<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[BOL: Ruby: Bad or Good]]></title>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2249?</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2249?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2249</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://bioinformaticsonline.com/view/2249</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Ruby: Bad or Good]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I found several angry bioinformatician writting a lot of&nbsp;criticism on Ruby and BioRuby. They also did comparative analysis with several other languages. What do you think about this language?</p><p>http://madhadron.com/a-criticism-of-ruby</p><p>http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ruby-from-other-languages/</p><p>Ruby Introduction : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyyIvAwwMPM</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jitendra Narayan</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>