<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Related items]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/9032?offset=170</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/related/9032?offset=170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26752/rna-seq-de-novo-assembly-using-trinity</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 05:53:46 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/26752/rna-seq-de-novo-assembly-using-trinity</link>
	<title><![CDATA[RNA-Seq De novo Assembly Using Trinity]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Trinity, developed at the <a href="http://www.broadinstitute.org">Broad Institute</a> and the <a href="http://www.cs.huji.ac.il">Hebrew University of Jerusalem</a>, represents a novel method for the efficient and robust de novo reconstruction of transcriptomes from RNA-seq data. Trinity combines three independent software modules: Inchworm, Chrysalis, and Butterfly, applied sequentially to process large volumes of RNA-seq reads. Trinity partitions the sequence data into many individual de Bruijn graphs, each representing the transcriptional complexity at at a given gene or locus, and then processes each graph independently to extract full-length splicing isoforms and to tease apart transcripts derived from paralogous genes. Briefly, the process works like so:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><em>Inchworm</em> assembles the RNA-seq data into the unique sequences of transcripts, often generating full-length transcripts for a dominant isoform, but then reports just the unique portions of alternatively spliced transcripts.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><em>Chrysalis</em> clusters the Inchworm contigs into clusters and constructs complete de Bruijn graphs for each cluster. Each cluster represents the full transcriptonal complexity for a given gene (or sets of genes that share sequences in common). Chrysalis then partitions the full read set among these disjoint graphs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><em>Butterfly</em> then processes the individual graphs in parallel, tracing the paths that reads and pairs of reads take within the graph, ultimately reporting full-length transcripts for alternatively spliced isoforms, and teasing apart transcripts that corresponds to paralogous genes.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>More at https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/wiki</p>
<p>......................................................................................................................................</p>
<p>Download Trinity <a href="https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/releases">here</a>.</p>
<p>Build Trinity by typing 'make' in the base installation directory.</p>
<p>Assemble RNA-Seq data like so:</p>
<pre><code> Trinity --seqType fq --left reads_1.fq --right reads_2.fq --CPU 6 --max_memory 20G 
</code></pre>
<p>Find assembled transcripts as: 'trinity_out_dir/Trinity.fasta'</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/wiki" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/wiki</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Surabhi Chaudhary</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37545/ncbi-magic-blast</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 18:11:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/37545/ncbi-magic-blast</link>
	<title><![CDATA[NCBI Magic-BLAST]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Magic-BLAST is a tool for mapping large next-generation RNA or DNA sequencing runs against a whole genome or transcriptome. Each alignment optimizes a composite score, taking into account simultaneously the two reads of a pair, and in case of RNA-seq, locating the candidate introns and adding up the score of all exons. This is very different from other versions of BLAST, where each exon is scored as a separate hit and read-pairing is ignored.</p>
<p>Magic-BLAST incorporates within the NCBI BLAST code framework ideas developed in the NCBI Magic pipeline, in particular hit extensions by local walk and jump&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109056">(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109056)</a>, and recursive clipping of mismatches near the edges of the reads, which avoids accumulating artefactual mismatches near splice sites and is needed to distinguish short indels from substitutions near the edges.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://ncbi.github.io/magicblast/" rel="nofollow">https://ncbi.github.io/magicblast/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43384/lncpipea-nextflow-based-pipeline-for-comprehensive-analyses-of-long-non-coding-rnas-from-rna-seq-datasets</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:57:02 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/43384/lncpipea-nextflow-based-pipeline-for-comprehensive-analyses-of-long-non-coding-rnas-from-rna-seq-datasets</link>
	<title><![CDATA[LncPipe:A Nextflow-based pipeline for comprehensive analyses of long non-coding RNAs from RNA-seq datasets]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The pipeline was developed based on a popular workflow framework&nbsp;</span><a href="https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow">Nextflow</a><span>, composed of four core procedures including reads alignment, assembly, identification and quantification. It contains various unique features such as well-designed lncRNAs annotation strategy, optimized calculating efficiency, diversified classification and interactive analysis report.&nbsp;</span><a href="https://github.com/likelet/LncPipe">LncPipe</a><span>&nbsp;allows users additional control in interuppting the pipeline, resetting parameters from command line, modifying main script directly and resume analysis from previous checkpoint.</span></p>
<p>Ref&nbsp;https://www.lncrnablog.com/lncpipe-a-nextflow-based-pipeline-for-identification-and-analysis-of-long-non-coding-rnas-from-rna-seq-data/</p>
<p><img src="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1673852718301176-gr1.jpg" alt="image" style="border: 0px;"></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://github.com/likelet/LncPipe" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/likelet/LncPipe</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>LEGE</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/19090/deeptools</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:02:08 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/news/view/19090/deeptools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[deepTools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>deepTools addresses the challenge of handling the large amounts of data that are now routinely generated from DNA sequencing centers. To do so, deepTools contains useful modules to process the mapped reads data to create coverage files in standard bedGraph and bigWig file formats. By doing so, deepTools allows the creation of normalized coverage files or the comparison between two files (for example, treatment and control). Finally, using such normalized and standardized files, multiple visualizations can be created to identify enrichments with functional annotations of the genome.<br /><br />Publicaton: http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/05/05/nar.gku365.full<br /><br />Source Code and Wiki: https://github.com/fidelram/deepTools/wiki<br /><br />Galaxy Tool Shed repository: http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/bgruening/deeptools<br /><br />and example Galaxy workflows: http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/bgruening/deeptools_workflows</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Martin Jones</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34195/strand-life-sciences-announces-the-release-of-strand-ngs-v31-at-ashg-2017</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:36:05 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/34195/strand-life-sciences-announces-the-release-of-strand-ngs-v31-at-ashg-2017</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Strand Life Sciences announces the release of Strand NGS v3.1 at ASHG 2017]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h1><a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/strand-announce-strandngss-v31">Strand Life Sciences announces the release of Strand NGS v3.1 at ASHG 2017</a></h1>
<p><strong><em>ORLANDO, USA, Oct 17, 2017/ PRNewswire/</em></strong></p>
<p><em>Strand NGS now supports large scale RNA- and small-RNA-Seq and Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) for DNA-, RNA-, and small-RNA-Seq.</em></p>
<p>Strand Life Sciences announced the latest version release of its bioinformatics flagship product, Strand NGS, at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics today. Two major themes in Strand NGS v3.1 address recent challenges in next generation sequencing (NGS).</p>
<p>The first theme is large-scale RNA-Seq data analysis. Current cross-cohort RNA- and small-RNA-Seq studies span tens of replicates and batches across hundreds of samples, sometimes conducted across several different institutions. For such studies, Strand NGS v3.1 includes confounding variable analysis to eliminate technical effects, including batch effects; the t-SNE plot; profile and heat-map plots of gene-body coverage; and several other notable visual enhancements.</p>
<p>The second new feature is support for Unique Molecular Identifiers, or UMIs, for DNA-, RNA- and small-RNA-Seq. UMI support in Strand NGS is end-to-end, spanning alignment to variant calling in DNA-Seq, and alignment to quantification in RNA- and small-RNA-Seq. The Bioo Scientific, Qiagen, and Rubicon UMI protocols are natively supported, and an intuitive interface allows the specification of custom UMI protocols.</p>
<p><em>&ldquo;For liquid biopsies and low-grade FFPE samples, UMI support in DNA-Seq enables the detection of somatic variants at low concentrations. In RNA-Seq, large-scale and UMI support can be used in single-cell-based studies that reveal tumor-cell heterogeneity, even at low concentrations&rdquo;, says<strong>&nbsp;Dr. Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Chief Scientific Officer, Strand Life Sciences.</strong></em></p>
<p><em>&ldquo;At Strand, we are continuously working towards improving the accuracy and efficiency of NGS data analysis. Customers can look forward to Strand NGS becoming available on the cloud in the near future&rdquo;, says&nbsp;<strong>Dr. Ramesh Hariharan, Chief Executive Officer, Strand Life Sciences.</strong></em></p>
<p>Visit Strand Life Sciences at ASHG booth #1017 to know more about Strand NGS v3.1 and other products and service offerings from Strand Life Sciences. Click here to access detailed agenda and v3.1&nbsp;<a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/download/releasenotes">release notes</a>.</p>
<p><strong>About Strand Life Sciences</strong></p>
<p>Strand Life Sciences is a premier life science informatics innovation company. Founded in 2000, Strand is a leader in technology innovations for healthcare using genomics. By enhancing sequence-based diagnostics and clinical genomic data interpretation using a strong foundation of computational, scientific, and medical expertise, Strand is bringing individualized medicine to the world. To know more, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://www.strandls.com/" title="www.strandls.com">www.strandls.com</a></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://www.strand-ngs.com/strand-announce-strandngss-v31" rel="nofollow">http://www.strand-ngs.com/strand-announce-strandngss-v31</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Yeshodari</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41843/stringtie-transcript-assembly-and-quantification-for-rna-seq</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 05:21:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/41843/stringtie-transcript-assembly-and-quantification-for-rna-seq</link>
	<title><![CDATA[StringTie Transcript assembly and quantification for RNA-Seq]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>StringTie</strong><span>&nbsp;is a fast and highly efficient assembler of RNA-Seq alignments into potential transcripts. It uses a novel network flow algorithm as well as an optional&nbsp;</span><em>de novo</em><span>&nbsp;assembly step to assemble and quantitate full-length transcripts representing multiple splice variants for each gene locus. Its input can include not only alignments of short reads that can also be used by other transcript assemblers, but also alignments of longer sequences that have been assembled from those reads. In order to identify differentially expressed genes between experiments, StringTie's output can be processed by specialized software like&nbsp;</span><a href="https://github.com/alyssafrazee/ballgown">Ballgown</a><span>,&nbsp;</span><a href="http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/cufflinks/cuffdiff/index.html">Cuffdiff</a><span>&nbsp;or other programs (DESeq2, edgeR, etc.).</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/" rel="nofollow">https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44713/understanding-rna-seq-normalization-methods-tpm-vs-fpkm-vs-cpm</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:59:15 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/blog/view/44713/understanding-rna-seq-normalization-methods-tpm-vs-fpkm-vs-cpm</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Understanding RNA-Seq Normalization Methods: TPM vs. FPKM vs. CPM]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful technology used to study transcriptomes, providing insights into gene expression levels. However, raw RNA-Seq data requires normalization to account for sequencing depth and gene length, enabling accurate comparisons between genes and samples. Among the most widely used normalization methods are TPM (Transcripts Per Million), FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million), and CPM (Counts Per Million). Each method has its unique principles and applications, which we&rsquo;ll explore in this blog.</p><h2>Why Normalize RNA-Seq Data?</h2><p>Normalization is a crucial step in RNA-Seq analysis for the following reasons:</p><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Sequencing depth:</strong> Different RNA-Seq experiments produce varying numbers of reads, making direct comparisons between samples misleading.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gene length:</strong> Longer genes inherently generate more reads, irrespective of their actual expression level.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Bias reduction:</strong> Normalization mitigates technical biases, enabling meaningful biological interpretation.</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>TPM (Transcripts Per Million)</h2><p>TPM measures the proportion of reads mapped to a transcript, normalized by transcript length and sequencing depth. It is calculated as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Proportionality:</strong> TPM values sum to 1,000,000 across all transcripts in a sample, making it easier to compare between samples.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Intuitive interpretation:</strong> TPM values directly represent the abundance of transcripts in a sample.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Preferred for comparisons:</strong> TPM facilitates between-sample comparisons better than FPKM.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Million)</h2><p>FPKM normalizes read counts by transcript length and sequencing depth, but without enforcing proportionality like TPM. It is defined as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Historical significance:</strong> FPKM was one of the first normalization methods used for RNA-Seq.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Single-end vs. paired-end:</strong> In paired-end sequencing, FPKM becomes RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Limited utility:</strong> FPKM values are not as robust as TPM for cross-sample comparisons due to lack of proportionality.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>CPM (Counts Per Million)</h2><p>CPM normalizes raw read counts by sequencing depth, without considering gene length. It is expressed as:</p><h3>Key Features:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p><strong>Simplicity:</strong> CPM is straightforward and computationally less intensive.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Application:</strong> Suitable for non-length-dependent analyses, such as comparing total expression levels or differential expression analysis.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gene length agnostic:</strong> CPM does not correct for gene length, making it less ideal for measuring expression levels.</p>
</li>
</ol><h2>When to Use Each Method</h2><ul>
<li>
<p><strong>TPM:</strong> Best for comparing expression levels between samples, especially when transcript length and sequencing depth vary.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>FPKM:</strong> Useful for historical consistency but generally replaced by TPM.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CPM:</strong> Ideal for differential expression analysis when gene length normalization is unnecessary.</p>
</li>
</ul><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>Choosing the right normalization method depends on the specific objectives of your RNA-Seq analysis. TPM&rsquo;s proportionality and robustness make it the preferred choice for most applications, while CPM serves well for differential expression studies. Although FPKM paved the way for RNA-Seq normalization, it has largely been supplanted by TPM in modern workflows. Understanding these methods and their nuances ensures accurate and meaningful interpretations of RNA-Seq data.</p><h3>References:</h3><ol>
<li>
<p>Li, B., &amp; Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. <em>BMC Bioinformatics.</em></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Trapnell, C., et al. (2010). Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. <em>Nature Biotechnology.</em></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Law, C. W., et al. (2014). voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. <em>Genome Biology.</em></p>
</li>
</ol>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Neel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35437/dupradar-package</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:28:57 -0600</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/bookmarks/view/35437/dupradar-package</link>
	<title><![CDATA[dupRadar package]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The&nbsp;</span><em>dupRadar</em><span>&nbsp;package gives an insight into the duplication problem by graphically relating the gene expression level and the duplication rate present on it. Thus, failed experiments can be easily identified at a glance</span></p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.7/bioc/vignettes/dupRadar/inst/doc/dupRadar.html" rel="nofollow">https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.7/bioc/vignettes/dupRadar/inst/doc/dupRadar.html</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/982</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:25:09 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/982</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Is reference genome necessary for gene expression study in transcriptome sequencing or for variant discovery in genome sequencing?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Like in case of plant genomes where nature of genome is too complex and huge in size to accomplish complete<em> de novo</em> assembly by current sequencing technology. What would be alternate solution? Can we live in reference free world?</span></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Rahul Agarwal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2044</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2044</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Does anyone have Nanopore latest updates?]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of buzz about&nbsp;<span>Oxford Nanopore Technologies&reg; is developing the GridION&trade; system and miniaturised MinION&trade; device. These are a new generation of electronic molecular analysis system for use in scientific research, personalised medicine, crop science, security/defence and more. The platform technology uses nanopores to analyse single molecules including DNA/RNA and proteins. With a broad patent portfolio, the Oxford Nanopore pipeline includes biological nanopores and solid-state nanopores.</span></p><p>Is this available, or still under trial mode?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.nanoporetech.com/">https://www.nanoporetech.com/</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nanoporetech.com/technology/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system">https://www.nanoporetech.com/technology/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system/the-minion-device-a-miniaturised-sensing-system</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Poonam Mahapatra</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>