Our research is at the crossroad between cell biology, ecological genomics, systems biology, molecular evolution and population genetics. We study the architecture and evolution of protein and signalling networks.

More at http://landrylab.ibis.ulaval.ca/

1. sequenced and analyzed the genome of the invasive red fire ant Solenopsis invicta (PNAS 2011)

2. discovered that a fundamental social trait in this species (how many queens are accepted in the colony) is determined by variants of a social chromosome (Nature 2013).

3. described the gene expression changes that occur in a virgin queen when she is given the opportunity of replacing her mother (Mol Ecol 2010).

Homepage: http://yannick.poulet.org/

More at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/science/groups/lawley-lab

We present methods for the identification of protein-coding genes based on their patterns of nucleotide conservation across related species. We observed the pressure to conserve the reading frame of functional proteins and developed a test for gene identification with high sensitivity and specificity. We used this test to revisit the genome of S. cerevisiae, reducing the overall gene count by 500 genes (10% of previously annotated genes) and refining the gene structure of hundreds of genes. We present novel methods for the systematic de novo identification of regulatory motifs. The methods do not rely on previous knowledge of gene function and in that way differ from the current literature on computational motif discovery. Based on the genome-wide conservation patterns of known motifs, we developed three conservation criteria that we used to discover novel motifs. We used an enumeration approach to select strongly conserved motif cores, which we extended and collapsed into a small number of candidate regulatory motifs. These include most previously known regulatory motifs as well as several noteworthy novel motifs. The majority of discovered motifs are enriched in functionally related genes, allowing us to infer a candidate function for novel motifs.

Our results demonstrate the power of comparative genomics to further our understanding of any species. Our methods are validated by the extensive experimental knowledge in yeast, and will be invaluable in the study of complex genomes like that of human.

Address of the bookmark: http://web.mit.edu/manoli/www/publications/Kellis_JCB_04.pdf

We wish to recruit a highly motivated, postdoctoral scientist to carry out a BBSRC funded project in the laboratory of Dr. Denis Larkin. The project is focused on developing and applying new methods and algorithms to study genome and chromosome evolution in mammals and other animals using whole-genome sequences and existing algorithms (e.g., Damas et al. Genome Res. 2017. 27(5):875-884; Kim et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013. 110 (5)). The post holder will use cutting edge computational and laboratory approaches to generate chromosomal assemblies for sequenced genomes, study chromosomal structures and differences between mammalian and other vertebrate genomes in attempt to identify species- and clade-specific genome signatures.

Applicants must have a Ph.D. and a track record of success, as indicated by first-author publications in international journals. They must possess excellent organisation skills and be capable of individual initiative and of interacting as part of a team. Applicants with extensive practical experience in bioinformatics or computer science, programming, visualization, handling of large data sets, high-performance computing are encouraged to apply. The post will involve collaboration with a wide range of academic partners both within the EU and worldwide.

Experience in programming, bioinformatics and comparative genome analysis is essential. Applicants should have a minimum of a degree and preferably a higher degree in a relevant subject.

The Royal Veterinary College has the largest range of veterinary, para-veterinary and animal science undergraduate and postgraduate courses of any veterinary school in the world and is one of the largest veterinary schools in Europe.

Prospective applicants are encouraged to contact Dr. Denis Larkin, Comparative Biomedical Sciences Department on +442071211906 or email: dlarkin@rvc.ac.uk

We offer a generous reward package.

For further information and to apply on-line please visit our website: www.rvc.ac.uk
Job reference CBS-0084-18

https://jobs.rvc.ac.uk/Vacancy.aspx?ref=CBS-0084-18

the evolutionary history of genes and species, building phylogenetic trees of life
the contrasting roles of horizontal gene transfer and introgression in shaping evolution
the biology of symbioses, especially symbioses between eukaryotes and bacteria, and between parasites and their hosts
the processes that drive the evolution of pattern in the structure of chromosomes
the diversity of meiofauna, particularly tardigrades, nematodes and other Ecdysozoa
the genomics of extremophilia

More at https://www.sanger.ac.uk/group/blaxter-group/

Our research centres on the use of genetics/genomics and phenotypic studies to address complex questions in the ecology, epidemiology and evolution of microbes. Our most recent interest focuses upon comparative genome analysis to describe the core and flexible genome of pathogenic bacteria (Campylobacter, Acinetobacter, Escherichia coli, Helicobacter, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus suis) and how this is related to population genetic structuring, the maintenance of species, and the evolution of host/niche adaptation and virulence.

More at https://sheppardlab.com/research/

A new study in Science offers a different and surprisingly sweet perspective. Researchers Jennie Brand-Miller, Karen Hardy, David Raubenheimer, and Les Copeland suggest that sugars from fruits and honey, and later starch from cooked plants, may have been key in helping the human brain evolve.

The brain’s carbohydrate problem

The human brain uses a lot of energy. Even though it is only about 2% of an adult’s body weight, it takes up a large share of the body’s resting energy, mainly using glucose as fuel. Over millions of years, as our ancestors’ brains grew from about 300 grams in Australopithecus afarensis to around 1,500 grams in modern humans, the need for easy-to-access glucose would have gone up a lot.

The researchers, therefore, asked a simple question: where did all that glucose come from?

Their analysis suggests that early hominins may have gotten much of their glucose from naturally sweet foods. Fruit and honey could give them easy access to sugars before they learned to digest cooked starch well. The study’s models show that sugars may have made up a big part of their diet.

From fruit and honey to cooked starch

The story did not end with fruit.

The researchers suggest that humans shifted from eating sweet foods to eating cooked starchy foods. Once people learned to control fire and process food, cooking made starchy plants much easier to digest and turned them into a key source of glucose.

From this perspective, new ways of preparing food, like pounding, processing, and cooking, were not just about making meals softer or tastier. These changes may have given our ancestors access to much more carbohydrate energy.

This gives us a more detailed view of how the human diet evolved. Animal foods were clearly important, but carbohydrates may have been just as important for meeting the high energy needs of a growing brain.

A different way to think about the human diet

The study does not claim that our ancestors ate sugar the way we do today. There is a big difference between eating whole fruits or natural honey and eating the highly processed, refined sugars common now.

Instead, the research points to something bigger. Human evolution may have depended on our ability to find, process, and get energy from many different foods.

Seasonal fruit, honey, underground plant foods, and later cooked starches could have been important sources of glucose. The researchers think that changes in how available these foods were may have shaped how our ancestors searched for food and even affected human evolution.

What does this mean today?

The findings should not be interpreted as a license to eat more refined sugar. Instead, they challenge the simple idea that carbohydrates were less important than meat in human evolution. Our ancestors survived and evolved by exploiting different nutritional opportunities—and by developing technologies that made previously difficult foods more useful.

So perhaps the history of the human brain was not written by meat alone. ISo maybe the story of the human brain is not just about meat. It could also be about fruit, honey, roots, grains, and our unique ability to turn plants into energy. sweeter than we once imagined.

Read more about it at https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.aed8437

To attempt to answer these questions about the basics of how evolution works, we use a combination of computational biology, analytical theory, comparative genomics.

More at https://yeamanlab.weebly.com

Address of the bookmark: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mimicree2/