<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/45310?offset=240</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/45310?offset=240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/38418/charles-swanton-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:09:22 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[CHARLES SWANTON LAB]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>They are using the latest DNA sequencing technology to read the genetic makeup of cancer cells within tumours in ever greater detail, teasing out patterns of evolution (evolutionary rule books), cancer heterogeneity and working out what changes have happened as a tumour evolves. We’re also investigating the processes that cause mutations and accelerate tumour evolution and working out how they might be stopped. And we are running evolutionary clinical trials with immune and targeted therapies to bring the benefits of our work to patients as quickly as possible.</p>

<p>https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/labs/charles-swanton</p>
]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/43762/vicoso-group</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:51:27 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Vicoso group]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>The Vicoso group investigates how sex chromosomes evolve over time, and what biological forces are driving their patterns of differentiation.</p>

<p>The Vicoso group is interested in understanding several aspects of the biology of sex chromosomes, and the evolutionary processes that shape their peculiar features. By combining the use of next-generation sequencing technologies with studies in several model and non-model organisms, they can address a variety of standing questions, such as: Why do some Y chromosomes degenerate while others remain homomorphic, and how does this relate to the extent of sexual dimorphism of the species? What forces drive some species to acquire global dosage compensation of the X, while others only compensate specific genes? What are the frequency and molecular dynamics of sex-chromosome turnover?</p>

<p>More at https://ist.ac.at/en/research/vicoso-group/<br />http://pub.ist.ac.at/~bvicoso/</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:39:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology, for a literature club.<br /><br />Below is a summary of all answers that we received.

All the best,

Jana and Xiaoyan

1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))
</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44934/genomic-basis-of-evolutionary-innovations-gevol</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 06:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44934/genomic-basis-of-evolutionary-innovations-gevol</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovations (GEvol)]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The Priority Programme (SPP 2349) funded by German Science Foundation (DFG) started 2022: &bdquo;Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovations (GEvol)&ldquo;</p>
<p>GEvol is unique as it will use, for the first time, a large taxonomic group to focus on one goal: to characterise the dynamics and mechanisms of genomic innovations underlying novel traits using comparative evolutionary genomics (and related data).<br>Thus, projects participating in GEvol we will ask fundamental evolutionary questions such as:<br>1. At what level is evolution repeatable?<br>2. How does genomic plasticity interfere with phenotypic plasticity during evolution?<br>3. How do inter- and intra-specific interactions influence genomic architectures?<br>4. How predictable is phenotypic variation given some knowledge about the dynamics and mechanisms of underlying genome evolution?</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://g-evol.uni-muenster.de/open-positions/" rel="nofollow">https://g-evol.uni-muenster.de/open-positions/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45244/the-ghost-ancestors-hidden-in-our-dna</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:16:24 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45244/the-ghost-ancestors-hidden-in-our-dna</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Ghost Ancestors Hidden in Our DNA]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine standing in a museum of human evolution.</p><p>There are Neanderthal bones. Denisovan remains. Fossils from ancient relatives of our species. Each specimen gives us another piece of the story of how Homo sapiens came to be.</p><p>But now imagine that one of the most important characters in that story has left behind no fossil, no skull, no bone, and no genome.</p><p>Nothing that a paleontologist could put behind glass.</p><p>And yet, somehow, that ancient population is still speaking.</p><p>It is speaking through us.</p><p>A fascinating new study published in Science (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aef8874?) introduces a computational method called TRACE, which allows scientists to search modern human genomes for genetic traces of ancient populations that have never been directly identified.</p><p>For years, scientists have known that our ancestors interacted with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Their DNA still survives in modern human populations. But these may not have been the only ancient humans who crossed paths with our ancestors.</p><p>Using TRACE, researchers found evidence of an unknown archaic population that contributed DNA to the ancestors of modern humans before humans spread beyond Africa.</p><p>Even more surprisingly, they found evidence of a much older lineage&mdash;possibly around 1.8 million years old&mdash;whose genetic legacy may have reached some modern humans indirectly through Denisovans.</p><p>The extraordinary part is that researchers did not need DNA from these mysterious populations to detect them. Instead, they studied the ancestry of modern genomes and looked for genetic patterns that revealed unusually ancient branches of our family history.</p><p>It is almost like finding the footprints of someone who disappeared thousands of years ago&mdash;without ever finding the person themselves.</p><p>These discoveries suggest that human evolution was far more complicated than a simple family tree. Ancient human populations repeatedly separated, migrated, met and exchanged genes. Some eventually disappeared, but pieces of their genetic legacy survived.</p><p>And that means our DNA is more than a biological instruction manual.</p><p>It is also an archive of human history.</p><p>Some of the people recorded in that archive may never have a name or a fossil. But thanks to methods like TRACE, their genetic echoes are finally becoming visible.</p><p>The next big discovery about our ancient past may not come from a fossil in the ground.</p><p>It may already be inside us.</p><p>Reference: Zhang et al., &ldquo;Recovering signatures of archaic hominin introgression using ancestral recombination graphs,&rdquo; Science (2026), DOI: 10.1126/science.aef8874. Detail paper @&nbsp;https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aef8874?</p><p><br />The TRACE repository (https://github.com/YulinZhang9806/trace) contains the Python package and command-line tools used to infer archaic admixture tracts from ancestral recombination graphs.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/33306/ancestral-sequence-reconstruction-asr-or-ancestral-genesequence-reconstructionresurrection-tools-to-study-molecular-evolution</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 04:20:05 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/33306/ancestral-sequence-reconstruction-asr-or-ancestral-genesequence-reconstructionresurrection-tools-to-study-molecular-evolution</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) or ancestral gene/sequence reconstruction/resurrection tools to study molecular evolution]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span><strong>Ancestral sequence reconstruction</strong><span>&nbsp;(</span><strong>ASR</strong><span>) &ndash; also known as&nbsp;</span><strong>ancestral gene</strong><span>/</span><strong>sequence reconstruction</strong><span>/</span><strong>resurrection</strong><span>&nbsp;&ndash; is a technique used in the study of&nbsp;</span>molecular evolution<span>. The method consists of the synthesis of an ancestral&nbsp;</span>gene<span>&nbsp;and expression of the corresponding ancestral&nbsp;</span>protein<span>.&nbsp;</span><sup id="cite_ref-thornton_1-0"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-thornton-1"></a></sup><span>The idea of protein 'resurrection' was suggested in 1963 by Pauling and Zuckerkandl.</span><sup id="cite_ref-2"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-2"></a></sup><span>&nbsp;Some early efforts were made in the eighties-nineties, led by the laboratory of&nbsp;</span>Steven A. Benner<span>, showing the potential of this technique &ndash; one that only started to be fulfilled in the post-genomic era.</span><sup id="cite_ref-3"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-3"></a></sup><span>&nbsp;Thanks to the improvement of algorithms and of better sequencing and synthesis techniques, the method was developed further in the early 2000s to allow the resurrection of a greater variety of and much more ancient genes.</span><sup id="cite_ref-4"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sequence_reconstruction#cite_note-4"></a></sup><span>&nbsp;Over the last decade, ancestral protein resurrection has developed as a strategy to reveal the mechanisms and dynamics of protein evolution.&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e4/ASR_phylogeny.png/510px-ASR_phylogeny.png" alt="image" width="610" height="435" style="border: 0px; border: 0px;"></p><p><span>Following are the list of&nbsp;</span><strong style="font-size: 12.8px;">Ancestral /sequence/ reconstruction</strong><span>&nbsp;(</span><strong style="font-size: 12.8px;">ASR</strong><span>) tools:&nbsp;</span></p><p><a href="http://www.bx.psu.edu/miller_lab/car/" target="_blank" title="To inferCars official website"><span>inferCars</span></a></p><p><span><span><span><span><span>Reconstructs contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. Given information about adjacencies between conserved segments in each modern species, our goal is to infer segment order in the ancestral genome. To get a clean and precise statement of the problem, we formalize it using graph theory. We develop an algorithm that identifies a most parsimonious scenario for the history of each individual adjacency, although the whole-genome prediction is not guaranteed to optimize traditional measures like the number of breakpoints. We introduce weights to the graph edges to model the reliability of each adjacency.</span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span><span><a href="http://paleogenomics.irmacs.sfu.ca/ANGES/" target="_blank" title="To ANGES official website">ANGES</a>:</span><a href="http://paleogenomics.irmacs.sfu.ca/ANGES/" target="_blank" title="To ANGES official website">reconstructing ANcestral GEnomeS maps</a></span></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span>A suite of Python programs that allows reconstructing ancestral genome maps from the comparison of the organization of extant-related genomes. ANGES can reconstruct ancestral genome maps for multichromosomal linear genomes and unichromosomal circular genomes. It implements methods inspired from techniques developed to compute physical maps of extant genomes.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><a href="http://virulence.molgen.mpg.de/cocos/" target="_blank" title="To Cocos official website"><span>Cocos</span></a></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>Constructs phylogenies of multi-domain proteins. With a given species tree and domain phylogenies, the procedure infers the composition of ancestral multi-domain proteins. Cocos implements and extend a suggested algorithmic approach by Behzadi and Vingron in an easy-to-use program. Such method could be applied to reconstruction of partial homologous units such as bacterial operons or protein complexes.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><a href="https://github.com/msrosenberg/MySSP" target="_blank" title="To MySSP official website"><span>MySSP</span></a></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>Constructs an initial DNA sequence at the root of the tree and simulates evolution across the tree using a variety of common models of DNA evolution. MySSP is a program for the simulation of DNA sequence evolution across a phylogenetic tree. It is designed for large-scale studies, including simulation of multiple replicates and outputs sequences into NEXUS, MEGA, or FASTA formats. MySSP has a fairly simple graphical user interface (GUI) for basic use, but also has a specialized batch script interpreter to allow for more complicated or large-scale simulations.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span><span><a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/parana/" target="_blank" title="To PARANA official website">PARANA</a>:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/parana/" target="_blank" title="To PARANA official website">Parsimonious Ancestral Reconstruction And Network Analysis</a></span></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>Performs parsimony based inference of ancestral biological networks. Given multiple extant networks and phylogenetic information relating extant nodes, PARANA finds a parsimonious set of ancestral interaction events (edge gains and losses) which explain the extant networks. The framework adopted by PARANA is able to represent network evolution under models that support gene duplication and loss and independent interaction gain and loss. The method works on both directed and undirected networks and can incorporate asymmetric interaction gain and loss costs. In contrast to previous approaches, PARANA does not require knowing the relative ordering of unrelated duplication events and thus, works on phylogenetic trees even where branch lengths are not provided.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span><span><a href="http://www-labs.iro.umontreal.ca/~mabrouk/" target="_blank" title="To GapAdj official website">GapAdj</a>:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www-labs.iro.umontreal.ca/~mabrouk/" target="_blank" title="To GapAdj official website">Gapped Adjacencies</a></span></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>A synteny-based method that is flexible enough to handle a model of evolution involving whole genome duplication events, in addition to rearrangements, gene insertions, and losses. Ancestral relationships between markers are defined in term of Gapped Adjacencies, i.e. pairs of markers separated by up to a given number of markers. It improves on a previous restricted to direct adjacencies, which revealed a high accuracy for adjacency prediction, but with the drawback of being overly conservative, i.e. of generating a large number of contiguous ancestral regions (CARs).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><a href="http://ancestors.bioinfo.uqam.ca/"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>ANCESTOR</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></a></p><p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>A web server allowing one to easily and quickly perform the last three steps of the ancestral genome reconstruction procedure. Ancestors implements several alignment algorithms, an indel maximum likelihood solver and a context-dependent maximum likelihood substitution inference algorithm. The results presented by the server include the posterior probabilities for the last two steps of the ancestral genome reconstruction and the expected error rate of each ancestral base prediction.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p><a href="http://bioinfo.lifl.fr/procars/" target="_blank" title="To ProCARs official website"><span>ProCARs</span></a></p><p>Reconstructs ancestral gene orders as contiguous ancestral regions (CARs) with a progressive homology-based method. ProCARs runs from a phylogeny tree (without branch lengths needed) with a marked ancestor and a block file. This homology-based method is based on iteratively detecting and assembling ancestral adjacencies, while allowing some micro-rearrangements of synteny blocks at the extremities of the progressively assembled CARs. The method starts with a set of blocks as the initial set of CARs, and detects iteratively the potential ancestral adjacencies between extremities of CARs, while building up the CARs progressively by adding, at each step, new non-conflicting adjacencies that induce the less homoplasy phenomenon. The species tree is used, in some additional internal steps, to compute a score for the remaining conflicting adjacencies, and to detect other reliable adjacencies, in order to reach completely assembled ancestral genomes.</p><p><a href="http://fastml.tau.ac.il/" target="_blank" title="To FastML official website"><span>FastML</span></a></p><p>A user-friendly tool for the reconstruction of ancestral sequences. FastML implements various novel features that differentiate it from existing tools: (i) FastML uses an indel-coding method, in which each gap, possibly spanning multiples sites, is coded as binary data. FastML then reconstructs ancestral indel states assuming a continuous time Markov process. FastML provides the most likely ancestral sequences, integrating both indels and characters; (ii) FastML accounts for uncertainty in ancestral states: it provides not only the posterior probabilities for each character and indel at each sequence position, but also a sample of ancestral sequences from this posterior distribution, and a list of the k-most likely ancestral sequences; (iii) FastML implements a large array of evolutionary models, which makes it generic and applicable for nucleotide, protein and codon sequences; and (iv) a graphical representation of the results is provided, including, for example, a graphical logo of the inferred ancestral sequences.</p><p><a href="http://rth.dk/resources/maxAlike/" target="_blank" title="To maxAlike official website"><span>maxAlike</span></a></p><p>Reconstructs a genomic sequence for a specific taxon based on sequence homologs in other species. The input is a multiple sequence alignment and a phylogenetic tree that also contains the target species. For this target species, the algorithm computes nucleotide probabilities at each sequence position. Consensus sequences are then reconstructed based on a certain confidence level.</p><p><span><span><a href="http://www.geneorder.org/server.php" target="_blank" title="To MLGO official website">MLGO</a>:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.geneorder.org/server.php" target="_blank" title="To MLGO official website">Maximum Likelihood for Gene Order Analysis</a></span></p><p>A web tool for the reconstruction of phylogeny and/or ancestral genomes from gene-order data. MLGO was designed for analysis of large-scale genomic changes including not only rearrangements but also gene insertions, deletions and duplications. MLGO can be used to infer a phylogeny from genome rearrangement and gene order data, and can also obtain an estimation of ancestral genomes, given an input tree. MLGO takes the advantage of binary encoding on gene-order data, supports a fairly general model of genomic evolution (rearrangements plus duplications, insertions, and losses of genomic regions), and successfully accommodates itself into the framework of maximized likelihood.</p><p>Image Reference : Wiki</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/38383/sidow-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:06:30 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Sidow Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>We study mechanisms of cancer evolution by using state-of-the-art genomic approaches at the bench and in analysis. Accurate genome reconstruction is our other major area of interest. We also collaborate on important questions for which our expertise in genomics and computation is relevant. Arend's biosketch highlights some of our past contributions.</p>

<p>http://www.sidowlab.org/</p>
]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/43769/ideaslab-workshop</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:13:48 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA["IdeasLab"* workshop !]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>A new, grant-funded opportunity seeks early career researchers interested<br />in life's origins: https://templetonideaslab.umbc.edu/</p>

<p>Applications are invited to an all-expenses paid position at a 5-day<br />"IdeasLab"* workshop to be held near Prague CZ in June 2022. Thirty<br />successful applicants will be drawn in equal number from the relevant<br />sectors biological evolution, A-Life anbd theoretical physics. The week's<br />activities will lead these thirty to form interdisciplinary teams which<br />each propose how they can advance frontiers of abiogenesis research. Up to<br />$5 million total funding will be available for developing these ideas<br />produced by the week's activities. Further details of the event,<br />including the online application form, are found at the link posted above</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44525/synorth-exploring-the-evolution-of-synteny-and-long-range-regulatory-interactions-in-vertebrate-genomes</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 06:21:10 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44525/synorth-exploring-the-evolution-of-synteny-and-long-range-regulatory-interactions-in-vertebrate-genomes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Synorth: exploring the evolution of synteny and long-range regulatory interactions in vertebrate genomes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Genomic regulatory blocks are chromosomal regions spanned by long clusters of highly conserved noncoding elements devoted to long-range regulation of developmental genes, often immobilizing other, unrelated genes into long-lasting syntenic arrangements. Synorth&nbsp;</span><a href="http://synorth.genereg.net/" target="_blank">http://synorth.genereg.net/</a><span>&nbsp;is a web resource for exploring and categorizing the syntenic relationships in genomic regulatory blocks across multiple genomes, tracing their evolutionary fate after teleost whole genome duplication at the level of genomic regulatory block loci, individual genes, and their phylogenetic context.</span></p>
<p><span>More at&nbsp;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745767/</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://synorth.genereg.net/" rel="nofollow">http://synorth.genereg.net/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/119</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:35:34 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/119</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Which are the best statistical programming languages to study for a bioinformatician?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In Bio-informatics based&nbsp;genome sequencing and predicting metabolic pathways&nbsp;research jobs&nbsp;I used Matlab, SAS, SPSS, R and several Bioconductor packages. Matlab had a lot of powerful tools and was easy to use, whereas SPSS is for non-programmers and R need programming skills. I am wondering what other people think is best? or there might not be one specific language but a few that lend themselves best to Bio-informatics work that is math heavy and deals with a large amount of data.</span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>