• Expansion of Protists and Fungi with hundreds of annotated genomes
• Variation data for bread wheat, rice, Aedes aegypti, and Ixodes scapularis
• Whole genome alignments for O. longistaminata and T. cacao
• Non-coding RNA gene models in Bacteria
• New assembly of tomato (version 2.50)
• Full support for UCSC Track Hub format for hosting your own data in Ensembl

More at http://www.ensembl.info/blog/2015/06/16/ensembl-genomes-release-27-is-out/

The main features are, it supports many standard file formats such as GFF, BED, GTF, FASTA, VCF, BAM and it can be integrated with other browsers or tools for analysis of genome.

• Automatically improve draft assemblies
• Find variation among strains, including large event detection

Pilon requires as input a FASTA file of the genome along with one or more BAM files of reads aligned to the input FASTA file. Pilon uses read alignment analysis to identify inconsistencies between the input genome and the evidence in the reads. It then attempts to make improvements to the input genome, including:

• Single base differences
• Small indels
• Larger indel or block substitution events
• Gap filling
• Identification of local misassemblies, including optional opening of new gaps

More at https://github.com/broadinstitute/pilon/wiki

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/broadinstitute/pilon/wiki

http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/prism/

Address of the bookmark: http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/prism/

Address of the bookmark: http://ab.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/software/metasim/

http://www.nibmg.ac.in/academic/SyMeC-ICGC/SyMeC%20&%20ICGC_May%202018.pdf

http://www.nibmg.ac.in/academic/plp/15_05_2018/AdvertisementMay2018.pdf

GA4GH core funders and sponsors enable our work and allow us to convene the international genomic data sharing community.

https://www.ga4gh.org/

Address of the bookmark: https://www.ga4gh.org/

a) Scientist-B – UR (2 posts-Bioinformatics) on consolidated salary of Rs.48,000/- pm + HRA

b) Scientist C – UR (1 post -Bioinformatics) on consolidated salary of Rs. 51,000 pm+ HRA

c) Scientist B- UR (2 post-Statistics) on a consolidated salary of Rs.48,000/- pm +HRA

d) Computer Programmer 1 post UR & 1 post SC on a consolidated salary of Rs. 32,500/- pm

e) Research Assistant -UR 1 post on a consolidated salary of Rs. 31,000/- pm

More at https://projectjobs.icmr.org.in/sccbioinformatics/uploads/recruitment/Adv_BMI_24122020.pdf

• A simple intro to statistical distributions
• hypothesis testing
• linear models.

reading: http://compgenomr.github.io/book/stats.html

slides: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week1/compgen2021_stats.pdf

exercises+code: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week1/

Module 2: Unsupervised learning for genomics (9-15 August 2021)

• Understanding basic intuition behind machine learning approaches.
• Using unsupervised learning to cluster and visualise data points
• Dimension reduction techniques for visualisation and as input to clustering methods

reading: http://compgenomr.github.io/book/unsupervisedLearning.html

slides: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week2/compgen2021_unsupervisedLearning.pdf

exercises+code: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week2/

Module 3: Supervised learning for genomics (16-22 August 2021)

• Understanding and using supervised learning methods for predictive purposes
• How to measure prediction performance
• Understand and use cross-validation and related concepts

reading: http://compgenomr.github.io/book/supervisedLearning.html

slides: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week3/compgen2021_supervisedLearning.pdf

exercises+code: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021/tree/main/week3/

https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021

Address of the bookmark: https://github.com/BIMSBbioinfo/compgen2021

Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?

Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:

• Sequencing depth: Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.

• Gene length: Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.

• Bias reduction: Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.

TPM (Transcripts Per Million)

TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:

Key Features:

1. Proportionality: TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.

2. Intuitive interpretation: TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.

3. Preferred for comparisons: TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.

FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)

FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:

Key Features:

1. Historical significance: FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.

2. Single-end vs. paired-end: In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).

3. Limited utility: FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.

CPM (Counts Per Million)

CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:

Key Features:

1. Simplicity: CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.

2. Application: Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.

3. Gene length agnostic: CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.

When to Use Each Method

• TPM: Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.

• FPKM: Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.

• CPM: Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.

Conclusion

Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM’s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.

References:

1. Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics.

2. Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology.

3. Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology.