<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/7568?offset=850</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/7568?offset=850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11144/scientists-map-17294-proteins-produced-in-human-body</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 01:57:55 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/11144/scientists-map-17294-proteins-produced-in-human-body</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Scientists map 17,294 proteins produced in human body]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Indian scientists missed the genomic profiling bus, but they've more than made up for it by creating the first human proteome map which is an extension of the genomic study. Till now, here is no direct equivalent for the human proteome. But recently two groups present mass spectrometry-based analysis of human tissues, body fluids and cells mapping the large majority of the human proteome.</p><p>The Indian scientists working in Bangalore, along with their American counterparts, have mapped more than 17,000 proteins in 30 organs of the human body. Just like the human genome was sequenced around the turn of the millennium, this is an equivalent mapping of the human proteome.<br /><br />The researcher estimated there are around 20,500 proteins in the human body. These scientists have profiled around 17,294, which account for around 84% of the total proteins. Apart from this, the team also traced around 2,500 of 3,000 proteins that had been categorised as "missing proteins".</p><p>The work, done by group of Indian scientists, and Johns Hopkins University, published in the renowned journal Nature ( http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7502/full/nature13302.html ). Of the 72 people who worked on the project, 46 are Indians.</p><p>Reference:</p><p>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7502/full/nature13302.html</p><p>http://www.proteinatlas.org/ -The antibody-based Human Protein Atlas programme</p><p>http://www.humanproteomemap.org/ -Proteogenomic analysis by identifying translated proteins from annotated pseudogenes, non-coding RNAs and untranslated regions.</p><p>https://www.proteomicsdb.org/ -Assembled protein evidence for 18,097 genes in ProteomicsDB</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/11249/how-to-sequence-the-human-genome-mark-j-kiel</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 13:24:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/videolist/watch/11249/how-to-sequence-the-human-genome-mark-j-kiel</link>
	<title><![CDATA[How to sequence the human genome - Mark J. Kiel]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<iframe width="" height="" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/MvuYATh7Y74" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-to-sequence-the-human-genome-mark-j-kiel

Your genome, every human's genome, consists of a unique DNA sequence of A's, T's, C's and G's that tell your cells how to operate. Thanks to technological advances, scientists are now able to know the sequence of letters that makes up an individual genome relatively quickly and inexpensively. Mark J. Kiel takes an in-depth look at the science behind the sequence.

Lesson by Mark J. Kiel, animation by Marc Christoforidis.]]></description>
	
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/45211/postdoc-in-germany-evolutionarytheory</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:50:26 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[PostDoc in Germany @ EvolutionaryTheory]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>We are seeking a postdoctoral researcher to join the group of Jonathan Henshaw at the University of Freiburg in Germany (https://www.henshaw-lab.com/). We are a primarily theoretical lab working on a broad set of topics in evolutionary biology, with a particular focus on the evolution of animal behaviour. We develop both individual-based simulations and mathematical models (e.g., using evolutionary game theory, adaptive dynamics and quantitative genetics). We put a strong emphasis on a supportive and inclusive working environment. As a postdoc in our lab, you would have considerable freedom to shape the direction of your projects within these broad areas of interest.</p>

<p>More at https://evoldir.net/brian/evoldir/PostDocs//UniFreiburg_Germany.EvolutionaryTheory</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:39:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44614/online-resources-on-must-read-papers-in-evolutionary-biology</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<pre>Online resources on must-read papers in evolutionary biology, for a literature club.<br /><br />Below is a summary of all answers that we received.

All the best,

Jana and Xiaoyan

1.       *Nick Barton:*

- The textbook "Evolution" by Nick Barton, with resources for
  exploring the literature: Barton, N. H., Briggs, D. E. G., Eisen, J.
  A., Goldstein, D. B., &amp; Patel, N. H. (2007). Evolution. Cold Spring
  Harbor Laboratory Press.

- Papers from a course named "Classics in Evolutionary Biology":

Evolutionary Synthesis
1. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans. New York.
   (esp. Ch. IV).
2. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford
   University Press, Oxford. Selected Sections - Fundamental Theorem.

Genetic Variation
1a. Lewontin, R. C., and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to
the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount
of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595-609.

1b. Sachidandam et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation
containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. 409: 928-33.

2. Wright S., Dobzhansky T., Hovanitz W. 1942 Genetics of natural
populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of
Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363-394.

Recombination and evolution
1. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits
to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.

2. Maynard Smith and Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable
gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.

Understanding sequence variation
1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F., 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA
polymorphism correlate with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nature 356: 519-520.

2. Green R. E., Reich D., P&auml;&auml;bo S., 2010 A draft sequence of the
Neandertal genome. Science 328: 710-722.

Quantitative Genetics:  variation in complex traits
1. Galton F., 1877 Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15: 492-495-
512-514- 532-533.

2. Turelli M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via
mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal
bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.

Quantitative Genetics:  finding the genes
1. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A., 1988 The Isolation of polygenic factors
controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster II Distribution of
third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics
118: 445-459.

2. Boyle E. A., Li Y. I., Pritchard J. K., 2017 An expanded view of
complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169: 1177-1186.

Neutral Evolution
1. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Science.
217:624-626.

2a. Kern A. D., Hahn M. W., 2018 The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural
Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 110: 21077-6.

2b. Jensen J. D., Payseur B. A., Stephan W., Aquadro C. F., Lynch M.,
Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 2018 The importance of the Neutral Theory
in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 112:
2109-4.

2c. Ellegren &amp; Galtier. 2016. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nature
Reviews Genetics.

Mutation and Genetic Variability
1. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbr&uuml;ck. 1943. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus
Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 28(6):491-511.

2. Hill, W G. 1982. "Rates of Change in Quantitative Traits From Fixation
of New Mutations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.)
79: 142-45.

Testing for selection
1. McDonald &amp; Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus
in Drosophila. Nature.

2. Begun, et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1816-1819 (1999).

3. Siddiq et al. 2016. Experimental test and refutation of a classic case
of molecular adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.  Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution.

The shifting balance
1. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and
selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of
Genetics: 1. pp 356-366.

2. Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Wright's
shifting balance theory of evolution.  Evolution 51: 643-671.

3. Barton. 2016. Sewall Wright on Evolution in Mendelian Populations and
the "Shifting Balance". Genetics.

Evolution of Sex
1.  Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance.
Mutation Res. 1(1):2-9

2. McDonald et al. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of
molecular evolution. Nature.

Kin Selection, Cooperation, and Conflict
1. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.
Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1-52.

2. Trivers, R. L. 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist.
14(1):249-264.

Sexual Selection
1. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection of a handicap. J. Theor.
Biol. 53:205-214.

2. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating
preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:33-38.

Fitness Landscapes
1. Dean, A. 1995. A Molecular Investigation of Genotype by Environment
Interactions. Genetics. 139:19-33.

2. Costanzo et al. 2010. The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science.

Speciation
1. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Evolution. 43:362-381.

2. Corbett-Detig et al. 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread
within species. Nature.

2.       *Marcos Antezana:*

Valen, L. v. 1975. Energy and Evolution. University of Chicago, Department
of Biology.

3.       *Remco Folkertsma:*

1. The work by Hopi Hoekstra on local adaptation and oldfield mice

2. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C. M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., M&uuml;ller,
I., ... &amp; Wolf, J. B. (2014). The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic
integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science, 344(6190), 1410-1414.

4.       *Joshka Kaufmann and Leslie Turner*

They offer us a link to 'papers every evolutionary biologist should read',
the papers are collected by Leslie Turner.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53e8cb7ce4b02c4bc3aeeee4/t/5ab8fcb670a6ad55c67fcdf4/1522072758665/EvoBioClassicsRefList.pdf

5.       *Sarah Stockwell*

Matt Ridley collected classic papers in evolutionary biology and printed
part of these papers in his book Evolution (see Matt Ridley. Evolution
(Univ. of Oxford Press, 2nd edition, 2004))
</pre>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>BioStar</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/opportunity/view/11434/adhoc-bioinformatics-faculty-position-nit</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:19:52 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Adhoc Bioinformatics Faculty Position @ NIT]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, WARANGAL – 506 021, Andhra Pradesh</p>

<p>No.NITW/BT/2014/adhoc</p>

<p>APPLICATIONS ARE INVITED FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ADHOC FACULTY ON CONTRACT BASIS IN THE DEAPARTMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY</p>

<p>Period of Contract: Initially the appointment is for one semester i.e., from July 2014 up to December 2014 only.</p>

<p>Essential Qualifications:</p>

<p>i) B. Tech or equivalent in Biotechnology/ Industrial Biotechnology/ Biochemical Engineering / Chemical Engg. Or M. Sc in Microbiology/ Botany/ Zoology/ Biochemistry/Biotechnology and ii) M. Tech or equivalent in Biotechnology/Industrial Biotechnology/Bioinformatics</p>

<p>Or</p>

<p>Integrated M. Tech in Biotechnology/Industrial Biotechnology/ Bioinformatics</p>

<p>Candidates must possess First class (60% aggregate marks or 6.5 CGPA) at B. Tech/ M. Sc and M. Tech.</p>

<p>Desirable: Ph. D Pay Package: All selected candidates shall be eligible for a consolidated pay of Rs.30, 000/- per month. Candidates with Ph. D shall be eligible for an additional amount of Rs.5, 000/- per month.</p>

<p>How to apply : Applications on plain paper with attested photocopies of certificate and bio data along with justification for eligibility should reach to the Head, Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Warangal AP 506004 in the form of soft or hard copy on or before 21st June 2014 email : biotech_hod@nitw.ac.in</p>

<p>Intimation: No separate call letters will be sent to the candidates. All the eligible candidates will be notified in the institute web site on 23rd June 2014. All the eligible candidates are requested to report for the interview to the Head, Department of Biotechnology at 9:00 AM on 27th June 2014</p>

<p>Joining: Selected candidates will be informed and they are expected to join immediately.</p>

<p>Advertisement:</p>

<p>http://www.nitw.ac.in/nitw/announcements/2014/Bio-Adhoc%20Advt.%20May-2014.pdf</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45231/the-giant-who-walked-across-ancient-taiwan</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:48:45 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/45231/the-giant-who-walked-across-ancient-taiwan</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Giant Who Walked Across Ancient Taiwan]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of years ago, long before Taiwan became the island we know today, a large-bodied human walked across the landscape. We will probably never know what this individual looked like or where they travelled. But part of their story survived&mdash;in two ancient leg bones recovered from the seabed of the Penghu Channel.</p><p>The bones sat quietly in a fossil collection for years. One was part of a femur; the other, a tibia. They looked like the remains of an unusually large ancient human. But who did they belong to?</p><p>The answer came from an unexpected source: ancient proteins.</p><p>Using palaeoproteomic analysis, researchers found a molecular signature in both bones that matches the Denisovan lineage. The discovery identifies the two Penghu fossils as Denisovan and, more importantly, gives scientists their first substantial glimpse of the Denisovans' body size.</p><p>And the picture is striking.</p><p>One individual is estimated to have been about 1.8 metres tall and weighed around 83 kilograms. The other may have reached 1.9 metres and about 91 kilograms. Their leg bones rank among the largest known from Pleistocene Homo.</p><p>These were not small or fragile people.</p><p>They were powerful, heavily built humans moving through Ice Age eastern Asia.</p><p>But the bones tell an even more intriguing story. The femur has a pronounced ridge called a femoral pilaster&mdash;a feature particularly associated with modern human hunter-gatherers and increased mechanical strength during terrestrial movement. Why would a Denisovan, with an otherwise strongly archaic skeleton, possess this modern-looking feature?</p><p>Perhaps these Denisovans travelled extensively across the landscape. Perhaps their bodies were shaped by a demanding hunting lifestyle. Or perhaps, the researchers suggest, genetic exchange with early modern humans contributed to some of these features.</p><p>Their extraordinary size raises another mystery. A common expectation in human evolution is that populations living closer to the tropics tend to be smaller. Yet these Denisovans lived around 23&deg;N latitude and were exceptionally large. The researchers argue that cold climate alone cannot explain their size, pointing instead toward lifestyle and diet&mdash;including evidence that at least one Penghu individual relied heavily on meat.</p><p>So, piece by piece, the Denisovans are becoming less mysterious.</p><p>What was once a shadowy population known mainly from DNA is beginning to take physical form: large, robust, mobile humans who lived across eastern Asia and whose bodies carried a fascinating mixture of ancient and modern traits.</p><p>And perhaps the most remarkable part of this story is where it began&mdash;not in a spectacular cave discovery, but with two weathered bones lying among thousands of fossils.</p><p>The Denisovans may have left no written history. But their bones are beginning to tell one.</p><p>*Note: This research is currently a bioRxiv preprint and has not yet undergone peer review.&nbsp; Detail at&nbsp;https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.743438v1.full.pdf</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/11735/search-shell-command-history</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:43:34 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/pages/view/11735/search-shell-command-history</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Search Shell Command History]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>We use couple of hundreads of command in daily basis. Most of them are actually repeated several time. The question remain open how do I search old command history under bash shell and modify or reuse it? <br /><br />Now a days almost all modern shell allows you to search command history if enabled by user. Use history command to display the history list with line numbers. Lines listed with with a * have been modified by user.</p><p><br /><strong>Shell history search command</strong><br /><br />Type history at a shell prompt:<br />$ history</p><p>It will display the list of all used commandline history with an serial number.<br /><br />To search particular command, enter:<br />$ history | grep command-name<br />$ history | egrep -i 'scp|ssh|ftp'<br />Emacs Line-Edit Mode Command History Searching<br /><br />To get previous command containing string, hit [CTRL]+[r] followed by search string:<br /><br />(reverse-i-search): <br /><br />To get previous command, hit [CTRL]+[p]. You can also use up arrow key.<br /><br />CTRL-p<br /><br />To get next command, hit [CTRL]+[n]. You can also use down arrow key.<br /><br />CTRL-n<br /><br /></p><p><strong>fc command</strong></p><p>Apart from hostory command there are fc command to extract the command from history. The fc stands for either "find command" or "fix command.</p><p>For example list last 10 command, enter:<br />$ fc -l 10<br />To list commands 130 through 150, enter:<br />$ fc -l 130 150<br />To list all commands since the last command beginning with ssh, enter:<br />$ fc -l ssh<br />You can edit commands 1 through 5 using vi text editor, enter:<br />$ fc -e vi 1 5</p><p><strong>Delete command history</strong><br /><br />The -c option causes the history list to be cleared by deleting all of the entries:<br />$ history -c</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Nayak</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/45296/luo-lab-symbiosis-genomics-evolution</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 03:30:30 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[Luo Lab | Symbiosis Genomics &amp; Evolution]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>We study the evolutionary genomics of marine invertebrates to understand their origins and diversity. Our lab combines high-throughput sequencing and single-cell transcriptomics to explore a wide range of non-model systems. We are particularly interested in how evolutionary novelty arises, with a focus on animal development and photosymbiosis.</p>

<p>Research Directions</p>

<p>Stony corals: evolution of novelty and photosymbiosis</p>

<p>Symbiotic acoels: cell type evolution and photosymbiosis</p>

<p>Animal genomes: structural evolution and gene regulation</p>

<p>https://sgel.biodiv.tw/home</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/11609/bioinformatician%E2%80%99s-pocket-reference</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2014 09:56:58 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/11609/bioinformatician%E2%80%99s-pocket-reference</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Bioinformatician’s Pocket Reference !!]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>It is amusing how brain of bioinformaticians work! Learning a new programming language for days feels so much of fun that making 5 minute discussion with neighbours (unless under special circumstances!) in our own mother-tongue. Today every bioinformatician keeps more than few languages and core IT toolkits on their plate. It has become mandatory to be able to mould different code snippets to build our own custom workflows, and thus keeping syntax at our fingertips has become essential.Although Google is best way to get syntax problem solved, it is not a bad idea to keep reference sheets is our smartphones or stick out some printed sheets on the back of your door, in the old fashion way!!</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://infoplatter.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/bioinformaticians-pocket-reference/" rel="nofollow">http://infoplatter.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/bioinformaticians-pocket-reference/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>RAJESH DETROJA</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/researchlabs/view/4546/sowdhamini-lab</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 09:19:12 -0500</pubDate>
  <link></link>
  <title><![CDATA[SOWDHAMINI Lab]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>Genome sequencing projects have enormous potential for benefiting human endeavors. However, just as acquiring a language's vocabulary does not enable one to speak it, databases that list the amino acid composition of proteins do not directly tell us much about these proteins' higher-level structure and function. The most productive way to indirectly exploit these databases has been to start with the small number of proteins that are fully-characterised and to assume that other "similar" proteins will have a related structure and function. Proteins with very similar amino acid sequence are "no-brainers", but the real test, which our group largely focuses on, is to detect the "essential" similarity in proteins whose non-critical sections have experienced random rearrangements during evolution. In such cases functionally similar proteins may have less than 25% sequence overlap.</p>

<p>More @ http://www.ncbs.res.in/sowdhamini/groups_sowdhamini.htm</p>
]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>