology and adaptation strategies in the field are well known, we typically lack the appropriate genetic tools to investigate functionality. Advances in genomics and statistics as well as investments in evolutionary model organisms are now providing access to putatively adaptive genome-wide variation within species from across the tree of life. In this symposium, we focus on integrating life-history biology, genetics and evolutionary ecology in the genomics era.

We wish to (1) highlight the role of genetic architecture of complex traits, such as adaptations to biotic interactions or life-history traits; (2) contrast this to morphological traits which are generally thought to have a less complex genetic architecture; and (3) discuss the opportunities and drawbacks of specific model systems.

INVITED SPEAKERS: Josephine Pemberton, University of Cambridge (http://bit.ly/2hJWytJ ) Peter Tiffin, University of Minnesota (http://bit.ly/2hK7HuS )

ABSTRACT SUBMISSION The deadline for abstract submission is January 10, 2017. For more information and to submit abstracts online, please visit: http://bit.ly/2fBXlvN We look forward to an exciting symposium and seeing you all in Groningen! Sincerely, Ben Blackman, UC Berkeley Maaike de Jong, University of Bristol Bart Pannebakker, Wageningen University Noah Whiteman, UC Berkeley Jelle Zandveld, Wageningen University

More at https://evoldir.net/brian/evoldir/PostDocs//UniFreiburg_Germany.EvolutionaryTheory

Key Findings:

1. Chromosomal Fusion and Its Molecular Signature:

   • The fusion site is located at 2q13–2q14.1 and is characterized by degenerate telomeric sequences appearing interstitially, indicating the historical head-to-head joining of ancestral chromosomes.
   • Despite being a signature of a past fusion event, these telomeric repeats are no longer functional and have undergone sequence degradation over time.

2. Extensive Duplications in the Surrounding Genomic Region:

   • The study identifies large-scale segmental duplications flanking the fusion site, with several of these regions duplicated and scattered across multiple chromosomes.
   • These duplications are predominantly located in subtelomeric and pericentromeric regions, suggesting their role in genomic instability and chromosomal evolution.

3. Paralogous Regions and Their Evolutionary Relationships:

   • A 168-kilobase (kb) segment near the fusion site has 98%–99% sequence identity with three regions on chromosome 9 (9pter, 9p11.2, and 9q13).
   • Another 67-kb region distal to the fusion site shows a high degree of homology to sequences in chromosome 22qter.
   • Additionally, a 100-kb segment exhibits 96% sequence identity with a region in chromosome 2q11.2.

4. Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Implications:

   • By comparing the duplicated sequences and their arrangement in primates, the researchers traced the order of duplication events leading to their present distribution.
   • The presence of specific repetitive elements within these duplicated segments serves as evolutionary markers that help infer their historical rearrangements.
   • Some of these duplicated regions are associated with chromosomal inversion breakpoints, potentially contributing to evolutionary changes in primates.
   • Recurrent structural rearrangements in these regions have been linked to human chromosomal disorders.

Conclusions and Implications:

• The findings provide valuable insights into the structural evolution of human chromosome 2, which played a crucial role in human speciation.
• Understanding these segmental duplications and their evolutionary trajectories sheds light on genomic instability, which may contribute to human genetic diseases.
• The study highlights how large-scale chromosomal rearrangements, such as fusion and duplication, have influenced the evolutionary divergence of humans from other primates.

This research advances our understanding of human genome evolution and offers a foundation for studying the effects of structural variants in genetic disorders.

A new study in Science offers a different and surprisingly sweet perspective. Researchers Jennie Brand-Miller, Karen Hardy, David Raubenheimer, and Les Copeland suggest that sugars from fruits and honey, and later starch from cooked plants, may have been key in helping the human brain evolve.

The brain’s carbohydrate problem

The human brain uses a lot of energy. Even though it is only about 2% of an adult’s body weight, it takes up a large share of the body’s resting energy, mainly using glucose as fuel. Over millions of years, as our ancestors’ brains grew from about 300 grams in Australopithecus afarensis to around 1,500 grams in modern humans, the need for easy-to-access glucose would have gone up a lot.

The researchers, therefore, asked a simple question: where did all that glucose come from?

Their analysis suggests that early hominins may have gotten much of their glucose from naturally sweet foods. Fruit and honey could give them easy access to sugars before they learned to digest cooked starch well. The study’s models show that sugars may have made up a big part of their diet.

From fruit and honey to cooked starch

The story did not end with fruit.

The researchers suggest that humans shifted from eating sweet foods to eating cooked starchy foods. Once people learned to control fire and process food, cooking made starchy plants much easier to digest and turned them into a key source of glucose.

From this perspective, new ways of preparing food, like pounding, processing, and cooking, were not just about making meals softer or tastier. These changes may have given our ancestors access to much more carbohydrate energy.

This gives us a more detailed view of how the human diet evolved. Animal foods were clearly important, but carbohydrates may have been just as important for meeting the high energy needs of a growing brain.

A different way to think about the human diet

The study does not claim that our ancestors ate sugar the way we do today. There is a big difference between eating whole fruits or natural honey and eating the highly processed, refined sugars common now.

Instead, the research points to something bigger. Human evolution may have depended on our ability to find, process, and get energy from many different foods.

Seasonal fruit, honey, underground plant foods, and later cooked starches could have been important sources of glucose. The researchers think that changes in how available these foods were may have shaped how our ancestors searched for food and even affected human evolution.

What does this mean today?

The findings should not be interpreted as a license to eat more refined sugar. Instead, they challenge the simple idea that carbohydrates were less important than meat in human evolution. Our ancestors survived and evolved by exploiting different nutritional opportunities—and by developing technologies that made previously difficult foods more useful.

So perhaps the history of the human brain was not written by meat alone. ISo maybe the story of the human brain is not just about meat. It could also be about fruit, honey, roots, grains, and our unique ability to turn plants into energy. sweeter than we once imagined.

Read more about it at https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.aed8437

Research Directions

Stony corals: evolution of novelty and photosymbiosis

Symbiotic acoels: cell type evolution and photosymbiosis

Animal genomes: structural evolution and gene regulation

https://sgel.biodiv.tw/home

To understand the evolution of the biodiversity seen on planet earth is one of the major goals in biology. How animals explored new habitats from only being confined to the marine environment and the how the forms diversified is still one of the most tremendous questions to be answered.

http://www.sars.no/research/HejnolGrp.php

https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/gupta-lab/index.html