The bones sat quietly in a fossil collection for years. One was part of a femur; the other, a tibia. They looked like the remains of an unusually large ancient human. But who did they belong to?

The answer came from an unexpected source: ancient proteins.

Using palaeoproteomic analysis, researchers found a molecular signature in both bones that matches the Denisovan lineage. The discovery identifies the two Penghu fossils as Denisovan and, more importantly, gives scientists their first substantial glimpse of the Denisovans' body size.

And the picture is striking.

One individual is estimated to have been about 1.8 metres tall and weighed around 83 kilograms. The other may have reached 1.9 metres and about 91 kilograms. Their leg bones rank among the largest known from Pleistocene Homo.

These were not small or fragile people.

They were powerful, heavily built humans moving through Ice Age eastern Asia.

But the bones tell an even more intriguing story. The femur has a pronounced ridge called a femoral pilaster—a feature particularly associated with modern human hunter-gatherers and increased mechanical strength during terrestrial movement. Why would a Denisovan, with an otherwise strongly archaic skeleton, possess this modern-looking feature?

Perhaps these Denisovans travelled extensively across the landscape. Perhaps their bodies were shaped by a demanding hunting lifestyle. Or perhaps, the researchers suggest, genetic exchange with early modern humans contributed to some of these features.

Their extraordinary size raises another mystery. A common expectation in human evolution is that populations living closer to the tropics tend to be smaller. Yet these Denisovans lived around 23°N latitude and were exceptionally large. The researchers argue that cold climate alone cannot explain their size, pointing instead toward lifestyle and diet—including evidence that at least one Penghu individual relied heavily on meat.

So, piece by piece, the Denisovans are becoming less mysterious.

What was once a shadowy population known mainly from DNA is beginning to take physical form: large, robust, mobile humans who lived across eastern Asia and whose bodies carried a fascinating mixture of ancient and modern traits.

And perhaps the most remarkable part of this story is where it began—not in a spectacular cave discovery, but with two weathered bones lying among thousands of fossils.

The Denisovans may have left no written history. But their bones are beginning to tell one.

*Note: This research is currently a bioRxiv preprint and has not yet undergone peer review.  Detail at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.743438v1.full.pdf

More at https://sites.temple.edu/liberles/

A recent study published in PLOS Computational Biology introduces REvolutionH-tl 2.0 (https://pypi.org/project/revolutionhtl/), a computational tool designed to help solve this mystery. The software analyzes protein sequences and identifies evolutionary relationships between genes. It can help researchers detect important events such as gene duplication, gene loss, and speciation, allowing them to reconstruct how genes evolved across different organisms.

What makes the tool especially interesting is its focus on both speed and interpretation. The researchers compared REvolutionH-tl 2.0 with several existing computational tools and reported that it achieved competitive accuracy while requiring less computational time in their tests. The tool also includes visualization features, helping researchers turn complicated genetic data into evolutionary stories that are easier to explore.

Genes are more than simple sequences of DNA; they are records of life’s long history. Each surviving gene carries traces of the changes that shaped it. By bringing together computational analysis and visualization, REvolutionH-tl 2.0 acts like a detective, helping scientists uncover these hidden stories. Ultimately, tools like this can improve our understanding of how genomes evolved and how genes acquired the roles they perform today.

More at https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013017

More @ http://www.ncbs.res.in/sowdhamini/groups_sowdhamini.htm

Address of the bookmark: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mimicree2/

Daniel A Dalquen, Maria Anisimova, Gaston H Gonnet, Christophe Dessimoz: ALF - A Simulation Framework for Genome Evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 29(4):1115-1123, April 2012.
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/29/4/1115

Address of the bookmark: http://alfsim.org/#index

Applications are invited for the position of Lecturer in Evolutionary Biology (Bioinformatics).

We are seeking a person with a relevant doctorate, and demonstrated potential to develop as an outstanding researcher and teacher in evolutionary bioinformatics in the Department of Zoology. The position affords an exciting opportunity for an emerging scholar to research and teach in a vibrant and diverse Department. The successful candidate will develop a transformative and collaborative research program, supporting the university's commitment to excellence in research.

Your skills and experience

A PhD with a background in analysis of high-throughput sequencing data and evolutionary biology.
Knowledge of and familiarity with a range of bioinformatics skills, concepts, and practices as they relate to the biology of animals, including genomic, transcriptomic and metabarcoding data analyses.
A strong interest, and experience, in research and teaching of bioinformatics and evolutionary genomics.
An ability to contribute to teaching and learning environments that support engagement of students and staff with bioinformatics and genomics.
Be committed to and or have established connections or track record of working with national and local bioinformaticians.
Be committed to being a productive collaborator with a track record of working collegially.
Further details

This is a confirmation-path (tenure track) position at the level of Lecturer. The successful candidate is expected to take up duties by 1 July 2021.

To see a full job description and to apply online go to: https://otago.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?job=2100342

In this post, we’ll explore the core methods used in comparative genomics, the questions they help answer, and how they’re shaping our understanding of life.

1. Whole-Genome Alignment
Whole-genome alignment involves mapping the entire genome of one species to another. Tools like MUMmer, MAUVE, and LASTZ perform large-scale sequence alignments to detect conserved regions, rearrangements, insertions, and deletions.

Use Case:
Comparing human and chimpanzee genomes to identify evolutionary conserved sequences (ECS) and regions of divergence.

Key Challenges:
Handling repetitive sequences and genome rearrangements.

Computational complexity in large genomes.

2. Synteny and Collinearity Analysis
Synteny refers to conserved blocks of gene order across species. Tools like MCScanX, SynMap, or CHITRA (for visualizing synteny interactively) detect these blocks to understand chromosomal evolution.

Use Case:
Studying ancient genome duplications in plants.

Investigating chromosomal rearrangements in cancer genomes.

3. Ortholog and Paralog Detection
Orthologs are genes in different species that evolved from a common ancestor, while paralogs are genes duplicated within a genome. Identifying them is crucial for functional annotation and evolutionary studies.

Popular Tools:
OrthoFinder, Orthologous MAtrix (OMA), InParanoid, and EggNOG.

Use Case:
Functional prediction of uncharacterized genes based on orthologs in model organisms.

Tracing gene family evolution.

4. Phylogenomic Analysis
Phylogenomic methods combine phylogenetics and genomics to infer evolutionary trees based on genome-wide data. These methods can handle dozens to hundreds of genomes, using concatenated alignments or gene trees.

Tools:
RAxML, IQ-TREE, ASTRAL, Phylip, BEAST.

Use Case:
Resolving the evolutionary relationships between microbial species.

Studying speciation events.

5. Pan-Genome Analysis
The pan-genome consists of the core genome (shared by all strains) and the accessory genome (strain-specific genes). This is especially popular in microbial genomics.

Tools:
Roary, Panaroo, BPGA, PGAP.

Use Case:
Understanding virulence factor diversity in E. coli.

Designing broad-spectrum vaccines.

6. Comparative Transcriptomics
Comparing transcriptomes across species or conditions reveals conserved and unique expression patterns. RNA-seq data can be mapped to reference genomes to identify orthologous expression profiles.

Use Case:
Comparing stress response in extremophiles and model species.

Studying conserved regulatory networks.

7. Functional Element Comparison
Beyond genes, comparative genomics also targets non-coding regions—enhancers, promoters, miRNAs. Conservation across species often implies functional importance.

Tools:
PhastCons, GERP, phyloP (based on multiple alignments).

Use Case:
Detecting conserved non-coding elements in vertebrates.

Studying regulatory divergence in human evolution.

8. Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) Detection
In microbes, genes often jump across species boundaries. Comparative genomics can detect HGT by identifying genes that defy the expected phylogenetic pattern.

Tools:
HGTector, DarkHorse, AlienHunter, SIGI-HMM.

Use Case:
Tracing antibiotic resistance genes.

Exploring microbial adaptability in extreme environments.

Final Thoughts
Comparative genomics is a powerful lens to observe the diversity and unity of life. With a broad toolkit—from aligners to orthology pipelines, phylogenetic engines to visualization tools—it allows scientists to ask big questions: How did genomes evolve? What makes species unique? Where do new genes come from?

Whether you're studying extremophiles, building better crops, or exploring human ancestry, comparative genomics offers the methods to connect the dots across the tree of life.