<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/4962?offset=30</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/4962?offset=30" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/42327/blaxter-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:05:28 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Blaxter Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Using these high quality genomes we explore</p>

<p>the evolutionary history of genes and species, building phylogenetic trees of life<br />the contrasting roles of horizontal gene transfer and introgression in shaping evolution<br />the biology of symbioses, especially symbioses between eukaryotes and bacteria, and between parasites and their hosts<br />the processes that drive the evolution of pattern in the structure of chromosomes<br />the diversity of meiofauna, particularly tardigrades, nematodes and other Ecdysozoa<br />the genomics of extremophilia</p>

<p>More at https://www.sanger.ac.uk/group/blaxter-group/</p>
]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/43762/vicoso-group</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:51:27 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Vicoso group]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>The Vicoso group investigates how sex chromosomes evolve over time, and what biological forces are driving their patterns of differentiation.</p>

<p>The Vicoso group is interested in understanding several aspects of the biology of sex chromosomes, and the evolutionary processes that shape their peculiar features. By combining the use of next-generation sequencing technologies with studies in several model and non-model organisms, they can address a variety of standing questions, such as: Why do some Y chromosomes degenerate while others remain homomorphic, and how does this relate to the extent of sexual dimorphism of the species? What forces drive some species to acquire global dosage compensation of the X, while others only compensate specific genes? What are the frequency and molecular dynamics of sex-chromosome turnover?</p>

<p>More at https://ist.ac.at/en/research/vicoso-group/<br />http://pub.ist.ac.at/~bvicoso/</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:39:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology, for a literature club.<br /><br />Below is a summary of all answers that we received.

All the best,

Jana and Xiaoyan

1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))
</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44934/genomic-basis-of-evolutionary-innovations-gevol</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 06:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/44934/genomic-basis-of-evolutionary-innovations-gevol</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovations (GEvol)]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The Priority Programme (SPP 2349) funded by German Science Foundation (DFG) started 2022: &bdquo;Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovations (GEvol)&ldquo;</p>
<p>GEvol is unique as it will use, for the first time, a large taxonomic group to focus on one goal: to characterise the dynamics and mechanisms of genomic innovations underlying novel traits using comparative evolutionary genomics (and related data).<br>Thus, projects participating in GEvol we will ask fundamental evolutionary questions such as:<br>1. At what level is evolution repeatable?<br>2. How does genomic plasticity interfere with phenotypic plasticity during evolution?<br>3. How do inter- and intra-specific interactions influence genomic architectures?<br>4. How predictable is phenotypic variation given some knowledge about the dynamics and mechanisms of underlying genome evolution?</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://g-evol.uni-muenster.de/open-positions/" rel="nofollow">https://g-evol.uni-muenster.de/open-positions/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/35752/hejnol-group</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:02:53 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Hejnol Group]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>The group studies a broad range of animal taxa using morphological and molecular tools to unravel the evolution and development of animal organ systems.</p>

<p>To understand the evolution of the biodiversity seen on planet earth is one of the major goals in biology. How animals explored new habitats from only being confined to the marine environment and the how the forms diversified is still one of the most tremendous questions to be answered.</p>

<p>http://www.sars.no/research/HejnolGrp.php</p>
]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/38551/gupta-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:18:31 -0600</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Gupta Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Work include (i) understanding the evolutionary relationships among different prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms; (ii) Understanding the cellular functions of these lineage-specific signature proteins as well as lineage-specific conserved inserts and deletions in important housekeeping proteins by genetic and biochemical studies; (iii) Development of novel diagnostic methods (PCR based and immunological) for identification of different groups of organisms based upon these signature proteins and conserved indels; (iv) The use of these lineage-specific probes with predicitive ability to identify/explore the presence of different groups of organisms in metagenomic sequences from various environments.</p>

<p>https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/gupta-lab/index.html</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42794/tmrca-calculator</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 05:07:30 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/42794/tmrca-calculator</link>
	<title><![CDATA[TMRCA Calculator]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This program calculates the probability that two people have a certain number of generations between them, based on the standard&nbsp;</span><em>infinite alleles</em><span>&nbsp;formula of Walsh. It calculates both the probability of being at an exact number of generations back to the Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) of a certain pair of people and the cumulative probability that the actual number of generations is less than a certain value. Note that the convention using generations is changed from an earlier version of this calculator which used "transmission events". It can list both result types in a table or graph. In either case the horizontal axis stops at the point where the cumulative probability reaches 95% or 10 generations, whichever is longer, or an absolute max of 50,000. Beyond 90% the calculation becomes inaccurate.</span></p>
<p>https://clandonaldusa.org/index.php/tmrca-calculator</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://clandonaldusa.org/index.php/tmrca-calculator" rel="nofollow">https://clandonaldusa.org/index.php/tmrca-calculator</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43806/genomicus-genome-browser-that-enables-users-to-navigate-in-genomes-in-several-dimensions</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:27:37 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43806/genomicus-genome-browser-that-enables-users-to-navigate-in-genomes-in-several-dimensions</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genomicus: genome browser that enables users to navigate in genomes in several dimensions]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Genomicus is a genome browser that enables users to navigate in genomes in several dimensions: linearly along chromosome axes, transversaly across different species, and chronologicaly along evolutionary time.</p>
<p>Once a query gene has been entered, it is displayed in its genomic context in parallel to the genomic context of all its orthologous and paralogous copies in all the other sequenced metazoan genomes. Moreover, Genomicus stores and displays the predicted ancestral genome structure in all the ancestral species within the phylogenetic range of interest.</p>
<p>All the data on extant species displayed in this browser are from&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ensembl.org/">Ensembl</a>.</p>
<p><br><strong>Summary statistics of Genomicus version 105.01:</strong><span>&nbsp;(view species tree in&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.genomicus.bio.ens.psl.eu/genomicus-105.01/data/SpeciesTree.pdf">pdf</a><span>&nbsp;or&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.genomicus.bio.ens.psl.eu/genomicus-105.01/data/SpeciesTree.nwk">newick</a><span>)</span><br><br></p>
<table id="introstats">
<tbody>
<tr><th>Number of extant species</th>
<td>200</td>
</tr>
<tr><th>Number of extant genes</th>
<td>4303993</td>
</tr>
<tr><th>&nbsp;</th></tr>
<tr><th>Number of ancestral species</th>
<td>196</td>
</tr>
<tr><th>Number of ancestral genes</th>
<td>4624213</td>
</tr>
<tr><th>Number of ancestral synteny blocks</th>
<td>83342<br><br></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://www.genomicus.bio.ens.psl.eu/genomicus-105.01/cgi-bin/search.pl" rel="nofollow">https://www.genomicus.bio.ens.psl.eu/genomicus-105.01/cgi-bin/search.pl</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44773/genetic-basis-of-tail-loss-evolution</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 12:12:36 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44773/genetic-basis-of-tail-loss-evolution</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Genetic basis of tail-loss evolution]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The paper <em>"On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07095-8)"</em>, published in <em>Nature</em>, investigates the genetic mechanisms that led to the loss of tails in humans and apes. The study suggests that a specific genetic mutation, involving the insertion of an <em>Alu</em> element (a type of transposable DNA sequence), played a critical role in the evolutionary transition from tailed primates to tailless hominoids.</p><h3><strong>Key Findings of the Study:</strong></h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Alu Insertion and Tail Loss:</strong><br /> The researchers discovered an <em>Alu</em>-mediated genetic change in a common ancestor of modern apes and humans. This change disrupted the normal function of a gene involved in tail development, leading to the suppression of tail formation.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gene Disruption Mechanism:</strong><br /> The <em>Alu</em> insertion was found within a regulatory region of the <em>TBXT</em> gene (also known as <em>T</em> or <em>Brachyury</em>), which is crucial for tail development in vertebrates. This insertion likely altered the gene's expression patterns, leading to tail reduction over evolutionary time.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Functional Evidence from Model Organisms:</strong><br /> To test their hypothesis, the researchers introduced similar genetic modifications in mice. The modified mice exhibited shortened or absent tails, supporting the idea that the identified mutation played a role in tail loss in hominoids.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Evolutionary Implications:</strong><br /> The findings suggest that small, random genomic changes&mdash;such as transposable element insertions&mdash;can have profound effects on body morphology. This study provides evidence that mobile DNA elements (like <em>Alu</em>) can drive major evolutionary transitions.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Relevance to Human Evolution:</strong><br /> Understanding the genetic basis of tail loss helps in reconstructing the evolutionary history of hominins (the lineage that includes humans and our extinct relatives). It also sheds light on how genetic variations contribute to anatomical diversity among primates.</p>
</li>
</ol><h3><strong>Significance of the Study:</strong></h3><p>This research highlights the role of transposable elements in shaping evolutionary traits and provides a concrete genetic explanation for a defining characteristic of humans and great apes. It also demonstrates how mutations in regulatory regions of developmental genes can lead to significant anatomical changes.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/4043/what-is-bioinformatics</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:53:05 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/4043/what-is-bioinformatics</link>
	<title><![CDATA[What is Bioinformatics?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/71581534?byline=0" width="" height="" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen></iframe>Illustration and Animation: Rachel Robinson Script: Tiffany Trent Voice-over: Kris Monger Sound: Glisten Carefully by Guennadi Malyshevski]]></description>
	
</item>

</channel>
</rss>