• Generate a cell x gene or cell x transcript equivalence class count matrix
• Perform RNA velocity and single-nuclei RNA-seq analsis
• Quantify data from numerous technologies such as 10x, inDrops, and Dropseq.
• Customize workflows for new technologies and protocols.
• Process feature barcoding data such as CITE-seq, REAP-seq, MULTI-seq, Clicktags, and Perturb-seq.
• Obtain QC reports from single-cell RNA-seq data

The kallisto | bustools workflow is described in:

Páll Melsted*, A. Sina Booeshaghi*, Lauren Liu, Fan Gao, Lambda Lu, Kyung Hoi (Joseph) Min, Eduardo da Veiga Beltrame, Kristján Eldjárn Hjörleifsson, Jase Gehring & Lior Pachter† Modular and efficient pre-processing of single-cell RNA-seq, Nature Biotechnology (2021).

Documentation and tutorials for the kallisto bustools workflow are available at http://pachterlab.github.io/kallistobustools. 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00870-2

Address of the bookmark: https://pachterlab.github.io/kallistobustools/

Tool link:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/software/sailfish/

Address of the bookmark: http://www.genengnews.com/gen-news-highlights/lightweight-algorithms-sail-through-rna-sequencing-data/81249765/

ORLANDO, USA, Oct 17, 2017/ PRNewswire/

Strand NGS now supports large scale RNA- and small-RNA-Seq and Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) for DNA-, RNA-, and small-RNA-Seq.

Strand Life Sciences announced the latest version release of its bioinformatics flagship product, Strand NGS, at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics today. Two major themes in Strand NGS v3.1 address recent challenges in next generation sequencing (NGS).

The first theme is large-scale RNA-Seq data analysis. Current cross-cohort RNA- and small-RNA-Seq studies span tens of replicates and batches across hundreds of samples, sometimes conducted across several different institutions. For such studies, Strand NGS v3.1 includes confounding variable analysis to eliminate technical effects, including batch effects; the t-SNE plot; profile and heat-map plots of gene-body coverage; and several other notable visual enhancements.

The second new feature is support for Unique Molecular Identifiers, or UMIs, for DNA-, RNA- and small-RNA-Seq. UMI support in Strand NGS is end-to-end, spanning alignment to variant calling in DNA-Seq, and alignment to quantification in RNA- and small-RNA-Seq. The Bioo Scientific, Qiagen, and Rubicon UMI protocols are natively supported, and an intuitive interface allows the specification of custom UMI protocols.

“For liquid biopsies and low-grade FFPE samples, UMI support in DNA-Seq enables the detection of somatic variants at low concentrations. In RNA-Seq, large-scale and UMI support can be used in single-cell-based studies that reveal tumor-cell heterogeneity, even at low concentrations”, says Dr. Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Chief Scientific Officer, Strand Life Sciences.

“At Strand, we are continuously working towards improving the accuracy and efficiency of NGS data analysis. Customers can look forward to Strand NGS becoming available on the cloud in the near future”, says Dr. Ramesh Hariharan, Chief Executive Officer, Strand Life Sciences.

Visit Strand Life Sciences at ASHG booth #1017 to know more about Strand NGS v3.1 and other products and service offerings from Strand Life Sciences. Click here to access detailed agenda and v3.1 release notes.

About Strand Life Sciences

Strand Life Sciences is a premier life science informatics innovation company. Founded in 2000, Strand is a leader in technology innovations for healthcare using genomics. By enhancing sequence-based diagnostics and clinical genomic data interpretation using a strong foundation of computational, scientific, and medical expertise, Strand is bringing individualized medicine to the world. To know more, visit www.strandls.com

Address of the bookmark: http://www.strand-ngs.com/strand-announce-strandngss-v31

Address of the bookmark: https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/

Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?

Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:

• Sequencing depth: Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.

• Gene length: Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.

• Bias reduction: Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.

TPM (Transcripts Per Million)

TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:

Key Features:

1. Proportionality: TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.

2. Intuitive interpretation: TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.

3. Preferred for comparisons: TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.

FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)

FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:

Key Features:

1. Historical significance: FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.

2. Single-end vs. paired-end: In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).

3. Limited utility: FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.

CPM (Counts Per Million)

CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:

Key Features:

1. Simplicity: CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.

2. Application: Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.

3. Gene length agnostic: CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.

When to Use Each Method

• TPM: Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.

• FPKM: Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.

• CPM: Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.

Conclusion

Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM’s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.

References:

1. Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics.

2. Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnology.

3. Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology.

Details:
Session 1: 28 Feb 2018, 9 AM CET
Session 2: 28 Feb 2018, 8 AM PST
Register here: http://www.strand-ngs.com/webinar_registration

About Speaker:

Dr. Suman Kapoor, Manager- Application Science at Strand Life Sciences, has over 11 years experience in molecular biology, next-generation sequencing based testing, clinical genomics, and personalized medicine for disease management and prenatal testing. Dr. Suman holds a Ph.D in Molecular and Cell Biology from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Prior to joining Strand NGS team, Suman has worked extensively on protein synthesis in eubacteria and has experience working in CAP and NABL accredited lab validating and interpreting NGS based diagnostic tests.

The GO provides core biological knowledge representation for modern biologists, whether computationally or experimentally based. GO resources include biomedical ontologies that cover molecular domains of all life forms as well as extensive compilations of gene product annotations to these ontologies that provide largely species-neutral, comprehensive statements about what gene products do. Although extensively used in data analysis workflows, and widely incorporated into numerous data analysis platforms and applications, the general user of GO resources often misses fundamental distinctions about GO structures, GO annotations, and what can and can not be extrapolated from GO resources. Here are ten quick tips for using the Gene Ontology.

Read "Ten Quick Tips for Using the Gene Ontology" at http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003343

Following are the most commonly used old and new GO term enrichment determination tools. These tools are recommended to people working in a wet-lab.

CLASSIFI (Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center)

CLASSIFI (Cluster Assignment for Biological Inference) is a data-mining tool that can be used to identify significant co-clustering of genes with similar functional properties (e.g. cellular response to DNA damage). Briefly, CLASSIFI uses the Gene OntologyTM (GO) gene annotation scheme to define the functional properties of all genes/probes in a microarray data set, and then applies a cumulative hypergeometric distribution analysis to determine if any statistically significant gene ontology co-clustering has occurred.

http://pathcuric1.swmed.edu/pathdb/classifi.html

EasyGO (China Agricultural University)

EasyGO is designed to automate enrichment job for experimental biologists to identify enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms in a list of microarray probe sets or gene identifiers (with expression information for PAGE analysis). Also EasyGO is also a GO annotation database, especially focus on agronomical species, supporting 30 species. It is user friendly, with advanced result browsing format and in-time update.

http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/neweasygo/

http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/easygo/

g:GOSt (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu)

g:GOSt retrieves most significant Gene Ontology (GO) terms, KEGG and REACTOME pathways, and TRANSFAC motifs to a user-specified group of genes, proteins or microarray probes. g:GOSt also allows analysis of ranked or ordered lists of genes, visual browsing of GO graph structure, interactive visualisation of retrieved results, and many other features. Multiple testing corrections are applied to extract only statistically important results.

http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/

DAVID : Gene Functional Classification (Laboratory of Immunopathogenesis and Bioinformatics, NIAID)

The Functional Classification Tool provides a rapid means to organize large lists of genes into functionally related groups to help unravel the biological content captured by high throughput technologies.

http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/gene2gene.jsp

http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/

API https://github.com/chrisamiller/davidapi

GOEAST (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

GOEAST is web based software toolkit providing easy to use, visualizable, comprehensive and unbiased Gene Ontology (GO) analysis for high-throughput experimental results, especially for results from microarray hybridization experiments. The main function of GOEAST is to identify significantly enriched GO terms among give lists of genes using accurate statistical methods.

http://omicslab.genetics.ac.cn/GOEAST/

GOstat (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research)

Find statistically overrepresented GO terms within a group of genes

http://gostat.wehi.edu.au/

GOrilla (Technion - Laboratory of Computational Biology , Israel Institute of Technology)

GOrilla is a tool for identifying and visualizing enriched GO terms in ranked lists of genes.
It uses two approaches, first by searching for enriched GO terms that appear densely at the top of a ranked list of genes  or by searching for enriched GO terms in a target list of genes compared to a background list of genes.

GOrilla makes nice pictures !!!!

http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il/

Gene Ontology for Functional Analysis (GOFFA)

GOFFA is a tool developed for ArrayTrack™ that takes a list of genes and identifies terms in Gene Ontology (GO) disclaimer icon associated with those genes.

It provides several tools to view/access the GO term hierarchy, full listing of GO terms annotated with the genes associated with a given term with statically useful report.

http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/BioinformaticsTools/ucm233315.htm

GOAT (The University of Manchester)

The aim of the GOAT project is to create an application that will guide users, especially biomedical researchers, in the annotation of gene products with terms from the Gene Ontology.

http://goat.man.ac.uk/

Script https://github.com/tanghaibao/goatools/

REVIGO ( Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Croatia)

REViGO is a web server that can take long lists of Gene Ontology terms and summarize them by removing redundant GO terms. The remaining terms can be visualized in semantic similarity-based scatterplots, interactive graphs, or tag clouds.

http://revigo.irb.hr/

QuickGo (EMBL-EBI Institute)

It uses extensive computational filters to allow the generation of specific subsets of GO annotations, mapped to sequence identifiers of your choice. Then GO slims are used which is collective list of GO full set of terms available from the Gene Ontology project.

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/

GOLEM

An interactive graph-based gene-ontology navigation and analysis tool. GOLEM is a userful tool which allows the viewer to navigate and explore a local portion of the Gene Ontology (GO) hierarchy.

http://reducio.princeton.edu/GOLEM/

BGI Web Gene Ontology (WEGO) Annotation Plot (Beijing Genomics Institute)

WEGO () is a useful tool for plotting GO annotation results. It has been widely used in many important biological research projects, such as the rice genome project [Yu, J. et al. Science 296, 79-92 (2002); Yu, J. et al. PLoS Biol 3, e38 (2005)] and the silkworm genome project [Xia, Q. et al. Science 306, 1937-40 (2004)]. It has become one of the daily tools for downstream gene annotation analysis, especially when performing comparative genomics tasks. WEGO along with two other tools, namely External to GO Query and GO Archive Query, are freely available for all users. Any suggestions are welcome at wego@genomics.org.cn. Here is a sample output generated by WEGO

http://wego.genomics.org.cn/cgi-bin/wego/index.pl

GeneGO MetaCore (MIT)

GeneGo is a leading provider of data mining & analysis solutions in systems biology. MetaCore, GeneGo's flapship product, is an integrated software suite for functional analysis of experimental data. MetaCore is based on a curated database of human protein-protein, protein-DNA interactions, transcription factors, signaling and metabolic pathways, disease and toxicity, and the effects of bioactive molecules.

https://portal.genego.com/

GOEx (Stony Brook University)

GOEx facilitates organism-specific studies by leveraging GO and providing a rich graphical user interface. It is a simple to use tool, specialized for biologists who wish to analyze spectral counting data from shotgun proteomics.

http://pcarvalho.com/patternlab

GOssTo

GOssTo and GOssToWeb are tools to calculate the semantic similarity between genes or terms in the Gene Ontology.

http://www.paccanarolab.org/gosstoweb/

GO Workbench

The Gene Ontology Analysis Viewer allows direct browsing of the Gene Ontology, and also the visualization of GO Term analysis results.

http://wiki.c2b2.columbia.edu/workbench/index.php/Gene_Ontology_Viewer

Some other useful list of GO software and tools is available at http://www.geneontology.org/GO.tools.shtml#browser

Yet another useful webpage with list of GO tools at http://neurolex.org/wiki/Category:Resource:Gene_Ontology_Tools

Links @ http://raivokolde.github.io/GOsummaries/

Lab @ http://biit.cs.ut.ee/about/main

Reference:

http://www.r-statistics.com/2014/03/r-3-0-3-is-released/